Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 6/2008

01.06.2008 | Original Paper

Histopathological assessment of anastrozole and tamoxifen as preoperative (neoadjuvant) treatment in postmenopausal Japanese women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in the PROACT trial

verfasst von: Masafumi Kurosumi, Yuichi Takatsuka, Toru Watanabe, Shigeru Imoto, Hideo Inaji, Hitoshi Tsuda, Futoshi Akiyama, Goi Sakamoto, Tadashi Ikeda, Shinzaburo Noguchi

Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology | Ausgabe 6/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The PReOperative ‘Arimidex’® Compared with Tamoxifen (PROACT) trial compared neoadjuvant anastrozole and tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with large, operable or potentially operable, locally advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Here, we compare objective clinical responses with histopathological tumor responses to therapy in a cohort of 97 Japanese patients, in order to investigate the consistency of assessment methods and the change in estrogen-receptor (ER) and progesterone-receptor (PgR) status.

Methods

Histopathological response and the change in ER and PgR status were assessed by comparing pathological specimens collected at baseline (via needle biopsy) with those collected at 3 months (from excised tumors). The response was evaluated using Pathological Response Criteria for Breast Cancer as defined by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society. The patients were randomized to receive anastrozole (n = 48) or tamoxifen (n = 49).

Results

A numerically greater histopathological response rate was observed when neoadjuvant anastrozole compared with neoadjuvant tamoxifen (35.4 and 12.2%, respectively). The histopathological and clinical objective response rates agreed in 63/97 patients. The ER status of 5/40 patients changed from positive at baseline to negative at 3 months in the anastrozole group compared with 20/37 patients in the tamoxifen group. The PgR status of 16/17 patients in the anastrozole group and of 1/11 patients in the tamoxifen group changed from positive to negative.

Conclusions

These data support the findings of the main PROACT trial, which confirmed that anastrozole, as compared with tamoxifen, is an effective neoadjuvant endocrine treatment in objective response rates for postmenopausal women with large operable hormone-receptor positive breast cancer. Further follow-up is required to confirm whether histopathological responses to therapy correlate with an overall improvement in survival.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson TJ, Dixon JM, Stuart M, Sahmoud T, Miller WR (2002) Effect of neoadjuvant treatment with anastrozole on tumour histology in postmenopausal women with large operable breast cancer. Br J Cancer 87:334–338PubMedCrossRef Anderson TJ, Dixon JM, Stuart M, Sahmoud T, Miller WR (2002) Effect of neoadjuvant treatment with anastrozole on tumour histology in postmenopausal women with large operable breast cancer. Br J Cancer 87:334–338PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat ATAC Trialists’ Group (2005) Results of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) trial after completion of 5 years’ adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. Lancet 365:60–62CrossRef ATAC Trialists’ Group (2005) Results of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) trial after completion of 5 years’ adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. Lancet 365:60–62CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Beresford MJ, Stott D, Makris A (2007) Assessment of clinical response after two cycles of primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 11 July 2007 (E-pub ahead of print) Beresford MJ, Stott D, Makris A (2007) Assessment of clinical response after two cycles of primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 11 July 2007 (E-pub ahead of print)
Zurück zum Zitat Buzdar AU, Valero V, Theriault RL, Frye D, Green M, Booser D, Guerra L, Sahin A, Ames F, Smith T, Singletary E, Hortobagyi GN (2003) Pathological complete response to chemotherapy is related to hormone receptor status. Breast Cancer Res Treat 82 (Suppl 1):S69, abs 302 Buzdar AU, Valero V, Theriault RL, Frye D, Green M, Booser D, Guerra L, Sahin A, Ames F, Smith T, Singletary E, Hortobagyi GN (2003) Pathological complete response to chemotherapy is related to hormone receptor status. Breast Cancer Res Treat 82 (Suppl 1):S69, abs 302
Zurück zum Zitat Buzdar AU, Ibrahim NK, Francis D, Booser DJ, Thomas ES, Theriault RL, Pusztai L, Green MC, Arun BK, Giordano SH, Cristofanilli M, Frye DK, Smith TL, Hunt KK, Singletary SE, Sahin AA, Ewer MS, Buchholz TA, Berry D, Hortobagyi GN (2005) Significantly higher pathologic complete remission rate after neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and epirubicin chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:3676–3685PubMedCrossRef Buzdar AU, Ibrahim NK, Francis D, Booser DJ, Thomas ES, Theriault RL, Pusztai L, Green MC, Arun BK, Giordano SH, Cristofanilli M, Frye DK, Smith TL, Hunt KK, Singletary SE, Sahin AA, Ewer MS, Buchholz TA, Berry D, Hortobagyi GN (2005) Significantly higher pathologic complete remission rate after neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and epirubicin chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:3676–3685PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cataliotti L, Buzdar AU, Noguchi S, Bines J, Takatsuka Y, Petrakova K, Dube P, de Oliveira CT (2006) Comparison of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as preoperative therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: the Pre-Operative “Arimidex” Compared to Tamoxifen (PROACT) trial. Cancer 106:2095–2103PubMedCrossRef Cataliotti L, Buzdar AU, Noguchi S, Bines J, Takatsuka Y, Petrakova K, Dube P, de Oliveira CT (2006) Comparison of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as preoperative therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: the Pre-Operative “Arimidex” Compared to Tamoxifen (PROACT) trial. Cancer 106:2095–2103PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dixon JM, Love CD, Renshaw L, Bellamy C, Cameron DA, Miller WR, Leonard RC (1999) Lessons from the use of aromatase inhibitors in the neoadjuvant setting. Endocr Relat Cancer 6:227–230PubMedCrossRef Dixon JM, Love CD, Renshaw L, Bellamy C, Cameron DA, Miller WR, Leonard RC (1999) Lessons from the use of aromatase inhibitors in the neoadjuvant setting. Endocr Relat Cancer 6:227–230PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dixon JM, Renshaw L, Bellamy C, Stuart M, Hoctin-Boes G, Miller WR (2000) The effects of neoadjuvant anastrozole (Arimidex) on tumor volume in postmenopausal women with breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind, single-center study. Clin Cancer Res 6:2229–2235PubMed Dixon JM, Renshaw L, Bellamy C, Stuart M, Hoctin-Boes G, Miller WR (2000) The effects of neoadjuvant anastrozole (Arimidex) on tumor volume in postmenopausal women with breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind, single-center study. Clin Cancer Res 6:2229–2235PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Dixon JM, Anderson TJ, Miller WR (2002) Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of breast cancer: a surgical perspective. Eur J Cancer 38:2214–2221PubMedCrossRef Dixon JM, Anderson TJ, Miller WR (2002) Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of breast cancer: a surgical perspective. Eur J Cancer 38:2214–2221PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eiermann W, Paepke S, Appfelstaedt J, Llombart-Cussac A, Eremin J, Vinholes J, Mauriac L, Ellis M, Lassus M, Chaudri-Ross HA, Dugan M, Borgs M, Letrozole Neo-Adjuvant Breast Cancer Study Group (2001) Preoperative treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with letrozole: a randomized double-blind multicenter study. Ann Oncol 12:1527–1532PubMedCrossRef Eiermann W, Paepke S, Appfelstaedt J, Llombart-Cussac A, Eremin J, Vinholes J, Mauriac L, Ellis M, Lassus M, Chaudri-Ross HA, Dugan M, Borgs M, Letrozole Neo-Adjuvant Breast Cancer Study Group (2001) Preoperative treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with letrozole: a randomized double-blind multicenter study. Ann Oncol 12:1527–1532PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ellis MJ, Coop A, Singh B, Mauriac L, Llombert-Cussac A, Janicke F, Miller WR, Evans DB, Dugan M, Brady C, Quebe-Fehling E, Borgs M (2001) Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for ErbB-1- and/or ErbB-2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 19:3808–3816PubMed Ellis MJ, Coop A, Singh B, Mauriac L, Llombert-Cussac A, Janicke F, Miller WR, Evans DB, Dugan M, Brady C, Quebe-Fehling E, Borgs M (2001) Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for ErbB-1- and/or ErbB-2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 19:3808–3816PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Huober J, Krainick-Strobel U, Kurek R, Wallwiener D (2004) Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in primary breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 5:341–347PubMed Huober J, Krainick-Strobel U, Kurek R, Wallwiener D (2004) Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in primary breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 5:341–347PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kurosumi M (2003) Significance of immunohistochemical assessment of steroid hormone receptor status for breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer 10:97–104PubMed Kurosumi M (2003) Significance of immunohistochemical assessment of steroid hormone receptor status for breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer 10:97–104PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kurosumi M (2004) Significance of histopathological evaluation in primary therapy for breast cancer–recent trends in primary modality with pathological complete response (pCR) as endpoint. Breast Cancer 11:139–147PubMed Kurosumi M (2004) Significance of histopathological evaluation in primary therapy for breast cancer–recent trends in primary modality with pathological complete response (pCR) as endpoint. Breast Cancer 11:139–147PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Mansi JL, Smith IE, Walsh G, A’Hern RP, Harmer CL, Sinnett HD, Trott PA, Fisher C, McKinna JA (1989) Primary medical therapy for operable breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 25:1623–1627PubMedCrossRef Mansi JL, Smith IE, Walsh G, A’Hern RP, Harmer CL, Sinnett HD, Trott PA, Fisher C, McKinna JA (1989) Primary medical therapy for operable breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 25:1623–1627PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuo K, Fukutomi T, Watanabe T, Hasegawa T, Tsuda H, Akashi-Tanaka S (2002) Concordance in pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy between invasive and noninvasive components of primary breast carcinomas. Breast Cancer 9:75–81PubMed Matsuo K, Fukutomi T, Watanabe T, Hasegawa T, Tsuda H, Akashi-Tanaka S (2002) Concordance in pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy between invasive and noninvasive components of primary breast carcinomas. Breast Cancer 9:75–81PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Miller WR, Dixon JM, Cameron DA, Anderson TJ (2001) Biological and clinical effects of aromatase inhibitors in neoadjuvant therapy. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 79:103–107PubMedCrossRef Miller WR, Dixon JM, Cameron DA, Anderson TJ (2001) Biological and clinical effects of aromatase inhibitors in neoadjuvant therapy. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 79:103–107PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Miller WR, Dixon JM, Macfarlane L, Cameron D, Anderson TJ (2003) Pathological features of breast cancer response following neoadjuvant treatment with either letrozole or tamoxifen. Eur J Cancer 39:462–468PubMedCrossRef Miller WR, Dixon JM, Macfarlane L, Cameron D, Anderson TJ (2003) Pathological features of breast cancer response following neoadjuvant treatment with either letrozole or tamoxifen. Eur J Cancer 39:462–468PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Preece PE, Wood RA, Mackie CR, Cuschieri A (1982) Tamoxifen as initial sole treatment of localised breast cancer in elderly women: a pilot study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 284:869–870CrossRef Preece PE, Wood RA, Mackie CR, Cuschieri A (1982) Tamoxifen as initial sole treatment of localised breast cancer in elderly women: a pilot study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 284:869–870CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Semiglazov VF, Semiglazov VV, Ivanov VG, Ziltzova EK, Dashyan GA, Kletzel A, Bozhok AA, Nurgaziev KS, Tzyrlina EV, Berstein LM (2003) Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: exemestane (E) vs tamoxifen (T) in postmenopausal ER+ breast cancer patients (T1-4N1-2MO). Breast Cancer Res Treat 82 (Suppl 1):S22, abs 111 Semiglazov VF, Semiglazov VV, Ivanov VG, Ziltzova EK, Dashyan GA, Kletzel A, Bozhok AA, Nurgaziev KS, Tzyrlina EV, Berstein LM (2003) Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: exemestane (E) vs tamoxifen (T) in postmenopausal ER+ breast cancer patients (T1-4N1-2MO). Breast Cancer Res Treat 82 (Suppl 1):S22, abs 111
Zurück zum Zitat Smith IE (2003) Letrozole versus tamoxifen in the treatment of advanced breast cancer and as neoadjuvant therapy. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 86:289–293PubMedCrossRef Smith IE (2003) Letrozole versus tamoxifen in the treatment of advanced breast cancer and as neoadjuvant therapy. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 86:289–293PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas JS, Julian HS, Green RV, Cameron DA, Dixon MJ (2007) Histopathology of breast carcinoma following neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a common association between letrozole therapy and central scarring. Histopathology 51:219–226PubMedCrossRef Thomas JS, Julian HS, Green RV, Cameron DA, Dixon MJ (2007) Histopathology of breast carcinoma following neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a common association between letrozole therapy and central scarring. Histopathology 51:219–226PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tsuda H, Kurosumi M, Akiyama F, Sakamoto G, Noguchi S, Takatsuka Y, Watanbe T, Imoto S, Inji H (2005) Histopathological assessment of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as preoperative treatment in postmenopausal women with T2-4b, N0-2, M0 breast cancer: Results from a randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts) 23:21s, abs 570 Tsuda H, Kurosumi M, Akiyama F, Sakamoto G, Noguchi S, Takatsuka Y, Watanbe T, Imoto S, Inji H (2005) Histopathological assessment of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as preoperative treatment in postmenopausal women with T2-4b, N0-2, M0 breast cancer: Results from a randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts) 23:21s, abs 570
Zurück zum Zitat Vyzula R, Dusek L, Zaloudik J, Demlova R, Klimes D, Selvekerova S (2004) Breast cancer and neoadjuvant therapy: any predictive marker? Neoplasma 51:471–480PubMed Vyzula R, Dusek L, Zaloudik J, Demlova R, Klimes D, Selvekerova S (2004) Breast cancer and neoadjuvant therapy: any predictive marker? Neoplasma 51:471–480PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Wolmark N, Wang J, Mamounas E, Bryant J, Fisher B (2001) Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 30:96–102PubMed Wolmark N, Wang J, Mamounas E, Bryant J, Fisher B (2001) Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 30:96–102PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Organization (2002) WHO Classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone World Health Organization (2002) WHO Classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone
Zurück zum Zitat Kurosumi M, Akiyama F, Iwase T, Motomura K, Okazaki M, Tsuda H (2001) Histopathological criteria for assessment of therapeutic response in breast cancer. Breast Cancer 8:1–2PubMed Kurosumi M, Akiyama F, Iwase T, Motomura K, Okazaki M, Tsuda H (2001) Histopathological criteria for assessment of therapeutic response in breast cancer. Breast Cancer 8:1–2PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Histopathological assessment of anastrozole and tamoxifen as preoperative (neoadjuvant) treatment in postmenopausal Japanese women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in the PROACT trial
verfasst von
Masafumi Kurosumi
Yuichi Takatsuka
Toru Watanabe
Shigeru Imoto
Hideo Inaji
Hitoshi Tsuda
Futoshi Akiyama
Goi Sakamoto
Tadashi Ikeda
Shinzaburo Noguchi
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology / Ausgabe 6/2008
Print ISSN: 0171-5216
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1335
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-007-0343-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2008

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 6/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.