Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 2/2020

29.10.2019 | Neuro

Highly accelerated time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography using spiral imaging improves conspicuity of intracranial arterial branches while reducing scan time

verfasst von: Tobias Greve, Nico Sollmann, Andreas Hock, Silke Hey, Velmurugan Gnanaprakasam, Marco Nijenhuis, Claus Zimmer, Jan S. Kirschke

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To systematically compare time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) acquired with Compressed SENSE (TOF-CS) to spiral imaging (TOF-Spiral) for imaging of brain-feeding arteries.

Methods

Seventy-one patients (60.2 ± 19.5 years, 43.7% females, 28.2% with pathology) who underwent TOF-MRA after implementation of a new scanner software program enabling spiral imaging were analyzed retrospectively. TOF-CS (standard sequence; duration ~ 4 min) and the new TOF-Spiral (duration ~ 3 min) were acquired. Image evaluation (vessel image quality and detectability, diagnostic confidence (1 (diagnosis very uncertain) to 5 (diagnosis very certain)), quantitative measurement of aneurysm diameter or degree of stenosis according to North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria) was performed by two readers. Quantitative assessments of pathology were compared to computed tomography angiography (CTA) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

Results

TOF-CS showed higher image quality for intraosseous and intradural segments of the internal carotid artery while TOF-Spiral better depicted small intracranial vessels like the anterior choroidal artery. All vessel pathologies were correctly identified by both readers for TOF-CS and TOF-Spiral with high confidence (TOF-CS (4.4 ± 0.6 and 4.3 ± 0.8), TOF-Spiral (4.3 ± 0.7 and 4.3 ± 0.8)) and good inter-reader agreement (Cohen’s kappa > 0.8). Quantitative assessments of aneurysm size or stenosis did not significantly differ between TOF-CS or TOF-Spiral and CTA or DSA (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

TOF-Spiral for imaging of brain-feeding arteries enables reductions in scan time without drawbacks in diagnostic confidence. A combination of spiral imaging and CS may help to overcome shortcomings of both sequences alone and could further reduce acquisition times in the future.

Key Points

• TOF-MRA with Compressed SENSE is superior in depicting arteries at the skull base while spiral TOF-MRA is able to better depict small intracranial vessels.
• Both TOF-MRA with Compressed SENSE and TOF-MRA with spiral imaging provide high diagnostic confidence for detection of pathologies of brain-feeding arteries.
• Spiral TOF-MRA is faster (by 25% for the sequence used in this study) than TOF-MRA with Compressed SENSE, thus enabling clear reductions in scan time for the clinical setting.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS et al (2016) Heart disease and stroke statistics-2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 133:e38–e360 Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS et al (2016) Heart disease and stroke statistics-2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 133:e38–e360
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Volný O, Kašičková L, Coufalová D, Cimflová P, Novák J (2015) microRNAs in cerebrovascular disease. Adv Exp Med Biol 888:155–195 Volný O, Kašičková L, Coufalová D, Cimflová P, Novák J (2015) microRNAs in cerebrovascular disease. Adv Exp Med Biol 888:155–195
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart RG, Diener HC, Coutts SB et al (2014) Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol 13:429–438CrossRef Hart RG, Diener HC, Coutts SB et al (2014) Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol 13:429–438CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nüssel F, Wegmüller H, Huber P (1991) Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, magnetic resonance imaging and conventional angiography in cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Neuroradiology 33:56–61 Nüssel F, Wegmüller H, Huber P (1991) Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, magnetic resonance imaging and conventional angiography in cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Neuroradiology 33:56–61
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Borisch I, Horn M, Butz B et al (2003) Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:1117–1122PubMed Borisch I, Horn M, Butz B et al (2003) Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:1117–1122PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bui TD, Gelfand D, Whipple S et al (2005) Comparison of CT and catheter arteriography for evaluation of peripheral arterial disease. Vasc Endovascular Surg 39:481–490CrossRef Bui TD, Gelfand D, Whipple S et al (2005) Comparison of CT and catheter arteriography for evaluation of peripheral arterial disease. Vasc Endovascular Surg 39:481–490CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cirillo M, Scomazzoni F, Cirillo L et al (2013) Comparison of 3D TOF-MRA and 3D CE-MRA at 3T for imaging of intracranial aneurysms. Eur J Radiol 82:e853–e859CrossRef Cirillo M, Scomazzoni F, Cirillo L et al (2013) Comparison of 3D TOF-MRA and 3D CE-MRA at 3T for imaging of intracranial aneurysms. Eur J Radiol 82:e853–e859CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Schernthaner R, Stadler A, Lomoschitz F et al (2008) Multidetector CT angiography in the assessment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: accuracy in detecting the severity, number, and length of stenoses. Eur Radiol 18:665–671CrossRef Schernthaner R, Stadler A, Lomoschitz F et al (2008) Multidetector CT angiography in the assessment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: accuracy in detecting the severity, number, and length of stenoses. Eur Radiol 18:665–671CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mandell DM, Mossa-Basha M, Qiao Y et al (2017) Intracranial vessel wall MRI: principles and expert consensus recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:218–229CrossRef Mandell DM, Mossa-Basha M, Qiao Y et al (2017) Intracranial vessel wall MRI: principles and expert consensus recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:218–229CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung MS, Jung SC, Kim SO et al (2017) Intracranial artery steno-occlusion: diagnosis by using two-dimensional spatially selective radiofrequency excitation pulse MR imaging. Radiology 284:834–843CrossRef Chung MS, Jung SC, Kim SO et al (2017) Intracranial artery steno-occlusion: diagnosis by using two-dimensional spatially selective radiofrequency excitation pulse MR imaging. Radiology 284:834–843CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee NJ, Chung MS, Jung SC et al (2016) Comparison of high-resolution MR imaging and digital subtraction angiography for the characterization and diagnosis of intracranial artery disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37:2245–2250CrossRef Lee NJ, Chung MS, Jung SC et al (2016) Comparison of high-resolution MR imaging and digital subtraction angiography for the characterization and diagnosis of intracranial artery disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37:2245–2250CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JE, Jung SC, Lee SH et al (2017) Comparison of 3D magnetic resonance imaging and digital subtraction angiography for intracranial artery stenosis. Eur Radiol 27:4737–4746CrossRef Park JE, Jung SC, Lee SH et al (2017) Comparison of 3D magnetic resonance imaging and digital subtraction angiography for intracranial artery stenosis. Eur Radiol 27:4737–4746CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel MR, Klufas RA, Kim D, Edelman RR, Kent KC (1994) MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation: artifacts and limitations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:1431–1437CrossRef Patel MR, Klufas RA, Kim D, Edelman RR, Kent KC (1994) MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation: artifacts and limitations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:1431–1437CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaufmann TJ, Huston J 3rd, Cloft HJ et al (2010) A prospective trial of 3T and 1.5T time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:912–918CrossRef Kaufmann TJ, Huston J 3rd, Cloft HJ et al (2010) A prospective trial of 3T and 1.5T time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:912–918CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fushimi Y, Fujimoto K, Okada T et al (2016) Compressed sensing 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for cerebral aneurysms: optimization and evaluation. Invest Radiol 51:228–235CrossRef Fushimi Y, Fujimoto K, Okada T et al (2016) Compressed sensing 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for cerebral aneurysms: optimization and evaluation. Invest Radiol 51:228–235CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM (2007) Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 58:1182–1195CrossRef Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM (2007) Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 58:1182–1195CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto T, Okada T, Fushimi Y et al (2018) Magnetic resonance angiography with compressed sensing: an evaluation of moyamoya disease. PLoS One 13:e0189493CrossRef Yamamoto T, Okada T, Fushimi Y et al (2018) Magnetic resonance angiography with compressed sensing: an evaluation of moyamoya disease. PLoS One 13:e0189493CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu SS, Qi M, Zhang X et al (2018) Clinical evaluation of highly accelerated compressed sensing time-of-flight MR angiography for intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:1833–1838CrossRef Lu SS, Qi M, Zhang X et al (2018) Clinical evaluation of highly accelerated compressed sensing time-of-flight MR angiography for intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:1833–1838CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Li B, Li H, Dong L, Huang G (2017) Fast carotid artery MR angiography with compressed sensing based three-dimensional time-of-flight sequence. Magn Reson Imaging 43:129–135CrossRef Li B, Li H, Dong L, Huang G (2017) Fast carotid artery MR angiography with compressed sensing based three-dimensional time-of-flight sequence. Magn Reson Imaging 43:129–135CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Fushimi Y, Okada T, Kikuchi T et al (2017) Clinical evaluation of time-of-flight MR angiography with sparse undersampling and iterative reconstruction for cerebral aneurysms. NMR Biomed 30:e3774CrossRef Fushimi Y, Okada T, Kikuchi T et al (2017) Clinical evaluation of time-of-flight MR angiography with sparse undersampling and iterative reconstruction for cerebral aneurysms. NMR Biomed 30:e3774CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hutter J, Grimm R, Forman C, Hornegger J, Schmitt P (2015) Highly undersampled peripheral time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography: optimized data acquisition and iterative image reconstruction. MAGMA 28:437–446 Hutter J, Grimm R, Forman C, Hornegger J, Schmitt P (2015) Highly undersampled peripheral time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography: optimized data acquisition and iterative image reconstruction. MAGMA 28:437–446
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Vasanawala SS, Alley MT, Hargreaves BA, Barth RA, Pauly JM, Lustig M (2010) Improved pediatric MR imaging with compressed sensing. Radiology 256:607–616CrossRef Vasanawala SS, Alley MT, Hargreaves BA, Barth RA, Pauly JM, Lustig M (2010) Improved pediatric MR imaging with compressed sensing. Radiology 256:607–616CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer CH, Hu BS, Nishimura DG, Macovski A (1992) Fast spiral coronary artery imaging. Magn Reson Med 28:202–213CrossRef Meyer CH, Hu BS, Nishimura DG, Macovski A (1992) Fast spiral coronary artery imaging. Magn Reson Med 28:202–213CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Li Z, Hu HH, Miller JH et al (2016) A spiral spin-echo MR imaging technique for improved flow artifact suppression in T1-weighted postcontrast brain imaging: a comparison with Cartesian turbo spin-echo. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37:642–647CrossRef Li Z, Hu HH, Miller JH et al (2016) A spiral spin-echo MR imaging technique for improved flow artifact suppression in T1-weighted postcontrast brain imaging: a comparison with Cartesian turbo spin-echo. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37:642–647CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang D, Zwart NR, Pipe JG (2018) Joint water-fat separation and deblurring for spiral imaging. Magn Reson Med 79:3218–3228CrossRef Wang D, Zwart NR, Pipe JG (2018) Joint water-fat separation and deblurring for spiral imaging. Magn Reson Med 79:3218–3228CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Samuels OB, Joseph GJ, Lynn MJ, Smith HA, Chimowitz MI (2000) A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:643–646PubMed Samuels OB, Joseph GJ, Lynn MJ, Smith HA, Chimowitz MI (2000) A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:643–646PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Fox AJ (1993) How to measure carotid stenosis. Radiology 186:316–318CrossRef Fox AJ (1993) How to measure carotid stenosis. Radiology 186:316–318CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Bash S, Villablanca JP, Jahan R et al (2005) Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:1012–1021PubMed Bash S, Villablanca JP, Jahan R et al (2005) Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:1012–1021PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kasper L, Haeberlin M, Dietrich BE et al (2014) Matched-filter acquisition for BOLD fMRI. Neuroimage 100:145–160 Kasper L, Haeberlin M, Dietrich BE et al (2014) Matched-filter acquisition for BOLD fMRI. Neuroimage 100:145–160
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahn CB, Kim JH, Cho ZH (1986) High-speed spiral-scan echo planar NMR imaging-I. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 5:2–7CrossRef Ahn CB, Kim JH, Cho ZH (1986) High-speed spiral-scan echo planar NMR imaging-I. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 5:2–7CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Heberlein K, Hu X (2006) Auto-calibrated parallel spiral imaging. Magn Reson Med 55:619–625CrossRef Heberlein K, Hu X (2006) Auto-calibrated parallel spiral imaging. Magn Reson Med 55:619–625CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Zahneisen B, Poser BA, Ernst T, Stenger AV (2014) Simultaneous multi-slice fMRI using spiral trajectories. Neuroimage 92:8–18 Zahneisen B, Poser BA, Ernst T, Stenger AV (2014) Simultaneous multi-slice fMRI using spiral trajectories. Neuroimage 92:8–18
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilm BJ, Barmet C, Gross S et al (2017) Single-shot spiral imaging enabled by an expanded encoding model: demonstration in diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 77:83–91CrossRef Wilm BJ, Barmet C, Gross S et al (2017) Single-shot spiral imaging enabled by an expanded encoding model: demonstration in diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 77:83–91CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Block KT, Frahm J (2005) Spiral imaging: a critical appraisal. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:657–668CrossRef Block KT, Frahm J (2005) Spiral imaging: a critical appraisal. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:657–668CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Börnert P, Schomberg H, Aldefeld B, Groen J (1999) Improvements in spiral MR imaging. MAGMA 9:29–41CrossRef Börnert P, Schomberg H, Aldefeld B, Groen J (1999) Improvements in spiral MR imaging. MAGMA 9:29–41CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Börnert P, Boesiger P (2001) Advances in sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k-space trajectories. Magn Reson Med 46:638–651CrossRef Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Börnert P, Boesiger P (2001) Advances in sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k-space trajectories. Magn Reson Med 46:638–651CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilm BJ, Nagy Z, Barmet C et al (2015) Diffusion MRI with concurrent magnetic field monitoring. Magn Reson Med 74:925–933CrossRef Wilm BJ, Nagy Z, Barmet C et al (2015) Diffusion MRI with concurrent magnetic field monitoring. Magn Reson Med 74:925–933CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Li Z, Karis JP, Pipe JG (2018) A 2D spiral turbo-spin-echo technique. Magn Reson Med 80:1989–1996CrossRef Li Z, Karis JP, Pipe JG (2018) A 2D spiral turbo-spin-echo technique. Magn Reson Med 80:1989–1996CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Dyvorne H, Knight-Greenfield A, Jajamovich G et al (2015) Abdominal 4D flow MR imaging in a breath hold: combination of spiral sampling and dynamic compressed sensing for highly accelerated acquisition. Radiology 275:245–254CrossRef Dyvorne H, Knight-Greenfield A, Jajamovich G et al (2015) Abdominal 4D flow MR imaging in a breath hold: combination of spiral sampling and dynamic compressed sensing for highly accelerated acquisition. Radiology 275:245–254CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Bane O, Peti S, Wagner M et al (2019) Hemodynamic measurements with an abdominal 4D flow MRI sequence with spiral sampling and compressed sensing in patients with chronic liver disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 49:994–1005CrossRef Bane O, Peti S, Wagner M et al (2019) Hemodynamic measurements with an abdominal 4D flow MRI sequence with spiral sampling and compressed sensing in patients with chronic liver disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 49:994–1005CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Highly accelerated time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography using spiral imaging improves conspicuity of intracranial arterial branches while reducing scan time
verfasst von
Tobias Greve
Nico Sollmann
Andreas Hock
Silke Hey
Velmurugan Gnanaprakasam
Marco Nijenhuis
Claus Zimmer
Jan S. Kirschke
Publikationsdatum
29.10.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06442-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

European Radiology 2/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.