Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports
Erschienen in: Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports 3/2013

01.06.2013 | Cardiac Computed Tomography (TC Villines and S Achenbach, Section Editors)

High-Pitch Dual Spiral Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

verfasst von: Holger Hetterich, Stefan Wirth, Thorsten R. Johnson, Fabian Bamberg

Erschienen in: Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports | Ausgabe 3/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

High-pitch dual spiral computed tomography (CT) acquisitions are a relatively novel technical development characterized by significantly reduced acquisition time and radiation exposure by avoiding data oversampling. This approach may therefore overcome major limitations of current cardiovascular CT imaging and be applicable to a variety of clinical settings. Given the great potential, we review technical principles, summarize available early scientific evidence and identify limitations of the technique.
Literatur
1.
Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1864–94.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA. 2007;298:317–23.PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka S, et al. Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. Heart. 2008;94:1132–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H, et al. Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. Radiology. 2008;249:71–80.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA. 2009;301:500–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Lell M, Marwan M, Schepis T, et al. Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:2576–83.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, et al. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1081–6.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Hausleiter J, Meyer T. Tips to minimize radiation exposure. J Cardiovasc Comp Tomograph. 2008;2:325–7.CrossRef
10.
Paul JF, Abada HT. Strategies for reduction of radiation dose in cardiac multislice CT. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:2028–37.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, et al. Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology. 2008;248:431–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Achenbach S, Marwan M, Schepis T, et al. High-pitch spiral acquisition: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comp Tomograph. 2009;3:117–21.CrossRef
13.
Nie P, Wang X, Cheng Z, Ji X, Duan Y, Chen J. Accuracy, image quality and radiation dose comparison of high-pitch spiral and sequential acquisition on 128-slice dual-source CT angiography in children with congenital heart disease. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:2057–66.PubMedCrossRef
14.
De Zordo T, von Lutterotti K, Dejaco C, et al. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose of different pulmonary CTA protocols on a 128-slice CT: high-pitch dual source CT, dual energy CT and conventional spiral CT. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:279–86.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Wuest W, Anders K, Schuhbaeck A, et al. Dual source multidetector CT-angiography before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) using a high-pitch spiral acquisition mode. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:51–8.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Sommer WH, Albrecht E, Bamberg F, et al. Feasibility and radiation dose of high-pitch acquisition protocols in patients undergoing dual-source cardiac CT. AJR. 2010;195:1306–12.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Petersilka M, Bruder H, Krauss B, Stierstorfer K, Flohr TG. Technical principles of dual source CT. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68:362–8.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:256–68.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Achenbach S, Anders K, Kalender WA. Dual-source cardiac computed tomography: image quality and dose considerations. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1188–98.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Ketelsen D, Buchgeister M, Korn A, et al. High-pitch computed tomography coronary angiography-a new dose-saving algorithm: estimation of radiation exposure. Radiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:724129.PubMed
21.
Matsubara K, Koshida H, Sakuta K, et al. Radiation dose and physical image quality in 128-section dual-source computed tomographic coronary angiography: a phantom study. J Appl Clin Med Phys / Am Coll Med Physics. 2012;13:3959.
22.
Lell M, Hinkmann F, Anders K, et al. High-pitch electrocardiogram-triggered computed tomography of the chest: initial results. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:728–33.PubMedCrossRef
23.
• Neefjes LA, Dharampal AS, Rossi A, et al. Image quality and radiation exposure using different low-dose scan protocols in dual-source CT coronary angiography: randomized study. Radiology. 2011;261:779–86. Comprehensive evaluation of different coronary CTA protocols regarding image quality and radiation exposure.PubMedCrossRef
24.
• Neefjes LA, Rossi A, Genders TS et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography: a randomized comparison of different acquisition protocols. Eur Radiol. 2012. Comprehensive evaluation of different coronray CTA protocols regardin g diagnostic accuracy.
25.
Schuhbaeck A, Achenbach S, Layritz C et al. Image quality of ultra-low radiation exposure coronary CT angiography with an effective dose <0.1 mSv using high-pitch spiral acquisition and raw data-based iterative reconstruction. Eur Radiol. 2012.
26.
Stolzmann P, Goetti RP, Maurovich-Horvat P, et al. Predictors of image quality in high-pitch coronary CT angiography. AJR. 2011;197:851–8.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Hu XH, Zheng WL, Wang D, Xie SS, Wu R, Zhang SZ. Accuracy of high-pitch prospectively ECG-triggering CT coronary angiography for assessment of stenosis in 103 patients: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. Clin Radiol. 2012;67:1083–8.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Ghadri JR, Kuest SM, Goetti R, et al. Image quality and radiation dose comparison of prospectively triggered low-dose CCTA: 128-slice dual-source high-pitch spiral versus 64-slice single-source sequential acquisition. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28:1217–25.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Bamberg F, Marcus R, Sommer W, et al. Diagnostic image quality of a comprehensive high-pitch dual-spiral cardiothoracic CT protocol in patients with undifferentiated acute chest pain. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:3697–702.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1724–32.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2324–36.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Achenbach S, Goroll T, Seltmann M, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:328–37.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Sommer WH, Schenzle JC, Becker CR, et al. Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique. Invest Radiol. 2010;45:64–71.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Rogers IS, Banerji D, Siegel EL, et al. Usefulness of comprehensive cardiothoracic computed tomography in the evaluation of acute undifferentiated chest discomfort in the emergency department (CAPTURE). Am J Cardiol. 2011;107:643–50.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS, et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:1072–84.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Okada DR, Ghoshhajra BB, Blankstein R, et al. Direct comparison of rest and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion CT with rest and stress SPECT. J Nuclear Cardiol: Am Soc Nuclear Cardiol. 2010;17:27–37.CrossRef
37.
Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F, et al. Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic ct-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology. 2011;260:689–98.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A, et al. Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:540–9.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1445–53.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Kim RJ, Chen EL, Lima JA, Judd RM. Myocardial Gd-DTPA kinetics determine MRI contrast enhancement and reflect the extent and severity of myocardial injury after acute reperfused infarction. Circulation. 1996;94:3318–26.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Goetti R, Feuchtner G, Stolzmann P, et al. Delayed enhancement imaging of myocardial viability: low-dose high-pitch CT versus MRI. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:2091–9.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:2042–7.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Gerber BL, Belge B, Legros GJ, et al. Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2006;113:823–33.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Nieman K, Shapiro MD, Ferencik M, et al. Reperfused myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced 64-Section CT in comparison to MR imaging. Radiology. 2008;247:49–56.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Paul JF, Rohnean A, Sigal-Cinqualbre A. Multidetector CT for congenital heart patients: what a paediatric radiologist should know. Pediatr Radiol. 2010;40:869–75.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Goo HW. State-of-the-art CT, imaging techniques for congenital heart disease. Korean J Radiol: Korean Radiol Soc. 2010;11:4–18.CrossRef
47.
Calkins H, Brugada J, Packer DL, et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed and approved by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Europace: European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology: journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of. Cardiology. 2007;9:335–79.
48.
Tops LF, Bax JJ, Zeppenfeld K, et al. Fusion of multislice computed tomography imaging with three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping to guide radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures. Heart Rhythm: J Heart Rhythm Soc. 2005;2:1076–81.CrossRef
49.
Jongbloed MR, Bax JJ, Lamb HJ, et al. Multislice computed tomography versus intracardiac echocardiography to evaluate the pulmonary veins before radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a head-to-head comparison. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:343–50.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Thai WE, Wai B, Lin K, et al. Pulmonary venous anatomy imaging with low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch 128-slice dual-source computed tomography. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2012;5:521–30.CrossRef
51.
Remy-Jardin M, Pistolesi M, Goodman LR, et al. Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2007;245:315–29.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2317–27.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:1231–43.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Iung B, Baron G, Tornos P, Gohlke-Barwolf C, Butchart EG, Vahanian A. Valvular heart disease in the community: a European experience. Curr Prob Cardiol. 2007;32:609–61.CrossRef
55.
Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation. 2002;106:3006–8.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1597–607.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Holmes Jr DR, Mack MJ, Kaul S, et al. 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1200–54.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Goetti R, Baumuller S, Feuchtner G, et al. High-pitch dual-source CT angiography of the thoracic and abdominal aorta: is simultaneous coronary artery assessment possible? AJR. 2010;194:938–44.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Leipsic J, Wood D, Manders D, et al. The evolving role of MDCT in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a radiologists' perspective. AJR. 2009;193:W214–9.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Plank F, Friedrich G, Bartel T, et al. Benefits of high-pitch 128-slice dual-source computed tomography for planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:1961–6.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
High-Pitch Dual Spiral Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
verfasst von
Holger Hetterich
Stefan Wirth
Thorsten R. Johnson
Fabian Bamberg
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2013
Verlag
Current Science Inc.
Erschienen in
Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports / Ausgabe 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1941-9066
Elektronische ISSN: 1941-9074
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-013-9199-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2013

Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports 3/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Cardiac Computed Tomography (TC Villines and S Achenbach, Section Editors)

Automated Interpretation and Reporting of Coronary CT Coronary Angiography

Cardiac Computed Tomography (TC Villines and S Achenbach, Section Editors)

Automated Coronary Plaque and Stenosis Assessment on Coronary CT Angiography: A Closer Look at Coronary Atherosclerosis

Cardiac Computed Tomography (TC Villines and S Achenbach, Section Editors)

CT Imaging of the Pericardium

Cardiac Computed Tomography (TC Villines and S Achenbach, Section Editors)

Coronary Artery Calcium Testing in Symptomatic Patients: An Issue of Diagnostic Efficiency

Cardiac Computed Tomography (TC Villines and S Achenbach, Section Editors)

Iterative Reconstruction Techniques: What do they Mean for Cardiac CT?

Cardiac Computed Tomography (TC Villines and S Achenbach, Section Editors)

Cardiac CT in the Diagnosis and Postoperative Assessment of Congenital Heart Disease

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

25.04.2024 | Hypotonie | Nachrichten

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

24.04.2024 | Adipositas | Nachrichten

Adipositas-Medikament auch gegen Schlafapnoe wirksam

24.04.2024 | ACC 2024 | Nachrichten

Komplette Revaskularisation bei Infarkt: Neue Studie setzt ein Fragezeichen
weitere anzeigen

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen