Open wedge high tibial osteotomy is a standard procedure for frontal realignment. It is indicated in varus knee with reduced mechanical medial proximal tibia angle. Overcorrection producing a mechanical medial proximal tibia angle out of the normal range (85–90°) is not recommended because this would lead to unphysiological joint-line orientation. Osteotomies around the knee also influence the adjacent ankle and hip joints. For the hip, it is known that frontal alignment of the leg influences the ischiofemoral space. A decreased ischiofemoral space can lead to painful impingement between the ischial bone and the lesser trochanter.
Case presentation
A 53-year-old German woman presented with severe ischiofemoral impingement symptoms and valgus malalignment of the left leg after open wedge high tibial osteotomy, which was indicated and performed by an orthopedic surgeon with intention to treat medial knee pain due to degenerative arthritis of the medial compartment years after medial meniscectomy. The mechanical medial proximal tibia angle was 100.5°. We performed closed wedge high tibial osteotomy producing a mechanical medial proximal tibia angle of 90.0° and normal joint-line orientation. The hip pain was gone immediately after the surgery, and the patient had no signs of ischiofemoral impingement or hip pain at last follow-up 12 months after closed wedge high tibial osteotomy.
Conclusions
Frontal realignment osteotomy around the knee can create problems at adjacent joints. Overvalgization of the proximal tibia made the patient compensate by hyperadduction of the hip to enable full foot sole contact with the floor. Hyperadduction of the hip decreased the ischiofemoral space, leading to severe impingement. Therefore, meticulous planning of osteotomies is important not to produce unphysiological situations or unwanted negative effects at the level of an adjacent joint.
Hinweise
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
CT
Computed tomography
cw
Closed wedge
HTO
High tibial osteotomy
JLCA
Joint-line convergence angle
JLO
Joint-line obliquity
mLDFA
Mechanical lateral distal femur angle
mMPTA
Mechanical medial proximal tibia angle
ow
Open wedge
ROM
Range of motion
WOMAC
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis
Background
Open wedge high tibial osteotomy (owHTO) is a standard procedure for frontal realignment [1, 2]. It is indicated in varus knee with reduced mechanical medial proximal tibia angle (mMPTA) [3]. Overcorrection producing a mMPTA out of the normal range (85–90°) is not recommended because this would lead to unphysiological joint-line orientation [4, 5].
Osteotomies around the knee also influence the adjacent joints—ankle and hip [6‐9]. For the hip, it was demonstrated earlier that frontal alignment of the leg influences the ischiofemoral space [9], but this has not become common knowledge yet. A decreased ischiofemoral space can lead to impingement between the ischial bone and the lesser trochanter [7, 9]. This is demonstrated and illustrated by the present case.
Anzeige
Unphysiological valgus knee alignment is normally compensated by the patient by adducting the hip to enable full foot sole contact with the floor [9]. As hip adduction decreases the space between the ischial bone of the pelvis and the lesser trochanter of the femur, ischiofemoral impingement can result [9]. This is known to be an important extraarticular source of hip pain.
Case presentation
A 53-year-old German woman presented with severe ischiofemoral impingement symptoms and valgus malalignment of the left leg after owHTO, which was indicated and performed by an orthopedic surgeon with intention to treat medial knee pain due to degenerative arthritis of the medial compartment years after medial meniscectomy. The initial osteotomy was performed 4 years previously, and the patient has been severely symptomatic since this surgery.
On clinical examination, the Faber test was positive and external rotation of the hip in extension was painful, too. Radiologically, the mMPTA was 101.5° (Fig. 1a). The patient almost could not walk because she needed to adduct her left hip so much to enable her foot to approach the floor evenly. With a positive Faber test, psoas sign, and posterior impingement test, the range of motion (ROM) of the affected hip was Ext/Flex 0/0/120°, Abd/Add 45/0/0°, Aro/Iro 40/0/15°. The WOMAC score was 20.3. The Merle D’Aubigné and Postel score was 13. Torsional malalignment was excluded by torsional CT analysis. On axial CT slides, a reduced ischiofemoral distance was found on the affected left side (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1
Long-leg standing radiograph. a Valgus aligned knee with oblique joint-line and minimal ischiofemoral space between the ischial bone and the lesser trochanter. Using mediCAD software, a medial closed wedge high tibial osteotomy for varization is planned on the native X-ray showing the planned surgical procedure (11-mm closed wedge high tibial osteotomy) and b the planned result after osteotomy
Fig. 2
Axial computed tomography slide at level of lesser trochanters. The ischiofemoral distance is smaller on the left than right side
×
×
We planned (Fig. 1a, b) and performed cwHTO producing a mMPTA of 90.0° and normal joint-line orientation (Fig. 3). The hip pain was gone immediately after surgery, and the patient had no signs of ischiofemoral impingement or hip pain at the last follow-up 12 months after cwHTO. At this time, the ROM was Ext/Flex 10/0/120°, Abd/Add 45/0/25°, Aro/Iro 45/0/20°. The WOMAC score was 87.5, and the Merle D’Aubigné and Postel score was 18.
Fig. 3
Long-leg standing radiograph showing normal knee alignment and increased ischiofemoral space postoperatively (after closed wedge high tibial osteotomy)
×
Anzeige
Discussion and conclusions
In the presented case of a 53-year-old patient, massive overvalgization of about 10° deteriorated the function of the lower extremity tremendously. In varus situations of the knee due to medial joint space narrowing without bony malalignment per se, one should be cautious when performing realignment osteotomies. In these cases, medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty might be more appropriate.
For sufficient preoperative planning, it is recommended to at least analyze the long-leg axis, the joint-line convergence angle (JLCA), and the following bony angles around the knee on a standardized long-leg standing radiograph: mechanical lateral distal femur angle (mLDFA) and mMPTA [10‐12]. Figure 1 shows the computer-aided digital planning, which was conducted preoperatively.
Slight overvalgization is accepted in cases with medial gonarthritis, but no unphysiological bony angles or oblique JLCA should be created. To avoid this, often double-level osteotomy of the proximal tibia and the distal femur is indicated in cases with bony malalignment [4, 13, 14]. It was demonstrated earlier that joint-line obliquity (JLO) of more than 3° is associated with worse clinical outcomes after medial owHTO [15]. Overcorrection of more than 3° should be avoided [15].
In conclusion, frontal realignment osteotomy around the knee can create problems at the hip. Overvalgization of the proximal tibia made the patient compensate by hyperadduction of the hip to enable full foot sole contact with the floor. Hyperadduction of the hip decreased the ischiofemoral space, leading to severely painful symptoms of ischiofemoral impingement. Therefore, meticulous planning of osteotomies according to the described principles is important to avoid unphysiological situations or unwanted negative effects at the knee or the level of an adjacent joint.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support by Open Access Publishing Fund of University of Tübingen.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained. This work does not consist of studies in humans or animals.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Anzeige
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Mit e.Med Allgemeinmedizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Premium-Inhalten der allgemeinmedizinischen Zeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Allgemeinmedizin-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
