Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Open Access 01.12.2018 | Research article

Health insurance is important in improving maternal health service utilization in Tanzania—analysis of the 2011/2012 Tanzania HIV/AIDS and malaria indicator survey

verfasst von: Stephen M. Kibusi, Bruno Fokas Sunguya, Eunice Kimunai, Courtney S. Hines

Erschienen in: BMC Health Services Research | Ausgabe 1/2018

Abstract

Background

Maternal mortality rates vary significantly from region to region. Interventions such as early and planned antenatal care attendance and facility delivery with skilled health workers can potentially reduce maternal mortality rates. Several factors can be attributed to antenatal care attendance, or lack thereof, including the cost of health care services. The aim of this study was to examine the role of health insurance coverage in utilization of maternal health services in Tanzania.

Methods

Secondary data analysis was conducted on the nationally representative sample of men and women aged 15–49 years using the 2011/12 Tanzania HIV and Malaria Indicator Survey. It included 4513 women who had one or more live births within three years before the survey. The independent variable was health insurance coverage. Outcome variables included proper timing of the first antenatal care visit, completing the recommended number of antenatal care (ANC) visits, and giving birth under skilled worker. Data were analyzed both descriptively and using regression analyses to examine independent association of health insurance and maternal health services.

Results

Of 4513 women, only 281 (6.2%) had health insurance. Among all participants, only 16.9%, 7.1%, and 56.5%, respectively, made their first ANC visit as per recommendation, completed the recommended number of ANC visits, and had skilled birth assistance at delivery. A higher proportion of women with health insurance had a proper timing of 1st ANC attendance compared to their counterparts (27.0% vs. 16.0%, p < 0.001). Similar trend was for skilled birth attendance (77.6% vs. 55.1%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for other confounders and covariates, having health insurance was associated with proper timing of 1st ANC attendance (AOR = 1.89, p < 0.001) and skilled birth attendance (AOR = 2.01, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Health insurance coverage and maternal health services were low in this nationally representative sample in Tanzania. Women covered by health insurance were more likely to have proper timing of the first antenatal visit and receive skilled birth assistance at delivery. To improve maternal health, health insurance alone is however not enough. It is important to improve other pillars of health system to attain and sustain better maternal health in Tanzania and areas with similar contexts.
Abkürzungen
ANC
Antenatal Clinic
EAs
Enumeration areas
MDG5
Millennium Development Goal five
MMR
Maternal Mortality Ratio
NBS
National Bureau of Statistics
NIMR
National Institute of Medical Research
OOP
Out-of-pocket
THMIS
Tanzania HIV/AIDS and Malaria Indicator Survey
ZAMREC
Zanzibar Medical Research and Ethics Committee

Background

Maternal mortality has decreased significantly in the past two decades [1, 2]. Globally, the rate of annual decline of maternal deaths increased from 0.3% from 1990 to 2003 to 2.7% between 2003 and 2013 [1]. This decline however, varies with regions. While some regions show fast decline in maternal mortality ratios (MMR), others are stagnant and the rest display upward trends. In sub-Saharan Africa in particular, MMR have been increasing despite the efforts of various programs and initiatives. To this end, Tanzania is no different [3]. In Tanzania, MMR per 100,000 live births was 578 in 2015, 454 in 2010, and 432 in 2012 [35]. The most recent data in Tanzania shows further increase in MMR to 556 per 100,000 live births [4]. The rate of annual decline in maternal mortality in the last decade was only 1.1% compared to 4.7% in the previous decade [1]. Such poor trend was behind the failure to reach the Millennium Development Goal five (MDG5) that expired in 2015 [6].
High MMR in Tanzania and slow decline thereof is caused by a myriad of underlying factors. Like other countries in the region, Tanzania faces poor health systems with few qualified health workers, inequality in health facilities distribution, high out-of-pocket health expenditures, food insecurity and poor nutrition status in some regions, poverty, low maternal education levels, and diseases, including HIV [68]. As a result, a high proportion of mothers choose to deliver at home, unassisted by skilled health workers, even if they attend antenatal clinics (ANC) [3].
Early and planned ANC attendance and facility delivery with skilled health workers can potentially reduce the risks of immediate causes of MMR [9, 10]. These causes include: pregnancy induced hypertension, malaria infection during pregnancy, vaccine-preventable diseases such as rubella and tetanus, high risk pregnancies such as multipara and multiple gestation, and prenatal, natal, and post natal hemorrhage [11]. ANC attendance and other community based interventions for maternal health were associated with facility delivery in some countries [12]. In Tanzania as high as 96.5% of women attend ANC at least once; however, a fraction of them attend the four required ANC visits and only 42.6% of births are attended by skilled personnel [3].
A myriad of factors contribute to inadequate ANC attendance and unassisted delivery in Tanzania and countries with similar characteristics. Such factors include long distance to health facilities, low economic status, low levels of maternal education and poor knowledge of danger signs, lack of skilled workers and facilities, and high financial burden to families of expectant mothers [1315]. In Tanzania, the government subsidizes maternal health services and user-fee exemption is provided in public health facilities [1618]. However, pregnant women encounter a number of hidden expenses when pursuing health services [19]. Such expenses may arise from the long distance travelled to seek care, lack of essential medicine and equipment in public facilities necessitating them to buy in private drug stores, unofficial payment to the health workers, and time spent due to the heavy burden of patients in facilities with inadequate numbers of health workers [13, 14, 16, 19]. Such high out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditures introduce barriers to accessing maternal health services in Tanzania [19].
Health insurance is an effective mechanism to mitigate OOP expenditures [20]. It reduces catastrophic payments, and can improve health seeking and utilization behaviors [21]. It is also associated with ANC attendance and may increase the number of deliveries attended by skilled health workers and the number of deliveries that take place in a health facility [7]. Under such context, health insurance has a role in improving MMR and other related health problems. However, only a fraction of the population in Tanzania has access to health insurance [3, 5, 22]. Health insurance coverage is also not equally distributed along the socio- economic and employment lines [22]. Various forms of health insurance exist for individuals in informal sectors, including community health funds, but distribution of coverage varies with areas of implementation [22].
Evidence is available on the association between health insurance and maternal service utilization in developed countries [7, 2325]. However, such evidence is not available in developing countries, especially where insurance coverage is low; Tanzania is no exception. This study aims to examine health insurance coverage and its association with maternal health services utilization in Tanzania.

Methods

Study design

This cross-sectional study was designed to utilize secondary data originated from the nationally representative sample of men and women aged 15–49 years in the 2011/12 Tanzania HIV/AIDS and Malaria Indicator Survey (THMIS). Data were collected between December 2011 and May 2012. The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) developed the sampling frame used for the survey to cover all 30 regions of Tanzania. It excluded nomadic and institutional populations such as persons in hotels, barracks, and prisons.

Sampling procedures

The sample was selected in two stages. The first stage involved the selection of 585 clusters (sample units) consisting of enumeration areas (EAs). On the mainland, 30 clusters were selected from Dar es Salaam and 20 were selected from each of the other 24 regions. In Zanzibar, 15 sample points were selected from each of the five regions.
The second stage of selection involved the systematic sampling of households. A household listing operation was undertaken in all of the selected areas prior to the fieldwork. From these lists, households to be included in the survey were selected. Approximately 18 households were selected from each sample point for a total sample size of 10,496 households. Weighting factors were added to the data file so that the results would be proportional at the national level. Eligibility criteria included women and men ages 15–49 who were either permanent residents of the selected households or visitors who stayed in the household the night before the survey were.

Data source

Data analyzed in this study came from the Individual Questionnaire of the 2011/2012 THMIS dataset. It included a total of 19,319 men and women. Out of them, a total of 8352 men were excluded to get the study population of women who had a live birth within three years prior to the survey. Out of the 10,967 women remained, only 4627 women had one or more live births in the past three years before the survey were selected. A total of 114 women were excluded for missing data on important variables. They include 14 women who were missing information on insurance coverage and 100 women who were missing information on the timing of the first antenatal visit. Finally, 4513 women who had one or more live births within three years before the survey were included for analysis. The data set for this survey is available upon request from Measures, DHS program. The URL for this specific dataset is https://​www.​dhsprogram.​com/​data/​dataset_​admin/​login_​main.​cfm;jsessionid=​4E33501BD1C8593F​A55A278F027BFD44​.​cfusion?​CFID=​12989464&​CFTOKEN=​c9b926a975283d4-05E5988A-9609-2AFA-E0772649E1FDACED​

Variables and measurements

Variables were identified from the 2011–12 THMIS individual questionnaires and selected based on previous literature. The outcome variable of interest was maternal health services utilization. Three items from the THMIS individual questionnaire were used to measure it. They include: timing of the first antenatal care visit, completing the recommended number of ANC visits, and giving birth at a health facility under skilled care. Timing of the first ANC visit is recommended during the first trimester. Four spaced visits are the minimum number of recommended focused ANC visits. Lastly, a woman is considered as having received skilled birth assistance at delivery if she gave birth in a health facility, under the care of a trained health worker with the necessary skills for assisting with birth [3].
The main independent variable in this study was health insurance coverage. Participants were asked if they have any type of health insurance eliciting a dichotomized response of “Yes” or “No.” Other covariates and confounders in this analysis included socioeconomic and demographic variables. Demographic variables included age clustered in five-year age groups, rural or urban area of residence, education level, marital status, occupation, and wealth status. Number of births in the past five years before the survey was dichotomized into “one child” or “2 or more births.” Tanzania’s regions were regrouped into nine geographical zones, including Eastern, Western, Southern, Southern High, South West Highlands, Central, Northern, Lake and the Zanzibar zone.
We used weighted wealth index to assess economic status. It was constructed using ownership of household assets ranging from a television to a bicycle or car; dwelling characteristics, such as source of drinking water, sanitation facilities, and type of flooring material; and household’s food availability or consumption. Three steps were undertaken; first, a subset of indicators common to urban and rural areas was used to create wealth scores for households in both areas. Second, separate factor scores were produced for households in urban and rural areas using area-specific indicators using principle component analysis. Third, the separate area-specific factor scores were combined to produce a nationally applicable combined wealth index by adjusting area-specific scores through a regression on the common factor scores. Wealth quintiles (from lowest to highest) were formed by dividing the generated wealth index into the five rankings—the wealth index quintiles.

Data analyses

Analysis was conducted using both descriptive and regression methods. First, descriptive statistics on the distribution of participants’ socio-demographic characteristics by health insurance coverage and utilization of maternal health services were collected. For maternal services utilization, timing of the first antenatal visit, completing the recommended number of antenatal visits, and giving birth under skilled labor attendance were analyzed. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05 (2-tailed) for all the analyses.
A multiple logistic regression was conducted to examine independent associations between health insurance coverage with the three items used to measure maternal health services utilization. The generated adjusted odds ratios (AOR) were estimated to assess the strength of the associations and used the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for significance testing. All the covariates were entered simultaneously into the multiple regression models. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 16. Sample weighting was applied to allow for adjustments for the cluster sampling design and sampling probabilities across clusters and strata.

Results

Data of 4513 participants was available for analysis. Health insurance coverage was low. Of all participants, only 281 (6.2%) reported to have health insurance. Among those insured 167 (59.5%) were covered under community health insurance schemes, 95 (33.8%) covered under employment based health insurance schemes and the remaining 4.5% and 1.8% were covered under social security funds and other types of insurance schemes respectively.
Table 1 shows the results of descriptive characteristics stratified by health insurance coverage. Health insurance coverage varied with education level, occupation, marital status, place of residence, and wealth index. For example, it increased from non-educated women to secondary and above level (2.8% to 13.2%, p < 0.001). It also increased from low wealth index (3.6% to 12.7%, p < 0.001). Women residing in rural areas had lower rates compared to their counterparts in urban areas (5.8% vs. 8.5%, p < 0.01). Unemployed individuals had lower coverage compared to their employed counterparts (5.4% vs. 23.2%, p < 0.001). Health insurance coverage was high among women at the age groups 25–39 years.
Table 1
The distribution of participants by socio-demographic characteristics and health insurance coverage (N = 4513)
Variables
Health insurance coverage
P-value
Not covered
Covered
n
%
n
%
Education:
 No education
984
97.2
28
2.8
***
 Primary
2730
94.0
174
6.0
 Secondary+
518
86.8
79
13.2
Age groups:
 15–19
381
96.2
15
3.8
 
 20–24
1034
94.3
63
5.7
 25–29
1074
92.8
83
7.2
 30–34
767
93.7
52
6.3
 35–39
626
94.5
49
7.3
 40–44
275
96.2
16
5.5
 45–49
75
93.2
3
3.8
Occupation:
 Unemployed
541
94.6
31
5.4
***
 Self employed
2958
94.4
175
5.6
 Manual labor
594
94.7
33
5.3
 Employed
139
76.8
42
23.2
Marital Status:
 Never married
290
92.1
25
7.9
**
 Married/living together
3533
93.6
243
6.4
 Divorced/Separated
409
96.9
13
3.1
Area of residence:
 Urban
666
91.5
62
8.5
**
 Rural
3566
94.2
219
5.8
Wealth:
 Poorest
918
96.4
34
3.6
***
 Poorer
921
94.9
50
5.1
 Middle
907
95.0
48
5.0
 Richer
860
93.7
58
6.3
 Richest
626
87.3
91
12.7
Here *, ** and *** indicate p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 respectively

Maternal health service utilization

Table 2 shows the characteristics of 4513 study participants stratified by their utilization of maternal health services. Utilization of maternal health services was categorized into timing of first ANC visit, completion of the recommended ANC visits, and attended by skilled health worker during labor.
Table 2
Distribution of participants by factors affecting use of maternal and child health services during pregnancy and birth in Tanzania (N = 4513)
Variable
Timing of the 1st ANC Visit
Completed recommended number of ANC visits
Birth attended by a skilled worker
Yes
No
P-value
Yes
No
P-value
Yes
No
P-value
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
Health insurance coverage:
 Yes
76
27.0
205
73.0
***
19
6.8
262
93.2
 
218
77.6
63
22.4
***
 No
686
16.2
3546
83.8
303
7.2
3929
92.8
2332
55.1
1900
44.9
Age group:
 15–19
62
15.7
334
84.3
**
2
0.5
394
99.5
**
262
66.2
134
33.8
**
 20–24
229
20.9
868
79.1
77
7.0
1020
93.0
627
57.2
470
42.8
 25–29
197
17.0
960
83.0
103
8.9
1054
91.1
657
56.8
500
43.2
 30–34
117
14.3
702
85.7
71
8.7
748
91.3
442
54.0
377
46.0
 35–39
108
16.0
567
84.0
56
8.3
619
91.7
376
55.7
299
44.3
 40–44
40
13.7
251
86.3
11
3.8
280
96.2
144
49.5
147
50.5
 45–49
9
11.5
69
88.5
2
2.6
76
97.4
42
53.8
36
46.2
Area of Residence:
 Rural
149
20.5
579
79.5
***
16
2.2
712
97.8
***
627
86.1
101
13.9
***
 Urban
613
16.2
3751
83.1
306
8.1
3479
91.9
1923
50.8
1862
49.2
Education level:
 No education
127
12.5
885
87.5
***
112
11.1
900
88.9
***
400
39.5
612
60.5
***
 Primary incomplete
125
18.8
541
81.2
59
8.9
607
91.1
332
49.8
334
50.2
 Primary Complete
406
18.1
1832
81.9
131
5.9
2107
94.1
1359
60.7
879
39.3
 Secondary or higher
104
17.4
493
82.6
20
3.4
577
96.6
459
76.9
138
23.1
Wealth:
 Poorest
137
14.4
815
85.6
***
81
8.5
871
91.5
***
372
39.1
580
60.9
***
 Poorer
141
14.5
830
85.5
96
9.9
875
90.1
458
47.2
513
52.8
 Middle
147
15.4
808
84.6
78
8.2
877
91.8
486
50.9
469
49.1
 Richer
169
18.4
749
81.6
50
5.4
868
94.6
612
66.7
306
33.3
 Richest
168
23.4
549
76.6
17
2.4
700
97.6
622
86.8
95
13.2
Marital status:
 Single
58
18.4
257
81.6
0.524
3
1.0
312
99.0
***
238
75.6
77
24.4
***
 Married
627
16.6
3149
83.4
297
7.9
3479
92.1
2087
55.3
1689
44.7
 Separated/Widowed
77
18.2
345
81.8
22
5.2
400
94.8
225
53.3
197
46.7
Occupation:
 Unemployed
108
18.9
462
81.1
***
36
6.3
534
93.7
***
380
66.7
190
33.3
***
 Self employed
87
22.8
295
77.2
24
6.3
358
93.7
198
51.8
184
48.2
 Manual laborer
128
20.4
499
79.6
18
2.9
609
97.1
467
74.5
160
25.5
 Employed
438
14.9
2494
85.1
244
8.3
2688
91.7
1504
51.3
1428
48.7
Number of births in last 5 yrs.:
 1
444
20.2
1758
79.8
***
0
0.0
2202
100.0
***
1488
67.6
714
32.4
***
 2 or more
318
13.8
1993
86.2
322
13.9
1989
86.1
1062
46.0
1249
54.0
Zone:
 Eastern
127
31.1
282
68.9
***
11
2.7
398
97.3
***
337
82.4
72
17.6
***
 Western
55
13.6
349
86.4
34
8.4
370
91.6
220
54.5
184
45.5
 Southern
64
32.2
135
67.8
7
3.5
192
96.5
116
58.3
83
41.7
 Southern Highlands
91
25.0
273
75.0
9
2.5
355
97.5
327
89.8
37
10.2
 South West highlands
66
13.4
425
86.6
31
6.3
460
3.7
240
48.9
251
51.1
 Central
53
11.3
414
88.7
41
8.8
426
91.2
238
51.0
229
49.0
 Northern
64
19.2
270
80.8
8
2.4
326
97.6
183
54.8
151
45.2
 Lake
148
11.7
1120
88.3
131
10.3
1137
89.7
589
46.5
679
53.5
 Zanzibar
94
16.3
483
83.7
50
8.7
527
91.3
300
52.0
277
48.0
Here *, ** and *** indicate p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 respectively
In this study, timing of the first ANC visit was also low. Only 762 (16.9%) of participants reported proper timing. A higher proportion of those with health insurance had proper timing of ANC compared to their counterparts (27.0% vs. 16.2%, p < 0.001). Timing of the first ANC visit differed across various socio-demographic characteristics. For example, it was higher among women in the age group 20–24 (20.9%), residing in rural areas (20.5%), and women with at least primary education or higher education (primary incomplete 18.8%, primary complete 18.1% and secondary or higher education 17.4%) compared to those in other age groups (χ2 test p < 0.01), residing in urban areas or with no formal education (χ2 test p < 0.001). Also, timing of the first antenatal care visit increased proportionally with the wealth index. For example, 23.4% and 18.4% of those in the richest and richer quintile, respectively, had recommended timing of first visit compared with only 14.4% of the poorest group quintile (χ2 test p < 0.001). Only 14.9% of the employed mothers had proper timing of the first ANC visit compared to 22.8% among those who were self-employed (χ2 test p < 0.001). There were proportionally significant variations across the nine survey zones with the Eastern zone showing the highest proportion of women timing their first antenatal care visit as recommended (31.1%) compared to only 11.7% and 11.3% the Lake and the Central zones respectively (χ2 test p < 0.001).
A few women had completed the recommended ANC visits (Table 2). Only 322 (7.1%) completed four recommended ANC visits. There was no difference between those with or without health insurance under such context (6.8% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.460). Younger women were less likely to complete all four recommended ANC visits compared to other age groups (χ2 test p < 0.01). This was also true for the urban-rural residency (2.2% vs. 8.1%, p < 0.001). Those with low education had higher completion rates compared to the higher education cluster (χ2 test p < 0.001). Similarly, women of the richest quintile had the lowest completion rate of ANC visits compared to poorest quintile (2.4% vs. 9.9%, p < 0.001). Completion rate was also lower among single women compared to their married counterparts (χ2 test p < 0.001); and those residing in the Eastern zones (χ2 test p < 0.001).
Lastly, majority of the selected population (56.5%) reported to have delivered at health facilities under skilled attendants. A higher proportion of them had health insurance compared to their counterparts (77.6% vs. 55.1%, p < 0.001). A high number [1963 (43.5%)] of women did not have their birth attended by a skilled health worker. More young women gave birth in healthcare facilities under skilled health workers compared to older groups (χ2 test p < 0.01). Counter intuitively, a significantly high proportion of women residing in rural areas gave birth under skilled health workers than those in urban areas (86.1% vs. 50.8% p < 0.001). About 76.9% of women with secondary or higher education gave birth under skilled attendance compared with only 39.5% of those with no education (χ2 test p < 0.001). Women of the richer quintile category received skilled attendance at birth in higher proportion compared to those of the poorest wealth quintile (86.0% vs 39.1%, p < 0.001). Contrary to the results of ANC completion rates, 75.6% of single women gave birth under skilled attendance, while only 55.3% of the married women gave birth under skilled attendants (χ2 test p < 0.001). Occupational status, parity and the geographical zone also showed significance differences with skilled birth in this survey (Table 2).

Independent associations between health insurance and maternal services utilization

Table 3 shows the results of a multivariate logistic regression analysis for the association between health insurance coverage and utilization of maternal health services. After controlling for other factors, health insurance coverage was associated with increased odds of timing the first antenatal visit as recommended (OR 1.86, p < 0.001). Women with health insurance were also more likely to deliver at a health facility under a skilled attendant compared to their counterparts (AOR 2.01 p < 0.001). There was no significant association between health insurance coverage and completing the recommended number of antenatal visits (AOR 1.33, 95% CI 0.782–2.267).
Table 3
Adjusted Odds Ratios (AOR) for the association between health insurance coverage and maternal health service utilization among women of reproductive age in Tanzania (N = 4513)
Variable
Timing of the first Antenatal visit
Completing recommended number of antenatal visits
Birth attended by a skilled health worker
AOR
95% CI
P value
AOR
95% CI
P value
AOR
95% CI
P value
Health insurance coverage:
 No
1
  
1
  
1
  
 Yes
1.855
1.375–2.503
***
1.331
0.782–2.267
 
2.012
1.458–2.775
***
Age groups:
 15–19
1
  
1
  
1
  
 20–24
1.465
1.060–2.026
**
5.367
1.280–22.51
**
0.041
0.754–0.576
*
 25–29
1.055
0.751–1.483
 
5.786
1.385–24.17
**
0.023
0.723–0.546
*
 30–34
0.836
0.581–1.202
 
5.874
1.396–24.71
**
0.008
0.677–0.506
**
 35–39
0.949
0.657–1.370
 
5.883
1.390–24.91
**
0.106
0.783–0.582
 
 40–44
0.795
0.506–1.250
 
2.911
0.621–13.65
 
0.006
0.614–0.432
**
 45–49
0.673
0.313–1.450
 
2.254
0.298–17.06
 
0.633
0.877–0.511
 
Area of Residence:
 Rural
1
  
1
  
1
  
 Urban
1.255
1.054–1.345
**
1.454
0.775–2.726
 
0.511
0.388–0.673
***
Marital Status:
 Single
1
  
1
  
1
  
 Married
1.202
0.861–1.679
 
1.625
0.485–5.436
 
0.899
0.656–1.231
 
 Separated/widowed
1.327
0.880–2.002
 
1.325
0.367–4.782
 
0.732
0.504–1.063
 
Zones:
 Eastern
1
  
1
  
1
  
 Western
0.391
0.268–0.572
***
1.086
0.516–2.287
 
0.654
0.457–0.937
*
 Southern
1.118
0.756–1.653
 
1.355
0.477–3.847
 
0.626
0.412–0.951
*
 Southern Highlands
0.765
0.543–1.079
***
0.526
0.204–1.352
 
3.669
2.325–5.790
***
 Southern West Highland
0.381
0.266–0.546
***
0.853
0.402–1.809
 
0.475
0.335–0.673
***
 Central
0.298
0.204–0.436
**
1.432
0.688–2.983
 
0.499
0.352–0.709
***
 Northern
0.568
0.398–0.809
***
0.483
0.184–1.265
 
0.360
0.248–0.522
***
 Lake
0.323
0.238–0.438
***
1.414
0.719–2.782
 
0.448
0.327–0.615
***
 Zanzibar
0.512
0.363–0.722
***
1.641
0.784–3.434
 
0.210
0.146–0.303
***
Births in the past 5 yrs.:
 One
1
  
1
  
1
  
 Two or more
1.277
1.071–1.523
**
1.681
0.000
 
0.589
0.510–0.679
***
Educational level:
 No education
1
  
1
  
1
  
 Primary incomplete
1.415
1.071–1.869
**
0.974
0.681–1.393
 
1.209
0.974–1.500
 
 Primary Complete
1.212
0.962–1.528
 
0.769
0.575–1.029
 
1.335
1.126–1.583
**
 Secondary or higher
0.817
0.581–1.150
 
0.658
0.365–1.186
 
2.102
1.564–2.824
***
Wealth:
 Poorest
1
  
1
  
1
  
 Poorer
0.988
0.79–1.286
 
1.200
0.859–1.676
 
1.326
1.092–1.609
**
 Middle
1.082
0.830–1.411
 
0.989
0.696–1.406
 
1.463
1.200–1.783
***
 Richer
1.228
0.931–1.621
 
0.829
0.544–1.262
 
2.369
1.898–2.958
***
 Richest
1.605
1.126–2.288
**
0.686
0.344–1.369
 
4.527
3.239–6.326
***
Occupation:
 Unemployed
1
  
1
  
1
  
 Self employed
1.104
0.828–1.473
 
0.930
0.587–1.473
 
0.760
0.591–0.978
*
 Manual laborer
1.191
0.884–1.605
 
0.547
0.296–1.009
 
1.306
0.978–1.743
 
 Employed
1.254
0.808–1.946
 
0.508
0.144–1.788
 
1.289
0.784–2.120
 
Here *, ** and *** indicate p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 respectively
Other factors associated with timing the first antenatal visit as recommended were being in the 20–24 age group compared to the youngest age group (AOR 1.47 p < 0.01) and residing in an urban compared to rural area (AOR 1.26 p < 0.01). In the ANC completion rate model, age was the only factor associated with completing the recommended number of antenatal visits. Compared with young women in the 15–19 years, being older increased the odds of completing the recommended number of antenatal visits (p < 0.01).
Table 3 also presents results of a regression analysis in the skilled birth attendants’ model. Counter intuitively; women residing in urban areas were less likely to deliver under skilled workers (AOR 0.511 p < 0.001). Being a young mother (ages 15–19) increased the odds of delivering at a health facility compared to those in 20–24 years and above age groups. Residents from the Southern highlands were more likely to deliver under skilled health worker than those from the Eastern zone (AOR 3.67 p < 0.001).

Discussion

Health insurance coverage was low in this study. Only 6.2% of women in this study had health insurance. Maternal health services utilization was also low. For example, only 16.9% of all women in this study had a timing of first ANC initiation as recommended. Moreover, only 7.1% completed four recommended ANC visits and about 43.5% did not deliver their last baby under a skilled attendant. This result is not far from previous studies in Tanzania on skilled birth delivery [14, 15]. Having a health insurance was associated with proper timing of ANC initiation and giving birth under a skilled attendant. Results of this secondary analysis will help shade some light into the challenge ahead in trying to achieve the universal health and further reduce the otherwise persistent maternal mortality rate in Tanzania.
Low health insurance coverage was associated with low rates of maternal services utilization in this study. To counter low rates of maternal health services utilization, Tanzania, like many other countries in sub-Saharan Africa introduced policies to provide free medical care to pregnant women. Removing the financial barriers to antenatal care is thought to help increasing utilization of ANC services [26, 27]. However, lack of equipment, including essential medicine, introduces hidden user fee [14, 19], especially for those with no insurance coverage. These women have to purchase such medicine and equipment in private pharmacies, therefore, increase the rates of out-of-pocket payments. In Tanzania, 73.3% of women with facility delivery reported having made out-of-pocket payments for delivery-related costs, including unofficial provider payments [19]. Like previous studies, health insurance coverage may therefore increase the likelihood of enrolment and utilization of ANC [7, 26].
Like in a previous study [7], our results confirmed that parity, age, education level, wealth index, place of residence influences timing of ANC initiation. Specifically, young women, those who lived in urban areas, with two or more births, and with highest economic status were more likely to adhere to the recommended timing of ANC initiation. Women of high wealth quintile are more likely to also be educated, have knowledge of risk factors for pregnancy, and therefore adhere to the recommended timing of ANC initiation. In this study however, women having incomplete primary education level were more likely to adhere to this recommendation compared to non-educated. Associations with other education levels did not reach statistical significant levels. Also, women with higher parity are more likely to have more knowledge of risk factors and therefore adhere to this recommendation compared with the primigravida [7]. There was a regional variation of ANC initiation in this study. The Eastern zone had the best indicators of ANC initiation. Efforts should be done in other zones by looking at the strategies that have been effective in the Eastern zone.
Health insurance was not associated with completion rates of ANC visits in this study. However, this study shows that, age was an important factor for ANC completion rate. Women who were older had adhered to the recommendation of at least four ANC visits compared to the youngest age group (15–19). This finding is similar to previous study in different settings [7]. In India for example, adolescents had unacceptably low utilization of maternal health services [28]. Similar findings were reported elsewhere [29, 30].
In contrast to other studies [14, 31], our study found that women of urban areas were less likely to deliver under skilled health workers compared to their rural counterparts. Also, similar to our study, wealth index was positively associated with skilled birth delivery [31]. This can be explained by the knowledge that, wealthier women are more likely to be empowered or educated, and therefore are aware of the maternal risk or can access health facilities even under hidden costs [14]. Also, our study found that, younger women were more likely to deliver under skilled health workers. Similar to the ANC initiation, the Eastern zone had highest rate of skilled birth delivery which coincide with another study where focused ANC care was the highest in this region [13].
Results of this study should be carefully discussed owing to the following limitations. First, we only examined women who had a live birth in the past three years to minimize recall period. Therefore, we cannot generalize our findings to all other women. Second, the primary source of the information collected from the research participants was self-report. Such method could have introduced recall bias that could have resulted into underestimation or overestimation of past experiences or events. We minimized this effect through limiting the sample to only those who gave a live birth in the past three years. Third, we were limited on the variables that were available in the DHS questionnaire; thus, we could not explore other factors that could be relevant for this study. To minimize the effect of this limitation, we included as many variables from the questionnaire into our conceptual model. Despite these limitations, this is the first study that examined the role of health insurance in maternal health utilization in Tanzania.

Conclusions

In conclusion, health insurance coverage was low in Tanzania. Also, maternal services utilization such as recommended timing of ANC initiation, completion of recommended number of ANC visits, and skilled birth delivery was low. Having health insurance was associated with recommended timing the first ANC visit and increases the chances for health facility delivery under skilled health worker. Our results highlight the potential role of health insurance in improving maternal health and therefore address areas of improvement in the newly introduced Sustainable Development Goals number three and five. These study findings also provide guidance for policy makers in low- and middle-income countries on the role of health insurance coverage in utilization of maternal health services. Increase in health insurance coverage alone may not bring about the desirable changes in maternal health. It is also important to address other health system challenges to attain and sustain better maternal health in this settings. Such challenges are on the health system pillars such as poor human resource for health, medical supplies, information technology, and stewardship.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) and Measure DHS for providing us with the data set.

Funding

This study received no funding.
The protocol and data collection procedures for the THMIS were approved by NIMR, ZAMREC, the Institutional Review Board of ICF International, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta. All participants were asked to provide verbal informed consent after being read a document emphasizing the voluntary nature of the survey. The consent form was verbally read by the interviewer and the participant’s response recorded on the consent form as either agreeing to be interviewed or not agreeing to be interviewed. The ethical approval was not needed for the secondary data analysis. The approval to use the data set in this study was obtained from Measures DHS, the IRB used for data collection that was obtained from above committees are applicable by users of the dataset. In this case, we did not need to look for another IRB approval.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kassebaum NJ, Bertozzi-Villa A, Coggeshall MS, Shackelford KA, Steiner C, Heuton KR, Gonzalez-Medina D, Barber R, Huynh C, Dicker D, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9947):980–1004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kassebaum NJ, Bertozzi-Villa A, Coggeshall MS, Shackelford KA, Steiner C, Heuton KR, Gonzalez-Medina D, Barber R, Huynh C, Dicker D, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9947):980–1004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Verguet S, Norheim OF, Olson ZD, Yamey G, Jamison DT. Annual rates of decline in child, maternal, HIV, and tuberculosis mortality across 109 countries of low and middle income from 1990 to 2013: an assessment of the feasibility of post-2015 goals. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(12):e698–709.CrossRefPubMed Verguet S, Norheim OF, Olson ZD, Yamey G, Jamison DT. Annual rates of decline in child, maternal, HIV, and tuberculosis mortality across 109 countries of low and middle income from 1990 to 2013: an assessment of the feasibility of post-2015 goals. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(12):e698–709.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat NBS, ORC-Macro. Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey 2009-2010. Dar es Salaam: National Bureau of Statistics and ORC Macro; 2010. NBS, ORC-Macro. Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey 2009-2010. Dar es Salaam: National Bureau of Statistics and ORC Macro; 2010.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat MoHCDGEC(Mainland), MoH(Zanzibar), NBS, OCGS, ICF. Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey (TDHS-MIS). Dar es salaam: MOHCDGEC, MoH, NBS, OCGS, ICF; 2016. MoHCDGEC(Mainland), MoH(Zanzibar), NBS, OCGS, ICF. Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey (TDHS-MIS). Dar es salaam: MOHCDGEC, MoH, NBS, OCGS, ICF; 2016.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat NBS, ORC-Macro. Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey 2004–2005. Dar es Salaam: National Bureau of Statistics(Tanzania) and ORC Macro; 2005. NBS, ORC-Macro. Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey 2004–2005. Dar es Salaam: National Bureau of Statistics(Tanzania) and ORC Macro; 2005.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhutta ZA, Chopra M, Axelson H, Berman P, Boerma T, Bryce J, Bustreo F, Cavagnero E, Cometto G, Daelmans B, et al. Countdown to 2015 decade report (2000-10): taking stock of maternal, newborn, and child survival. Lancet. 2010;375(9730):2032–44.CrossRefPubMed Bhutta ZA, Chopra M, Axelson H, Berman P, Boerma T, Bryce J, Bustreo F, Cavagnero E, Cometto G, Daelmans B, et al. Countdown to 2015 decade report (2000-10): taking stock of maternal, newborn, and child survival. Lancet. 2010;375(9730):2032–44.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Feijen-de Jong EI, Jansen DE, Baarveld F, van der Schans CP, Schellevis FG, Reijneveld SA. Determinants of late and/or inadequate use of prenatal healthcare in high-income countries: a systematic review. Eur J Pub Health. 2012;22(6):904–13.CrossRef Feijen-de Jong EI, Jansen DE, Baarveld F, van der Schans CP, Schellevis FG, Reijneveld SA. Determinants of late and/or inadequate use of prenatal healthcare in high-income countries: a systematic review. Eur J Pub Health. 2012;22(6):904–13.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhutta ZA, Ahmed T, Black RE, Cousens S, Dewey K, Giugliani E, Haider BA, Kirkwood B, Morris SS, Sachdev HP, et al. What works? Interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survival. Lancet. 2008;371(9610):417–40.CrossRefPubMed Bhutta ZA, Ahmed T, Black RE, Cousens S, Dewey K, Giugliani E, Haider BA, Kirkwood B, Morris SS, Sachdev HP, et al. What works? Interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survival. Lancet. 2008;371(9610):417–40.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lassi ZS, Mansoor T, Salam RA, Das JK, Bhutta ZA. Essential pre-pregnancy and pregnancy interventions for improved maternal, newborn and child health. Reprod Health. 2014;11(Suppl 1):S2.CrossRef Lassi ZS, Mansoor T, Salam RA, Das JK, Bhutta ZA. Essential pre-pregnancy and pregnancy interventions for improved maternal, newborn and child health. Reprod Health. 2014;11(Suppl 1):S2.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yakoob MY, Ali MA, Ali MU, Imdad A, Lawn JE, Van Den Broek N, Bhutta ZA. The effect of providing skilled birth attendance and emergency obstetric care in preventing stillbirths. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(Suppl 3):S7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yakoob MY, Ali MA, Ali MU, Imdad A, Lawn JE, Van Den Broek N, Bhutta ZA. The effect of providing skilled birth attendance and emergency obstetric care in preventing stillbirths. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(Suppl 3):S7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lassi ZS, Haider BA, Bhutta ZA. Community-based intervention packages for reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality and improving neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;11:CD007754. Lassi ZS, Haider BA, Bhutta ZA. Community-based intervention packages for reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality and improving neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;11:CD007754.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Barros AJ, Ronsmans C, Axelson H, Loaiza E, Bertoldi AD, França GV, Bryce J, Boerma JT, Victora CG. Equity in maternal, newborn, and child health interventions in countdown to 2015: a retrospective review of survey data from 54 countries. Lancet. 2012;379(9822):1225–33.CrossRefPubMed Barros AJ, Ronsmans C, Axelson H, Loaiza E, Bertoldi AD, França GV, Bryce J, Boerma JT, Victora CG. Equity in maternal, newborn, and child health interventions in countdown to 2015: a retrospective review of survey data from 54 countries. Lancet. 2012;379(9822):1225–33.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta S, Yamada G, Mpembeni R, Frumence G, Callaghan-Koru JA, Stevenson R, Brandes N, Baqui AH. Factors associated with four or more antenatal care visits and its decline among pregnant women in Tanzania between 1999 and 2010. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e101893.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gupta S, Yamada G, Mpembeni R, Frumence G, Callaghan-Koru JA, Stevenson R, Brandes N, Baqui AH. Factors associated with four or more antenatal care visits and its decline among pregnant women in Tanzania between 1999 and 2010. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e101893.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mpembeni RN, Killewo JZ, Leshabari MT, Massawe SN, Jahn A, Mushi D, Mwakipa H. Use pattern of maternal health services and determinants of skilled care during delivery in southern Tanzania: implications for achievement of MDG-5 targets. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007;7:29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mpembeni RN, Killewo JZ, Leshabari MT, Massawe SN, Jahn A, Mushi D, Mwakipa H. Use pattern of maternal health services and determinants of skilled care during delivery in southern Tanzania: implications for achievement of MDG-5 targets. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007;7:29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng'anjo Phiri S, Kiserud T, Kvåle G, Byskov J, Evjen-Olsen B, Michelo C, Echoka E, Fylkesnes K. Factors associated with health facility childbirth in districts of Kenya, Tanzania and Zambia: a population based survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:219.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ng'anjo Phiri S, Kiserud T, Kvåle G, Byskov J, Evjen-Olsen B, Michelo C, Echoka E, Fylkesnes K. Factors associated with health facility childbirth in districts of Kenya, Tanzania and Zambia: a population based survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:219.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Shija A, Msovela J, Mboera L. Maternal health in fifty years of Tanzania independence: challenges and opportunities of reducing maternal mortality. Tanzania J Health Res. 2011:13. Shija A, Msovela J, Mboera L. Maternal health in fifty years of Tanzania independence: challenges and opportunities of reducing maternal mortality. Tanzania J Health Res. 2011:13.
17.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat MOHSW. National Health Policy. Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Health and Social Welfare; 2003. MOHSW. National Health Policy. Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Health and Social Welfare; 2003.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kruk ME, Mbaruku G, Rockers PC, Galea S. User fee exemptions are not enough: out-of-pocket payments for 'free' delivery services in rural Tanzania. Tropical Med Int Health. 2008;13(12):1442–51.CrossRef Kruk ME, Mbaruku G, Rockers PC, Galea S. User fee exemptions are not enough: out-of-pocket payments for 'free' delivery services in rural Tanzania. Tropical Med Int Health. 2008;13(12):1442–51.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lagarde M, Palmer N. The impact of user fees on access to health services in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;4:CD009094. Lagarde M, Palmer N. The impact of user fees on access to health services in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;4:CD009094.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lagarde M, Palmer N. The impact of user fees on health service utilization in low- and middle-income countries: how strong is the evidence? Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(11):839–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lagarde M, Palmer N. The impact of user fees on health service utilization in low- and middle-income countries: how strong is the evidence? Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(11):839–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Chomi EN, Mujinja PG, Enemark U, Hansen K, Kiwara AD. Risk distribution across multiple health insurance funds in rural Tanzania. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;18:350.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chomi EN, Mujinja PG, Enemark U, Hansen K, Kiwara AD. Risk distribution across multiple health insurance funds in rural Tanzania. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;18:350.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ayoola AB, Nettleman MD, Stommel M, Canady RB. Time of pregnancy recognition and prenatal care use: a population-based study in the United States. Birth. 2010;37(1):37–43.CrossRefPubMed Ayoola AB, Nettleman MD, Stommel M, Canady RB. Time of pregnancy recognition and prenatal care use: a population-based study in the United States. Birth. 2010;37(1):37–43.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Marín HA, Ramírez R, Wise PH, Peña M, Sánchez Y, Torres R. The effect of Medicaid managed care on prenatal care: the case of Puerto Rico. Matern Child Health J. 2009;13(2):187–97.CrossRefPubMed Marín HA, Ramírez R, Wise PH, Peña M, Sánchez Y, Torres R. The effect of Medicaid managed care on prenatal care: the case of Puerto Rico. Matern Child Health J. 2009;13(2):187–97.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Braveman P, Bennett T, Lewis C, Egerter S, Showstack J. Access to prenatal care following major Medicaid eligibility expansions. JAMA. 1993;269(10):1285–9.CrossRefPubMed Braveman P, Bennett T, Lewis C, Egerter S, Showstack J. Access to prenatal care following major Medicaid eligibility expansions. JAMA. 1993;269(10):1285–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Dixon J, Luginaah I, Mkandawire P. The National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana's upper west region: a gendered perspective of insurance acquisition in a resource-poor setting. Soc Sci Med. 2014;122:103–12.CrossRefPubMed Dixon J, Luginaah I, Mkandawire P. The National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana's upper west region: a gendered perspective of insurance acquisition in a resource-poor setting. Soc Sci Med. 2014;122:103–12.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Dzakpasu S, Soremekun S, Manu A, Ten Asbroek G, Tawiah C, Hurt L, Fenty J, Owusu-Agyei S, Hill Z, Campbell OM, et al. Impact of free delivery care on health facility delivery and insurance coverage in Ghana's Brong Ahafo region. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49430.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dzakpasu S, Soremekun S, Manu A, Ten Asbroek G, Tawiah C, Hurt L, Fenty J, Owusu-Agyei S, Hill Z, Campbell OM, et al. Impact of free delivery care on health facility delivery and insurance coverage in Ghana's Brong Ahafo region. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49430.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh PK, Rai RK, Alagarajan M, Singh L. Determinants of maternity care services utilization among married adolescents in rural India. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31666.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Singh PK, Rai RK, Alagarajan M, Singh L. Determinants of maternity care services utilization among married adolescents in rural India. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31666.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Osubor KM, Fatusi AO, Chiwuzie JC. Maternal health-seeking behavior and associated factors in a rural Nigerian community. Matern Child Health J. 2006;10(2):159–69.CrossRefPubMed Osubor KM, Fatusi AO, Chiwuzie JC. Maternal health-seeking behavior and associated factors in a rural Nigerian community. Matern Child Health J. 2006;10(2):159–69.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Ochako R, Fotso JC, Ikamari L, Khasakhala A. Utilization of maternal health services among young women in Kenya: insights from the Kenya demographic and health survey, 2003. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11(1) Ochako R, Fotso JC, Ikamari L, Khasakhala A. Utilization of maternal health services among young women in Kenya: insights from the Kenya demographic and health survey, 2003. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11(1)
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Say L, Raine R. A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(10):812–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Say L, Raine R. A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(10):812–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Health insurance is important in improving maternal health service utilization in Tanzania—analysis of the 2011/2012 Tanzania HIV/AIDS and malaria indicator survey
verfasst von
Stephen M. Kibusi
Bruno Fokas Sunguya
Eunice Kimunai
Courtney S. Hines
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2018
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Health Services Research / Ausgabe 1/2018
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2924-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe