nach oben

International Journal of Public Health

Erschienen in:

11.12.2018 | Original Article

Higher mortality in women living in high-participation areas of a population-based health check and lifestyle intervention study

verfasst von: Anne Mette Bender, Torben Jørgensen, Charlotta Pisinger

Erschienen in: International Journal of Public Health | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The aim was to study whether the effects of a population-based health check and lifestyle intervention differed according to study participation rate.

Methods

All persons living in 73 areas of Copenhagen County, Denmark, were included in the Inter99 randomized trial in 1999 (intervention group n = 11,483; control group n = 47,122). All persons in the intervention group were invited for health checks and were offered lifestyle counseling if they were at high risk of ischemic heart disease. Areas were divided into low 35–49%, middle 50–54% and high ≥ 55% health check participation. All persons were followed in registers for 10-year cause-specific mortality.

Results

In high-participation areas, there was a significantly higher risk of lifestyle-(HR 1.37 [1.04, 1.79]) and cancer-related deaths (HR 1.47 [1.08, 2.02]) among women in the intervention group than control group. Regarding smoking-related cancer deaths, differences were even more pronounced. Among men, no significant difference in mortality was seen between control and intervention groups.

Conclusions

The results of this paper suggest that among women, the health check and lifestyle intervention may increase the risk of lifestyle and cancer-related deaths.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abdalrahman B, Soljak M (2015) NHS health checks. J Ambul Care Manag 38:5–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/JAC.0000000000000070 CrossRef

Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study Group (1994) The effect of vitamin E and beta carotene on the incidence of lung cancer and other cancers in male smokers. N Engl J Med 330:1029–1035. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199404143301501 CrossRef

Amoroso C, Harris MF, Ampt A et al (2009) The 45 year old health check—feasibility and impact on practices and patient behaviour. Aust Fam Physician 38:358–362PubMed

Bender AM, Jørgensen T, Pisinger C (2015) Is self-selection the main driver of positive interpretations of general health checks? The Inter99 randomized trial. Prev Med 81:42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.07.004 CrossRefPubMed

Bender AM, Jørgensen T, Pisinger C (2017) Do high participation rates improve effects of population-based general health checks? Prev Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.05.008 CrossRefPubMed

Boytsov S, Potemkina RA (2014) Perspectives: preventive measures for public health in Russian Federation. Eur Heart J Suppl 16:A84–A86. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/sut018 CrossRef

European Commission E (2018) Glossary: equivalised disposable income. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php/Glossary:Equivalised_disposable_income

Holland W (2009) Periodic health examination—a brief history and critical assessment. Eurohealth 15(4):16–20

Jørgensen T, Borch-Johnsen K, Thomsen TF et al (2003) A randomized non-pharmacological intervention study for prevention of ischaemic heart disease: baseline results Inter99. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil Off J Eur Soc Cardiol Work Groups Epidemiol Prev Card Rehabil Exerc Physiol 10:377–386. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjr.0000096541.30533.82 CrossRef

Jørgensen T, Capewell S, Prescott E et al (2012) Population-level changes to promote cardiovascular health. Eur J Prev Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487312441726 CrossRefPubMed

Jørgensen T, Jacobsen RK, Toft U et al (2014) Effect of screening and lifestyle counselling on incidence of ischaemic heart disease in general population: inter99 randomised trial. BMJ 348:g3617CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kohro T, Furui Y, Mitsutake N et al (2008) The Japanese national health screening and intervention program aimed at preventing worsening of the metabolic syndrome. Int Heart J 49:193–203CrossRefPubMed

Krogsboll LT, Jorgensen KJ, Gronhoj Larsen C, Gotzsche PC (2012) General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease: cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 345:e7191. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e7191 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

McDermott MS, Marteau TM, Hollands GJ et al (2013) Change in anxiety following successful and unsuccessful attempts at smoking cessation: cohort study. Br J Psychiatry 202:62–67. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.112.114389 CrossRefPubMed

Mindell JS, Giampaoli S, Goesswald A et al (2015) Sample selection, recruitment and participation rates in health examination surveys in Europe—experience from seven national surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0072-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US) Office on Smoking and Health (2014) The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the surgeon general. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), Atlanta (GA)

NHS Health Check Expert Scientific and Clinical Advisory Panel (2014) ESCAP (2014) Inter99 trial: a statement from the NHS Health Check Expert Scientific and Clinical Advisory Panel

O’Connor RJ, Rees VW, Rivard C et al (2017) Internalized smoking stigma in relation to quit intentions, quit attempts, and current e-cigarette use. Subst Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2017.1326999 CrossRef

Office of the Surgeon General (US), Office on Smoking and Health (US) (2004) The health consequences of smoking: a report of the surgeon general. centers for disease control and prevention (US), Atlanta (GA)

Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H et al (2012) European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012): the fifth joint task force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Atherosclerosis 223:1–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.05.007 CrossRefPubMed

Pisinger C, Glümer C, Toft U et al (2008) High risk strategy in smoking cessation is feasible on a population-based level. The Inter99 study. Prev Med 46:579–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.026 CrossRefPubMed

Richard L, Potvin L, Kishchuk N et al (1996) Assessment of the integration of the ecological approach in health promotion programs. AJHP 10:318–328PubMed

Rose G (1987) European collaborative trial of multifactorial prevention of coronary heart disease. Lancet 1:685CrossRefPubMed

Si S, Moss JR, Sullivan TR et al (2014) Effectiveness of general practice-based health checks: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract 64:e47–e53. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X676456 CrossRef

Skaaby T, Jørgensen T, Linneberg A (2017) Effects of invitation to participate in health surveys on the incidence of cardiovascular disease: a randomized general population study. Int J Epidemiol 46:603–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw311 CrossRefPubMed

Stead LF, Buitrago D, Preciado N et al (2013) Physician advice for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000165.pub4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Thomsen TF, Davidsen M, Ibsen H et al (2001) A new method for CHD prediction and prevention based on regional risk scores and randomized clinical trials; PRECARD and the Copenhagen Risk Score. J Cardiovasc Risk 8:291–297CrossRefPubMed

Wilson JMG, Jungner G, Organization WH (1968) Principles and practice of screening for disease. Available from: http://apps.who.int.ep.fjernadgang.kb.dk//iris/handle/10665/37650

Yong H-H, Borland R, Hyland A, Siahpush M (2008) How does a failed quit attempt among regular smokers affect their cigarette consumption? Findings from the International Tobacco Control Four-Country Survey (ITC-4). Nicotine Tob Res Off J Soc Res Nicotine Tob 10:897. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200802023841 CrossRef

Titel: Higher mortality in women living in high-participation areas of a population-based health check and lifestyle intervention study
verfasst von: Anne Mette Bender
Torben Jørgensen
Charlotta Pisinger
Publikationsdatum: 11.12.2018
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: International Journal of Public Health / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1661-8556
Elektronische ISSN: 1661-8564
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-018-1179-2

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Rural–urban inequities in deaths and cancer mortality amid rapid economic and environmental changes in China

“I am spiritual, but not religious”: Does one without the other protect against adolescent health-risk behaviour?

Women’s health and well-being in low-income formal and informal neighbourhoods on the eve of the armed conflict in Aleppo

United States Congressmen support the legalization of environmental health injustice in Puerto Rico

Towards environmental health equity in health impact assessment: innovations and opportunities

Impact of desertification and land degradation on Colombian children