Background
Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is defined as excessive menstrual blood loss which interferes with a woman’s physical, social, emotional, and/or material quality of life. It can occur alone or in combination with other symptoms [
1]. The objective definition of a total menstrual blood loss (MBL) exceeding 80 mL per menstruation is now only used in studies involving physiological mechanisms because the amount of blood loss does not always correlate with women’s perception of their MBL or the impact of bleeding on their lives [
2,
3].
About 1 in 20 women aged 30–49 years consult their general practitioner each year for HMB, which is the second highest-ranked reason for a hospital referral and accounts for 12% of all gynecologic referrals [
4]. Overall, 8–38.9% of women experience HMB based on subjective assessments [
5‐
7], and this condition has been linked to a lower quality of life and increased health care expenses [
2,
8]. There are a number of factors that are known to be associated with HMB [
6]; however, many of these factors are not fully understood.
Among Chinese population, research on HMB has been very limited. Up to now, there is only one study that has examined self-reported HMB, giving a prevalence of 36% in 2012 [
9], no published study has addressed risk factors for HMB or the disturbances of women’s daily lives caused by the bleeding. In a community-based sample of Chinese women aged 18 to 50 years old living in Beijing, China, we aimed to: 1) investigate the prevalence of self-reported HMB and associated risk factors; and 2) evaluate the impact of menstrual bleeding on their daily lives in relation to HMB.
Discussion
The present study is the first one that entailed a community-based survey to address the effect of HMB on a wider population of Chinese women and associated risk factors. The results of our study showed that the prevalence of experienced HMB among Chinese women aged 18–50 years living in Beijing was 18.2%, which was consistent with the self-reported prevalence of 8–27% in other developing countries [
5], but notably lower than the prevalence of 36% reported by Zhao et al. based on subjective assessments from 1021 Chinese women of reproductive age [
9]. However, the study by Zhao et al. was conducted in a selected group of patients who attended medical centers for insertion of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and thus might lead to an overestimate of the HMB rate [
9].
While HMB may occur in the presence of uterine pathology and other disorders, a broader view of this condition has shown that its potential risk factors also include age, lifestyle factors, and reproductive history [
15]. Therefore, we performed a detailed evaluation of these factors for self-reported HMB, and found that the presence of uterine fibroids, increased alcohol consumption, younger age, and multiple abortions (≥3) were predictors of heavy bleeding.
Uterine fibroids are age-related and one of the most common gynecologic abnormalities. The association between the site, size, and number of fibroids and the amount of MBL has been well-recognized [
16]. In the present study, the self-reported rate of uterine fibroids was 11.9% (
n = 51/429) in HMB group, which is in accordance with previous studies [
17,
18]. Accordingly, after adjusting for age and other predictors in the model, our findings also showed that the presence of uterine fibroids doubled the risk of an individual woman experiencing HMB.
In our study, the prevalence of heavy bleeding increased monotonically with a higher drinking level. A similar result was obtained from the Danish web-based pregnancy planning study, which linked high alcohol consumption (≥14 drinks per week) with a 48% increase in risk of heavy periods [
19]. No association was found in another study conducted in Brazil [
7]; however, our results are difficult to compare with the Brazilian study because the latter only assessed dichotomous levels of alcohol consumption (any consumption versus none). Recent evidence indicates that alcohol intake may elevate levels of testosterone, estradiol, and luteinizing hormone in premenopausal women [
20,
21]. In turn, such hormonal imbalance may increase menstrual bleeding, which suggests biological plausibility for the association between alcohol drinking and heavy bleeding.
Previous research has suggested that younger women (< 26 years old) are significantly more likely than older women (> 37 years old) to regard moderate blood loss as very heavy [
2]. Based on our findings, women aged ≤24 and 25–29 years had increased odds for reporting heavy periods compared with those aged 45–50 years. This finding is probably because older women are getting more accustomed to coping with menstrual bleeding and its consequences; the bleeding thus might have a greater negative impact on younger women, which makes the blood loss feel heavier. An inverse relationship between age and HMB was also observed in a recent Danish study of women aged 18–40 years [
19].
Our results showed that having multiple abortions (≥3) was associated with an increased risk of HMB, while no incremental risk was found among women with fewer numbers of abortions. To the best of our knowledge, only a few studies have investigated whether women’s reproductive histories affected their perception of menstrual bleeding. For example, Santos et al. found no difference in the prevalence of self-reported HMB between women with and without a history of abortion [
7]. However, women in that study were crudely classified into two categories (≥1 abortions versus none), making it difficult to detect a correlation between number of abortions and HMB. When women reporting more than one abortion in this study were combined into one group, there is no statistical difference in HMB prevalence between women with abortion history and those who have never had an abortion (
P = 0.087).
HMB and multiple abortions (≥3) may have shared common etiologies, such as underlying bleeding disorders [
22], which can partly explain the observed correlation between these two conditions. Estimates suggested that 20–29% of women with HMB had an underlying bleeding disorder [
22,
23]; however, recognition is difficult as women often ignore their symptoms until serious bleeding events occur. Correspondingly, only one woman who reported HMB and had a clinically diagnosed coagulation disorder was identified in our survey. As our study did not distinguish miscarriages from induced abortions, ongoing studies with the screening of bleeding disorders and comprehensive reproductive histories are still needed to better understand and confirm this finding.
Obesity is an independent risk factor for several hormonal abnormalities, such as increased concentrations of testosterone and insulin, and reduced concentrations of the sex hormone-binding globulin [
24], which inevitably influences the menstrual cycle. Along with the well-documented increased risk of menstrual irregularity, a limited number of studies reported a higher prevalence of heavy periods among obese women [
7,
19,
25]. We also observed a slightly higher prevalence of HMB among obese women (18.2%) compared with normal (18.1%) or overweight women (16.5%); however, these results failed to reach statistical significance (
P = 0.735), most likely due to a small sample size of the obese group (
n = 99 [4.2%]).
To our knowledge, this study is also the first one to examine the perceived impact of HMB on women’s daily lives in a Chinese population. We noted that heavy bleeding was associated with more practical discomforts and limited family, professional, and social activities, which are supported by findings in other study population [
2,
26]. There is evidence that the main impacts of HMB were physical and social issues, which also served as the main reasons why women consulted for their heavy periods [
15]. However, based on our findings, a considerable high proportion of the women surveyed treated their HMB with indifference and appeared reluctant to seek gynecological consultation even when faced with social concerns arising from the bleeding. One reason that keeps women from seeking assistance is that they view heavy periods as good fertility or feminine [
2], often accompanied by a belief that the menstrual bleeding, even if heavy, is a salubrious cleansing of their bodies [
6,
27]. An alternative explanation is the traditional “culture of silence surrounding menstruation”, which restrains women from knowing how their own experiences compare with those of others [
6]. Previous qualitative studies have shown that more information was required for women in terms of accessing health care services [
15], indicating an opportunity for health education programs on menstruation.
Noticeably, the prevalence of self-reported iron-deficiency anemia in this sample is only 6.4%, which is markedly lower than the national rate of 10.9% amongst Chinese adult women based on laboratory results [
28,
29]. Even among those who reported HMB, only 8.9% were self-reported as anemic. These data suggest that a significant percentage of women may have anemia that remains undiagnosed and untreated. Anemia resulting from iron deficiency adversely affects cognitive and motor development, causes fatigue and low productivity, and if left untreated, can produce severe symptoms and result in major medical complications [
29]. Also, studies have shown that the correction of iron deficiency and anemia among women experiencing HMB significantly improves their health-related quality of life [
30]. Therefore, women should be educated on the consequences of HMB and counseled to seek care when they perceive HMB. More importantly, clinician should be aware that the evaluation for iron deficiency and anemia is essentially important for women who present with HMB.
Strengths of this study include its community-based design, inclusion of a wide range of potential risk factors, and updated definition of HMB. This study also provided detailed information on the impact of heavy periods on daily life, which is necessary to piece together a complete picture of the burden of this condition in Chinese women. Our study also has limitations. First of all, because of cultural problems, women might feel uncomfortable discussing subject with their menstruation; however, they are more likely to be willing to be approached, with their schools, trade union committees or village committees engaging in organizing the survey, and this is the primary why a cluster sampling method with stratification by occupation was used in the present study. Although that the unemployed ones were excluded seems to be a limitation, unemployed females only accounted for an insignificant minority (1.2%) of the total women population aged 18–50 years living in Beijing in 2013 [
31]. Second, the present data were all based on self-reports and might thus result in misclassification; however, it is virtually impossible to fully circumvent this limitation in survey studies due to the secretive nature of menstruation. Our assessment regarding HMB is reliable because it reflects women’s self-experience and shows a good correlation with both clinically relevant conditions like anemia and impacts on quality of life in previous studies [
2,
32]. Finally, the cross-sectional design is a poor way to ascertain risk factors; further longitudinal studies are necessary to better understand the roles of these possible risk factors in causality and the effect of modifying them.