Introduction
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a critical medical condition characterized by the sudden interruption of blood supply to a segment of the brain, leading to insufficient oxygen and nutrients delivery to the affected cerebral tissue and subsequent neuronal damage [
1]. It stands as a significant cause of severe disability and mortality, particularly among the elderly. Annually, stroke affects 26 million individuals worldwide, ranking as the second leading cause of death [
2].
Fluid balance (FB), the equilibrium between fluid intake and output in the body, plays a pivotal role in sustaining vital functions. In intensive care units, maintaining FB is a fundamental aspect of supportive care for critically ill patients. Patients with AIS often exhibit symptoms such as dysphagia and altered consciousness, resulting in inadequate fluid intake [
3]. In older adults, the perception of thirst diminishes, and the kidney’s ability to concentrate urine declines [
4]. All these factors may result in dehydration, hemoconcentration, and even thrombosis [
5] exacerbating cerebral ischemia. Additionally, elderly patients frequently contend with conditions like acute and chronic heart failure, leading to lower cerebral perfusion pressure. Such factors intensify the complexity in managing fluids for older patients with AIS. A previous study showed that patients aged 85 years and older with AIS had a worse outcome (higher in-hospital mortality and more severe neurological deficit) than younger patients [
6]. Consequently, timely assessment of FB and adjustment of it are crucial for improving outcomes.
In clinical practice, as a result of the variability of conditions, not all patients consistently follow prescribed fluid strategies, whether liberal or restrictive [
7]. Categorizing patients based solely on single strategy is inaccurate and inappropriate. To address this limitation, our study employs group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM), a method that more accurately classifies patients by continuously monitoring their FB patterns. GBTM allows for the identification of subgroups within a population based on similar trajectories over time. This approach not only enhances the precision of patient categorization but also provides insights into the potential mechanisms linking fluid strategies to outcomes [
8]. While FB assessment is crucial in patients’ management, relying solely on it for prognosis is insufficient. Considering fluid overload (FO), defined as a 10% increase in cumulative FB from baseline weight, is also imperative [
9]. Early fluid resuscitation effectively enhances tissue perfusion, thereby improving outcomes [
10,
11]. However, the lack of efficient indicators for fluid responsiveness often leads to the accumulation of positive FB or FO [
12,
13]. Studies indicate that FO is an independent predictor for morbidity and increased hospital costs in critically ill patients [
14,
15]. A recent study on patients with septic shock demonstrated that patients with FO faced a 1.4 times higher risk of hospital mortality compared to those without [
16].
Current research on the dynamic changes in FB or cumulative FB and their correlation with the prognosis of elderly patients with stroke is limited. The use of group-based trajectory models holds the potential to uncover latent patterns and associations, addressing this research gap. This study aimed to explore the association between longitudinal FB trajectories and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with AIS. We hypothesized that the trajectories of FB in patients with AIS can be classified into several patterns, some of which may be associated with better recovery, while others may indicate poor prognosis.
Discussion
In this retrospective multicenter study, we investigated the impact of FB trajectories on adverse outcomes in elderly patients with AIS. Fluid management, considered fundamental care for critically ill patients, aims to maintain circulatory stability, balance electrolytes and acid–base levels, and enhance tissue perfusion [
9]. Various perspectives exist regarding the association between FB and prognosis. While some studies indicate that hypovolemia may lead to secondary brain injury [
20], recent data also highlight the potential risks of FO [
21,
22]. Patients with AIS primarily present with either normal or insufficient blood volume [
23]. Although having a normal blood volume is preferable, the relationship between hydration and outcomes during AIS remains unclear.
Our study identified three trajectory patterns in this population, categorized as low FB, decreasing FB, and high FB groups. We found that persistent high FB was a risk factor for adverse outcomes in elderly patients with AIS, supported by multivariate logistic regression models and quasi-Poisson regression models, which was further demonstrated using subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis. Additionally, the decreasing group was significantly associated with an increased risk of adverse kidney event and prolonged ICU stays as well. Although the FB trajectory of the decreasing group rapidly diminished over time, its cumulative FB maintained a positive equilibrium. Our research indicated that patients experiencing positive FB or FO ultimately face a poor prognosis. Raimundo et al. found that for every 1-L increase in FB, the risk of AKI progression increased sixfold [
24]. In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, a positive cumulative FB correlated with AKI development by day 3, whereas this association was not observed in patients with an even or negative cumulative FB [
25]. Therefore, for physicians, daily review of fluid status and limiting FO is essential.
In the multivariate regression models, the trajectory characterized by high FB exhibited the highest risk of in-hospital mortality and prolonged ICU stays. And the decreasing FB trajectory exhibited the highest risk of AKI. The decreasing FB trajectory was also associated with prolonged ICU stays, albeit with a lower risk compared to the high FB group. This group’s cumulative FB exceeded that of the high FB group in the first 2 days, but showed a downward trend from the third day onwards. This nuanced observation suggested that distinct degrees and durations of FO may exert varying impacts on the prognosis of patients with AIS. Our RCS models further underscored the correlation between increasing peak FO and elevated risks of in-hospital mortality and AKI. The risk of in-hospital mortality began to increase when the levels exceeded 3.6% and continued to increase. Another multicenter study demonstrates that the 28-day mortality risk for patients with AKI increases markedly when the maximum FO is over 10% [
26]. This disparity indicates that in managing patients with AIS, their susceptibility to FO significantly exceeds that of patients with AKI. Therefore, intervention at a lower level of FO may be necessary to mitigate the increased risk of death compared to patients with AKI. It suggests that FO thresholds for assessing mortality risk might need adjustment based on the specific condition.
FO manifests as increased blood volume and edema [
27]. Currently, osmotherapy serves as the cornerstone in the treatment of cerebral edema, with mannitol and hypertonic saline (HS) emerging as the most frequently utilized osmotic agents [
28]. The contribution of FO to cerebral edema can elevate intracranial pressure [
29] thereby posing significant risks to brain function. In our study, 16.5% of the patients developed FO; in comparison to those without FO, patients with FO exhibited an almost 1.6-fold higher hospital mortality risk. One of the common causes of early death in patients with AIS is cerebral edema. Malignant cerebral edema usually occurs between the second and fifth days after a stroke. As the brain is encased in a closed space, the increased intracranial pressure caused by cerebral edema can lead to brain herniation, brainstem compression, and death. A study shows that fluid intake exceeding 28 mL/kg/day in the initial days is associated with malignant cerebral edema [
23]. Over the initial 4-day period, FB levels of our study within the high FB group consistently exceeded this threshold, with the decreasing FB group also recording an FB level above this threshold on the first day. A European multicenter study reveals a substantial correlation between positive daily FB in patients with traumatic brain injury and increased ICU mortality (OR 1.10 [95% CI 1.07–1.12] per 0.1-L increase) along with worse functional outcomes (OR 1.04 [95% CI 1.02–1.05] per 0.1-L increase) [
29].
AKI is prevalent among critically ill patients, with fluid therapy as a conventional approach [
30]. While fluid administration is commonly employed to prevent AKI [
31] excessive fluid resuscitation beyond correcting the hypovolemia can also precipitate AKI [
32]. Numerous studies have demonstrated a correlation between FO and AKI. Kuo et al. reported a 7.1-fold increase in AKI risk among patients with positive FB after cardiac or aortic surgery [
33]. Similarly, Wang et al. found that, compared with a low FB, a high FB trajectory was associated with an increased risk of AKI in critically ill patients (OR 2.04 [95% CI 1.23–3.37]) [
26]. One plausible mechanism behind this association is that FO leads to an accumulation of fluids in the extracellular space, disrupting the diffusion of oxygen and metabolites, impairing intercellular interactions, and potentially culminating in progressive organ dysfunction, including renal failure [
34]. It is noteworthy that in our study, for the subgroup of patients with sepsis, a high FB was not identified as a risk factor for adverse kidney event. The inflammatory response in patients with sepsis can alter the effectiveness of fluid management. This response leads to the widening of gaps between endothelial cells in blood vessels, increasing vascular permeability and causing relative hypovolemia. In this context, appropriate fluid resuscitation is considered a crucial component of treating septic shock and hypotension [
35].
Fluid management in neurocritical care patients poses specific challenges compared to other critically ill patients, given its focus on maintaining adequate cerebral blood flow (CBF) and oxygenation. Unfortunately, the implementation of sophisticated tools for CBF and oxygenation monitoring is not widely adopted in clinical practice [
20]. In patients with ischemic stroke, the process of ischemia and subsequent reperfusion initiates a series of pathological events, with cerebral edema being the most critical. Cytotoxic edema initiates within hours of the stroke and peaks between the second and fifth days. This critical “watch period” necessitates vigilant neurological monitoring because of the inherent risk of secondary brain and brainstem compression [
36].
In our study, patients’ FB levels were repeatedly documented over the initial 7 days following a stroke. This timeframe aligns with the development of cerebral edema development, ensuring the capture of significant changes in FB during the highest risk phase. Contrary to measurements taken at a single time point, longitudinal data provides a more comprehensive perspective, accurately reflecting trends in indicators over time [
37]. Moreover, our study marked the pioneering use of GBTM to investigate the value of FB trajectories during the first 7 days following ICU admission in this population. This approach facilitates a deeper insight into disease progression and treatment efficacy, empowering doctors to make more precise decisions based on individual changes. However, our study still had some limitations. As a result of the retrospective nature of this study, we were unable to collect data on several important variables related to stroke prognosis, such as the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), blood pressure targets, ischemic stroke subtypes, death causes, etc. Further prospective studies are needed to incorporate these critical variables, which could provide a more detailed understanding of stroke outcomes and fluid strategies. Exploring the differences in fluid balance and prognosis among different subtypes of ischemic stroke is also an interesting direction worth further investigation. Moreover, we did not consider insensible losses while calculating FB because of the difficulty of accurate assessment. Lastly, the study did not investigate the effects of different fluid intake types on fluid accumulation and outcomes.