Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 7/2018

20.03.2018 | Original Article

Hybrid 2D–3D ultrasound registration for navigated prostate biopsy

verfasst von: Sonia-Yuki Selmi, Emmanuel Promayon, Jocelyne Troccaz

Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | Ausgabe 7/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

We present a hybrid 2D–3D ultrasound (US) rigid registration method for navigated prostate biopsy that enables continuous localization of the biopsy trajectory during the exam.

Methods

Current clinical computer-assisted biopsy systems use either sensor-based or image-based approaches. We combine the advantages of both in order to obtain an accurate and real-time navigation based only on an approximate localization of the US probe. Starting with features extracted in both 2D and 3D images, our method introduces a variant of the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm. Among other differences to ICP, a combination of both the euclidean distance of feature positions and the similarity distance of feature descriptors is used to find matches between 2D and 3D features. The evaluation of the method is twofold. First, an analysis of variance on input parameters is conducted to estimate the sensitivity of our method to their initialization. Second, for a selected set of their values, the target registration error (TRE) was calculated on 29,760 (resp. 4000) registrations in two different experiments. It was obtained using manually identified anatomical fiducials.

Results

For 160 US volumes, from 20 patients, recorded during routine biopsy procedures performed in two hospitals by six operators, the mean TRE was \(3.91\pm 3.22\) mm (resp. \(4.37\pm 2.62\) mm).

Conclusion

This work allows envisioning further developments for prostate navigation and their clinical transfer.
Fußnoten
1
Cumbersome equipment such as an articulated arm to hold the probe or constraining equipment such as a magnetic localizer that can be perturbed by metallic objects.
 
2
For the multi-scale method, the number of features is not preset but depends on image quality or echogenicity and is related to the selected size of the Gaussian.
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Iremashvili V, Pelaez L, Jorda M, Manoharan M, Arianayagam M, Rosenberg D, Soloway M (2012) Prostate sampling by 12-core biopsy: comparison of the biopsy results with tumor location in prostatectomy specimens. Urology 79(1):37–42CrossRefPubMed Iremashvili V, Pelaez L, Jorda M, Manoharan M, Arianayagam M, Rosenberg D, Soloway M (2012) Prostate sampling by 12-core biopsy: comparison of the biopsy results with tumor location in prostatectomy specimens. Urology 79(1):37–42CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu S, Kruecker J, Turkbey B, Glossop N, Singh A, Choyke P, Pinto P, Wood B (2008) Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies. Aided Surg 13(5):255–264CrossRef Xu S, Kruecker J, Turkbey B, Glossop N, Singh A, Choyke P, Pinto P, Wood B (2008) Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies. Aided Surg 13(5):255–264CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bax J, Cool D, Gardi L, Knight K, Smith D, Montreuil J, Sherebrin S, Romagnoli C, Fenster A (2008) Mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound guided prostate biopsy system. Med Phys 35(12):5397–5410CrossRefPubMed Bax J, Cool D, Gardi L, Knight K, Smith D, Montreuil J, Sherebrin S, Romagnoli C, Fenster A (2008) Mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound guided prostate biopsy system. Med Phys 35(12):5397–5410CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumann M, Mozer P, Daanen V, Troccaz J (2011) Prostate biopsy tracking with deformation estimation. Med Image Anal 16:562–576CrossRefPubMed Baumann M, Mozer P, Daanen V, Troccaz J (2011) Prostate biopsy tracking with deformation estimation. Med Image Anal 16:562–576CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat De Silva T, Fenster A, Cool D, Gardi L, Romagnoli C, Samarabandu J, Ward A (2013) 2D–3D rigid registration to compensate for prostate motion during 3D TRUS-guided biopsy. Med Phys 40(2):022904CrossRefPubMed De Silva T, Fenster A, Cool D, Gardi L, Romagnoli C, Samarabandu J, Ward A (2013) 2D–3D rigid registration to compensate for prostate motion during 3D TRUS-guided biopsy. Med Phys 40(2):022904CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat De Silva T, Cool DW, Yuan J, Romagnoli C, Samarabandu J, Fenster A, Ward AD (2017) Aaron robust 2D–3D registration optimization for motion compensation during 3D TRUS-guided biopsy using learned prostate motion data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 36(10):2010–2020CrossRefPubMed De Silva T, Cool DW, Yuan J, Romagnoli C, Samarabandu J, Fenster A, Ward AD (2017) Aaron robust 2D–3D registration optimization for motion compensation during 3D TRUS-guided biopsy using learned prostate motion data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 36(10):2010–2020CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gillies DJ, Gardi L, Zhao R, Fenster A (2017) Optimization of real-time rigid registration motion compensation for prostate biopsies using 2D/3D ultrasound. In: SPIE medical imaging, pp 101351F–101351F Gillies DJ, Gardi L, Zhao R, Fenster A (2017) Optimization of real-time rigid registration motion compensation for prostate biopsies using 2D/3D ultrasound. In: SPIE medical imaging, pp 101351F–101351F
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Khallaghi S, Sanchez C, Nouranian S, Sojoudi S, Chang S, Abdi H, Machan L, Harris A, Black P, Gleave M, Goldenberg L, Fels S, Abolmaesumi P (2015) A 2D–3D registration framework for freehand TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. MICCAI 9350:272–279 Khallaghi S, Sanchez C, Nouranian S, Sojoudi S, Chang S, Abdi H, Machan L, Harris A, Black P, Gleave M, Goldenberg L, Fels S, Abolmaesumi P (2015) A 2D–3D registration framework for freehand TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. MICCAI 9350:272–279
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Selmi S-Y, Promayon E, Troccaz J (2016) 3D–2D ultrasound feature-based registration for navigated prostate biopsy: a feasibility study. In: 38th annual international conference on IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, p 41094112 Selmi S-Y, Promayon E, Troccaz J (2016) 3D–2D ultrasound feature-based registration for navigated prostate biopsy: a feasibility study. In: 38th annual international conference on IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, p 41094112
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowe D (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis 60(2):91–100CrossRef Lowe D (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis 60(2):91–100CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Arun KS, Huang TS, Blostein SD (1987) Least-squares fitting of two 3-D point sets. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell PAMI 9(5):698–700CrossRef Arun KS, Huang TS, Blostein SD (1987) Least-squares fitting of two 3-D point sets. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell PAMI 9(5):698–700CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris C, Stephens M (1988) A combined corner and edge detector, pp 147–151 Harris C, Stephens M (1988) A combined corner and edge detector, pp 147–151
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cornud F, Brolis L, Delongchamps NB, Portalez D, Malavaud B, Renard-Penna R, Mozer P (2013) TRUS-MRI image registration: a paradigm shift in the diagnosis of significant prostate cancer. Abdom Imaging 38(6):1447–1463CrossRefPubMed Cornud F, Brolis L, Delongchamps NB, Portalez D, Malavaud B, Renard-Penna R, Mozer P (2013) TRUS-MRI image registration: a paradigm shift in the diagnosis of significant prostate cancer. Abdom Imaging 38(6):1447–1463CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fouard C, Deram A, Keraval Y, Promayon E (2012) CamiTK: a modular framework integrating visualization, image processing and biomechanical modeling. In: Payan Y (ed) Soft tissue biomechanical modeling for computer assisted surgery. Springer, Berlin, pp 323–354CrossRef Fouard C, Deram A, Keraval Y, Promayon E (2012) CamiTK: a modular framework integrating visualization, image processing and biomechanical modeling. In: Payan Y (ed) Soft tissue biomechanical modeling for computer assisted surgery. Springer, Berlin, pp 323–354CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Hybrid 2D–3D ultrasound registration for navigated prostate biopsy
verfasst von
Sonia-Yuki Selmi
Emmanuel Promayon
Jocelyne Troccaz
Publikationsdatum
20.03.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery / Ausgabe 7/2018
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-6429
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1736-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2018

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 7/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.