The emergence of multidrug-resistant strains is a major health problem especially for countries with high TB incidence such as Peru. In this study, we evaluated High Resolution Melting (HRM) assay in Peruvian isolates for the detection of mutations within rpoB, katG genes and promoter region inhA to determine isoniazid and rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb).
Methods
DNA samples extracted from a total of 167 clinical isolates of Mtb, 89 drug-sensitive and 78 multidrug-resistant, were blindly analyzed by HRM analysis and verified by DNA sequencing.
Results
The HRM analysis generated patterns that were specific to distinguish between sensitive and resistance isolates. The sensitivity and specificity of the HRM assays in comparison with drug susceptibility testing (DST) for detection of rifampicin resistance were 98.7 % and 97.5 %, and for isoniazid resistance were 98.7 % and 100 %.
Conclusion
This study suggests that HRM Analysis could help with rapid diagnosis of MDR-TB cases in Peru.
Background
In countries with high TB burden such as Peru, the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains is a major health problem. In 2013, Peru registered 27 504 new TB cases (21 916 pulmonary and 5588 extrapulmonary), from which a 3.9 % (850) were multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) [1]. MDR-TB is defined as resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid, two of the first-line anti-TB drugs [1]. According to the WHO TB report, research should focus on the development of simple and rapid diagnostic methods that can be used at first level health facilities to diagnose and thus prevent the increase of MDR-TB cases [2]. The conventional phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) method, Agar Proportion Method (APM) continues to be the gold standard for Mtb DST. The problem with the current conventional DST methods available is that they are generally carried out after a culture is isolated from a clinical sample detecting Mtb’s growth in the presence of anti-TB drugs by absolute concentration, resistance ratio or portion methods on solid medium having a turnaround time of about 2–4 weeks. Therefore, more rapid TB DST methods that can use clinical samples directly are needed to give a prompt diagnosis. Some non-commercially available direct methods such as MODS (microscopic observation drug susceptibility) assay have been developed. However, the MODS assay, which can process a large number of sputum samples with results in 7–9 days, is too laborious and time consuming due to the need of daily plate readings [3]. There has been an increased effort to develop new simple and rapid diagnostic molecular methods for MDR-TB taking advantage of mutations that render resistance [4]. For rifampicin, resistance is observed with the presence of localized mutations in the 81 bp region of the rpoB gene [5]. Also, mutations in the rpoA and rpoC regions have been recently reported in resistant strains and would be important in future diagnostic methods [6, 7]. Resistance to isoniazid is observed mostly with the presence of mutations in katG. Other important mutations also occur in ahpC, kasA, ndh genes and the promoter region of inhA [8‐11]. The current molecular methods can detect resistance-associated mutations within 1–2 days using clinical samples. One of the commercially available molecular methods is Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid), a real-time PCR assay that detects rifampicin resistance in sputum samples. There are also two commercially available DNA macroarray assays (reverse hibridization-based line probe assays), INNO-LiPA rif (Innogenetics), which detect mutations on rpoB gene, and MTBDRplus (Hain Lifesciences), which simultaneously detects rifampicin (rpoB gene) and isonizid (katG and inhA region) resistance [12, 13]. These assays are able to reduce the time for MDR-TB diagnosis. In our quest to develop another molecular method that can be helpful for diagnosing MDR-TB and be implemented in Peru, we evaluated the HRM assay. Some of the advantages of HRM analysis include short processing time, simple procedure and low cost compared to current methods used in Peru [14]. HRM is based on the analysis of fluorescence curves produced by DNA intercalating dye during strand dissociation events in the melting phase following real-time PCR. It allows the detection of genetic mutations or variance in nucleic acid sequences [15]. The use of this methodology include identification of SNPs, genotyping, gene scanning, sequence matching and nucleic acids methylation [16]. In this study, we evaluated the detection of mutations in rpoB, katG genes and the inhA promoter region by HRM analysis using Peruvian culture isolates with known phenotypic susceptibility profiles of MDR-TB.
Methods
Sample collection
DNA samples extracted from a total of 167 Mtb isolates were used for this study. Convenience sampling was applied. The isolates were provided by the Laboratory Reference of Mycobacteria from DIRESA Callao, province with one of the highest number of TB cases in PERU. 89 isolates had sensitive phenotype (susceptible to both rifampicin and isoniazid) and 78 isolates had multidrug-resistant phenotype (resistant to both rifampicin and isoniazid), as determined by MODS. MODS assay was performed as described previously [17, 18] using critical concentrations of 0.4 μg/mL for isoniazid and 1.0 μg/mL for rifampicin. All but 14 isolates that had a resistant phenotype were verified by APM in the Reference Laboratory of Mycobacteria at the Instituto Nacional de Salud. Briefly, APM was performed in accordance with WHO guidelines [19] on Middlebrooks 7H10 agar containing 0.2 μg.ml and 1 μg/ml for INH or 1 μg/ml for RIF. The MODS and APM results were concordant in all samples analyzed. 64 % of the resistant samples had high level INH resistance and 11.5 % had low-level INH resistance. 17.9 % of the resistant samples had no APM results available (some due to their inability to grow on agar. For those, a molecular testing method was done). All the isolates that had the high level INH resistance and only one had both katG and inhA mutations, had katG mutations, and all the isolates that had low level INH resistance had inhA mutations.
Anzeige
All other processes and experimental methodologies were performed in the Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Laboratory at the Instituto Nacional de Salud (INS), Chorrillos. This project was approved by the INS‘s Research and Ethical Committees (OI-017-13) and has the participants’ consent to publish these data.
Extraction of DNA
Bacteria, grown on Lowenstein Jensen solid medium, were resuspended in molecular biology grade water and sonicated using S2 ultrasonicator (Covaris Inc, USA). The bacterial solution was then treated with lysozyme overnight. Finally, the DNA was extracted using the PureLink™ Genomic DNA kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA) according to manufacturer’s procedure.
High resolution melting analysis
HRM assays were performed using Type I HRM PCR kit (Qiagen). All samples were tested in duplicates. The primers used for these experiments were previously reported [20] (Table 1). For confirmation of Mtb, the IS6110 primers were used. Each reaction included: 1X HRM master mix (containing HotStarTaq Plus DNA polymerase, HRM PCR buffer with EvaGreen dye, Q-solution and dNTPs), 0.7uM of each primer, 2 ul (1 ng/ul) of Mtb DNA, and RNase-Free water. All assays were run on the Rotor-Gene Q real time PCR instrument (Qiagen, USA) using the following cycling parameters: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, 45 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s and 60 °C for 40 s. For HRM analysis, a second hold was set at 60 °C for 1 min to allow reannealing of the amplified DNA. The melt analysis was performed from 80–94 °C with 0.1 °C increments every 2 s. The reference strain H37Rv, susceptible to RIF and INH, was included in each run as a wild-type positive control and nuclease free water was used as a negative control. The biologists who performed the HRM analysis were blinded to the phenotype and genotype resistance data.
Table 1
Sequences of the primers used HRM analysis
Primer
Target
Sequence
Fragment size (bp)
HRM temperature range (°C)
IS6110-F
TCCGGCCGGTGGTCG
IS6110
103
IS6110-R
CGGCGCTTGTGGGTCAA
rpoB-F
CGCGATCAAGGAGTTCTTC
rpoB
118
rpoB-R
TGACAGACCGCCGGGCCC
80–95
katG-F
GCTGAGCCAATTCATGGACC
katG
235
katG-R
TGACAGACCGCCGGGCCC
inhA-F
GCGGTCACACTTTCGGTAA
Promoter inhA
180
inhA-R
GGTGTTCGTCCATACGACCT
F forward primer; R reverse primer
The HRM data were analyzed with the Rotor-Gene Q software. The melting curves generated represented by different color lines and shapes easily differentiate between sensitive and resistant isolates.
Anzeige
DNA sequencing
Sequencing analysis was used to confirm resistance in all phenotypically resistant strains using the primers listed on Table 2, which have been previously reported (16). Sequencing was performed using 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA), and subsequent alignment was done using Geneious 5.4.4 program.
Table 2
Sequence of primers used DNA sequencing
Primer
Gene
Sequence
Fragment size (bp)
rpoB-FS
TGGTCCGCTTGCACGAGGGTCAGA
rpoB
758
rpoB-RS
CAGGAAGGGAATCATCGCGG
katG-FS
TGCAGATGGGGCTGATCTACG
katG
ACCCATGTCTCGGTGGATCAG
596
katG-RS
inhA-FS
ACATACCTGCTGCGCAAT
inhA
TCACATTCGACGCCAAAC
400
inhA-RS
F forward; R reverse
Statistical analysis
The sensitivity and specificity parameters were calculated before and after discrepancies were resolved using statistical formula. Sensitivity was calculated as follows: (true positive/(true positive + false negative); specificity was calculated as follows: (true negative)/(true negative + false positive). The data were analyzed using the EPIDAT ver. 3.1 software. The study conforms to the international standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy (STARD) requirements [21].
Results and Discussion
Detection of rifampicin resistance using HRM analysis
To evaluate the ability of the HRM assay to detect rifampicin resistance, we analyzed sequence variations in a 118 bp region of the rpoB gene on the DNA samples of 167 Mtb isolates. 89 isolates were sensitive and 78 were MDR as determined by MODS and confirmed by APM. According to the HRM results, there were phenotypic and genotypic (HRM analysis) concordance for 77 out of 78 resistant isolates. One phenotypic resistant isolate was genotypic sensitive and two phenotypic sensitive isolates were genotypic resistant by HRM (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
HRM curve analysis for resistant discrimination in 118 bp amplified fragment from rpoB gene. Resistant profiles with positive and negative fluorescence are shows in red circles (five samples). Sensitive profiles are shows in black circle (seven samples)
×
Detection of isoniazid resistance using HRM analysis
To evaluate the ability of the HRM assay to detect isoniazid resistance, we analyzed sequence variations in a 235 bp region of the katG gene and in a 190 bp region of the inhA promoter the DNA samples of the 167 isolates. The results of the HRM analysis showed that there was phenotypic and genotypic (HRM analysis) concordance for 77 out of 78 resistant isolates. One phenotypic resistant isolate was genotypic sensitive. HRM analysis for katG gene detected 90 sensitive and 67 isoniazid resistant isolates (Fig. 2), and for the promoter region of inhA 90 sensitive and 10 isoniazid resistant isolates were detected (Fig. 3).
Fig. 2
HRM curve analysis for resistant discrimination in 235 pb amplified fragment from katG gene. Resistant profiles are show in red circle (four samples). Sensitive profiles are show in black circle (eight samples)
Fig. 3
HRM curve analysis for resistant discrimination in 190 pb amplified fragment from inhA promotor region. Resistant profiles are show in red circle (seven samples). Sensitive profiles are show in black circle (ten samples)
×
×
DNA sequencing
Seventy-eight samples with drug-resistant profiles were sequenced for the rpoB, katG and inhA targets (Table 3). Fourteen types of mutations were observed in the rpoB gene of the resistant samples, with S531L (TCG➔TTG) being the most common. In the katG gene, the most common mutation was S315T, and C → T (−15) for inhA promoter. All the mutations observed have been previously linked to resistance to INH and RIF.
Table 3
Results of HRM curves analysis for rpoB, katG and inhA targets in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
DRUG
PHENOTYPE
TARGET
N°
MUTATION
HRM CURVE ASSAY
DNA SEQUENCING
RIFAMPICIN
Resistant (78)
rpoB
53
S531L (TCG → TTG)
mutant
mutant
14
D516V (GAC → GTC)
mutant
mutant
2
H526D (CAC → GAC)
mutant
mutant
1
Q513L (CAA → CTA)
mutant
mutant
1
Q513P (CAA → CCA)
mutant
mutant
1
M515I (ATG → ATA), D516G (GAC → GGC)
mutant
mutant
1
D516Y (GAC → TAC), N518H (AAC → CAC)
mutant
mutant
1
H526R (CAC → CGC)
mutant
mutant
1
H526Y (CAC → TAC)
mutant
mutant
1
S531F (TCG → TTT)
mutant
mutant
1
S531W (TCG → TGG)
mutant
mutant
1
No mutation
wild
wild
Susceptible (89)
87
Not sequenced
wild
-
2
514 Phe (TTC → TTT)
mutant
wild
ISONIAZID
Resistant (78)
katG
66
S315T (AGC → ACC)
mutant
mutant
1
S315T (AGC → ACC), C → T (−15)
mutant
mutant
inhA
10
C → T (−15)
mutant
mutant
katG,inhA
1
No mutation
wild
wild
Susceptible (89)
87
Not sequenced
wild
-
2
No mutation
wild
wild
Two samples with a sensitive phenotype that turn out resistant by HRM analysis were also sequenced. Sequencing revealed a synonymous mutation in codon 514 (TTC➔TTT), reason why the sample has a sensitive phenotype. A drug-resistant sample that gave wild-type results with HRM analysis had no mutations in rpoB, katG and inhA promoter, suggesting the possibility of mutations in other genes (like rpoA, rpoC, ahpC, kasA and ndh).
Analysis of sensitivity and specificity of HRM analysis
Most of HRM analysis results were consistent with the resistant or sensitive phenotype. The sensitivity for detection of rifampicin resistance was found to be 98.7 % and the specificity 97.75 %. For isoniazid resistance (katG and/or inhA), the sensitivity was found to be 98.7 % and the specificity 100 % (Table 4).
Table 4
Sensitivity and specificity of HRM analysis in comparison with Drug susceptibility
Drug
Target
HRM profile
% variant
Drug susceptibility
% resistant
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
+
−
+
−
Rifampicin
rpoB
79
88
47.3
78
89
46.7
98.7 (92.2–99.9)
97.75 (91.2–99.6)
Isoniazid
katG and/or
77
90
46.1
78
89
46.7
98.7 (92.2–99.9)
100 (94.2–99.9)
inhA promoter
Conclusions
At present, a rapid and effective diagnosis for TB and MDR-TB is necessary to provide a better treatment for infected individuals. Molecular biology techniques like HRM analysis can be employed to detect MDR-TB due to their high sensitivity, specificity and efficiency [20, 22, 23]. In this study, we evaluated the performance of HRM curve analysis as a method for the rapid and accurate detection of mutations associated to MDR-TB. All isolates with drug-resistance profiles were confirmed by DNA sequencing analysis. In comparison with previous studies, our results of sensitivity and specificity are similar to others (24–26). One limitation of the current study is that the target region used for the HRM analysis does not cover all mutations related to resistance, and thus, the technique cannot yet replace conventional DST. Another limitation is that the test may detect silent or other mutations not actually associated with drug resistance. An advantage of this technique is that it can be implemented to detect fluoroquinolone, pyrazinamide and streptomycin resistance [24‐26].
Anzeige
In conclusion, this study showed that using the rpoB, katG genes and inhA promoter region as targets in the HRM assay can be used to detect MDR-TB in culture isolates with high sensibility and specificity. Evaluation of the HRM assay on sputum samples would be an important next step to further expedite MDR-TB detection.
Abbreviations
HRM, high resolution melting; TB, tuberculosis; Mtb, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; DST, drug susceptibility testing; APM, Agar Proportion Method; MDR-TB, multidrug-resistance tuberculosis; MODS, Microscopic observations drug susceptibility
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Omar Piscoya and Jenny Reques for their help in sample collection.
Funding
This project was funded by the Instituto Nacional de Salud from Peru.
Anzeige
Availability of data and materials
All the data supporting our findings is contained within the manuscript.
Authors’ contributions
MG and MF participated in the design and development of the project, and drafting of the manuscript. HG participated in the design of the project and revision of the manuscript. KL participated in the drafting and revision of the manuscript, and given final approval of the manuscript. EC, NB and MR participated in the sample collection and their drug susceptibility analysis by MODS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Anzeige
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This project was approved by the INS‘s Research and Ethical Committees with reference number OI-017-13 and has the participants’ consent to publish these data.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
