Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 9/2017

29.06.2017 | Original Article

Hospital Volume and the Costs Associated with Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer

verfasst von: Faiz Gani, Fabian M Johnston, Howard Nelson-Williams, Marcelo Cerullo, Mary E Dillhoff, Carl R Schmidt, Timothy M. Pawlik

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 9/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Data evaluating the financial implications of volume-based referral are lacking. This study sought to compare in-hospital costs for pancreatic surgery by annual hospital volume.

Methods

Eleven thousand and eighty-one patients aged ≥18 years undergoing an elective pancreatic resection for cancer were identified using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2002–2011. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to compare length-of-stay (LOS), postoperative morbidity and mortality, failure-to-rescue (FTR), and inpatient costs by annual hospital volume group.

Results

Patients undergoing surgery at high-volume hospitals (HVH) demonstrated 23% lower odds (odds ratio [OR] = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.63–0.95) of developing a postoperative complication, 59% lower odds of experiencing an LOS > 14 days (OR = 0.41, 95%CI 0.34–0.50), 51% lower odds of postoperative mortality (OR = 0.49, 95%CI 0.34–0.71), and 47% lower odds of FTR (OR = 0.53, 95%CI 0.37–0.76; all p<0.05). The overall mean in-hospital cost was $39,012 (SD = $15,214) with minimal differences observed across hospital volume groups. Rather, postoperative complications (no complication vs. complication $26,686 [SD = $5762] vs. $44,633 [SD = $11,637]) and FTR (rescue vs. FTR $42,413 [SD = $8481] vs. $69,546 [SD = $13,131]) were determinant of higher in-hospital costs. While this pattern was observed at all hospital volume groups, costs varied minimally between hospital volume groups after this stratification.

Conclusions

Annual hospital surgical volume was not associated with in-hospital costs among patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should Operations Be Regionalized? N Engl J Med. 1979;301(25):1364–1369.CrossRefPubMed Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should Operations Be Regionalized? N Engl J Med. 1979;301(25):1364–1369.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EVA, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1128–1137.CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EVA, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1128–1137.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Buettner S, Gani F, Amini N, et al. The relative effect of hospital and surgeon volume on failure to rescue among patients undergoing liver resection for cancer. Surgery. 2016;159(4):1004–1012.CrossRefPubMed Buettner S, Gani F, Amini N, et al. The relative effect of hospital and surgeon volume on failure to rescue among patients undergoing liver resection for cancer. Surgery. 2016;159(4):1004–1012.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson E V, Birkmeyer CM. Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative. Surgery. 2001;130(3):415–422.CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson E V, Birkmeyer CM. Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative. Surgery. 2001;130(3):415–422.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Schrag D, Panageas KS, Riedel E, et al. Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection. Ann Surg. 2002;236(5):583–592.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schrag D, Panageas KS, Riedel E, et al. Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection. Ann Surg. 2002;236(5):583–592.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Reames BN, Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Hospital volume and operative mortality in the modern era. Ann Surg. 2014;260(2):244–251.CrossRefPubMedCentral Reames BN, Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Hospital volume and operative mortality in the modern era. Ann Surg. 2014;260(2):244–251.CrossRefPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(22):2128–2137.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(22):2128–2137.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gani F, Azoulay D, Pawlik TM. Evaluating Trends in the Volume-Outcomes Relationship Following Liver Surgery: Does Regionalization Benefit All Patients the Same? J Gastrointest Surg. November 2016. Gani F, Azoulay D, Pawlik TM. Evaluating Trends in the Volume-Outcomes Relationship Following Liver Surgery: Does Regionalization Benefit All Patients the Same? J Gastrointest Surg. November 2016.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Regenbogen SE, Gust C, Birkmeyer JD. Hospital Surgical Volume and Cost of Inpatient Surgery in the Elderly. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(6):758–765.CrossRefPubMed Regenbogen SE, Gust C, Birkmeyer JD. Hospital Surgical Volume and Cost of Inpatient Surgery in the Elderly. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(6):758–765.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gani F, Hundt J, Makary MA, Haider AH, Zogg CK, Pawlik TM. Financial Impact of Postoperative Complication Following Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery for Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. December 2015. Gani F, Hundt J, Makary MA, Haider AH, Zogg CK, Pawlik TM. Financial Impact of Postoperative Complication Following Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery for Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. December 2015.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Eappen S, Lane BH, Rosenberg B, et al. Relationship between occurrence of surgical complications and hospital finances. JAMA. 2013;309(15):1599–1606.CrossRef Eappen S, Lane BH, Rosenberg B, et al. Relationship between occurrence of surgical complications and hospital finances. JAMA. 2013;309(15):1599–1606.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dudekula A, Munigala S, Zureikat AH, Yadav D. Operative Trends for Pancreatic Diseases in the USA: Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998-2011. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(4):803–811.CrossRefPubMed Dudekula A, Munigala S, Zureikat AH, Yadav D. Operative Trends for Pancreatic Diseases in the USA: Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998-2011. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(4):803–811.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Okunrintemi V, Gani F, Pawlik TM. National Trends in Postoperative Outcomes and Cost Comparing Minimally Invasive Versus Open Liver and Pancreatic Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(11):1836–1843.CrossRefPubMed Okunrintemi V, Gani F, Pawlik TM. National Trends in Postoperative Outcomes and Cost Comparing Minimally Invasive Versus Open Liver and Pancreatic Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(11):1836–1843.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Datta J, Vollmer CM. Advances in Surgical Management of Pancreatic Diseases. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2016;45(1):129–144.CrossRef Datta J, Vollmer CM. Advances in Surgical Management of Pancreatic Diseases. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2016;45(1):129–144.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gooiker GA, van Gijn W, Wouters MWJM, Post PN, van de Velde CJH, Tollenaar RAEM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98(4):485–494.CrossRefPubMed Gooiker GA, van Gijn W, Wouters MWJM, Post PN, van de Velde CJH, Tollenaar RAEM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98(4):485–494.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nathan H, Atoria CL, Bach PB, Elkin EB. Hospital volume, complications, and cost of cancer surgery in the elderly. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(1):107–114.CrossRef Nathan H, Atoria CL, Bach PB, Elkin EB. Hospital volume, complications, and cost of cancer surgery in the elderly. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(1):107–114.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho V, Aloia T. Hospital volume, surgeon volume, and patient costs for cancer surgery. Med Care. 2008;46(7):718–725.CrossRefPubMed Ho V, Aloia T. Hospital volume, surgeon volume, and patient costs for cancer surgery. Med Care. 2008;46(7):718–725.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Krell RW, Girotti ME, Dimick JB. Extended length of stay after surgery: complications, inefficient practice, or sick patients? JAMA Surg. 2014;149(8):815–820.CrossRefPubMedCentral Krell RW, Girotti ME, Dimick JB. Extended length of stay after surgery: complications, inefficient practice, or sick patients? JAMA Surg. 2014;149(8):815–820.CrossRefPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Nassour I, Wang SC, Christie A, et al. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. May 2017:1. Nassour I, Wang SC, Christie A, et al. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. May 2017:1.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Amini N, Spolverato G, Kim Y, Pawlik TM. Trends in Hospital Volume and Failure to Rescue for Pancreatic Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(9):1581–1592.CrossRefPubMed Amini N, Spolverato G, Kim Y, Pawlik TM. Trends in Hospital Volume and Failure to Rescue for Pancreatic Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(9):1581–1592.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Gust C, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJO, Skinner JS. Hospital Quality and the Cost of Inpatient Surgery in the United States. Ann Surg. 2012;255(1):1–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Birkmeyer JD, Gust C, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJO, Skinner JS. Hospital Quality and the Cost of Inpatient Surgery in the United States. Ann Surg. 2012;255(1):1–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Short MN, Aloia TA, Ho V. The influence of complications on the costs of complex cancer surgery. Cancer. 2014;120(7):1035–1041.CrossRefPubMed Short MN, Aloia TA, Ho V. The influence of complications on the costs of complex cancer surgery. Cancer. 2014;120(7):1035–1041.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Knechtle WS, Perez SD, Medbery RL, et al. The Association Between Hospital Finances and Complications After Complex Abdominal Surgery: Deficiencies in the Current Health Care Reimbursement System and Implications for the Future. Ann Surg. 2015;262(2):273–279.CrossRefPubMed Knechtle WS, Perez SD, Medbery RL, et al. The Association Between Hospital Finances and Complications After Complex Abdominal Surgery: Deficiencies in the Current Health Care Reimbursement System and Implications for the Future. Ann Surg. 2015;262(2):273–279.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Zogg CK, Najjar P, Diaz AJR, et al. Rethinking Priorities: Cost of Complications After Elective Colectomy. Ann Surg. 2016;264(2):312–322.CrossRefPubMed Zogg CK, Najjar P, Diaz AJR, et al. Rethinking Priorities: Cost of Complications After Elective Colectomy. Ann Surg. 2016;264(2):312–322.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Page AJ, Gani F, Crowley KT, et al. Patient outcomes and provider perceptions following implementation of a standardized perioperative care pathway for open liver resection. Br J Surg. February 2016. Page AJ, Gani F, Crowley KT, et al. Patient outcomes and provider perceptions following implementation of a standardized perioperative care pathway for open liver resection. Br J Surg. February 2016.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Kagedan DJ, Ahmed M, Devitt KS, Wei AC. Enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the evidence. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(1):11–16.CrossRefPubMed Kagedan DJ, Ahmed M, Devitt KS, Wei AC. Enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the evidence. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(1):11–16.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Pradarelli JC, Healy MA, Osborne NH, Ghaferi AA, Dimick JB, Nathan H. Variation in Medicare Expenditures for Treating Perioperative Complications: The Cost of Rescue. JAMA Surg. October 2016:e163340. Pradarelli JC, Healy MA, Osborne NH, Ghaferi AA, Dimick JB, Nathan H. Variation in Medicare Expenditures for Treating Perioperative Complications: The Cost of Rescue. JAMA Surg. October 2016:e163340.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Gani F, Pawlik TM. Assessing the Costs Associated with Volume-Based Referral for Hepatic Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(5):945–952.CrossRefPubMed Gani F, Pawlik TM. Assessing the Costs Associated with Volume-Based Referral for Hepatic Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(5):945–952.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Nathan H, Pawlik TM. Limitations of claims and registry data in surgical oncology research. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(2):415–423.CrossRefPubMed Nathan H, Pawlik TM. Limitations of claims and registry data in surgical oncology research. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(2):415–423.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Hospital Volume and the Costs Associated with Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer
verfasst von
Faiz Gani
Fabian M Johnston
Howard Nelson-Williams
Marcelo Cerullo
Mary E Dillhoff
Carl R Schmidt
Timothy M. Pawlik
Publikationsdatum
29.06.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 9/2017
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3479-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2017

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 9/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.