nach oben

Brain Structure and Function

Erschienen in:

31.01.2022 | Original Article

High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex modulates decision-making and executive control

verfasst von: Giulia Mattavelli, Sara Lo Presti, Diana Tornaghi, Nicola Canessa

Erschienen in: Brain Structure and Function | Ausgabe 5/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Previous neuroimaging evidence highlights the translational implications of targeting the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), i.e. a key node of the networks underlying conflict monitoring and decision-making, in brain stimulation treatments with clinical or rehabilitative purposes. While the optimized modelling of “high-definition” current flows between multiple anode–cathode pairs might, in principle, allow to stimulate an otherwise challenging target, sensitive benchmark metrics of dACC neuromodulation are required to assess the effectiveness of this approach. On this basis, we aimed to assess the modulatory effect of anodal and cathodal high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) of the dACC on different facets of executive control and decision-making in healthy young individuals. A combined modelling/targeting procedure provided the optimal montage for the maximum intensity of dACC stimulation with six small “high-definition” electrodes delivering anodal, cathodal or sham HD-tDCS for 20 min in a within-subject design with three separate sessions. Following stimulation, participants performed Flanker and gambling tasks unveiling individual differences in executive control and both loss- and risk-aversion in decision-making, respectively. Compared to both anodal and sham conditions, cathodal dACC stimulation significantly affected task performance by increasing control over the Flanker conflict effect, and both loss and risk-aversion in decision-making. By confirming the feasibility and effectiveness of dACC stimulation with HD-tDCS, these findings highlight the implications of modelling and targeting procedures for neuromodulation in clinical research, whereby innovative protocols might serve as treatment addressing dysfunctional dACC activity, or combined with cognitive training, to enhance higher-order executive functioning in different neuropsychiatric conditions.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abutalebi J, Della Rosa PA, Green DW, Hernandez M, Scifo P, Keim R, Costa A (2011) Bilingualism tunes the anterior cingulate cortex for conflict monitoring. Cereb Cortex 22(9):2076–2086. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr287CrossRefPubMed

Aizenstein HJ, Butters MA, Wu M, Mazurkewicz LM, Stenger VA, Gianaros PJ, Carter CS (2009) Altered functioning of the executive control circuit in late-life depression: episodic and persistent phenomena. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 17(1):30–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e31817b60afCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Alexander WH, Brown JW (2010a) Competition between learned reward and error outcome predictions in anterior cingulate cortex. Neuroimage 49(4):3210–3218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.065CrossRefPubMed

Alexander WH, Brown JW (2010b) Computational models of performance monitoring and cognitive control. Top Cogn Sci 2(4):658–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01085.xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Alexander WH, Brown JW (2011) Medial prefrontal cortex as an action-outcome predictor. Nat Neurosci 14(10):1338–1344. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2921CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Antal A, Nitsche MA, Kruse W, Kincses TZ, Hoffmann K-P, Paulus W (2004) Direct current stimulation over V5 enhances visuomotor coordination by improving motion perception in humans. J Cogn Neurosci 16(4):521–527. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892904323057263CrossRefPubMed

Batsikadze G, Moliadze V, Paulus W, Kuo MF, Nitsche MA (2013) Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans. J Physiol 591:1987–2000CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bikson M, Rahman A (2013) Origins of specificity during tDCS: anatomical, activity-selective, and input-bias mechanisms. Front Hum Neurosci 7:688CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bush G, Vogt BA, Holmes J, Dale AM, Greve D, Jenike MA, Rosen BR (2002) Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex: a role in reward-based decision making. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(1):523–528. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.012470999CrossRefPubMed

Canessa N, Crespi C, Motterlini M, Baud-Bovy G, Chierchia G, Pantaleo G, Cappa SF (2013) The functional and structural neural basis of individual differences in loss aversion. J Neurosci 33(36):14307–14317. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0497-13.2013CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Canessa N, Crespi C, Baud-Bovy G, Dodich A, Falini A, Antonellis G, Cappa SF (2017) Neural markers of loss aversion in resting-state brain activity. Neuroimage 146:257–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.050CrossRefPubMed

Carter CS, MacDonald AW, Ross LL, Stenger VA (2001) Anterior cingulate cortex activity and impaired self-monitoring of performance in patients with schizophrenia: an event-related fMRI study. Am J Psychiatry 158(9):1423–1428. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.9.1423CrossRefPubMed

Chen X, Voets S, Jenkinson N, Galea JM (2020) Dopamine-dependent loss aversion during effort-based decision-making. J Neurosci 40(3):661–670. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1760-19.2019CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Croxson PL, Walton ME, O’Reilly JX, Behrens TEJ, Rushworth MFS (2009) Effort-based cost-benefit valuation and the human brain. J Neurosci 29(14):4531–4541. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4515-08.2009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cuthbert BN (2015) Research domain criteria: toward future psychiatric nosologies. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 17(1):89–97. https://doi.org/10.31887/dcns.2015.17.1/bcuthbertCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

DaSilva AF, Truong DQ, DosSantos MF, Toback RL, Datta A, Bikson M (2015) State-of-art neuroanatomical target analysis of high-definition and conventional tDCS montages used for migraine and pain control. Front Neuroanat 9:89. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2015.00089CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Datta A, Elwassif M, Battaglia F, Bikson M (2008) Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis. J Neural Eng 5(2):163–174. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/5/2/007CrossRefPubMed

De Martino B, Kumaran D, Seymour B, Dolan RJ (2006) Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science (new York, NY) 313(5787):684–687. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128356CrossRef

Dmochowski JP, Datta A, Bikson M, Su Y, Parra LC (2011) Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target. J Neural Eng. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046011CrossRefPubMed

Downar J, Blumberger DM, Daskalakis ZJ (2016) The neural crossroads of psychiatric illness: an emerging target for brain stimulation. Trends Cogn Sci 20(2):107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.007CrossRefPubMed

Dunlop KA, Woodside B, Downar J (2016) Targeting neural endophenotypes of eating disorders with non-invasive brain stimulation. Front Neurosci 10:30. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00030CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Edwards D, Cortes M, Datta A, Minhas P, Wassermann EM, Bikson M (2013) Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: a basis for high-definition tDCS. Neuroimage 74:266–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.042CrossRefPubMed

Eriksen B, Eriksen C (1974) Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept Psychophys 16(1):143–149. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2000.i650.965CrossRef

Esmaeilpour Z, Shereen AD, Ghobadi-Azbari P, Datta A, Woods AJ, Ironside M, Ekhtiari H (2020) Methodology for tDCS integration with fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 41(7):1950–1967. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24908CrossRefPubMed

Fan J, McCandliss BD, Sommer T, Raz A, Posner MI (2002) Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. J Cogn Neurosci 14(3):340–347. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902317361886CrossRefPubMed

Fan J, McCandliss B, Fossella J, Flombaum J, Posner M (2005) The activation of attentional networks. Neuroimage 26(2):471–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.004CrossRefPubMed

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39(2):175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146CrossRefPubMed

Fertonani A, Ferrari C, Miniussi C (2015) What do you feel if I apply transcranial electric stimulation? Safety, sensations and secondary induced effects. Clin Neurophysiol 126(11):2181–2188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.015CrossRefPubMed

Fleming SM, Dolan RJ (2010) Effects of loss aversion on post-decision wagering: implications for measures of awareness. Conscious Cogn 19(1):352–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.11.002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Friehs MA, Frings C (2019) Offline beats online: transcranial direct current stimulation timing influences on working memory. NeuroReport 30(12):795–799. https://doi.org/10.1097/wnr.0000000000001272CrossRefPubMed

Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG (2006) Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 117(4):845–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003CrossRefPubMed

Garnett EO, Malyutina S, Datta A, Ouden DD (2015) On the use of the terms anodal and cathodal in high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation : a technical note. Neuromodul Technol Neural Interface. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12320CrossRef

Gbadeyan O, McMahon K, Steinhauser M, Meinzer M (2016) Stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex enhances adaptive cognitive control: a high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation study. J Neurosci 36(50):12530–12536CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gluth S, Rieskamp J, Büchel C (2012) Deciding when to decide: time-variant sequential sampling models explain the emergence of value-based decisions in the human brain. J Neurosci 32(31):10686–10698. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0727-12.2012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Goldstein RZ, Alia-Klein N, Tomasi D, Carrillo JH, Maloney T, Woicik PA, Volkow ND (2009) Anterior cingulate cortex hypoactivations to an emotionally salient task in cocaine addiction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(23):9453–9458. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900491106CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Goschke T, Bolte A (2014) Emotional modulation of control dilemmas: the role of positive affect, reward, and dopamine in cognitive stability and flexibility. Neuropsychologia 62:403–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.07.015CrossRefPubMed

Grasso PA, Tonolli E, Bortoletto M, Miniussi C (2021) tDCS over posterior parietal cortex increases cortical excitability but decreases learning: an ERPs and TMS-EEG study. Brain Res 1753:147227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2020.147227CrossRefPubMed

Groenewold NA, Opmeer EM, de Jonge P, Aleman A, Costafreda SG (2013) Emotional valence modulates brain functional abnormalities in depression: evidence from a meta-analysis of fMRI studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37(2):152–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.015CrossRefPubMed

Guo H, Zhang Z, Da S, Sheng X, Zhang X (2018) High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects performance in Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Brain Behav 8(2):e00884–e00884. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.884CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hewig J, Straube T, Trippe RH, Kretschmer N, Hecht H, Coles MGH, Miltner WHR (2009) Decision-making under risk: an fMRI study. J Cogn Neurosci 21(8):1642–1652. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21112CrossRefPubMed

Hogeveen J, Grafman J, Aboseria M, David A, Bikson M, Hauner KK (2016) Effects of high-definition and conventional tDCS on response inhibition. Brain Stimul 9(5):720–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2016.04.015CrossRefPubMed

Holroyd CB, Umemoto A (2016) Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews the research domain criteria framework: the case for anterior cingulate cortex. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 71:418–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.021CrossRefPubMed

Holroyd CB, Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, Nystrom L, Mars RB, Coles MGH, Cohen JD (2004) Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex shows fMRI response to internal and external error signals. Nat Neurosci 7(5):497–498. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1238CrossRefPubMed

Huang Y, Parra LC, Haufe S (2016) The New York Head-A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting. Neuroimage 140:150–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.019CrossRefPubMed

Hyafil A, Summerfield C, Koechlin E (2009) Two mechanisms for task switching in the prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 29(16):5135–5142. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2828-08.2009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Imburgio MJ, Orr JM (2018) Effects of prefrontal tDCS on executive function: methodological considerations revealed by meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia 117(April):156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.022CrossRefPubMed

Jacobson L, Koslowsky M, Lavidor M (2011) tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review. Exp Brain Res 216(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2891-9CrossRefPubMed

Javadi AH, Cheng P (2013) Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhances reconsolidation of long-term memory. Brain Stimul 6(4):668–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2012.10.007CrossRefPubMed

Jones KT, Berryhill ME (2012) Parietal contributions to visual working memory depend on task difficulty. Front Psychiatry 3(Sep):1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00081CrossRef

Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185CrossRef

Karuza EA, Balewski ZZ, Hamilton RH, Medaglia JD, Tardiff N, Thompson-Schill SL (2016) Mapping the parameter space of tDCS and cognitive control via manipulation of current polarity and intensity. Front Hum Neurosci 10(DEC2016):1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00665CrossRef

Kaur N, Whitman ET, Moser AD, Hinojosa CA, Vanelzakker MB, Camprodon JA, Shin LM (2020) Targeting the anterior cingulate with bipolar and high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation. NeuroReport. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000001413CrossRefPubMed

Keel JC, Smith MJ, Wassermann EM (2001) A safety screening questionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 112(4):720. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00518-6CrossRefPubMed

Knoch D, Gianotti LRR, Pascual-Leone A, Treyer V, Regard M, Hohmann M, Brugger P (2006) Disruption of right prefrontal cortex by low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induces risk-taking behavior. J Neurosci 26(24):6469–6472. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0804-06.2006CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Koechlin E, Summerfield C (2007) An information theoretical approach to prefrontal executive function. Trends Cogn Sci 11(6):229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.005CrossRefPubMed

Levkovitz Y, Harel EV, Roth Y, Braw Y, Most D, Katz LN, Zangen A (2009) Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation over the prefrontal cortex: evaluation of antidepressant and cognitive effects in depressive patients. Brain Stimul 2(4):188–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2009.08.002CrossRefPubMed

Ma N, Liu Y, Li N, Wang CX, Zhang H, Jiang XF, Zhang DR (2010) Addiction related alteration in resting-state brain connectivity. Neuroimage 49(1):738–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.037CrossRefPubMed

MacDonald AG, Cohen JD, Stenger VA, Carter CS (2000) Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science 288:1835–1839. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5472.1835CrossRefPubMed

Martin DM, Liu R, Alonzo A, Green M, Loo CK (2014) Use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to enhance cognitive training : effect of timing of stimulation. Exp Brain Res 232:3345–3351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4022-xCrossRefPubMed

Mattavelli G, Gallucci A, Schiena G, D’Agostino A, Sassetti T, Bonora S, Papagno C (2019) Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates implicit attitudes towards food in eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord 52(5):576–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23046CrossRefPubMed

McGovern RA, Sheth SA (2017) Role of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex in obsessive-compulsive disorder: converging evidence from cognitive neuroscience and psychiatric neurosurgery. J Neurosurg 126(1):132–147. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.1.jns15601CrossRefPubMed

McNab F, Leroux G, Strand F, Thorell L, Bergman S, Klingberg T (2008) Common and unique components of inhibition and working memory: an fMRI, within-subjects investigation. Neuropsychologia 46(11):2668–2682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.04.023CrossRefPubMed

Moos K, Vossel S, Weidner R, Sparing R, Fink GR (2012) Modulation of top-down control of visual attention by cathodal tDCS over right IPS. J Neurosci 32(46):16360–16368. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6233-11.2012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Morris SE, Cuthbert BN (2012) Research Domain Criteria: cognitive systems, neural circuits, and dimensions of behavior. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 14:29–37CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2000) Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 527:633–639CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Antal A, Tergau F, Paulus W, Priori A (2003) Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 114:2220–2223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00235-9CrossRefPubMed

Nitsche MA, Niehaus L, Hoffmann KT, Hengst S, Liebetanz D, Paulus W, Meyer B-U (2004) MRI study of human brain exposed to weak direct current stimulation of the frontal cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 115(10):2419–2423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.05.001CrossRefPubMed

Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, Pascual-Leone A (2008) Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul 1:206–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004CrossRefPubMed

Palm U, Reisinger E, Keeser D, Kuo M-F, Pogarell O, Leicht G, Padberg F (2013) Evaluation of sham transcranial direct current stimulation for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Brain Stimul 6(4):690–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2013.01.005CrossRefPubMed

Pisoni A, Mattavelli G, Papagno C, Rosanova M, Casali AG, Romero Lauro LJ (2017) Cognitive enhancement induced by anodal tDCS drives circuit-specific cortical plasticity. Cereb Cortex 28(4):1132–1140. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx021CrossRef

Poreisz C, Boros K, Antal A, Paulus W (2007) Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull 72:208–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.004CrossRefPubMed

Renzi C, Ferrari C, Schiavi S, Pisoni A, Papagno C, Vecchi T, Cattaneo Z (2015) The role of the occipital face area in holistic processing involved in face detection and discrimination: a tDCS study. Neuropsychology 29(3):409–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000127CrossRefPubMed

Ridderinkhof KR (2004) The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 306(5695):443–447. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100301CrossRefPubMed

Romero Lauro LJ, Rosanova M, Mattavelli G, Convento S, Pisoni A, Opitz A, Vallar G (2014) TDCS increases cortical excitability: direct evidence from TMS-EEG. Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.05.003CrossRefPubMed

Romero Lauro LJ, Pisoni A, Rosanova M, Casarotto S, Mattavelli G, Bolognini N, Vallar G (2016) Localizing the effects of anodal tDCS at the level of cortical sources: a reply to Bailey et al., 2015. Cortex 74:323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.023CrossRefPubMed

Roth Y, Amir A, Levkovitz Y, Zangen A (2007) Three-dimensional distribution of the electric field induced in the brain by transcranial magnetic stimulation using figure-8 and deep H-coils. J Clin Neurophysiol 24(1):31–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/wnp.0b013e31802fa393CrossRefPubMed

Roy LB, Sparing R, Fink GR, Hesse MD (2015) Modulation of attention functions by anodal tDCS on right PPC. Neuropsychologia 74:96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.028CrossRefPubMed

Rushworth MFS, Behrens TEJ (2008) Choice, uncertainty and value in prefrontal and cingulate cortex. Nat Neurosci 11(4):389–397. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn2066CrossRefPubMed

Rushworth M, Walton M, Kennerley S, Banenrman D (2004) Action sets and decisions in the medial frontal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 8(9):410–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.009CrossRefPubMed

Samson AC, Kreibig SD, Soderstrom B, Wade AA, Gross JJ (2015) Eliciting positive, negative and mixed emotional states: a film library for affective scientists. Cogn Emot 30(5):827–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1031089CrossRefPubMed

Schroeder PA, Schwippel T, Wolz I, Svaldi J (2020) Meta-analysis of the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on inhibitory control. Brain Stimul 13(5):1159–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.05.006CrossRefPubMed

Shen B, Yin Y, Wang J, Zhou X, McClure SM, Li J (2016) High-definition tDCS alters impulsivity in a baseline-dependent manner. Neuroimage 143:343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.006CrossRefPubMed

Shenhav A, Cohen J, Botvinick MM (2016) Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the value of control. Nat Neurosci 19(10):1280–1285. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4382CrossRef

Siemann J, Herrmann M, Galashan D (2016) fMRI-constrained source analysis reveals early top–down modulations of interference processing using a flanker task. Neuroimage 136:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.036CrossRefPubMed

Sokol-Hessner P, Lackovic SF, Tobe RH, Camerer CF, Leventhal BL, Phelps EA (2015) Determinants of Propranolol’s Selective Effect on Loss Aversion. Psychol Sci 26(7):1123–1130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615582026CrossRefPubMed

Stevens T, Brevers D, Chambers CD, Lavric A, McLaren IPL, Mertens M, Verbruggen F (2015) How does response inhibition influence decision making when gambling? J Exp Psychol Appl 21(1):15–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000039CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Takahashi H, Fujie S, Camerer C, Arakawa R, Takano H, Kodaka F, Suhara T (2012) Norepinephrine in the brain is associated with aversion to financial loss. Mol Psychiatry 18(1):3–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2012.7CrossRefPubMed

Takeuchi H, Kawada R, Tsurumi K, Yokoyama N, Takemura A, Murao T, Takahashi H (2016) Heterogeneity of Loss Aversion in Pathological Gambling. J Gambl Stud 32(4):1143–1154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9587-1CrossRefPubMed

To WT, Eroh J, Hart J, Vanneste S (2018) Exploring the effects of anodal and cathodal high definition transcranial direct current stimulation targeting the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex. Sci Rep 8(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22730-xCrossRef

Tom SM, Fox CR, Trepel C, Poldrack RA (2007) The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science 315(5811):515–518. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134239CrossRefPubMed

Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683CrossRefPubMed

van Maanen L, Brown SD, Eichele T, Wagenmakers E-J, Ho T, Serences J, Forstmann BU (2011) Neural correlates of trial-to-trial fluctuations in response caution. J Neurosci 31(48):17488–17495. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2924-11.2011CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

van’t Wout M, Kahn RS, Sanfey AG, Aleman A (2005) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects strategic decision-making. NeuroReport 16(16):1849–1852. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000183907.08149.14CrossRef

Varoli E, Pisoni A, Mattavelli GC, Vergallito A, Gallucci A, Mauro LD, Lauro LJR (2018) Tracking the effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on cortical excitability and connectivity by means of TMS-EEG. Front Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00319CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Verbruggen F, Adams R, Chambers CD (2012) Proactive motor control reduces monetary risk taking in gambling. Psychol Sci 23(7):805–815. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434538CrossRefPubMed

Verveer I, Hill AT, Franken IHA, Yücel M, van Dongen JDM, Segrave R (2021) Modulation of control: can HD-tDCS targeting the dACC reduce impulsivity? Brain Res 1756:147282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147282CrossRefPubMed

Wager TD, Sylvester CYC, Lacey SC, Nee DE, Franklin M, Jonides J (2005) Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI. Neuroimage 27(2):323–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.054CrossRefPubMed

Wei Z, Yang N, Liu Y, Yang L, Wang Y, Han L, Zhang X (2016) Resting-state functional connectivity between the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and thalamus is associated with risky decision-making in nicotine addicts. Sci Rep 6(July 2015):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21778CrossRef

Weiss M, Lavidor M (2012) When less is more: evidence for a facilitative cathodal tDCS effect in attentional abilities. J Cogn Neurosci 24(9):1826–1833. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00248CrossRefPubMed

Weissman DH (2004) Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex resolves conflict from distracting stimuli by boosting attention toward relevant events. Cereb Cortex 15(2):229–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhh125CrossRefPubMed

Weissman DH, Giesbrecht B, Song AW, Mangun GR, Woldorff MG (2003) Conflict monitoring in the human anterior cingulate cortex during selective attention to global and local object features. Neuroimage 19(4):1361–1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00167-8CrossRefPubMed

Weller S, Nitsche MA, Plewnia C (2020) Enhancing cognitive control training with transcranial direct current stimulation: a systematic parameter study. Brain Stimul 13(5):1358–1369CrossRefPubMed

Woods AJ, Antal A, Bikson M, Boggio PS, Brunoni AR, Celnik P, Nitsche MA (2016) A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clin Neurophysiol 127(2):1031–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.012CrossRefPubMed

Yücel M, Lubman DI, Harrison BJ, Fornito A, Allen NB, Wellard RM, Pantelis C (2007) A combined spectroscopic and functional MRI investigation of the dorsal anterior cingulate region in opiate addiction. Mol Psychiatry 12(7):691–702. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001955CrossRef

Zmigrod S, Zmigrod L, Hommel B (2016) Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects stimulus conflict but not response conflict. Neuroscience 322:320–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.046CrossRefPubMed

Titel: High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex modulates decision-making and executive control
verfasst von: Giulia Mattavelli
Sara Lo Presti
Diana Tornaghi
Nicola Canessa
Publikationsdatum: 31.01.2022
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Brain Structure and Function / Ausgabe 5/2022
Print ISSN: 1863-2653
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2661
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-022-02456-3

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

18.04.2024 | Arterielle Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex modulates decision-making and executive control

Abstract

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Antihypertensiva schützen auch alte Menschen noch vor Demenz

Spinale Muskelatrophie: Neugeborenen-Screening lohnt sich

Manche Gestagene können das Risiko für Meningeome erhöhen

Parkinson: Größere Studie bestätigt Genauigkeit von Hauttest

Update Neurologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2022

Tasks activating the default mode network map multiple functional systems

Dual medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus projecting neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus

Converting sounds to meaning with ventral semantic language networks: integration of interdisciplinary data on brain connectivity, direct electrical stimulation and clinical disconnection syndromes

A co-alteration parceling of the cingulate cortex

Interaction of the salience network, ventral attention network, dorsal attention network and default mode network in neonates and early development of the bottom-up attention system

From words to phrases: neural basis of social event semantic composition

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Antihypertensiva schützen auch alte Menschen noch vor Demenz

Spinale Muskelatrophie: Neugeborenen-Screening lohnt sich

Manche Gestagene können das Risiko für Meningeome erhöhen

Parkinson: Größere Studie bestätigt Genauigkeit von Hauttest

Update Neurologie