Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2021

20.07.2020 | Hollow Organ GI

How to accurately measure the distance from the anal verge to rectal cancer on MRI: a prospective study using anal verge markers

verfasst von: Yeo Eun Han, Beom Jin Park, Deuk Jae Sung, Min Ju Kim, Na Yeon Han, Ki Choon Sim, Sung Bum Cho, Jin Kim, Seon-Hahn Kim, Hyonggin An

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To determine an accurate method for localizing rectal cancer using the distance from the anal verge on preoperative MRI.

Methods

This prospective study included 50 patients scheduled for MRI evaluation of rectal cancer. After rectal filling with gel, MRI was performed with two markers attached at the anal verge. The distance between the tumor and the anal verge on a sagittal T2-weighted image (T2WI) was measured independently by two radiologists using six methods divided into three groups of similar measurement approaches, and compared to those obtained on rigid sigmoidoscopy. The anal verge location relative to the external anal sphincter was assessed on oblique coronal T2WI in reference to the markers. Correlation analysis was performed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for verification, and a paired t test was used to evaluate the mean differences.

Results

The highest correlation (ICC 0.797–0.815) and the least mean difference (0.74–0.85 cm) with rigid sigmoidoscopy, and the least standard deviation (3.12–3.17 cm) were obtained in the direct methods group using a straight line from the anal verge to the tumor. The anal verge was localized within a range of − 1.4 to 1.5 cm (mean − 0.31 cm and − 0.22 cm) from the lower end of the external anal sphincter.

Conclusion

The direct methods group provided the most accurate tumor distance among the groups. Among the direct methods, we recommend the direct mass method for its simplicity. Despite minor differences in location, the lower end of the external anal sphincter was a reliable anatomical landmark for the anal verge.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Tersteeg JJC, Gobardhan PD, Crolla R, Kint PAM, Niers-Stobbe I, Boonman-de Winter LJM, Schreinemakers JMJ (2018) Improving the quality of MRI reports of preoperative patients with rectal cancer: Effect of national guidelines and structured reporting. Am J Roentgenol 210(6):1240-1244. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.17.19054CrossRef Tersteeg JJC, Gobardhan PD, Crolla R, Kint PAM, Niers-Stobbe I, Boonman-de Winter LJM, Schreinemakers JMJ (2018) Improving the quality of MRI reports of preoperative patients with rectal cancer: Effect of national guidelines and structured reporting. Am J Roentgenol 210(6):1240-1244. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2214/​ajr.​17.​19054CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Delli Pizzi A, Basilico R, Cianci R, Seccia B, Timpani M, Tavoletta A, Caposiena D, Faricelli B, Gabrielli D, Caulo M (2018) Rectal cancer MRI: protocols, signs and future perspectives radiologists should consider in everyday clinical practice. Insights inito Imaging 9(4):405-412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0606-5CrossRef Delli Pizzi A, Basilico R, Cianci R, Seccia B, Timpani M, Tavoletta A, Caposiena D, Faricelli B, Gabrielli D, Caulo M (2018) Rectal cancer MRI: protocols, signs and future perspectives radiologists should consider in everyday clinical practice. Insights inito Imaging 9(4):405-412. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s13244-018-0606-5CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ, Maas M, Bipat S, Barbaro B, Curvo-Semedo L, Fenlon HM, Gollub MJ, Gourtsoyianni S, Halligan S, Hoeffel C, Kim SH, Laghi A, Maier A, Rafaelsen SR, Stoker J, Taylor SA, Torkzad MR, Blomqvist L (2018) Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting. Eur Radiol 28(4):1465-1475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5026-2CrossRefPubMed Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ, Maas M, Bipat S, Barbaro B, Curvo-Semedo L, Fenlon HM, Gollub MJ, Gourtsoyianni S, Halligan S, Hoeffel C, Kim SH, Laghi A, Maier A, Rafaelsen SR, Stoker J, Taylor SA, Torkzad MR, Blomqvist L (2018) Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting. Eur Radiol 28(4):1465-1475. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00330-017-5026-2CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gollub MJ, Arya S, Beets-Tan RG, dePrisco G, Gonen M, Jhaveri K, Kassam Z, Kaur H, Kim D, Knezevic A, Korngold E, Lall C, Lalwani N, Blair Macdonald D, Moreno C, Nougaret S, Pickhardt P, Sheedy S, Harisinghani M (2018) Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017. Abdom Radiol (NY) 43(11):2893-2902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1642-9CrossRef Gollub MJ, Arya S, Beets-Tan RG, dePrisco G, Gonen M, Jhaveri K, Kassam Z, Kaur H, Kim D, Knezevic A, Korngold E, Lall C, Lalwani N, Blair Macdonald D, Moreno C, Nougaret S, Pickhardt P, Sheedy S, Harisinghani M (2018) Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017. Abdom Radiol (NY) 43(11):2893-2902. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00261-018-1642-9CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A, Valentini V, Glimelius B, Haustermans K, Nordlinger B, van de Velde CJ, Balmana J, Regula J, Nagtegaal ID, Beets-Tan RG, Arnold D, Ciardiello F, Hoff P, Kerr D, Kohne CH, Labianca R, Price T, Scheithauer W, Sobrero A, Tabernero J, Aderka D, Barroso S, Bodoky G, Douillard JY, El Ghazaly H, Gallardo J, Garin A, Glynne-Jones R, Jordan K, Meshcheryakov A, Papamichail D, Pfeiffer P, Souglakos I, Turhal S, Cervantes A (2012) ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. a personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol 23(10):2479-2516. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mds236 Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A, Valentini V, Glimelius B, Haustermans K, Nordlinger B, van de Velde CJ, Balmana J, Regula J, Nagtegaal ID, Beets-Tan RG, Arnold D, Ciardiello F, Hoff P, Kerr D, Kohne CH, Labianca R, Price T, Scheithauer W, Sobrero A, Tabernero J, Aderka D, Barroso S, Bodoky G, Douillard JY, El Ghazaly H, Gallardo J, Garin A, Glynne-Jones R, Jordan K, Meshcheryakov A, Papamichail D, Pfeiffer P, Souglakos I, Turhal S, Cervantes A (2012) ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. a personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol 23(10):2479-2516. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​annonc/​mds236
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Merchea A, Larson DW (2017) Anus. In: Sabiston DC, Townsend CM (eds) Sabiston textbook of surgery. 20th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1394-1417 Merchea A, Larson DW (2017) Anus. In: Sabiston DC, Townsend CM (eds) Sabiston textbook of surgery. 20th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1394-1417
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Standring S (2016) Large intestine. In: Standring S (ed) Gray’s anatomy, vol Chapter 66. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1136-1159 Standring S (2016) Large intestine. In: Standring S (ed) Gray’s anatomy, vol Chapter 66. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1136-1159
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Floch MH (2020) Anatomy of the colon, rectum, and anus. In: Floch MH, Netter FH (eds) Netter’s gastroenterology. 3rd edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 280-290 Floch MH (2020) Anatomy of the colon, rectum, and anus. In: Floch MH, Netter FH (eds) Netter’s gastroenterology. 3rd edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 280-290
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Meylemans D, Penninckx F, Vanbeckevoort D, Wolthuis AM, Fieuws S, D’Hoore A (2014) Endoscopic versus radiology-based location of rectal cancer. Acta chirurgica Belgica 114 (6):364-369CrossRef Meylemans D, Penninckx F, Vanbeckevoort D, Wolthuis AM, Fieuws S, D’Hoore A (2014) Endoscopic versus radiology-based location of rectal cancer. Acta chirurgica Belgica 114 (6):364-369CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Paparo F, Puppo C, Montale A, Bacigalupo L, Pascariello A, Clavarezza M, Binda C, Rollandi GA, Binda GA (2014) Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and rigid rectoscopy in the preoperative identification of intra- and extraperitoneal rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 16(11):O379-O385. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12698CrossRefPubMed Paparo F, Puppo C, Montale A, Bacigalupo L, Pascariello A, Clavarezza M, Binda C, Rollandi GA, Binda GA (2014) Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and rigid rectoscopy in the preoperative identification of intra- and extraperitoneal rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 16(11):O379-O385. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​codi.​12698CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Donner A, Zou G (2002) Testing the equality of dependent intraclass correlation coefficients. Statistician 51(3):367-379 Donner A, Zou G (2002) Testing the equality of dependent intraclass correlation coefficients. Statistician 51(3):367-379
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Walther BA, Moore JL (2005) The concepts of bias, precision and accuracy, and their use in testing the performance of species richness estimators, with a literature review of estimator performance. Ecography 28(6):815-829CrossRef Walther BA, Moore JL (2005) The concepts of bias, precision and accuracy, and their use in testing the performance of species richness estimators, with a literature review of estimator performance. Ecography 28(6):815-829CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
How to accurately measure the distance from the anal verge to rectal cancer on MRI: a prospective study using anal verge markers
verfasst von
Yeo Eun Han
Beom Jin Park
Deuk Jae Sung
Min Ju Kim
Na Yeon Han
Ki Choon Sim
Sung Bum Cho
Jin Kim
Seon-Hahn Kim
Hyonggin An
Publikationsdatum
20.07.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02654-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Abdominal Radiology 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.