Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2018 | Letter | Ausgabe 1/2018 Open Access

Critical Care 1/2018

Hemodynamic management of critically ill burn patients: an international survey

Zeitschrift:
Critical Care > Ausgabe 1/2018
Autoren:
Sabri Soussi, Mette M. Berger, Kirsten Colpaert, Martin W. Dünser, Anne Berit Guttormsen, Nicole P. Juffermans, Paul Knape, Guniz Koksal, Athina Lavrentieva, Thomas Leclerc, José A. Lorente, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Philipp Metnitz, Olivier Pantet, Paolo Pelosi, Anne-Françoise Rousseau, Folke Sjöberg, Matthieu Legrand, for the ESICM Burn ICU working group
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13054-018-2129-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Abbreviations
ESICM
European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
ICU
Intensive care unit
TBSA
Total body surface burn area
Fluid resuscitation is a cornerstone of the initial management of severely burned patients with the dual purpose of avoiding both under- and over-resuscitation [ 13]. There is a lack of consensus regarding the ideal amount and type of fluid and vasopressor use during initial resuscitation in this population [ 4, 5].
This international survey focuses on the current practices regarding hemodynamic management of severely burned adult patients (total body surface burn area (TBSA) > 20%, with mechanical ventilation) in the early phase after injury.
The study was designed as an electronic survey addressed to intensive care unit (ICU) physicians. Experts of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) Burn ICU working group were invited to review the original survey. The final questionnaire (32 questions) is provided in Additional file  1. A link to an electronic questionnaire was sent to all ESICM members (with reminding emails on a bimonthly frequency) and was posted on the ESICM website. The link was active between 31 August and 18 October 2017.
There were 173 total respondents to the questionnaire. The respondents were from 58 different countries (72% were high-income countries) with most in Europe (62%). The background of the respondents was mainly intensive care (61%) and anesthesiology (31%). Most of the respondents (61%) declared working in a mixed ICU, and 60% of the responders worked in centers with less than 50 adult burn patients admitted annually. Additional file  2 summarizes the difference in participant responses between burn centers and nonspecialized centers. In 76% of the cases, a local protocol for fluid resuscitation was used. The Parkland formula (4 ml/kg/%TBSA) is used to start volume therapy on admission by 54% of the responders. In the first 48 h, the five most frequently used parameters to guide volume therapy are represented in Fig. 1a. Fifty five % of the respondents declared monitoring cardiac output and 65% among them use echocardiography. Techniques used to monitor cardiac output continuously are presented in Fig.  1b. The most commonly used crystalloid and colloid were respectively Ringer Lactate and albumin 20%. Triggers to initiate colloid infusion are presented in Fig.  1c. While considering other strategies to reduce fluid requirements, 80% of responders consider early norepinephrine administration (Fig.  1d).
The results of this international survey highlight the use of albumin (> 60%) and vasopressors (80%) during the early resuscitation phase. Heterogeneous results were reported regarding monitoring strategies, early vasopressors, and albumin use between burn centers and nonspecialized centers. Large clinical trials should be initiated in the near future to determine optimal strategies to treat burn-related shock.

Acknowledgements

This survey was endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. We thank the ESICM Burn ICU working group experts for their involvement and help in conducting this survey.

Availability of data and materials

Figure  1 is original and has never been published.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Zusatzmaterial
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Critical Care 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update AINS und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise