Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 9/2019

31.01.2019 | Original Article

High Rates of Readmission in Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Natural History or Opportunity for Improvement?

verfasst von: Thomas K. Maatman, MD, Sarakshi Mahajan, MD, Alexandra M. Roch, MD, Kyle A. Lewellen, BS, Mark A. Heimberger, BS, Cameron L. Colgate, MS, Eugene P. Ceppa, MD, Michael G. House, MD, Attila Nakeeb, MD, C. Max Schmidt, PhD, Nicholas J. Zyromski, MD

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 9/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) is a complex and heterogeneous disease with a protracted disease course. Hospital readmission is extremely common; however, few data exist regarding the cause of readmission in NP.

Methods

A retrospective review of NP patients treated between 2005 and 2017 identified patients readmitted both locally and to our hospital. All patients with unplanned hospital readmissions were evaluated to determine the cause for readmission. Clinical and demographic factors of all patients were recorded. As appropriate, two independent group t tests and Pearson’s correlation or Fisher’s exact tests were performed to analyze the relationship between index admission clinical factors and readmission. p values of < 0.05 were accepted as statistically significant.

Results

Six hundred one NP patients were reviewed. Median age was 52 years (13–96). Median index admission length of stay was 19 days (2–176). The most common etiology was biliary (49.9%) followed by alcohol (20.0%). Unplanned readmission occurred in 432 patients (72%) accounting for a total of 971 unique readmissions (mean readmissions/patient, 2.3). The most common readmission indications were symptomatic necrosis requiring supportive care and/or intervention (31.2%), infected necrosis requiring antibiotics and/or intervention (26.6%), failure to thrive (9.7%), and non-necrosis infection (6.6%). Patients requiring readmission had increased incidence of index admission renal failure (21.3% vs. 14.2%, p = 0.05) and cardiovascular failure (12.5% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.01).

Discussion

Readmission in NP is extremely common. Significant portions of readmissions are a result of the disease natural history; however, a percentage of readmissions appear to be preventable. Patients with organ failure are at increased risk for unplanned readmission and will benefit from close follow-up.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fagenholz P, Fernández-del Castillo C, Harris N, Pelletier A, Camargo Jr. C. Direct Medical Costs of Acute Pancreatitis Hospitalizations in the United States. Pancreas. 2007;35(4):302–7.CrossRefPubMed Fagenholz P, Fernández-del Castillo C, Harris N, Pelletier A, Camargo Jr. C. Direct Medical Costs of Acute Pancreatitis Hospitalizations in the United States. Pancreas. 2007;35(4):302–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Howard TJ, Patel JB, Zyromski N, Sandrasegaran K, Yu J, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD. Declining morbidity and mortality rates in the surgical management of pancreatic necrosis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(1):43–9.CrossRefPubMed Howard TJ, Patel JB, Zyromski N, Sandrasegaran K, Yu J, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD. Declining morbidity and mortality rates in the surgical management of pancreatic necrosis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(1):43–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman M, Werner J, van Santvoort H, Baron T, Besselink M, Windsor J, Horvath K, vanSonnenberg E, Bollen T, Vege S. Interventions for Necrotizing pancreatitis: Summary of a Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference. Pancreas. 2012;41(8):1176–94.CrossRefPubMed Freeman M, Werner J, van Santvoort H, Baron T, Besselink M, Windsor J, Horvath K, vanSonnenberg E, Bollen T, Vege S. Interventions for Necrotizing pancreatitis: Summary of a Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference. Pancreas. 2012;41(8):1176–94.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer C, Lingsma HF, Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Kringos DS, Klazinga NS, Steyerberg EW. Is the Readmission Rate a Valid Quality Indicator? A Review of the Evidence. PLOS One. 2014;9(11):e112282.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fischer C, Lingsma HF, Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Kringos DS, Klazinga NS, Steyerberg EW. Is the Readmission Rate a Valid Quality Indicator? A Review of the Evidence. PLOS One. 2014;9(11):e112282.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yadav D, Lee E, Papchristou G, O'Connell M. A Population-Based Evaluation of Readmissions After First Hospitalization for Acute Pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2014;43(4):630–7.CrossRefPubMed Yadav D, Lee E, Papchristou G, O'Connell M. A Population-Based Evaluation of Readmissions After First Hospitalization for Acute Pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2014;43(4):630–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Yadav D, O'Connell M, Papachristou GI. Natural history following the first attack of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(7):1096–103.CrossRefPubMed Yadav D, O'Connell M, Papachristou GI. Natural history following the first attack of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(7):1096–103.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Vipperla K, Papachristou GI, Easler J, Muddana V, Slivka A, Whitcomb DC, Yadav D. Risk of and factors associated with readmission after a sentinel attack of acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12(11):1911–9.CrossRefPubMed Vipperla K, Papachristou GI, Easler J, Muddana V, Slivka A, Whitcomb DC, Yadav D. Risk of and factors associated with readmission after a sentinel attack of acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12(11):1911–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, Tsiotos GG, Vege SS, Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working G. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62(1):102–11.CrossRefPubMed Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, Tsiotos GG, Vege SS, Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working G. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62(1):102–11.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall J, Cook D, Christou N, Bernard G, Sprung C, Sibbald W. Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score: A Reliable Descriptor of a Complex Clinical Outcome. Critical Care Medicine. 1995;23(10):1638–52.CrossRefPubMed Marshall J, Cook D, Christou N, Bernard G, Sprung C, Sibbald W. Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score: A Reliable Descriptor of a Complex Clinical Outcome. Critical Care Medicine. 1995;23(10):1638–52.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Working Group IAPAPAAPG. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013;13(4 Suppl 2):e1–15. Working Group IAPAPAAPG. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013;13(4 Suppl 2):e1–15.
12.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitlock TL, Repas K, Tignor A, Conwell D, Singh V, Banks PA, Wu BU. Early readmission in acute pancreatitis: incidence and risk factors. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(11):2492–7.CrossRefPubMed Whitlock TL, Repas K, Tignor A, Conwell D, Singh V, Banks PA, Wu BU. Early readmission in acute pancreatitis: incidence and risk factors. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(11):2492–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitlock TL, Tignor A, Webster EM, Repas K, Conwell D, Banks PA, Wu BU. A scoring system to predict readmission of patients with acute pancreatitis to the hospital within thirty days of discharge. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(2):175–80.CrossRefPubMed Whitlock TL, Tignor A, Webster EM, Repas K, Conwell D, Banks PA, Wu BU. A scoring system to predict readmission of patients with acute pancreatitis to the hospital within thirty days of discharge. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(2):175–80.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
High Rates of Readmission in Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Natural History or Opportunity for Improvement?
verfasst von
Thomas K. Maatman, MD
Sarakshi Mahajan, MD
Alexandra M. Roch, MD
Kyle A. Lewellen, BS
Mark A. Heimberger, BS
Cameron L. Colgate, MS
Eugene P. Ceppa, MD
Michael G. House, MD
Attila Nakeeb, MD
C. Max Schmidt, PhD
Nicholas J. Zyromski, MD
Publikationsdatum
31.01.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 9/2019
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-04097-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2019

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 9/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.