Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Erschienen in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 3/2019

15.05.2019 | Review Article

Horizontal ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone graft—systematic review

verfasst von: Pedro Henrique de Azambuja Carvalho, Guilherme dos Santos Trento, Lucas Borin Moura, Giovanni Cunha, Marisa Aparecida Cabrini Gabrielli, Valfrido Antônio Pereira-Filho

Erschienen in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to perform a systematic review about the use of xenogenous bonegraft in horizontal ridge augmentation to answer the following question: In implant patients, treated with xenografts for horizontal ridge augmentation, what would be the outcomes in terms of bone gain, bone resorption, implant survival, and complication rates?

Methods

The main search was performed at PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases, and found 2610 articles. After selection and duplicate removal, 29 studies were included in the final review. The collected data were sample size, number and type of graft, site, horizontal gain, resorption rate, and complications.

Results

A total of 610 patients were submitted to 853 bone grafts, both in the maxilla and mandible. Most studies (n = 26) used particulate grafts, isolated or associated with autogenous bone, and covered by collagen membrane or titanium mesh. The mean of horizontal bone gain was 4.44 mm. In addition, the augmented ridges allowed placement of 1325 successful dental implants. The complication rate was 7.85%, and membrane exposure was the most reported complication.

Conclusions

Although the autogenous bone graft remains as the gold standard for alveolar reconstruction, this review suggests that xenogenous bone graft is a feasible alternative for horizontal bone augmentation.
Literatur
1.
Monje A, Monje F, Hernandez-Alfaro F, Gonzalez-Garcia R, Suarez-Lopez del Amo F, Galindo-Moreno P, et al. Horizontal bone augmentation using autogenous block grafts and particulate xenograft in the severe atrophic maxillary anterior ridges: a cone-beam computerized tomography case series. J Oral Implantol. 2015;41 Spec No:366–371
2.
De Stavola L, Tunkel J (2013) A new approach to maintenance of regenerated autogenous bone volume: delayed relining with xenograft and resorbable membrane. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28(4):1062–1067CrossRefPubMed
3.
Seibert JS (1983) Reconstruction of deformed, partially edentulous ridges, using full thickness onlay grafts. Part I. technique and wound healing. Compend Contin Educ Dent 4(5):437–453PubMed
4.
Buser D, Ingimarsson S, Dula K, Lussi A, Hirt HP, Belser UC (2002) Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 22(2):109–117PubMed
5.
Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M (2009) Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24(Suppl):237–259PubMed
6.
Jensen SS, Terheyden H (2009) Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: clinical results with different bone grafts and bone-substitute materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24(Suppl):218–236PubMed
7.
Hammerle CH, Jung RE, Feloutzis A (2002) A systematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients. J Clin Periodontol 29(Suppl 3):226–231 discussion 32-3CrossRefPubMed
8.
Faysal U, Cem SB, Atilla S (2013) Effects of different consolidation periods on bone formation and implant success in alveolar distraction osteogenesis: a clinical study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 41(3):194–197CrossRefPubMed
9.
Gonzalez-Garcia R, Monje F, Moreno C (2011) Alveolar split osteotomy for the treatment of the severe narrow ridge maxillary atrophy: a modified technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40(1):57–64CrossRefPubMed
10.
Donos N, Mardas N, Chadha V (2008) Clinical outcomes of implants following lateral bone augmentation: systematic assessment of available options (barrier membranes, bone grafts, split osteotomy). J Clin Periodontol 35(8 Suppl):173–202CrossRefPubMed
11.
Chiapasco M, Colletti G, Coggiola A, Di Martino G, Anello T, Romeo E (2015) Clinical outcome of the use of fresh frozen allogeneic bone grafts for the reconstruction of severely resorbed alveolar ridges: preliminary results of a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 30(2):450–460CrossRefPubMed
12.
Nystrom E, Nilson H, Gunne J, Lundgren S (2009) A 9-14 year follow-up of onlay bone grafting in the atrophic maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38(2):111–116CrossRefPubMed
13.
Simion M, Jovanovic SA, Tinti C, Benfenati SP (2001) Long-term evaluation of osseointegrated implants inserted at the time or after vertical ridge augmentation. A retrospective study on 123 implants with 1-5 year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 12(1):35–45CrossRefPubMed
14.
Pistilli R, Felice P, Piatelli M, Nisii A, Barausse C, Esposito M (2014) Blocks of autogenous bone versus xenografts for the rehabilitation of atrophic jaws with dental implants: preliminary data from a pilot randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 7(2):153–171PubMed
15.
Al Ruhaimi KA (2001) Bone graft substitutes: a comparative qualitative histologic review of current osteoconductive grafting materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 16(1):105–114PubMed
16.
Troeltzsch M, Kauffmann P, Gruber R, Brockmeyer P, Moser N, Rau A et al (2016) Clinical efficacy of grafting materials in alveolar ridge augmentation: a systematic review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 44:1618–1629CrossRefPubMed
17.
Kolk A, Handschel J, Drescher W, Rothamel D, Kloss F, Blessmann M, Heiland M, Wolff KD, Smeets R (2012) Current trends and future perspectives of bone substitute materials—from space holders to innovative biomaterials. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 40(8):706–718CrossRefPubMed
18.
Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P (2009) The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants—a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2(3):167–184PubMed
19.
Klein MO, Al-Nawas B (2011) For which clinical indications in dental implantology is the use of bone substitute materials scientifically substantiated. European Journal of Oral Implantology 4(Supplement):S11–S29
20.
Milinkovic I, Cordaro L (2014) Are there specific indications for the different alveolar bone augmentation procedures for implant placement? A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43(5):606–625CrossRefPubMed
21.
Nkenke E, Stelzle F (2009) Clinical outcomes of sinus floor augmentation for implant placement using autogenous bone or bone substitutes: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 20(Suppl 4):124–133CrossRefPubMed
22.
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 4:1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Wessing B, Emmerich M, Bozkurt A (2016) Horizontal ridge augmentation with a novel resorbable collagen membrane: a retrospective analysis of 36 consecutive patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 36(2):179–187CrossRefPubMed
24.
Steigmann M (2006) Pericardium membrane and xenograft particulate grafting materials for horizontal alveolar ridge defects. Implant Dent 15(2):186–191CrossRefPubMed
25.
von Arx T, Buser D (2006) Horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and the guided bone regeneration technique with collagen membranes: a clinical study with 42 patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 17(4):359–366CrossRef
26.
Hammerle CH, Jung RE, Yaman D, Lang NP (2008) Ridge augmentation by applying bioresorbable membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a report of twelve consecutive cases. Clin Oral Implants Res 19(1):19–25PubMed
27.
Block MS, Ducote CW, Mercante DE (2012) Horizontal augmentation of thin maxillary ridge with bovine particulate xenograft is stable during 500 days of follow-up: preliminary results of 12 consecutive patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(6):1321–1330CrossRefPubMed
28.
Pagliani L, Andersson P, Lanza M, Nappo A, Verrocchi D, Volpe S, Sennerby L (2012) A collagenated porcine bone substitute for augmentation at Neoss implant sites: a prospective 1-year multicenter case series study with histology. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14(5):746–758CrossRefPubMed
29.
Merli M, Moscatelli M, Mariotti G, Pagliaro U, Raffaelli E, Nieri M (2015) Comparing membranes and bone substitutes in a one-stage procedure for horizontal bone augmentation. A double-blind randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 8(3):271–281PubMed
30.
Gultekin BA, Bedeloglu E, Kose TE, Mijiritsky E (2016) Comparison of bone resorption rates after intraoral block bone and guided bone regeneration augmentation for the reconstruction of horizontally deficient maxillary alveolar ridges. Biomed Res Int 2016:4987437PubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Pelegrine AA, Teixeira ML, Sperandio M, Almada TS, Kahnberg KE, Pasquali PJ, Aloise AC (2016) Can bone marrow aspirate concentrate change the mineralization pattern of the anterior maxilla treated with xenografts? A preliminary study. Contemp Clin Dent 7(1):21–26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Meloni SM, Jovanovic SA, Urban I, Canullo L, Pisano M, Tallarico M (2017) Horizontal ridge augmentation using GBR with a native collagen membrane and 1:1 ratio of particulated xenograft and autologous bone: a 1-year prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 19(1):38–45CrossRefPubMed
33.
Amoian B, Moudi E, Majidi MS, Ali Tabatabaei SM (2016) A histologic, histomorphometric, and radiographic comparison between two complexes of CenoBoen/CenoMembrane and Bio-Oss/Bio-Gide in lateral ridge augmentation: a clinical trial. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 13(5):446–453CrossRef
34.
Urban IA, Monje A, Lozada JL, Wang HL (2017) Long-term evaluation of peri-implant bone level after reconstruction of severely atrophic edentulous maxilla via vertical and horizontal guided bone regeneration in combination with sinus augmentation: a case series with 1 to 15 years of loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 19(1):46–55CrossRefPubMed
35.
Cordaro L, Torsello F, Accorsi Ribeiro C, Liberatore M, Mirisola di Torresanto V. Inlay-onlay grafting for three-dimensional reconstruction of the posterior atrophic maxilla with mandibular bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;39(4):350–357
36.
Poulias E, Greenwell H, Hill M, Morton D, Vidal R, Shumway B, Peterson TL (2013) Ridge preservation comparing socket allograft alone to socket allograft plus facial overlay xenograft: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 84(11):1567–1575PubMed
37.
Urban IA, Nagursky H, Lozada JL, Nagy K (2013) Horizontal ridge augmentation with a collagen membrane and a combination of particulated autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 25 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 33(3):299–307CrossRefPubMed
38.
Kolerman R, Nissan J, Tal H (2014) Combined osteotome-induced ridge expansion and guided bone regeneration simultaneous with implant placement: a biometric study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 16(5):691–704CrossRefPubMed
39.
Mordenfeld A, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T, Hallman M (2014) A randomized and controlled clinical trial of two different compositions of deproteinized bovine bone and autogenous bone used for lateral ridge augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res 25(3):310–320CrossRefPubMed
40.
Urban IA, Nagursky H, Lozada JL (2011) Horizontal ridge augmentation with a resorbable membrane and particulated autogenous bone with or without anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 22 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26(2):404–414PubMed
41.
Pieri F, Corinaldesi G, Fini M, Aldini NN, Giardino R, Marchetti C (2008) Alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium mesh and a combination of autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone: a 2-year prospective study. J Periodontol 79(11):2093–2103CrossRefPubMed
42.
Calvo-Guirado JL, Mate-Sanchez JE, Delgado-Ruiz R, Ramirez-Fernandez MP (2011) Calculation of bone graft volume using 3D reconstruction system. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 16(2):e260–e264CrossRefPubMed
43.
Khamees J, Darwiche MA, Kochaji N (2012) Alveolar ridge augmentation using chin bone graft, bovine bone mineral, and titanium mesh: clinical, histological, and histomorphomtric study. J Indian Soc Periodontol 16(2):235–240CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Hising P, Bolin A, Branting C (2001) Reconstruction of severely resorbed alveolar ridge crests with dental implants using a bovine bone mineral for augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 16(1):90–97PubMed
45.
Hellem S, Astrand P, Stenstrom B, Engquist B, Bengtsson M, Dahlgren S (2003) Implant treatment in combination with lateral augmentation of the alveolar process: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 5(4):233–240CrossRefPubMed
46.
Nkenke E, Weisbach V, Winckler E, Kessler P, Schultze-Mosgau S, Wiltfang J, Neukam FW (2004) Morbidity of harvesting of bone grafts from the iliac crest for preprosthetic augmentation procedures: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33(2):157–163CrossRefPubMed
47.
Barone A, Ricci M, Mangano F, Covani U (2011) Morbidity associated with iliac crest harvesting in the treatment of maxillary and mandibular atrophies: a 10-year analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(9):2298–2304CrossRefPubMed
48.
Carlsen A, Gorst-Rasmussen A, Jensen T (2013) Donor site morbidity associated with autogenous bone harvesting from the ascending mandibular ramus. Implant Dent 22(5):503–506CrossRefPubMed
49.
Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Coletti FL, Faeda RS, Pereira LA, Marcantonio E Jr (2014) Graft incorporation and implant osseointegration following the use of autologous and fresh-frozen allogeneic block bone grafts for lateral ridge augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res 25(2):226–233CrossRefPubMed
50.
Sbordone C, Toti P, Guidetti F, Califano L, Santoro A, Sbordone L (2012) Volume changes of iliac crest autogenous bone grafts after vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation of atrophic maxillas and mandibles: a 6-year computerized tomographic follow-up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(11):2559–2565CrossRefPubMed
51.
Sbordone L, Toti P, Menchini-Fabris GB, Sbordone C, Piombino P, Guidetti F (2009) Volume changes of autogenous bone grafts after alveolar ridge augmentation of atrophic maxillae and mandibles. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38(10):1059–1065CrossRefPubMed
52.
Dasmah A, Thor A, Ekestubbe A, Sennerby L, Rasmusson L (2012) Particulate vs. block bone grafts: three-dimensional changes in graft volume after reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla, a 2-year radiographic follow-up. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 40(8):654–659CrossRefPubMed
53.
Di Stefano DA, Artese L, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Pagnutti S, Piccirilli M, Perrotti V (2009) Alveolar ridge regeneration with equine spongy bone: a clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 11(2):90–100CrossRefPubMed
54.
Wessing B, Lettner S, Zechner W (2017) Guided bone regeneration with collagen membranes and particulate graft materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Max Impl. e-pub, ahead of print
55.
Aloy-Prósper A, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Peñarrocha-Diago MA, Peñarrocha-Diago M (2015) The outcome of intraoral onlay block bone grafts on alveolar ridge augmentations: a systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 20:e251–e258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Horizontal ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone graft—systematic review
verfasst von
Pedro Henrique de Azambuja Carvalho
Guilherme dos Santos Trento
Lucas Borin Moura
Giovanni Cunha
Marisa Aparecida Cabrini Gabrielli
Valfrido Antônio Pereira-Filho
Publikationsdatum
15.05.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1865-1550
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-1569
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-019-00777-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Is specialized ophthalmologic evaluation necessary after orbital fractures? A prospective 64-case study

Author's Reply

Lingual anesthesia of the lower anterior teeth, which technique is better?

Original Article

Severe odontogenic deep neck space infections: risk factors for difficult airways and ICU admissions

Case Report

Merkel cell carcinoma of the forehead area: a literature review and case report

Original Article

Airway management techniques in head and neck cancer surgeries: a retrospective analysis

Case Report

Buccal vascular malformation with multiple giant phleboliths: a rare case presentation and review of the literature

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

17.04.2024 | Postoperative nausea and vomiting | Nachrichten

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

16.04.2024 | HNO-Chirurgie | Nachrichten

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

16.04.2024 | Infektiologie | Nachrichten

Kein Abstrich bei chronischen Wunden ohne Entzündungszeichen!

10.04.2024 | Postoperative Schmerztherapie | Nachrichten

Chronische Schmerzen nach Op. oft mit neuropathischer Komponente
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.