Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International 3/2020

23.01.2020 | Position Paper

Harmonization of commercial assays for PINP; the way forward

verfasst von: S. D. Vasikaran, H. P. Bhattoa, R. Eastell, A. C. Heijboer, N. R. Jørgensen, K. Makris, C. Ulmer, J. A. Kanis, C. Cooper, S. Silverman, E. Cavalier

Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Summary

International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine and The International Osteoporosis Foundation Joint Committee on Bone Metabolism believes that the harmonization of PINP assays is an achievable and practical goal.

Introduction

In order to examine the agreement between current commercial assays, a multi-center study was performed for PINP in serum and plasma.

Methods

The automated methods for PINP (Roche Cobas and IDS iSYS) gave similar results. A significant proportional bias was observed between the two automated assays and the Orion radioimmunoassay (RIA) for PINP.

Results

Results from other published studies comparing PINP values among these three assays broadly support our findings. Taken together, these results confirm that harmonized PINP measurements exist between the two automated assays (Roche Cobas and IDS iSYS) when the eGFR is > 30 mL/min/1.73m2, but a significant bias exists between the Orion RIA and the two automated assays.

Conclusion

Therefore, in subjects with normal renal function, PINP results reported by the Roche Cobas and IDS iSYS assays are similar and may be used interchangeably, and similar reference intervals and treatment targets could be applied for the two automated assays. Harmonization between the automated assays and the RIA is potentially possible with the use of common calibrators and the development of a reference method for PINP. This should also help ensure that any new commercial assay developed in the future will attain similar results. IOF and IFCC are committed to working together towards this goal with the cooperation of the reagent manufacturing industry.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Consensus Development Conference (1993) Diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 94:646–650CrossRef Consensus Development Conference (1993) Diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 94:646–650CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng SY, Levy AR, Lefaivre KA, Guy P, Kuramoto L, Sobolev B (2011) Geographic trends in incidence of hip fractures: a comprehensive literature review. Osteoporos Int 22:2575–2586CrossRef Cheng SY, Levy AR, Lefaivre KA, Guy P, Kuramoto L, Sobolev B (2011) Geographic trends in incidence of hip fractures: a comprehensive literature review. Osteoporos Int 22:2575–2586CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Khosla S, Hofbauer LC (2017) Osteoporosis treatment: recent developments and ongoing challenges. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 5:898–907CrossRef Khosla S, Hofbauer LC (2017) Osteoporosis treatment: recent developments and ongoing challenges. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 5:898–907CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Eastell R, Pigott T, Gossiel F, Naylor KE, Walsh JS, Peel NF (2018) Diagnosis of endocrine disease: bone turnover markers: are they clinically useful? Eur J Endocrinol 178:R19–R31CrossRef Eastell R, Pigott T, Gossiel F, Naylor KE, Walsh JS, Peel NF (2018) Diagnosis of endocrine disease: bone turnover markers: are they clinically useful? Eur J Endocrinol 178:R19–R31CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Vasikaran S, Eastell R, Bruyère O, Foldes AJ, Garnero P, Griesmacher A, McClung M, Morris HA, Silverman S, Trenti T, Wahl DA, Cooper C, Kanis JA, IOF-IFCC Bone Marker Standards Working Group (2011) Markers of bone turnover for the prediction of fracture risk and monitoring of osteoporosis treatment: a need for international reference standards. Osteoporos Int 22:391–420CrossRef Vasikaran S, Eastell R, Bruyère O, Foldes AJ, Garnero P, Griesmacher A, McClung M, Morris HA, Silverman S, Trenti T, Wahl DA, Cooper C, Kanis JA, IOF-IFCC Bone Marker Standards Working Group (2011) Markers of bone turnover for the prediction of fracture risk and monitoring of osteoporosis treatment: a need for international reference standards. Osteoporos Int 22:391–420CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Linkhart SG, Linkhart TA, Taylor AK, Wergedal JE, Bettica P, Baylink DJ (1993) Synthetic peptide-based immunoassay for amino-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen: application for evaluation of bone formation. Clin Chem 39:2254–2258CrossRef Linkhart SG, Linkhart TA, Taylor AK, Wergedal JE, Bettica P, Baylink DJ (1993) Synthetic peptide-based immunoassay for amino-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen: application for evaluation of bone formation. Clin Chem 39:2254–2258CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Koivula MK, Risteli L, Risteli J (2012) Measurement of aminoterminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) in serum. Clin Biochem 45:920–927CrossRef Koivula MK, Risteli L, Risteli J (2012) Measurement of aminoterminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) in serum. Clin Biochem 45:920–927CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cavalier E, Eastell R, Rye Jørgensen N, Makris K, Tournis S, Vasikaran S, Kanis JA, Cooper C, Pottel H, Morris HA, IFCC-IOF Joint Committee for Bone Metabolism (C-BM), IFCC-IOF Joint Committee for Bone Metabolism (C-BM) (2019) A multicenter study to evaluate harmonization of assays for N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP): a report from the IFCC-IOF joint committee for bone metabolism. Clin Chem Lab Med 57:1546–1555CrossRef Cavalier E, Eastell R, Rye Jørgensen N, Makris K, Tournis S, Vasikaran S, Kanis JA, Cooper C, Pottel H, Morris HA, IFCC-IOF Joint Committee for Bone Metabolism (C-BM), IFCC-IOF Joint Committee for Bone Metabolism (C-BM) (2019) A multicenter study to evaluate harmonization of assays for N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP): a report from the IFCC-IOF joint committee for bone metabolism. Clin Chem Lab Med 57:1546–1555CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Koivula MK, Richardson J, Leino A, Valleala H, Griffiths K, Barnes A et al (2010) Validation of an automated intact N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) assay. Clin Biochem 43:1453–1457CrossRef Koivula MK, Richardson J, Leino A, Valleala H, Griffiths K, Barnes A et al (2010) Validation of an automated intact N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) assay. Clin Biochem 43:1453–1457CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jørgensen NR, Møllehave LT, Hansen YBL, Quardon N, Lylloff L, Linneberg A (2017) Comparison of two automated assays of BTM (CTX and P1NP) and reference intervals in a Danish population. Osteoporos Int 28:2103–2113CrossRef Jørgensen NR, Møllehave LT, Hansen YBL, Quardon N, Lylloff L, Linneberg A (2017) Comparison of two automated assays of BTM (CTX and P1NP) and reference intervals in a Danish population. Osteoporos Int 28:2103–2113CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Harmonization of commercial assays for PINP; the way forward
verfasst von
S. D. Vasikaran
H. P. Bhattoa
R. Eastell
A. C. Heijboer
N. R. Jørgensen
K. Makris
C. Ulmer
J. A. Kanis
C. Cooper
S. Silverman
E. Cavalier
Publikationsdatum
23.01.2020
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Osteoporosis International / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05310-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Osteoporosis International 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.