nach oben

Erschienen in:

23.04.2022 | Guidelines

Guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric head and neck pathologies: a multicentre international consensus paper

verfasst von: Felice D’Arco, Livja Mertiri, Pim de Graaf, Bert De Foer, Katarina S. Popovič, Maria I. Argyropoulou, Kshitij Mankad, Hervé J. Brisse, Amy Juliano, Mariasavina Severino, Sofie Van Cauter, Mai-Lan Ho, Caroline D. Robson, Ata Siddiqui, Steve Connor, Sotirios Bisdas, on behalf of the Consensus for Magnetic Resonance Protocols Study (COMPS) Group

Erschienen in: Neuroradiology | Ausgabe 6/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The use of standardized imaging protocols is paramount in order to facilitate comparable, reproducible images and, consequently, to optimize patient care. Standardized MR protocols are lacking when studying head and neck pathologies in the pediatric population. We propose an international, multicenter consensus paper focused on providing the best combination of acquisition time/technical requirements and image quality. Distinct protocols for different regions of the head and neck and, in some cases, for specific pathologies or clinical indications are recommended. This white paper is endorsed by several international scientific societies and it is the result of discussion, in consensus, among experts in pediatric head and neck imaging.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Avula S, Peet A, Morana G et al (2021) European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE) MRI guidelines for imaging patients with central nervous system tumours. Childs Nerv Syst 37:2497–2508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05199-4CrossRefPubMed

Saunders DE, Thompson C, Gunny R et al (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging protocols for paediatric neuroradiology. Pediatr Radiol 37:789–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-007-0462-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Vargas M-I, Becker M, Garibotto V et al (2013) Approaches for the optimization of MR protocols in clinical hybrid PET/MRI studies. MAGMA 26:57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-012-0340-9CrossRefPubMed

Widmann G, Henninger B, Kremser C, Jaschke W (2017) MRI sequences in head & neck radiology - state of the art. Rofo 189:413–422. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-103280CrossRefPubMed

Vachha BA, Robson CD (2015) Imaging of pediatric orbital diseases. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 25:477–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2015.05.009CrossRefPubMed

Galluzzi P, Hadjistilianou T, Cerase A et al (2009) Is CT still useful in the study protocol of retinoblastoma? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:1760–1765. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1716CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rodjan F, de Graaf P, van der Valk P et al (2015) Detection of calcifications in retinoblastoma using gradient-echo MR imaging sequences: comparative study between in vivo MR imaging and ex vivo high-resolution CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:355–360. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bhatia A, Mirsky DM, Mankad K et al (2021) Neuroimaging of retinal hemorrhage utilizing adjunct orbital susceptibility-weighted imaging. Pediatr Radiol 51:991–996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04897-6CrossRefPubMed

Wells RG, Sty JR, Gonnering RS (1989) Imaging of the pediatric eye and orbit. Radiographics 9:1023–1044. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.9.6.2685932CrossRefPubMed

10.

Nagesh CP, Rao R, Hiremath SB, Honavar SG (2021) Magnetic resonance imaging of the orbit, Part 1: basic principles and radiological approach. Indian J Ophthalmol 69:2574–2584. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_3141_20CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Chen JS, Mukherjee P, Dillon WP, Wintermark M (2006) Restricted diffusion in bilateral optic nerves and retinas as an indicator of venous ischemia caused by cavernous sinus thrombophlebitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:1815–1816PubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Feeney C, Lingam RK, Lee V et al (2020) Non-EPI-DWI for detection, disease monitoring, and clinical decision-making in thyroid eye disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 41:1466–1472. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6664CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Zuccoli G, Panigrahy A, Haldipur A et al (2013) Susceptibility weighted imaging depicts retinal hemorrhages in abusive head trauma. Neuroradiology 55:889–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-013-1180-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Steinklein JM, Shatzkes DR (2018) Imaging of vascular lesions of the head and neck. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 51:55–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2017.09.007CrossRefPubMed

15.

Krishnamurthy R, Muthupillai R, Chung T (2009) Pediatric body MR angiography. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 17:133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2008.12.004CrossRefPubMed

16.

Sepahdari AR, Aakalu VK, Kapur R et al (2009) MRI of orbital cellulitis and orbital abscess: the role of diffusion-weighted imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:W244–W250. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1838CrossRefPubMed

17.

De B, Kinnaman MD, Wexler LH et al (2018) Central nervous system relapse of rhabdomyosarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.26710CrossRefPubMed

18.

Aerts I, Lumbroso-Le Rouic L, Gauthier-Villars M et al (2006) Retinoblastoma. Orphanet J Rare Dis 1:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-1-31CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

de Graaf P, Göricke S, Rodjan F et al (2012) Guidelines for imaging retinoblastoma: imaging principles and MRI standardization. Pediatr Radiol 42:2–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2201-5CrossRefPubMed

20.

de Jong MC, Kors WA, de Graaf P et al (2014) Trilateral retinoblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 15:1157–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70336-5CrossRefPubMed

21.

de Jong MC, Kors WA, de Graaf P et al (2015) The incidence of trilateral retinoblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Ophthalmol 160:1116-1126.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.09.009CrossRefPubMed

22.

de Jong MC, Kors WA, Moll AC et al (2020) Screening for pineal trilateral retinoblastoma revisited: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 127:601–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.10.040CrossRefPubMed

23.

Galluzzi P, de Jong MC, Sirin S et al (2016) MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part I, the solid gland. Neuroradiology 58:705–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-016-1684-zCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Sirin S, de Jong MC, Galluzzi P et al (2016) MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part II, the cystic gland. Neuroradiology 58:713–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-016-1683-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Chung EM, Specht CS, Schroeder JW (2007) From the archives of the AFIP: pediatric orbit tumors and tumorlike lesions: neuroepithelial lesions of the ocular globe and optic nerve. Radiographics 27:1159–1186. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.274075014CrossRefPubMed

26.

Jansen RW, de Bloeme CM, Brisse HJ et al (2020) MR imaging features to differentiate retinoblastoma from coats’ disease and persistent fetal vasculature. Cancers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123592CrossRef

27.

Brisse HJ, European Retinoblastoma Imaging Collaboration (2010) Retinoblastoma Imaging. Ophthalmology 117:1051-1051.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.12.022CrossRefPubMed

28.

Brisse HJ, de Graaf P, Galluzzi P et al (2015) Assessment of early-stage optic nerve invasion in retinoblastoma using high-resolution 1.5 Tesla MRI with surface coils: a multicentre, prospective accuracy study with histopathological correlation. Eur Radiol 25:1443–1452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3514-1CrossRefPubMed

29.

Sirin S, Schlamann M, Metz KA et al (2013) Diagnostic image quality of gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI with and without fat saturation in children with retinoblastoma. Pediatr Radiol 43:716–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2576-yCrossRefPubMed

30.

Quirk B, Connor S (2020) Skull base imaging, anatomy, pathology and protocols. Pract Neurol 20:39–49. https://doi.org/10.1136/practneurol-2019-002383CrossRefPubMed

31.

Hudgins PA, Baugnon KL (2018) Head and neck: skull base imaging. Neurosurgery 82:255–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx492CrossRefPubMed

32.

Muccio CF, Caranci F, D’Arco F et al (2014) Magnetic resonance features of pyogenic brain abscesses and differential diagnosis using morphological and functional imaging studies: a pictorial essay. J Neuroradiol 41:153–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2014.05.004CrossRefPubMed

33.

Severino M, Liyanage S, Novelli V et al (2012) Skull base osteomyelitis and potential cerebrovascular complications in children. Pediatr Radiol 42:867–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2340-8CrossRefPubMed

34.

Hoch BL, Nielsen GP, Liebsch NJ, Rosenberg AE (2006) Base of skull chordomas in children and adolescents: a clinicopathologic study of 73 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 30:811–818. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000209828.39477.abCrossRefPubMed

35.

Golden L, Pendharkar A, Fischbein N (2018) Imaging cranial base chordoma and chondrosarcoma. Chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base and spine. Elsevier, pp 67–78CrossRef

36.

Talenti G, Picariello S, Robson C et al (2021) Magnetic resonance features and cranial nerve involvement in pediatric head and neck rhabdomyosarcomas. Neuroradiology 63:1925–1934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02765-0CrossRefPubMed

37.

Flors L, Leiva-Salinas C, Maged IM et al (2011) MR imaging of soft-tissue vascular malformations: diagnosis, classification, and therapy follow-up. Radiographics 31:1321–1340. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.315105213CrossRefPubMed

38.

Mota EB, Penna CRR, Marchiori E (2017) Metastatic dissemination of a neuroblastoma. J Pediatr 189:232-232.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.05.069CrossRefPubMed

39.

Purnell CA, Skladman R, Alden TD et al (2019) Nasal dermoid cysts with intracranial extension: avoiding coronal incision through midline exposure and nasal bone osteotomy. J Neurosurg Pediatr. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.9.PEDS19132CrossRefPubMed

40.

Zaveri J, La Q, Yarmish G, Neuman J (2014) More than just Langerhans cell histiocytosis: a radiologic review of histiocytic disorders. Radiographics 34:2008–2024. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.347130132CrossRefPubMed

41.

Weerakkody Y, Singh G (2005) Langerhans cell histiocytosis (skeletal manifestations). In: Radiopaedia.org. Radiopaedia.org

42.

Chen H-C, Shen W-C, Chou D-Y, Chiang I-P (2002) Langerhans cell histiocytosis of the skull complicated with an epidural hematoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:493–495PubMedPubMedCentral

43.

McClain KL, Picarsic J, Chakraborty R et al (2018) CNS Langerhans cell histiocytosis: common hematopoietic origin for LCH-associated neurodegeneration and mass lesions. Cancer 124:2607–2620. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31348CrossRefPubMed

44.

Poe LB, Dubowy RL, Hochhauser L et al (1994) Demyelinating and gliotic cerebellar lesions in Langerhans cell histiocytosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15:1921–1928PubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Schäfer JF, Granata C, von Kalle T et al (2020) Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric oncology - recommendations by the Oncology Task Force of the ESPR. Pediatr Radiol 50:1162–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04683-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Godano E, Morana G, Di Iorgi N et al (2018) Role of MRI T2-DRIVE in the assessment of pituitary stalk abnormalities without gadolinium in pituitary diseases. Eur J Endocrinol 178:613–622. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-18-0094CrossRefPubMed

47.

Cerbone M, Visser J, Bulwer C et al (2021) Management of children and young people with idiopathic pituitary stalk thickening, central diabetes insipidus, or both: a national clinical practice consensus guideline. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 5:662–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00088-2CrossRefPubMed

48.

Meuwly J-Y, Lepori D, Theumann N et al (2005) Multimodality imaging evaluation of the pediatric neck: techniques and spectrum of findings. Radiographics 25:931–948. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.254045142CrossRefPubMed

49.

Chiesa-Estomba CM, Ravanelli M, Farina D et al (2020) Imaging checklist for preoperative evaluation of laryngeal tumors to be treated by transoral microsurgery: guidelines from the European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 277:1707–1714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05869-0CrossRefPubMed

50.

Elders BBLJ, Hermelijn SM, Tiddens HAWM et al (2019) Magnetic resonance imaging of the larynx in the pediatric population: a systematic review. Pediatr Pulmonol 54:478–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.24250CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Maroldi R, Ravanelli M, Farina D (2014) Magnetic resonance for laryngeal cancer. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 22:131–139. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000036CrossRefPubMed

52.

Ravanelli M, Farina D, Rizzardi P et al (2013) MR with surface coils in the follow-up after endoscopic laser resection for glottic squamous cell carcinoma: feasibility and diagnostic accuracy. Neuroradiology 55:225–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-012-1128-3CrossRefPubMed

53.

Avey G (2020) Technical improvements in head and neck MR imaging: at the cutting edge. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 30:295–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2020.04.002CrossRefPubMed

54.

Verbist BM (2012) Imaging of sensorineural hearing loss: a pattern-based approach to diseases of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle. Insights Imaging 3:139–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0134-zCrossRefPubMed

55.

Casselman JW, Offeciers EF, De Foer B et al (2001) CT and MR imaging of congential abnormalities of the inner ear and internal auditory canal. Eur J Radiol 40:94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0720-048x(01)00377-1CrossRefPubMed

56.

Burd C, Pai I, Connor S (2020) Imaging anatomy of the retrotympanum: variants and their surgical implications. Br J Radiol 93:20190677. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190677CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

57.

Joshi VM, Navlekar SK, Kishore GR et al (2012) CT and MR imaging of the inner ear and brain in children with congenital sensorineural hearing loss. Radiographics 32:683–698. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.323115073CrossRefPubMed

58.

Quirk B, Youssef A, Ganau M, D’Arco F (2019) Radiological diagnosis of the inner ear malformations in children with sensorineural hearing loss. BJR Open 1:20180050. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20180050CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Talenti G, Manara R, Brotto D, D’Arco F (2018) High-resolution 3 T magnetic resonance findings in cochlear hypoplasias and incomplete partition anomalies: a pictorial essay. Br J Radiol 91:20180120. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180120CrossRefPubMed

60.

Finsterer J, Scorza FA, Fiorini AC, Scorza CA (2020) MEGDEL Syndrome. Pediatr Neurol 110:25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2020.03.009CrossRefPubMed

61.

Campion T, Taranath A, Pinelli L et al (2019) Imaging of temporal bone inflammations in children: a pictorial review. Neuroradiology 61:959–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02258-1CrossRefPubMed

62.

Casselman JW, Kuhweide R, Deimling M et al (1993) Constructive interference in steady state-3DFT MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 14:47–57PubMedPubMedCentral

63.

Schmalbrock P, Brogan MA, Chakeres DW et al (1993) Optimization of submillimeter-resolution MR imaging methods for the inner ear. J Magn Reson Imaging 3:451–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880030304CrossRefPubMed

64.

Benson JC, Carlson ML, Lane JI (2020) MRI of the internal auditory canal, labyrinth, and middle ear: how we do it. Radiology 297:252–265. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020201767CrossRefPubMed

65.

Schwartz KM, Lane JI, Bolster BD, Neff BA (2011) The utility of diffusion-weighted imaging for cholesteatoma evaluation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:430–436. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

66.

Dudau C, Draper A, Gkagkanasiou M et al (2019) Cholesteatoma: multishot echo-planar vs non echo-planar diffusion-weighted MRI for the prediction of middle ear and mastoid cholesteatoma. BJR Open 1:20180015. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20180015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

67.

De Foer B, Vercruysse J-P, Bernaerts A et al (2007) The value of single-shot turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the detection of middle ear cholesteatoma. Neuroradiology 49:841–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-007-0268-3CrossRefPubMed

68.

Wiesmueller M, Wuest W, May MS et al (2021) Comparison of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging and single-shot TSE DWI for cholesteatoma diagnostics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 42:1305–1312. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7112CrossRefPubMed

69.

Lingam RK, Nash R, Majithia A et al (2016) Non-echoplanar diffusion weighted imaging in the detection of post-operative middle ear cholesteatoma: navigating beyond the pitfalls to find the pearl. Insights Imaging 7:669–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-016-0516-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

70.

Lingam RK, Bassett P (2017) A meta-analysis on the diagnostic performance of non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging in detecting middle ear cholesteatoma: 10 years on. Otol Neurotol 38:521–528. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001353CrossRefPubMed

71.

Nash R, Wong PY, Kalan A et al (2015) Comparing diffusion weighted MRI in the detection of post-operative middle ear cholesteatoma in children and adults. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 79:2281–2285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.10.025CrossRefPubMed

72.

De Foer B, Vercruysse J-P, Bernaerts A et al (2010) Middle ear cholesteatoma: non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging versus delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging–value in detection. Radiology 255:866–872. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10091140CrossRefPubMed

73.

De Foer B, Vercruysse JP, Spaepen M et al (2010) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the temporal bone. Neuroradiology 52:785–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0742-1CrossRefPubMed

74.

Kanona H, Stephenson K, D’Arco F et al (2018) Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in paediatric cochlear implant assessment: a pilot study and our experience at Great Ormond Street Hospital. J Laryngol Otol 132:529–533. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215118000440CrossRefPubMed

75.

D’Arco F, Youssef A, Ioannidou E et al (2020) Temporal bone and intracranial abnormalities in syndromic causes of hearing loss: an updated guide. Eur J Radiol 123:108803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108803CrossRefPubMed

76.

Connor SEJ, Borri M, Pai I, Barnsley H (2021) “Black Bone” magnetic resonance imaging as a novel technique to aid the pre-operative planning of posterior tympanotomy for cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int 22:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2020.1823126CrossRefPubMed

77.

Yuhasz M, Hoch MJ, Hagiwara M et al (2018) Accelerated internal auditory canal screening magnetic resonance imaging protocol with compressed sensing 3-dimensional T2-weighted sequence. Invest Radiol 53:742–747. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000499CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

78.

Srinivasan R, So CW, Amin N et al (2019) A review of the safety of MRI in cochlear implant patients with retained magnets. Clin Radiol 74:972.e9-972.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2019.06.011CrossRef

79.

Lu W, Pauly KB, Gold GE et al (2009) SEMAC: slice encoding for metal artifact correction in MRI. Magn Reson Med 62:66–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21967CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

80.

Amin N, Pai I, Touska P, Connor SEJ (2021) Utilization of SEMAC-VAT MRI for improved visualization of posterior fossa structures in patients with cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 42:e451–e458. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003016CrossRefPubMed

81.

Sharma D, Sharma N, Sharma V (2019) Sinonasal cancers: diagnosis and management. In: Wang T-C (ed) Challenging issues on paranasal sinuses. IntechOpen

82.

Sen S, Chandra A, Mukhopadhyay S, Ghosh P (2015) Imaging approach to sinonasal neoplasms. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 25:577–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2015.07.005CrossRefPubMed

83.

Kushchayeva YS, Kushchayev SV, Glushko TY et al (2018) Fibrous dysplasia for radiologists: beyond ground glass bone matrix. Insights Imaging 9:1035–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0666-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

84.

O’Brien WT, Hamelin S, Weitzel EK (2016) The preoperative sinus CT: avoiding a “CLOSE” call with surgical complications. Radiology 281:10–21. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016152230CrossRefPubMed

85.

Mossa-Basha M, Blitz AM (2013) Imaging of the paranasal sinuses. Semin Roentgenol 48:14–34. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ro.2012.09.006CrossRefPubMed

86.

Som PM, Curtin HD (1994) Inflammatory lesions and tumors of the nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses with skull base involvement. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 4:499–513PubMed

87.

Loevner LA, Sonners AI (2002) Imaging of neoplasms of the paranasal sinuses. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 10:467–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1064-9689(02)00006-5CrossRefPubMed

88.

Madani G, Beale TJ, Lund VJ (2009) Imaging of sinonasal tumors. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 30:25–38. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2008.10.013CrossRefPubMed

89.

Eisen MD, Yousem DM, Montone KT et al (1996) Use of preoperative MR to predict dural, perineural, and venous sinus invasion of skull base tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:1937–1945PubMedPubMedCentral

90.

Farina D, Borghesi A, Botturi E et al (2010) Treatment monitoring of paranasal sinus tumors by magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer Imaging 10:183–193. https://doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2010.0025CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

91.

Maroldi R, Ravanelli M, Farina D et al (2015) Post-treatment evaluation of paranasal sinuses after treatment of sinonasal neoplasms. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 25:667–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2015.07.009CrossRefPubMed

92.

Ho M-L (2021) Advanced pediatric neuroimaging: “better, stronger, faster.” Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 29:xvii–xviii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2021.07.001CrossRefPubMed

93.

Kirsch CF, Ho M-L (2021) Advanced magnetic resonance imaging of the skull base. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 42:229–252. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2021.04.006CrossRefPubMed

94.

Lu A, Gorny KR, Ho ML (2019) Zero TE MRI for craniofacial bone imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 40:1562–1566. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6175CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

95.

Kobayashi N, Bambach S, Ho M-L (2021) Ultrashort echo-time MR imaging of the pediatric head and neck. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 29:583–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2021.06.008CrossRefPubMed

96.

Nanjappa M, Kolipaka A (2021) Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 29:617–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2021.06.011CrossRefPubMed

97.

Yeung DKW, Bhatia KS, Lee YYP et al (2013) MR elastography of the head and neck: driver design and initial results. Magn Reson Imaging 31:624–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2012.09.008CrossRefPubMed

98.

Deelchand DK, Ho M-L, Nestrasil I (2021) Ultra-high-field imaging of the pediatric brain and spinal cord. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 29:643–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2021.06.013CrossRefPubMed

99.

van Egmond SL, Visser F, Pameijer FA, Grolman W (2014) Ex vivo and in vivo imaging of the inner ear at 7 Tesla MRI. Otol Neurotol 35:725–729. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000276CrossRefPubMed

100.

Prabhu SP (2021) 3D modeling and advanced visualization of the pediatric brain, neck, and spine. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 29:655–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2021.06.014CrossRefPubMed

101.

Eley KA, Rossi-Espagnet MC, Schievano S et al (2021) Multiparametric imaging for presurgical planning of craniopagus twins: the experience of two tertiary pediatric hospitals with six sets of twins. Radiology 298:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020202216CrossRefPubMed

102.

Mamlouk MD, Hess CP (2016) Arterial spin-labeled perfusion for vascular anomalies in the pediatric head and neck. Clin Imaging 40:1040–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.06.009CrossRefPubMed

103.

Mossa-Basha M, Zhu C, Wu L (2021) Vessel wall MR imaging in the pediatric head and neck. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 29:595–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2021.06.009CrossRefPubMed

104.

Fujima N, Carlota Andreu-Arasa V, Barest GD et al (2020) Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the head and neck: principles, applications, and challenges. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 30:283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2020.04.006CrossRefPubMed

105.

Jones KM, Pollard AC, Pagel MD (2018) Clinical applications of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 47:11–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25838CrossRefPubMed

106.

Pareek A, Muehe AM, Theruvath AJ et al (2017) Whole-body PET/MRI of pediatric patients: the details that matter. J Vis Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/57128CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

107.

Sepehrizadeh T, Jong I, DeVeer M, Malhotra A (2021) PET/MRI in paediatric disease. Eur J Radiol 144:109987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109987CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric head and neck pathologies: a multicentre international consensus paper
verfasst von: Felice D’Arco
Livja Mertiri
Pim de Graaf
Bert De Foer
Katarina S. Popovič
Maria I. Argyropoulou
Kshitij Mankad
Hervé J. Brisse
Amy Juliano
Mariasavina Severino
Sofie Van Cauter
Mai-Lan Ho
Caroline D. Robson
Ata Siddiqui
Steve Connor
Sotirios Bisdas
on behalf of the Consensus for Magnetic Resonance Protocols Study (COMPS) Group
Publikationsdatum: 23.04.2022
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Neuroradiology / Ausgabe 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0028-3940
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1920
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-02950-9

Predictive value of DWI posterior-circulation lesion volume for 90-day clinical outcome after endovascular treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion: a retrospective single-center study

Interventional Neuroradiology

Relationship between cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome and the immediate change of cerebral blood flow after carotid artery stenting evaluated by single-photon emission computed tomography

Diagnostic Neuroradiology

Association between carotid artery dissection and vascular tortuosity: a case–control study

Diagnostic Neuroradiology

Clinical 1H MRS in childhood neurometabolic diseases—part 1: technique and age-related normal spectra

Review

The radiological interpretation of possible microbleeds after moderate or severe traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal study

Open Access
Diagnostic Neuroradiology

Intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring during coil embolization for anterior choroidal artery aneurysms

Interventional Neuroradiology

Kompaktes Leitlinien-Wissen Neurologie (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

Mit medbee Pocketcards schnell und sicher entscheiden.
Leitlinien-Wissen kostenlos und immer griffbereit auf ihrem Desktop, Handy oder Tablet.

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Demenz-Leitlinie aktualisiert

13.03.2025
Demenz
Nachrichten

Empfohlen wird jetzt auch eine Musiktherapie sowie bei unklarem diagnostischem Befund ein Tau-PET, und Depressive mit leichten kognitiven Störungen sollten eine Verhaltenstherapie erhalten – das sind einige wichtige Änderungen der aktuellen S3-Leitlinie Demenzen.

Frauen akkumulieren Tau-Protein schneller als Männer

13.03.2025
Morbus Alzheimer
Nachrichten

Frauen mit einer hohen Beta-Amyloid-Last im Gehirn aggregieren mehr Tau-Protein als Männer mit vergleichbaren Amyloidwerten. Ähnliches gilt für Frauen mit einem ApoE4-Allel. Dafür sprechen die Daten einer Metaanalyse von Menschen im präklinischen Alzheimerstadium.

Frauen mit Apoplex in Deutschland nicht benachteiligt – oder doch?

13.03.2025
Ischämischer Schlaganfall
Nachrichten

Eine Analyse von Daten des statistischen Bundesamtes spricht dafür, dass Frauen in der Schlaganfallbehandlung nicht benachteiligt sind. Im Detail bleiben aber Fragen offen.

MS-Medikamente absetzen: ab 60 Jahren eine Option

06.03.2025
Multiple Sklerose
Nachrichten

Wann können ältere MS-Kranke ihre krankheitsmodifizierende Therapie gefahrlos absetzen? Bisher lieferten kontrollierte Studien hier keine eindeutigen Antworten. Eine neue Auswertung der Studie DISCOMS deutet auf einen grenzwertigen Nutzen ab 60 Jahren.

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric head and neck pathologies: a multicentre international consensus paper

Abstract

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2022

Predictive value of DWI posterior-circulation lesion volume for 90-day clinical outcome after endovascular treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion: a retrospective single-center study

Relationship between cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome and the immediate change of cerebral blood flow after carotid artery stenting evaluated by single-photon emission computed tomography

Association between carotid artery dissection and vascular tortuosity: a case–control study

Clinical 1H MRS in childhood neurometabolic diseases—part 1: technique and age-related normal spectra

The radiological interpretation of possible microbleeds after moderate or severe traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal study

Intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring during coil embolization for anterior choroidal artery aneurysms

Kompaktes Leitlinien-Wissen Neurologie (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Demenz-Leitlinie aktualisiert

Frauen akkumulieren Tau-Protein schneller als Männer

Frauen mit Apoplex in Deutschland nicht benachteiligt – oder doch?

MS-Medikamente absetzen: ab 60 Jahren eine Option

Update Neurologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten