Ausgabe 5/2021
Inhalt (53 Artikel)
Trends in the use of patient-reported outcome measures for inguinal hernia repair: a quantitative systematic review
A. Gram-Hanssen, M. L. Jessen, C. Christophersen, D. Zetner, J. Rosenberg
Watchful waiting vs repair for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernia in men: a systematic review
Hugin Reistrup, Siv Fonnes, Jacob Rosenberg
Cost analysis of inguinal hernia repair: the influence of clinical and hernia-specific factors
M. Aydin, P. Fikatas, C. Denecke, J. Pratschke, J. Raakow
Intestinal erosions following inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review
Nikolaos Koliakos, Dimitrios Papaconstantinou, Constantinos Nastos, George Kirkilesis, Georgia Bompetsi, Anargyros Bakopoulos, Vasileia Ntomi, Emmanouil Pikoulis
Total extraperitoneal (TEP) versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty: systematic review and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
Alberto Aiolfi, Marta Cavalli, Simona Del Ferraro, Livia Manfredini, Francesca Lombardo, Gianluca Bonitta, Piero Giovanni Bruni, Valerio Panizzo, Giampiero Campanelli, Davide Bona
Hemipelvectomy hernia: case series and literature review
W. C. Hope, L. C. Ferro, J. A. Snyder, L. D. Procter, J. L. Salluzzo
Differences in the outcomes of scrotal vs. lateral vs. medial inguinal hernias: a multivariable analysis of registry data
F. Köckerling, E. Hantel, D. Adolf, A. Kuthe, R. Lorenz, H. Niebuhr, B. Stechemesser, F. Marusch
Mesh repair for lateral inguinal hernias: a non-evidence-based practice
D. E. Tripoloni, M. I. Canaro García, F. Cassani, M. Zanni, A. Sosa Mercado
Lower reoperation rates after open and laparoscopic groin hernia repair when performed by high-volume surgeons: a nationwide register-based study
C. Christophersen, J. J. Baker, S. Fonnes, K. Andresen, J. Rosenberg
Shouldice standard 2020: review of the current literature and results of an international consensus meeting
R. Lorenz, G. Arlt, J. Conze, R. Fortelny, J. Gorjanc, A. Koch, J. Morrison, V. Oprea, G. Campanelli
Should surgeons repair symptomatic, clinically occult, radiologically evident, inguinal hernias? A case–control study of patient-reported outcomes
M. Aly, B. M. Farquharson, O. Clarke, G. K. Atkin
Results of Shouldice hernia repair after 18 years of follow-up in all the patients
A. Martín Duce, O. Lozano, M. Galván, A. Muriel, S. Villeta, J. Gómez
A multi-center study on recurrent inguinal hernias: assessment of surgeons’ compliance to guideline-based repair and evaluation of short-term outcomes
S. S. N. Goh, V. G. Shelat, B. G. W. Lee, R. Y. Chen, S. L. Oh, C. L. K. Chia
Crossing mesh tails in the Lichtenstein repair method for medial (direct) inguinal hernia: recurrence and chronic pain rates after five years
A. Sahin, E. Ölcucuoglu, H. Kulacoglu
Necessary duration of follow-up to assess complications of mesh in hernia surgery: a time-lapse study based on 460 explants
K. Petersen, J. Morrison, V. Oprea, D. Grischkan, A. Koch, R. Lorenz, R. Bendavid, V. Iakovlev
Algorithm for management of an incarcerated inguinal hernia in the emergency settings with manual reduction. Taxis, the technique and its safety
M. Pawlak, B. East, A. C. de Beaux
Surgical and non-surgical treatment of inguinal hernia during non-elective admissions in the Nationwide Readmissions Database
H. Drolshagen, A. Bhavaraju, K. J. Kalkwarf, S. A. Karim, R. Reif, K. W. Sexton, H. K. Jensen
Transrectus sheath pre-peritoneal (TREPP) procedure versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) procedure and Lichtenstein technique: a propensity-score-matched analysis in Dutch high-volume regional hospitals
T. L. R. Zwols, N. Slagter, N. J. G. M. Veeger, M. J. W. Möllers, D. A. Hess, E. Jutte, H. T. Brandsma, P. H. J. M. Veldman, G. G. Koning, H. H. Eker, J. P. E. N. Pierie
Effect of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on acid–base balance during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled study
Y. Liu, M. Wang, Y. Zhu, J. Chen
Does preoperative enhanced CT predict requirement of intestinal resection in the patients with incarcerated myopectineal hernias containing small bowel?
A. Kohga, A. Kawabe, K. Yajima, T. Okumura, K. Yamashita, J. Isogaki, K. Suzuki, K. Muramatsu, A. Komiyama
Outcomes of obese compared to non-obese veterans undergoing open inguinal hernia repair: a case–control study
S. Huerta, N. Tran, B. Yi, T. Pham
Open inguinal hernia repair outcomes in liver transplant recipients versus patients with cirrhosis
N. Siegel, S. DiBrito, T. Ishaque, A. B. Kernodle, A. Cameron, D. Segev, G. Adrales, J. Garonzik-Wang
Laparoscopic treatment (reTAPP) for recurrence after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
Joaquin Fernandez-Alberti, Facundo Iriarte, Raul Eduardo Croceri, Pablo Medina, Eduardo Agustin Porto, Daniel Enrique Pirchi
Safety and efficacy in inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective study comparing TREPP, TEP and Lichtenstein (SETTLE)
J. L. Faessen, J. H. M. B. Stoot, R. van Vugt
Clinical benefits of routine examination and synchronous repair of occult inguinal hernia during laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: a single-center experience
H.-W. Kou, C.-N. Yeh, C.-Y. Tsai, J.-T. Hsu, S.-Y. Wang, C.-W. Lee, M.-C. Yu, T.-L. Hwang
Quality and reliability evaluation of current Internet information regarding mesh use in inguinal hernia surgery using HONcode and the DISCERN instrument
Anna C. Fullard, Sean M. Johnston, Dermot J. Hehir
Intraoperative handling of spermatic cord lipomas during inguinal hernia repair: a nationwide survey
E. Piga, S. Öberg, K. Andresen, J. Rosenberg
Non reducible inguinal hernias in Malawi: an occupational hazard
B. M. Williams, L. N. Purcell, C. Varela, J. Gallaher, A. Charles
Inguinal hernia repair in Spain. A population-based study of 263,283 patients: factors associated with the choice of laparoscopic approach
S. Guillaumes, C. Hoyuela, N. J. Hidalgo, M. Juvany, I. Bachero, J. Ardid, A. Martrat, M. Trias
The use of biosynthetic mesh in giant hiatal hernia repair: is there a rationale? A 3-year single-center experience
E. Tartaglia, D. Cuccurullo, L. Guerriero, S. Reggio, C. Sagnelli, P. Mugione, F. Corcione
Is the nerve in the inguinal canal really protected by an investing fascia? Is it a real entity?
M. Narita, K. Moriyoshi
Local, regional, and general anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair: the importance of the study, the patient population, and surgeon’s experience
Bing Yi, Nguyen Tran, Sergio Huerta
Improving surgical education in East Africa with a standardized hernia training program
J. A. Akoh
Hernia research in developing countries: are we looking for needles in haystacks? Surgeons in action
E. Perea del Pozo, M. Bustos Jimenez, T. Butrón Vila, A. Senent Boza, A. Kingsnorth
Shouldice Hospital comments on “Shouldice standard 2020: review of current literature and results of an international consensus meeting”
P. Szasz, F. Spencer Netto
The value and role of mosquito meshes in low resource and poor income settings
B. M. Stephenson, A. N. Kingsnorth
The value and role of mosquito meshes in low resource and poor income settings: author’s reply
R. Wiessner, M. Philipp, R. Lorenz
The use of biosynthetic mesh in giant hiatal hernia repair: is there a rationale? A 3‐year single‐center experience—author’s reply
E. Tartaglia, L. Guerriero, D. Cuccurullo
Robotic‐assisted single site (RASS) TAPP: an advantageous choice? Author’s reply
D. Cuccurullo, L. Guerriero, E. Tartaglia
Comment to: intestinal erosions following inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review
L. D’Amore, L. Bambi, P. Negro, F. Gossetti
Comment to: intestinal erosions following inguinal hernia repair—a systematic review. Author’s reply
N. Koliakos, D. Papaconstantinou
Comment on: "Laparoscopic treatment (reTAPP) for recurrence after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair"
Jinfeng Wu, Qiang Hu, Jian Chen
Do TEP and TAPP have similar effect on postoperative pain?
L.-C. Huang, C.-C. Wu, Y.-N. Kang
Do TEP and TAPP have similar effect on postoperative pain? Author’s reply
A. Aiolfi, G. Bonitta
Comment on ‘Do TEP and TAPP have similar effect on postoperative pain? Author’s reply’
L-C Huang, C-C Wu, Y-N Kang
Correction to: Inguinal hernia repair in Spain. A population-based study of 263,283 patients: factors associated with the choice of laparoscopic approach
S. Guillaumes, C. Hoyuela, N. J. Hidalgo, M. Juvany, I. Bachero, J. Ardid, A. Martrat, M. Trias