nach oben

International Orthopaedics

Erschienen in:

01.08.2009 | Review

High-flexion total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

verfasst von: Michael Murphy, Simon Journeaux, Trevor Russell

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 4/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study is a systematic literature review of outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with implants specifically designed to enable increased knee flexion. English language comparative studies without date restriction were identified through a computerised literature search and bibliography review. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria representing a total of 399 high-flexion knee arthroplasties in 370 patients. Five studies reported greater flexion or range of motion; however, the methodological rigour was questionable with inadequate blinding, flawed participant selection, short follow-up periods and functional outcomes which lacked sensitivity. There was insufficient evidence of improved range of motion or functional performance after high-flexion knee arthroplasty.

Wylde V, Dieppe P, Hewlett S, Learmonth ID (2007) Total knee replacement: is it really an effective procedure for all? Knee 14:417–423PubMedCrossRef

Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T et al (2000) Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 71:262–267PubMedCrossRef

Katz JN (2006) Total joint replacement in osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 20:145–153PubMedCrossRef

Jones CA, Beaupre LA Johnston DW, Suarez-Almazor ME (2007) Total joint arthroplasties: current concepts of patient outcomes after surgery. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 33:71–86PubMedCrossRef

Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Scuderi GR, Zingde S (2007) Factors affecting flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:53–60PubMed

Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E et al (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:780–785PubMedCrossRef

Rowe PJ, Myles CM, Walker C, Nutton R (2000) Knee joint kinematics in gait and other functional activities measured using flexible electrogoniometry: how much knee motion is sufficient for normal daily life? Gait Posture 12:143–155PubMedCrossRef

Mulholland SJ, Wyss UP (2001) Activities of daily living in non-Western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants. Int J Rehabil Res 24:191–198PubMedCrossRef

Ritter MA, Harty LD, Davis KE et al (2003) Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1278–1285PubMed

10.

Anouchi YS, McShane M, Kelly F Jr et al (1996) Range of motion in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:87–92PubMedCrossRef

11.

Schurman DJ, Rojer DE (2005) Total knee arthroplasty: range of motion across five systems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 430:132–137PubMedCrossRef

12.

Finch E, Walsh M, Thomas SG, Woodhouse LJ (1998) Functional ability perceived by individuals following total knee arthroplasty compared to age-matched individuals without knee disability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 27:255–263PubMed

13.

March LM, Cross MJ, Lapsley H et al (1999) Outcomes after hip or knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis. A prospective cohort study comparing patients’ quality of life before and after surgery with age-related population norms. Med J Aust 171:235–238PubMed

14.

Noble PC, Gordon MJ, Weiss JM et al (2005) Does total knee replacement restore normal knee function? Clin Orthop Relat Res 431:157–165PubMedCrossRef

15.

Weiss JM, Noble PC, Conditt MA et al (2002) What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:172–188PubMedCrossRef

16.

Coughlin KM, Incavo SJ, Doohen RR et al (2007) Kneeling kinematics after total knee arthroplasty: anterior-posterior contact position of a standard and a high-flex tibial insert design. J Arthroplasty 22:160–165PubMedCrossRef

17.

Han HS, Kang SB, Yoon KS (2007) High incidence of loosening of the femoral component in legacy posterior stabilised-flex total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1457–1461PubMedCrossRef

18.

Argenson JN, Scuderi GR, Komistek RD et al (2005) In vivo kinematic evaluation and design considerations related to high flexion in total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech 38:277–284PubMedCrossRef

19.

Ranawat CS (2003) Design may be counterproductive for optimizing flexion after TKR. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:174–176PubMedCrossRef

20.

Sultan PG, Most E, Schule S et al (2003) Optimizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: advances in prosthetic design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:167–173PubMedCrossRef

21.

Fisher DA, Dierckman B, Watts MR, Davis K (2007) Looks good but feels bad: factors that contribute to poor results after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22(6 Suppl 2):39–42PubMedCrossRef

22.

Laskin RS, Beksac B (2004) Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19(4 Suppl 1):41–46PubMedCrossRef

23.

Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Mizuno K, Yamomoto T (2002) Maximizing flexion after total knee arthroplasty: the need and the pitfalls. J Arthroplasty 17:59–62PubMedCrossRef

24.

Bin SI, Nam TS (2007) Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: comparison study at 1 year after surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:350–355PubMedCrossRef

25.

Ng FY, Wong HL, Yau WP et al (2008) Comparison of range of motion after standard and high-flexion posterior stabilised total knee replacement. Int Orthop 32:795–798PubMedCrossRef

26.

Kim YH, Sohn KS, Kim JS (2005) Range of motion of standard and high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1470–1475PubMedCrossRef

27.

Huang HT, Su JY, Wang GJ (2005) The early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 20:674–679PubMedCrossRef

28.

Seon JK, Song EK, Lee JY (2005) Comparison of range of motion of high-flexion prosthesis and mobile-bearing prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 28(10 Suppl):s1247–s1250PubMed

29.

Gupta SK, Ranawat AS, Shah V et al (2006) The P.F.C. sigma RP-F TKA designed for improved performance: A matched-pair study. Orthopedics 29(9 Suppl):S49–S52PubMed

30.

Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14PubMed

31.

Nutton RW, van der Linden ML, Rowe PJ et al (2008) A prospective randomised double-blind study of functional outcome and range of flexion following total knee replacement with the NexGen standard and high flexion components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:37–42PubMedCrossRef

32.

Weeden SH, Schmidt R (2007) A randomized, prospective study of primary total knee components designed for increased flexion. J Arthroplasty 22:349–352PubMedCrossRef

33.

Laskin RS (2007) The effect of a high-flex implant on postoperative flexion after primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 30(8 Suppl):86–88PubMed

34.

Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J (1976) A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:754–765PubMed

35.

Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH et al (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840PubMed

36.

Fairbank JCT (2004) Randomised controlled trials. In: Pynsent PB, Fairbank JCT, Carr AJ (eds) Outcome measures in orthopaedics and orthopaedic trauma, 2nd edn. Arnold, London, pp 31–40

37.

Boutron I, Ravaud P, Nizard R (2007) The design and assessment of prospective randomised, controlled trials in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:858–863PubMedCrossRef

38.

Edwards JZ, Greene KA, Davis RS et al (2004) Measuring flexion in knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 19:369–372PubMedCrossRef

39.

Myles CM, Rowe PJ, Walker CR, Nutton RW (2002) Knee joint functional range of movement prior to and following total knee arthroplasty measured using flexible electrogoniometry. Gait Posture 16:46–54PubMedCrossRef

40.

Meneghini RM, Pierson JL, Bagsby D et al (2007) Is there a functional benefit to obtaining high flexion after total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 22(6 Suppl 2):43–46PubMedCrossRef

41.

Park KK, Chang CB, Kang YG et al (2007) Correlation of maximum flexion with clinical outcome after total knee replacement in Asian patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:604–608PubMedCrossRef

42.

Miner AL, Lingard EA, Wright EA et al (2003) Knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: how important is this as an outcome measure? J Arthroplasty 18:286–294PubMedCrossRef

43.

Park KK, Shin KS, Chang CB et al (2007) Functional disabilities and issues of concern in female Asian patients before TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 461:143–152PubMed

44.

Nagura T, Dyrby CO, Alexander EJ, Andriacchi TP (2002) Mechanical loads at the knee joint during deep flexion. J Orthop Res 20:881–886PubMedCrossRef

45.

Victor J, Bellemans J (2006) Physiologic kinematics as a concept for better flexion in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:53–58PubMedCrossRef

46.

Boonstra MC, De Waal Malefijt MC, Verdonschot N (2008) How to quantify knee function after total knee arthroplasty? Knee 15:390–395PubMedCrossRef

47.

Wylde V, Blom AW, Whitehouse SL et al (2009) Patient-reported outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty: comparison of midterm results. J Arthroplasty 24:210–216PubMedCrossRef

48.

Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB (2006) The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:35–43PubMedCrossRef

49.

Akagi M, Nakamura T, Matsusue Y et al (2000) The Bisurface total knee replacement: a unique design for flexion. Four-to-nine-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:1626–1633PubMed

Titel: High-flexion total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
verfasst von: Michael Murphy
Simon Journeaux
Trevor Russell
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2009
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 4/2009
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0774-5

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

High-flexion total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Abstract

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2009

Relationship of plasma and synovial fluid BMP-7 with disease severity in knee osteoarthritis patients: a pilot study

Association of oestrogen receptor gene polymorphism with the long-term results of rotational acetabular osteotomy

Surgical management of unstable elbow dislocation without intra-articular fracture

Myoelectric hand prostheses in very young children

Prevalence and functional impact of patient-perceived leg length discrepancy after hip replacement

Lateral fixation of open AO type-B2 ankle fractures: the Knowles pin versus plate

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie