Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2019

01.10.2018 | KNEE

High patient satisfaction with significant improvement in knee function and pain relief after mid-term follow-up in patients with isolated patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty

verfasst von: Andreas B. Imhoff, Matthias J. Feucht, Eva Bartsch, Matthias Cotic, Jonas Pogorzelski

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 7/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To prospectively evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes and survivorship at 2 and 5 years after isolated contemporary patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty.

Methods

Thirty-four patients were prospectively enrolled in the study and were evaluated preoperatively and at 2 and 5 years postoperatively. Clinical outcomes included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain. Kellgren-Lawrence grading was used to assess the progression of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis and the Caton-Deschamps Index to determine patellar height. A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to investigate the implant survivorship. Preoperative patient characteristics were compared among failures and success to determine potential risk factors and patient satisfaction was rated postoperatively.

Results

Five of the 34 patients were lost to follow-up resulting in a final follow-up rate of 86%. The total WOMAC subscores of pain and function and the VAS Pain improved significantly at 2- and 5-years, with no significant difference between the two time points. The WOMAC stiffness subscale reached significant improvement at 2-year follow-up alone. No significant progressions of tibiofemoral arthritis or changes in patellar height were observed. A total of six patients (17.1%) failed leaving a survival rate of 91% after 2 years and 83% after 5 years. The main cause for postoperative failure was persistent knee pain; however, no significant preoperative risk factor in patient characteristics could be identified.

Conclusion

Patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty shows high patient satisfaction with significant improvement in knee function and pain relief after mid-term follow-up with no radiographic progression of tibiofemoral OA.

Level of evidence

Prospective case series, Level III.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH et al (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840PubMed Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH et al (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Blazina ME, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W et al (1979) Patellofemoral replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 144:98–102 Blazina ME, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W et al (1979) Patellofemoral replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 144:98–102
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Khefacha A (2005) Long-term results with the first patellofemoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:47–54CrossRef Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Khefacha A (2005) Long-term results with the first patellofemoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:47–54CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Caton J, Deschamps G, Chambat P et al (1982) Patella infera. Apropos of 128 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparat Appar Mot 68:317–325 Caton J, Deschamps G, Chambat P et al (1982) Patella infera. Apropos of 128 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparat Appar Mot 68:317–325
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A et al (2007) Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoar Cartil 15:273–280CrossRef Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A et al (2007) Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoar Cartil 15:273–280CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Feucht MJ, Cotic M, Beitzel K et al (2017) A matched-pair comparison of inlay and onlay trochlear designs for patellofemoral arthroplasty: no differences in clinical outcome but less progression of osteoarthritis with inlay designs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:2784–2791CrossRefPubMed Feucht MJ, Cotic M, Beitzel K et al (2017) A matched-pair comparison of inlay and onlay trochlear designs for patellofemoral arthroplasty: no differences in clinical outcome but less progression of osteoarthritis with inlay designs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:2784–2791CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gould D, Kelly D, Goldstone L et al (2001) Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: developing and using illustrated patient simulations to collect the data. J Clin Nurs 10:697–706CrossRefPubMed Gould D, Kelly D, Goldstone L et al (2001) Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: developing and using illustrated patient simulations to collect the data. J Clin Nurs 10:697–706CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Imhoff AB, Feucht MJ, Meidinger G et al (2015) Prospective evaluation of anatomic patellofemoral inlay resurfacing: clinical, radiographic, and sports-related results after 24 months. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1299–1307CrossRefPubMed Imhoff AB, Feucht MJ, Meidinger G et al (2015) Prospective evaluation of anatomic patellofemoral inlay resurfacing: clinical, radiographic, and sports-related results after 24 months. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1299–1307CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Laursen JO (2017) High mid-term revision rate after treatment of large, full-thickness cartilage lesions and OA in the patellofemoral joint using a large inlay resurfacing prosthesis: HemiCAP-Wave(R). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:3856–3861CrossRefPubMed Laursen JO (2017) High mid-term revision rate after treatment of large, full-thickness cartilage lesions and OA in the patellofemoral joint using a large inlay resurfacing prosthesis: HemiCAP-Wave(R). Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:3856–3861CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Leadbetter WB, Ragland PS, Mont MA (2005) The appropriate use of patellofemoral arthroplasty: an analysis of reported indications, contraindications, and failures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:91–99CrossRef Leadbetter WB, Ragland PS, Mont MA (2005) The appropriate use of patellofemoral arthroplasty: an analysis of reported indications, contraindications, and failures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:91–99CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lubinus HH (1979) Patella glide bearing total replacement. Orthopedics 2:119–127PubMed Lubinus HH (1979) Patella glide bearing total replacement. Orthopedics 2:119–127PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Outerbridge RE (1961) The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43-B:752–757CrossRefPubMed Outerbridge RE (1961) The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43-B:752–757CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel A, Haider Z, Anand A et al (2017) Early results of patellofemoral inlay resurfacing arthroplasty using the HemiCap Wave prosthesis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 25(1):2309499017692705CrossRef Patel A, Haider Z, Anand A et al (2017) Early results of patellofemoral inlay resurfacing arthroplasty using the HemiCap Wave prosthesis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 25(1):2309499017692705CrossRef
16.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Zicaro JP, Yacuzzi C, Astoul Bonorino J et al (2017) Patellofemoral arthritis treated with resurfacing implant: Clinical outcome and complications at a minimum two-year follow-up. Knee 24:1485–1491CrossRefPubMed Zicaro JP, Yacuzzi C, Astoul Bonorino J et al (2017) Patellofemoral arthritis treated with resurfacing implant: Clinical outcome and complications at a minimum two-year follow-up. Knee 24:1485–1491CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
High patient satisfaction with significant improvement in knee function and pain relief after mid-term follow-up in patients with isolated patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty
verfasst von
Andreas B. Imhoff
Matthias J. Feucht
Eva Bartsch
Matthias Cotic
Jonas Pogorzelski
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5173-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2019

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.