Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 3/2017

05.06.2017 | Original Article

Hypoesthesia associated with mandibular movement after sagittal split ramus osteotomy

verfasst von: Toru Yamamoto, Keiko Fujii-Abe, Haruhisa Fukayama, Hiroshi Kawahara

Erschienen in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This retrospective study investigated the relationship between the degree of neurosensory disturbance (NSD) and mandibular movement distance after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and assessed sensory recovery.

Methods

Lower lip hypoesthesia was evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, and 2 months after SSRO in 38 patients categorized according to the distance of mandibular movement: S group (0–7 mm; n = 17, 4 males and 13 females) and L group (7–14 mm; n = 21, 7 males, 14 females). Symptoms were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS), tactile-threshold (SW) test, static 2-point discrimination (s-2PD) test, and current perception threshold (CPT) test.

Results

The two groups did not differ significantly in gender and age. The Aβ fiber results of the CPT test differed significantly between the groups at 1 week and 1 month postsurgery (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups throughout the period in terms of VAS, SW, s-2PD, Aδ fiber, and C fiber of CPT.

Conclusions

Post-SSRO, the incidence of NSD in terms of tactile sensation may be greater in the L group early postoperatively. This may assist surgeons in explaining postoperative hypoesthesia to patients preoperatively.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Monnazzi MS, Real-Gabrielli MF, Passeri LA, Gabrielli MA (2012) Cutaneous sensibility impairment after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy: a prospective clinical study of the spontaneous recovery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:696–702CrossRefPubMed Monnazzi MS, Real-Gabrielli MF, Passeri LA, Gabrielli MA (2012) Cutaneous sensibility impairment after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy: a prospective clinical study of the spontaneous recovery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:696–702CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips C, Kim SH, Tucker M, Turvey TA (2010) Sensory retraining: burden in daily life related to altered sensation after orthognathic surgery, a randomized clinical trial. Orthod Craniofacial Res 13:169–178CrossRef Phillips C, Kim SH, Tucker M, Turvey TA (2010) Sensory retraining: burden in daily life related to altered sensation after orthognathic surgery, a randomized clinical trial. Orthod Craniofacial Res 13:169–178CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Rustemeyer J, Eke Z, Bremerich A (2010) Perception of improvement after orthognathic surgery: the important variables affecting patient satisfaction. Oral Maxillofac Surg 14(3):155–162CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rustemeyer J, Eke Z, Bremerich A (2010) Perception of improvement after orthognathic surgery: the important variables affecting patient satisfaction. Oral Maxillofac Surg 14(3):155–162CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Poort LJ, van Neck JW, van der Wal KG (2009) Sensory testing of inferior alveolar nerve injuries: a review of methods used in pro-spective studies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:292–300CrossRefPubMed Poort LJ, van Neck JW, van der Wal KG (2009) Sensory testing of inferior alveolar nerve injuries: a review of methods used in pro-spective studies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:292–300CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Werner JL, Omer GE Jr (1970) Evaluating cutaneous pressure sensation of the hand. Am J Occup Ther 24:347–356PubMed Werner JL, Omer GE Jr (1970) Evaluating cutaneous pressure sensation of the hand. Am J Occup Ther 24:347–356PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Nogami K, Taniguchi S (2015) Stellate ganglion block compared with xenon light irradiation, is a more effective treatment of neurosensory deficits resulting from orthognathic surgery, as measured by current perception threshold. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73(7):1267–1274CrossRefPubMed Nogami K, Taniguchi S (2015) Stellate ganglion block compared with xenon light irradiation, is a more effective treatment of neurosensory deficits resulting from orthognathic surgery, as measured by current perception threshold. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73(7):1267–1274CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Verweij JP, Mensink G, Fiocco M, van Merkesteyn JP (2016) Incidence and recovery of neurosensory disturbances after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in different age groups: a retrospective study of 263 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45(7):898–903CrossRefPubMed Verweij JP, Mensink G, Fiocco M, van Merkesteyn JP (2016) Incidence and recovery of neurosensory disturbances after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in different age groups: a retrospective study of 263 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45(7):898–903CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Teerijoki-Oksa T, Jääskeläinen S, Forssell K, Virtanen A, Forssell H (2003) An evaluation of clinical and electrophysiologic tests in nerve injury diagnosis after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32:15–23CrossRefPubMed Teerijoki-Oksa T, Jääskeläinen S, Forssell K, Virtanen A, Forssell H (2003) An evaluation of clinical and electrophysiologic tests in nerve injury diagnosis after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32:15–23CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Aizenbud D, Ciceu C, Hazan-Molina H, Abu-El-Naaj I (2011) Relationship between inferior alveolar nerve imaging and neurosensory impairment following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in skeletal class III cases with mandibular prognathism. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:461–468CrossRefPubMed Aizenbud D, Ciceu C, Hazan-Molina H, Abu-El-Naaj I (2011) Relationship between inferior alveolar nerve imaging and neurosensory impairment following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in skeletal class III cases with mandibular prognathism. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:461–468CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Colella G, Cannavale R, Vicidomini A, Lanza A (2007) Neurosensory disturbance of the inferior alveolar nerve after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:1707–1715CrossRefPubMed Colella G, Cannavale R, Vicidomini A, Lanza A (2007) Neurosensory disturbance of the inferior alveolar nerve after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:1707–1715CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat van Merkesteyn JP, Zweers A, Corputty JE (2007) Neurosensory disturbances one year after bilateral sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy performed with separators. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 35:222–226CrossRefPubMed van Merkesteyn JP, Zweers A, Corputty JE (2007) Neurosensory disturbances one year after bilateral sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy performed with separators. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 35:222–226CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rich J, Golden BA, Phillips C (2014) Systematic review of preoperative mandibular canal position as it relates to postoperative neurosensory disturbance following the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:1076–1081CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rich J, Golden BA, Phillips C (2014) Systematic review of preoperative mandibular canal position as it relates to postoperative neurosensory disturbance following the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:1076–1081CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones DL, Wolford LM, Hartog JM (1990) Comparison of methods to assess neourosensory alterations following orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 5:35–42PubMed Jones DL, Wolford LM, Hartog JM (1990) Comparison of methods to assess neourosensory alterations following orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 5:35–42PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Takasaki Y, Noma H, Masaki H, Fujikawa M, Alberdas JL, Tamura H, Ueda E, Takaki T, Yamane G (1998) A clinical analysis of the recovery from sensory disturbance after sagittal splitting ramus osteotomy using a Semmes-Weinstein pressure aesthesiometer. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 39:189–197PubMed Takasaki Y, Noma H, Masaki H, Fujikawa M, Alberdas JL, Tamura H, Ueda E, Takaki T, Yamane G (1998) A clinical analysis of the recovery from sensory disturbance after sagittal splitting ramus osteotomy using a Semmes-Weinstein pressure aesthesiometer. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 39:189–197PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Westermark A, Bystedt H, von Konow L (1998) Inferior alveolar nerve function after mandibular osteotomies. Br J Maxillofac Surg 36:425–428CrossRef Westermark A, Bystedt H, von Konow L (1998) Inferior alveolar nerve function after mandibular osteotomies. Br J Maxillofac Surg 36:425–428CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Westermark A, Bystedt H, von Konow L (1998) Inferior alveolar nerve function after sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible: correlation with degree of intraoperative nerve encounter and other variables in 496 operations. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36:429–433CrossRefPubMed Westermark A, Bystedt H, von Konow L (1998) Inferior alveolar nerve function after sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible: correlation with degree of intraoperative nerve encounter and other variables in 496 operations. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36:429–433CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Dellon AL (1981) Evaliation of sensibility and reeducation of sensation in the hand, 1st edn. The Williams and Wilkins company, Boltimore, pp 3–192 Dellon AL (1981) Evaliation of sensibility and reeducation of sensation in the hand, 1st edn. The Williams and Wilkins company, Boltimore, pp 3–192
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Posnick JC, Zimbler AG, Grossman JA (1990) Normal cutaneous sensibility of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:429–435CrossRefPubMed Posnick JC, Zimbler AG, Grossman JA (1990) Normal cutaneous sensibility of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:429–435CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham LL, Tiner BD, Clark GM, Bays RA, Keeling SD, Rugh JD (1996) A comparison of questionnaire versus monofilament assessment of neurosensory deficit. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54(4):454–459CrossRefPubMed Cunningham LL, Tiner BD, Clark GM, Bays RA, Keeling SD, Rugh JD (1996) A comparison of questionnaire versus monofilament assessment of neurosensory deficit. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54(4):454–459CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips C, Essick G, Zuniga J, Tucker M, Blakey G 3rd (2006) Qualitative descriptors used by patients following orthognathic surgery to portray altered sensation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64(12):1751–1760CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Phillips C, Essick G, Zuniga J, Tucker M, Blakey G 3rd (2006) Qualitative descriptors used by patients following orthognathic surgery to portray altered sensation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64(12):1751–1760CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Akal UK, Sayan NB, Aydoğan S, Yaman Z (2000) Evaluation of the neurosensory deficiencies of oral and maxillofacial region following surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29(5):331–336CrossRefPubMed Akal UK, Sayan NB, Aydoğan S, Yaman Z (2000) Evaluation of the neurosensory deficiencies of oral and maxillofacial region following surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29(5):331–336CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Eliav E, Gracely RH, Nahlieli O, Benoliel R (2004) Quantitative sensory testing in trigeminal nerve damage assessment. J Orofac Pain 18(4):339–344PubMed Eliav E, Gracely RH, Nahlieli O, Benoliel R (2004) Quantitative sensory testing in trigeminal nerve damage assessment. J Orofac Pain 18(4):339–344PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Jääskeläinen SK (2004) The utility of clinical neurophysiological and quantitative sensory testing for trigeminal neuropathy. J Orofac Pain 18(4):355–359PubMed Jääskeläinen SK (2004) The utility of clinical neurophysiological and quantitative sensory testing for trigeminal neuropathy. J Orofac Pain 18(4):355–359PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kesarwani A, Antonyshyn O, Mackinnon SE, Gruss JS, Novak C, Kelly L (1989) Facial sensibility testing in the normal and posttraumatic population. Ann Plast Surg 22:416–425CrossRefPubMed Kesarwani A, Antonyshyn O, Mackinnon SE, Gruss JS, Novak C, Kelly L (1989) Facial sensibility testing in the normal and posttraumatic population. Ann Plast Surg 22:416–425CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Dellon AL, Andonian E, DeJesus RA (2007) Measuring sensibility of the trigeminal nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(6):1546–1550CrossRefPubMed Dellon AL, Andonian E, DeJesus RA (2007) Measuring sensibility of the trigeminal nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(6):1546–1550CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HS, Kho HS, Kim YK, Lee SW, Chung SC (2000) Reliability and characterisitics of current perception thresholds in the territory of the infraorbital and inferior alveolar nerves. J Orofac Pain 14(4):286–292PubMed Kim HS, Kho HS, Kim YK, Lee SW, Chung SC (2000) Reliability and characterisitics of current perception thresholds in the territory of the infraorbital and inferior alveolar nerves. J Orofac Pain 14(4):286–292PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ziccardi VB, Hullett JS, Gomes J (2009) Physical neurosensory testing versus current perception threshold assessment in trigeminal nerve injuries related to dental treatment: a retrospective study. Quintessence Int 40(7):603–609PubMed Ziccardi VB, Hullett JS, Gomes J (2009) Physical neurosensory testing versus current perception threshold assessment in trigeminal nerve injuries related to dental treatment: a retrospective study. Quintessence Int 40(7):603–609PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Calabria F, Sellek L, Gugole F, Trevisiol L, Bertolasi L, D’Agostino A (2013) The use of sensory action potential to evaluate inferior alveolar nerve damage after orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 24(2):514–517CrossRefPubMed Calabria F, Sellek L, Gugole F, Trevisiol L, Bertolasi L, D’Agostino A (2013) The use of sensory action potential to evaluate inferior alveolar nerve damage after orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 24(2):514–517CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Mensink G, Zweers A, Wolterbeek R, Dicker GG, Groot RH, van Merkesteyn RJ (2012) Neurosensory disturbances one year after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular performed with separators: a multi-centre prospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 40:763–767CrossRefPubMed Mensink G, Zweers A, Wolterbeek R, Dicker GG, Groot RH, van Merkesteyn RJ (2012) Neurosensory disturbances one year after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular performed with separators: a multi-centre prospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 40:763–767CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Borstlap WA, Stoelinga PJ, Hoppenreijs TJ, van’t Hof MA (2004) Stabilisation of sagittal split advancement osteotomies with miniplates: a prospective, multicentre study with two-year follow-up. Part I. Clinical parameters. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33:433–441CrossRefPubMed Borstlap WA, Stoelinga PJ, Hoppenreijs TJ, van’t Hof MA (2004) Stabilisation of sagittal split advancement osteotomies with miniplates: a prospective, multicentre study with two-year follow-up. Part I. Clinical parameters. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33:433–441CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Ylikontiola L, Kinnunen J, Oikarinen K (2000) Factors affecting neurosensory disturbance after mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58:1234–1239CrossRefPubMed Ylikontiola L, Kinnunen J, Oikarinen K (2000) Factors affecting neurosensory disturbance after mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58:1234–1239CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Sickels JE, Hatch JP, Dolce C, Bays RA, Rugh JD (2002) Effects of age, amount of advancement, and genioplasty on neurosensory disturbance after a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:1012–1017CrossRefPubMed Van Sickels JE, Hatch JP, Dolce C, Bays RA, Rugh JD (2002) Effects of age, amount of advancement, and genioplasty on neurosensory disturbance after a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:1012–1017CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Joss CU, Vassalli IM (2009) Stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery with rigid internal fixation: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:301–313CrossRefPubMed Joss CU, Vassalli IM (2009) Stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery with rigid internal fixation: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:301–313CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Rempel D, Dahlin L, Lundborg G (1999) Pathophysiology of nerve compression syndromes: response of peripheral nerves to loading. J Bone Joint Surg am 81(11):1600–1610CrossRefPubMed Rempel D, Dahlin L, Lundborg G (1999) Pathophysiology of nerve compression syndromes: response of peripheral nerves to loading. J Bone Joint Surg am 81(11):1600–1610CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Teerijoki-Oksa T, Jääskeläinen SK, Soukka T, Virtanen A, Forssell H (2011) Subjective sensory symptoms associated with axonal and demyelinating nerve injuries after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(6):e208–e213CrossRefPubMed Teerijoki-Oksa T, Jääskeläinen SK, Soukka T, Virtanen A, Forssell H (2011) Subjective sensory symptoms associated with axonal and demyelinating nerve injuries after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(6):e208–e213CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuroyanagi N, Miyachi H, Ochiai S, Kamiya N, Kanazawa T, Nagao T, Shimozato K (2013) Prediction of neurosensory alterations after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42(7):814–822CrossRefPubMed Kuroyanagi N, Miyachi H, Ochiai S, Kamiya N, Kanazawa T, Nagao T, Shimozato K (2013) Prediction of neurosensory alterations after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42(7):814–822CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Kobayashi A, Yoshimasu H, Kobayashi J, Amagasa T (2006) Neurosensory alteration in the lower lip and chin area after orthognathic surgery: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus inverted L ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:778CrossRefPubMed Kobayashi A, Yoshimasu H, Kobayashi J, Amagasa T (2006) Neurosensory alteration in the lower lip and chin area after orthognathic surgery: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus inverted L ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:778CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Gianni AB, D’Orto O, Biglioli F, Bozzetti A, Brusati R (2002) Neurosensory alterations of the inferior alveolar and mental nerve after genioplasty alone or associated with sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 30:295CrossRefPubMed Gianni AB, D’Orto O, Biglioli F, Bozzetti A, Brusati R (2002) Neurosensory alterations of the inferior alveolar and mental nerve after genioplasty alone or associated with sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 30:295CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Ylikontiola L, Kinnunen J, Laukkanen P, Oikarinen K (2000) Prediction of recovery from neurosensory deficit after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 90:275CrossRef Ylikontiola L, Kinnunen J, Laukkanen P, Oikarinen K (2000) Prediction of recovery from neurosensory deficit after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 90:275CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Vriens JP, Van der Glas HW (2009) Extension of normal values on sensory function for facial areas using clinical tests on touch and two-point discrimination. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:1154CrossRefPubMed Vriens JP, Van der Glas HW (2009) Extension of normal values on sensory function for facial areas using clinical tests on touch and two-point discrimination. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:1154CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Wijbenga JG, Verlinden CR, Jansma J, Becking AG, Stegenga B (2009) Long-lasting neurosensory disturbance following advancement of the retrognathic mandible: distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:719CrossRefPubMed Wijbenga JG, Verlinden CR, Jansma J, Becking AG, Stegenga B (2009) Long-lasting neurosensory disturbance following advancement of the retrognathic mandible: distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:719CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamashita Y, Mizuashi K, Shigematsu M, Goto M (2007) Masticatory function and neurosensory disturbance after mandibular correction by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a comparison between miniplate and bicortical screw rigid internal fixation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36:118CrossRefPubMed Yamashita Y, Mizuashi K, Shigematsu M, Goto M (2007) Masticatory function and neurosensory disturbance after mandibular correction by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a comparison between miniplate and bicortical screw rigid internal fixation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36:118CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Becelli R, Renzi G, Carboni A, Cerulli G, Gasparini G (2002) Inferior alveolar nerve impairment after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy: an analysis of spontaneous recovery patterns observed in 60 patients. J Craniofac Surg 13:315CrossRefPubMed Becelli R, Renzi G, Carboni A, Cerulli G, Gasparini G (2002) Inferior alveolar nerve impairment after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy: an analysis of spontaneous recovery patterns observed in 60 patients. J Craniofac Surg 13:315CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Blomqvist JE, Alberius P, Isaksson S (1998) Sensibility following sagittal split osteotomy in the mandible: a prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:325CrossRefPubMed Blomqvist JE, Alberius P, Isaksson S (1998) Sensibility following sagittal split osteotomy in the mandible: a prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:325CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshioka I, Tanaka T, Khanal A, Habu M, Kito S, Kodama M, Oda M, Wakasugi-Sato N, Matsumoto-Takeda S, Seta Y, Tominaga K, Sakoda S, Morimoto Y (2011) Correlation of mandibular bone quality with neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49(7):552–556CrossRefPubMed Yoshioka I, Tanaka T, Khanal A, Habu M, Kito S, Kodama M, Oda M, Wakasugi-Sato N, Matsumoto-Takeda S, Seta Y, Tominaga K, Sakoda S, Morimoto Y (2011) Correlation of mandibular bone quality with neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49(7):552–556CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Reyneke JP, Tsakiris P, Becker P (2002) Age as a factor in the complication rate after removal of unerupted/impacted third molars at the time of mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:654–659CrossRefPubMed Reyneke JP, Tsakiris P, Becker P (2002) Age as a factor in the complication rate after removal of unerupted/impacted third molars at the time of mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:654–659CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshida T, Nagamine T, Kobayashi T, Michimi N, Nakajima T, Sasakura H, Hanada K (1989) Impairment of the inferior alveolar nerve after sagittal split osteotomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 17(6):271–277CrossRefPubMed Yoshida T, Nagamine T, Kobayashi T, Michimi N, Nakajima T, Sasakura H, Hanada K (1989) Impairment of the inferior alveolar nerve after sagittal split osteotomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 17(6):271–277CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Hypoesthesia associated with mandibular movement after sagittal split ramus osteotomy
verfasst von
Toru Yamamoto
Keiko Fujii-Abe
Haruhisa Fukayama
Hiroshi Kawahara
Publikationsdatum
05.06.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1865-1550
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-1569
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-017-0633-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.