Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 4/2017

18.10.2016

Health-related quality of life associated with systemic corticosteroids

verfasst von: Patrick W. Sullivan, Vahram H. Ghushchyan, Gary Globe, Brandon Sucher

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Systemic corticosteroids (SCS) are commonly used but are associated with adverse effects. Given their prevalent use, the potential impact of SCS use on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is important to characterize.

Objective

To assess the HRQoL of patients taking SCS.

Methods

The 2000–2003 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey was used to examine EQ-5D and SF-6D scores associated with SCS use in adults. The study sample was restricted to those with a condition for which SCS are prescribed. SCS use was categorized into three levels: none; 1–3; and ≥4 prescriptions per year. HRQoL scores were regressed on SCS use (1–3 or ≥4 annual prescriptions) controlling for age, gender, race, ethnicity, education, income category, geographic region, number of ER visits, number of outpatient visits, total number of chronic conditions (for which SCS are not used) and conditions for which SCS are clinically indicated.

Results

There were 54,856 individuals with no SCS exposure, 2245 with 1–3 and 624 with ≥4 annual SCS prescriptions. In adjusted analyses, use of ≥4 annual SCS prescriptions appeared to be associated with significantly lower EQ-5D (US), EQ-5D (UK), SF-6D and EQ-5D VAS scores compared to no exposure: −0.032, −0.047, −0.036, and −7.58.

Conclusion

While SCS are efficacious and widely used for numerous conditions, results suggest that their use may be associated with a substantial deleterious impact on HRQoL. This potential negative effect should be considered in balance with the cost and efficacy of comparable treatments.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) NH, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. Bethesda, MD2012. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) NH, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. Bethesda, MD2012.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fardet, L., Kassar, A., Cabane, J., & Flahault, A. (2007). Corticosteroid-induced adverse events in adults: Frequency, screening and prevention. Drug Safety, 30(10), 861–881.CrossRefPubMed Fardet, L., Kassar, A., Cabane, J., & Flahault, A. (2007). Corticosteroid-induced adverse events in adults: Frequency, screening and prevention. Drug Safety, 30(10), 861–881.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss, A., Elixhauser, A., Bae, J., & Encinosa, W. (2013). Origin of adverse drug events in US Hospitals, 2011. Statistical Brief #158. Rockville, MD: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Weiss, A., Elixhauser, A., Bae, J., & Encinosa, W. (2013). Origin of adverse drug events in US Hospitals, 2011. Statistical Brief #158. Rockville, MD: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP).
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarnes, E., Crofford, L., Watson, M., Dennis, G., Kan, H., & Bass, D. (2011). Incidence and US costs of corticosteroid-associated adverse events: A systematic literature review. Clinical Therapeutics, 33(10), 1413–1432.CrossRefPubMed Sarnes, E., Crofford, L., Watson, M., Dennis, G., Kan, H., & Bass, D. (2011). Incidence and US costs of corticosteroid-associated adverse events: A systematic literature review. Clinical Therapeutics, 33(10), 1413–1432.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah, M., Chaudhari, S., McLaughlin, T. P., et al. (2013). Cumulative burden of oral corticosteroid adverse effects and the economic implications of corticosteroid use in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clinical Therapeutics, 35(4), 486–497.CrossRefPubMed Shah, M., Chaudhari, S., McLaughlin, T. P., et al. (2013). Cumulative burden of oral corticosteroid adverse effects and the economic implications of corticosteroid use in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clinical Therapeutics, 35(4), 486–497.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sullivan, P. W., & Ghushchyan, V. (2006). Preference-based EQ-5D index scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Medical Decision Making, 26(4), 410–420.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sullivan, P. W., & Ghushchyan, V. (2006). Preference-based EQ-5D index scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Medical Decision Making, 26(4), 410–420.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Brooks, R. G., Jendteg, S., Lindgren, B., Persson, U., & Bjork, S. (1991). EuroQol: Health-related quality of life measurement. Results of the Swedish questionnaire exercise. Health Policy, 18(1), 37–48.CrossRefPubMed Brooks, R. G., Jendteg, S., Lindgren, B., Persson, U., & Bjork, S. (1991). EuroQol: Health-related quality of life measurement. Results of the Swedish questionnaire exercise. Health Policy, 18(1), 37–48.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaw, J. W., Johnson, J. A., & Coons, S. J. (2005). US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: Development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Medical Care, 43(3), 203–220.CrossRefPubMed Shaw, J. W., Johnson, J. A., & Coons, S. J. (2005). US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: Development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Medical Care, 43(3), 203–220.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095–1108.CrossRefPubMed Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095–1108.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Brazier, J. E., & Roberts, J. (2004). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Medical Care, 42(9), 851–859.CrossRefPubMed Brazier, J. E., & Roberts, J. (2004). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Medical Care, 42(9), 851–859.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt, G. H., Osoba, D., Wu, A. W., Wyrwich, K. W., & Norman, G. R. (2002). Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77(4), 371–383.CrossRefPubMed Guyatt, G. H., Osoba, D., Wu, A. W., Wyrwich, K. W., & Norman, G. R. (2002). Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 77(4), 371–383.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Troosters, T. (2011). How important is a minimal difference? European Respiratory Journal, 37(4), 755–756.CrossRefPubMed Troosters, T. (2011). How important is a minimal difference? European Respiratory Journal, 37(4), 755–756.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Walters, S. J., & Brazier, J. E. (2005). Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Quality of Life Research, 14(6), 1523–1532.CrossRefPubMed Walters, S. J., & Brazier, J. E. (2005). Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Quality of Life Research, 14(6), 1523–1532.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Walters, S. J., & Brazier, J. E. (2003). What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1(1), 4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Walters, S. J., & Brazier, J. E. (2003). What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1(1), 4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sullivan, P. W., Lawrence, W. F., & Ghushchyan, V. (2005). A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Medical Care, 43(7), 736–749.CrossRefPubMed Sullivan, P. W., Lawrence, W. F., & Ghushchyan, V. (2005). A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Medical Care, 43(7), 736–749.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Grootendorst, P., Feeny, D., & Furlong, W. (2000). Health Utilities Index Mark 3: Evidence of construct validity for stroke and arthritis in a population health survey. Medical Care, 38(3), 290–299.CrossRefPubMed Grootendorst, P., Feeny, D., & Furlong, W. (2000). Health Utilities Index Mark 3: Evidence of construct validity for stroke and arthritis in a population health survey. Medical Care, 38(3), 290–299.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sullivan, P. W., Lawrence, W. F., Jr., & Ghushchyan, V. (2005). A, national catalogue of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the US. Medical Care, 43(7), 736–749.CrossRefPubMed Sullivan, P. W., Lawrence, W. F., Jr., & Ghushchyan, V. (2005). A, national catalogue of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the US. Medical Care, 43(7), 736–749.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sullivan, P. W., & Ghushchyan, V. (2006). Mapping the EQ-5D index from the SF-12: US general population preferences in a nationally representative sample. Medical Decision Making, 26(4), 401–409.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sullivan, P. W., & Ghushchyan, V. (2006). Mapping the EQ-5D index from the SF-12: US general population preferences in a nationally representative sample. Medical Decision Making, 26(4), 401–409.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Powell, J. (1984). Least absolute deviations estimation for the censored regression model. Journal of Econometrics, 25, 303–325.CrossRef Powell, J. (1984). Least absolute deviations estimation for the censored regression model. Journal of Econometrics, 25, 303–325.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Maddala, G. S. (1999). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Maddala, G. S. (1999). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Green, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Green, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Gray, A. M., Rivero-Arias, O., & Clarke, P. M. (2006). Estimating the association between SF-12 responses and EQ-5D utility values by response mapping. Medical Decision Making, 26(1), 18–29.CrossRefPubMed Gray, A. M., Rivero-Arias, O., & Clarke, P. M. (2006). Estimating the association between SF-12 responses and EQ-5D utility values by response mapping. Medical Decision Making, 26(1), 18–29.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hyland, M. E., Whalley, B., Jones, R. C., & Masoli, M. (2015). A qualitative study of the impact of severe asthma and its treatment showing that treatment burden is neglected in existing asthma assessment scales. Quality of Life Research, 24(3), 631–639.CrossRefPubMed Hyland, M. E., Whalley, B., Jones, R. C., & Masoli, M. (2015). A qualitative study of the impact of severe asthma and its treatment showing that treatment burden is neglected in existing asthma assessment scales. Quality of Life Research, 24(3), 631–639.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Fardet, L., Flahault, A., Kettaneh, A., et al. (2007). Corticosteroid-induced clinical adverse events: Frequency, risk factors and patient’s opinion. British Journal of Dermatology, 157(1), 142–148.CrossRefPubMed Fardet, L., Flahault, A., Kettaneh, A., et al. (2007). Corticosteroid-induced clinical adverse events: Frequency, risk factors and patient’s opinion. British Journal of Dermatology, 157(1), 142–148.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, E. S., & Chandler, P. A. (2001). Mood and cognitive changes during systemic corticosteroid therapy. Prim Care Companion Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 3(1), 17–21.CrossRef Brown, E. S., & Chandler, P. A. (2001). Mood and cognitive changes during systemic corticosteroid therapy. Prim Care Companion Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 3(1), 17–21.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Basch, E., Reeve, B. B., Mitchell, S. A., et al. (2014). Development of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). Journal of the National Cancer Institute. doi:10.1093/jnci/dju244. Basch, E., Reeve, B. B., Mitchell, S. A., et al. (2014). Development of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). Journal of the National Cancer Institute. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​dju244.
Metadaten
Titel
Health-related quality of life associated with systemic corticosteroids
verfasst von
Patrick W. Sullivan
Vahram H. Ghushchyan
Gary Globe
Brandon Sucher
Publikationsdatum
18.10.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1435-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Quality of Life Research 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe