Purpose Long-term sick leave due to common mental disorders (CMD) is an increasing problem in many countries. Recent reviews indicate that return to work (RTW) interventions have limited effect on reducing sickness absence among this group of sick-listed. The aims of this study were to investigate how sick-listed persons with CMD experienced participating in an RTW intervention and how workability assessments and RTW activities influenced their RTW-process, and to examine the working mechanisms of the intervention. The gained knowledge can help improve future RTW intervention design and implementation. Methods In-depth interviews were conducted with 17 participants on sick leave due to CMD who participated in an RTW intervention. Interviews were conducted at three time points with each participant. Principles of interpretative phenomenological analyses guided the analysis. Results The workability assessment consultations and RTW activities such as psychoeducative group sessions and individual sessions with psychologist could result in both motivation and frustration depending on the extent to which the RTW professionals practiced what we have termed an individual approach to the sick-listed person. Conclusions The individual approach seems necessary for the realization of the positive potential in the RTW intervention. However, the fact that RTW professionals are both the facilitators and the controllers of the sick-listed persons’ RTW process is an inherent paradox in the intervention, which can impede the necessary establishment of a high-quality relationship between the sick-listed persons and RTW professionals.
Bültmann U, Huibers MJH, Van Amelsvoort LPGM, Kasl SV, Swaen GMH, Kant U. Psychological distress, fatigue and long-term sickness absence: prospective results from the Maastricht Cohort Study. JOEM. 2005;47:941–7. PubMed
Karpansalo M, Kauhanen J, Lakka TA, Kaplan GA, Salonen JT, Manninen P. Depression and early retirement: prospective population based study in middle aged men. Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59:70–4. CrossRef
OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers: a synthesis of findings across OECD countries. OECD Publishing, 2010.
OECD. Sick on the job? Myths and realities about mental health and work. OECD Publishing, 2012.
Borg V, Andersen MN, Kolte IV, Andersen MF. White paper on mental health, sickness absence and return to work. Copenhagen: National Research Centre for the Working Environment; 2010.
Arends I, Bruinvels DJ, Rebergen DS, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Madan I, Neumeyer-Gromen A et al. Interventions to facilitate return to work in adults with adjustment disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006389.pub2.
Hoefsmit N, Houkes I, Nijhuis F. Intervention characteristics that facilitate return to work after sickness absence: a systematic literature review. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22:462–77.
Cowls J, Galloway E. Understanding how traumatic re-enactment impacts the workplace: assisting clients’ successful return to work. Work. 2009;33:401–11. PubMed
Winzor G, Poulsen OM, Andersen I, Andersen MF, Andersen MH, Aust B et al. Det Store TTA-Projekt. Proces- effekt- og økonomisk evaluering (The Danish RTW-Program. Process-, effect- and economic evaluation). Copenhagen: National Research Centre for the Working Environment (NRCWE), 2012.
Smith JA. Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2004;1:39–54.
Smith JA, Larkin M, Flowers P. Interpretative phenomenological analysis, theory, method and research. Calif: Los Angeles; 2009.
Biggerstaff D, Thompson A. Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): a qualitative methodology of choice in healthcare research. Qual Res Psychol. 2008;5:214–24. CrossRef
Kleinman A. Patients and healers in the context of culture, an exploration of the borderland between anthropology, medicine and psychiatry. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1981.
Andersen MF, Brinkmann S. Nye perspektiver på stress (New perspectives on stress). Aarhus: Klims Forlag; 2013.
World Health Organization. ICD-10, International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. 2007. World Health Organization.
Alonzo AA. Everyday illness behavior: a situational approach to health status deviations. Soc Sci Med Part A. 1979;13:397–404. CrossRef
Leventhal H, Meyer D, Nerenz D. The common sense representation of illness danger. In: Rachman S, editor. Contributions to medical psychology. New York: Pergamon Press; 1980. p. 7–30.
Leventhal H, Diefenbach M. Illness cognition: using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition interactions. Cognit Ther Res. 1992;16:143–63. CrossRef
Danish Data Protection Agency. [homepage from the Internet] www.datatilsynet.dk. Accessed 22 Mar. 2013.
Giorgi A, Giorgi B. The descriptive phenomenological psychological method. In: Camic PM, Rhodes JE, Yardley L, editors. Qualitative research in psychology: expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2003. p. 243–73.
Marks D, Murray M, Evans B, Willig C, Woodall, Sykes CM. Health psychology—theory, research & practice. SAGE Publications, 2005.
Willig C. Introducing qualitative research in psychology. Open University Press, 2007.
Leventhal H, Forster R, Leventhal EA. Self-regulation of health threats, affect, and the self. In: Aldwin C, editor. Handbook of health psychology and aging. New York: Guilford Press; 2007. p. 341–66.
Corbiére M, Shen J. A systematic review of psychological return-to-work interventions for people with mental health problems and/or physical injuries. Can J Commun Ment Health. 2006;25:261–88. CrossRef
Høgelund J. In search of effective disability policy. Comparing the developments and outcomes of Dutch and Danish disability policies. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2003.
Schuring M, Burdorf L, Kunst A, Mackanbach J. The effects of ill health on entering and maintaining paid employment: evidence in European countries. Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:597–604. CrossRef
Lynöe N, Wessel M, Olsson D, Alexanderson K, Helgesson G. Respectful encounters and return to work: empirical study of long-term sick-listed patients’ experiences of Swedish healthcare. BMJ Open. 2011;1:2. CrossRef
Norlund S, Fjellman-Wiklund A, Nordin M, Stenlund T, Ahlgren C. Personal resources and support when regaining the ability to work: an interview study with exhaustion disorder patients. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9396-7.
Wessel M, Helgesson G, Olsson D, Juth N, Alexanderson K, Lynöe N. When do patients feel wronged? Empirical study of sick-listed patients’ experiences with healthcare encounters. Eur J Public Health. 2012;23:230–35.
Svensson T, Müssener U, Alexandersson K. Pride, empowerment and return to work: on the significance of positive social emotions in the rehabilitation of sickness absentees. Work. 2006;27:57–65. PubMed
Duncan B, Miller SD, Wampold BE, Hubble MA. The heart & soul of change: delivering what works in therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2010.
Norcross JC. Psychotherapy relationships that work, evidence-based responsiveness. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011. CrossRef
Lambert MJ, Barley DE. Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. In: Norcross JC, editor. Psychotherapy relationships that works. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 17–32.
Horvath AO, Del Re AC, Flückiger C, Symonds D. Alliance in individual psychotherapy. In: Norcross JC, editor. Psychotherapy relationships that works. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 25–69. CrossRef
Rogers C. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. J Consult Psychol. 1957;11:95–103. CrossRef
Elliott R, Bohart AC, Watson JC, Greenberg LS. Empathy. In: Norcross JC, editor. Psychotherapy relationships that works. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 132–52. CrossRef
Hougaard E. Psykoterapi, teori og forskning (Psychotherapy, theory and research). Copenhagen: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag; 2009.
Wesson M, Gould M. Can a ‘return-to-work’ agenda fit within the theory and practice of CBT for depression and anxiety disorders? Cogn Behav Ther. 2010;3:27–42.
Norcross JC, Lambert MJ. Introduction. In: Norcross JC, editor. Psychotherapy relationships that works. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 3–24. CrossRef
Fishman DB. From single case to database: a new method for enhancing psychotherapy, forensic, and other psychological practice. Appl Prev Psychol. 2001;10:275–304. CrossRef
Fishman DB, Neigher WD. Publishing systematic, pragmatic case studies in program evaluation: rationale and introduction to the special issue. Eval Program Plann. 2003;26:421–8. CrossRef
Fishman DB, Neigher WD. Publishing systematic, pragmatic case studies in program evaluation: collateral on a ‘promissory note’. Eval Program Plann. 2004;27:105–13. CrossRef
- How do Workers with Common Mental Disorders Experience a Multidisciplinary Return-to-Work Intervention? A Qualitative Study
Malene Friis Andersen
- Springer US