1 Introduction
Breast cancer death rates have decreased during the last several decades, but breast cancer is still the second leading cause of cancer deaths in women. In the clinic, breast cancer is screened for the presence of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and amplification of ERBB2/HER2 (HER2). Based on these assessments tumors are divided into ER + , HER2 + with or without ER + , and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) subgroups, and this categorization has been used to identify treatment options [
1]. Molecular studies are also now used to inform treatment and provide targeted therapies [
2]. However, a significant clinical problem is that inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity limits therapy response [
3‐
8]. Therefore, to improve breast cancer outcomes, in vivo and in vitro models need to recapitulate this heterogeneity in order to identify more effective treatments.
Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) have demonstrated an ability to predict patient response to treatment [
9]. However, the establishment of PDX models requires substantial time and tumor evolution in the patient may differ from that in the mouse [
10]. Two-dimensional cultures of dissociated human tumors do not recapitulate the structural complexity, cellular phenotypes, or gene expression profiles of the intact tumor tissue [
11]. Three-dimensional culture systems with properties similar to the tissue or tumor of origin are an attractive alternative, and they have been particularly well characterized for the normal human gastrointestinal tract [
12] and the normal human breast [
13]. However, there is a substantial challenge in using organoids derived from tumor tissue to ensure that the heterogeneity has been successfully recapitulated. Organoid systems for colon cancer are currently the best validated for their relevance to the starting tumor tissue [
14]. In contrast, the ability of breast cancer organoids to recapitulate the starting tissue has been very limited [
15]. In some cases no comparison between the starting tumor tissue and the tumor organoid was attempted [
16,
17]. Discordance between organoids and their starting tissue have been observed and these differences are amplified during in vitro passaging raising concerns over the physiological relevance of the organoids [
18,
19]. Therefore, ideally, to ensure that meaningful clinical information can be obtained from organoid analysis, a simple method to aid in evaluating how effectively the organoids recapitulate the starting tissue would be useful for the breast cancer field.
This study identifies a method that readily evaluates the fidelity of the organoid system to recapitulate the inter- and intra- tumor heterogeneity of a particular patient’s breast tumor. For these studies a simple culture system was used to assess the effectiveness of the organoids to recapitulate the inherent heterogeneity in primary TNBC or ER + breast cancer. This culture system included amphiregulin (AREG) and fibroblast growth factor 7 (FGF7), which were identified as essential components for generating normal breast organoids from human tissue [
13]. Additionally, AREG and FGF7 are necessary for mammary stem cell maintenance and are associated with breast cancer [
20‐
23]. Cellular phenotype was used as a readout for analyzing tumor heterogeneity and the response of the tumor to known chemotherapeutic agents. Support for analyzing cellular phenotype as a readout is provided by the observations that the various cell types comprising the tumor have been shown to respond differentially to therapies [
24]. To facilitate the comparison between the tumor tissue in situ and the organoid cultures we used the Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD) method. The JSD method measures the similarity between the starting tissue and the organoids by calculating the distance between their probability distributions. To provide context for the JSD method we analyzed > 5, 684 images taken from starting tissue and organoid cultures obtained from nineteen different breast cancer patients and seven normal breast tissues.
To simplify the phenotypic approach, tumor heterogeneity was analyzed using cytokeratin 8 (K8) and cytokeratin 14 (K14) although the JSD method can be used with different biomarkers. Keratins are cytoplasmic intermediate filament proteins that are expressed in epithelial cells. The biomarkers K8 and K14 were selected based on their previous use as diagnostic markers for luminal breast cancer and TNBC, respectively [
25]. K8 is expressed in the luminal cells of the normal breast and in breast cancer is correlated with a less invasive phenotype and increased overall survival [
26,
27]. Loss of K8 is associated with a worse prognosis [
28]. K14 is expressed in myoepithelial cells in the normal breast but is accepted as reliable marker of basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) [
29,
30]. Approximately 70% of TNBCs are classified as BLBCs and this tumor type has the worst prognosis [
31]. K14 has been correlated with a motile phenotype [
32] [
33‐
35] and the proliferation marker, Ki67 [
36]. In contrast, reduced expression of K14 was correlated with longer relapse-free survival [
37]. The JSD method provides a quantitative assessment of the heterogeneity within the starting tissue and the resultant organoids that are not readily defined by standard statistical methods due to the fact that the organoid population is an aggregate of distinct phenotypes.
This study clearly illustrates the challenge in representing the heterogeneity in an organoid model and also the necessity for developing approaches to quantitatively determine whether an organoid culture has recapitulated the tumor in situ. The JSD method succeeds in providing a quantitative approach and it can be used as a guide to further improve organoid cultures to better recapitulate the starting tumor tissue. Furthermore, enrichment of therapy-resistant populations in response to clinically-relevant drug treatments was easily identified using the JSD method. In summary, the JSD analysis provides a simple approach, which can be combined with other methodologies, to achieve the goal of personalized approaches to drug responses in breast cancer.
3 Discussion
Breast cancer organoid models have been proposed for use in personalized medicine and in the identification of novel therapeutic targets. A significant challenge for this technology is the recapitulation of the starting tissue and its intrinsic heterogeneity into the organoid model in order to increase the likelihood of obtaining physiologically relevant information. This intrinsic heterogeneity occurs through cell-autonomous and non-cell autonomous mechanisms, which are important to capture as it contributes to therapeutic response [
51‐
54]. To address the need for an easily managed method for evaluating whether organoids recapitulate the tumor in situ we describe an approach that generates a quantitative readout. This method is based on imaging data that provides an objective analysis of the similarity between organoids and the source tissue, and between different culture conditions. This approach can also facilitate the analysis of modifications to the culture conditions, such as the addition of immune cells or adipocytes or drug treatments. The method complements omics approaches by validating that the culture conditions are permissive for the activation of the relevant signal transduction pathways, which impact cellular phenotype.
In our example, distribution curves based on the frequency of K8 and K14 were generated from ≥ 23 organoid and starting tissue sections for each sample to obtain an 0.85 confidence level that the heterogeneity within the tissue had been captured. The similarity of these distributions was evaluated using the JSD method, which provided a quantitative value. For ease of use, the method described uses only two standard breast biomarkers, K8 and K14. However, markers other than K8 and K14 could be used and the choice would depend on the study focus. Markers in addition to K8 and K14 could be included although the complexity of the analysis will increase. For example, comparing RNA-seq data of starting tissue with organoids required an additional metric beyond the JSD analysis [
55] as the JSD approach could only satisfy the distribution evaluation criteria and not expression level differences. These additional complications do not occur in our data using only the distribution of two markers.
The JSD method summarizes the effects of proliferation, apoptosis and differentiation in a single value providing an evaluation of organoid fidelity and therapy-resistant cell populations. For example, in ER + breast cancer organoids generated from patient 687, the decrease in the normalized JSD score by fulvestrant indicates that the tissue heterogeneity is being altered. Analysis of the bin distribution profile that is used to generate the normalized JSD score shows enrichment of a K14 + population, which could be a possible source of resistance. In contrast Palbociclib does not change the normalized JSD score, and the lack of a resistant population suggests that Palbociclib would be an effective treatment for this patient as it also reduced tumor growth. The JSD method also provides a simple readout to identify culture conditions that influence tissue development as seen in particular for CXCL5. Addition of CXCL5 increased the proportion of K14 + cells in normal tissue and K14 + cells have been implicated in metastatic progression [
56].
Analysis of cytokines and growth factors secreted by normal and CAFs demonstrated the variability inherent between patients although HER1 and FGFR ligands were detected in all samples. Previously, HER1 and FGFR ligands were necessary for the in vitro development of normal breast [
13], and in this study were sufficient to recapitulate the majority of TNBCs in 3D culture with high fidelity. However, the HER1 and FGFR cocktail was only partially successful in recapitulating breast cancer tissue highly enriched for ERα cells. In part this problem may be due to the Matrigel, the matrix used in this study, which is considered a soft material. Matrix stiffness has been found to be important in maintaining ERα in breast cancer cells but further research is needed [
49]. The ability to propagate the inherent heterogeneity with HER1 and FGFR for both TNBC and ER + breast cancer suggests that there are intrinsic differences in how individual cells within these tumors respond to the signaling pathways. Our observations may partially explain the lack of success of HER1 and FGFR inhibitors in breast cancer, as those cells that are less dependent on HER1 or FGFR may generate resistance [
57,
58].
Evaluating the similarity between complex systems is extremely challenging and we have demonstrated the utility of the JSD approach to provide a quantitative measure that is particularly useful for personalized medicine. Standard statistical approaches are not applicable in comparing organoids to the ST as the sample size is one. The importance of analyzing each patient tissue separately was most effectively demonstrated when evaluating the ER + breast cancer patient samples 461, 549 and 687. In the same culture media the K14 + population expanded relative to the K8 + population in organoids generated from patients 461 and 549; however, these results were not observed with organoids generated from patient 687. This difference is most likely due to genomic alterations that result in the activation of signaling pathways that generate divergent responses in the patient’s tissue. These results also highlight the importance of a personalized medicine approach in identifying the best treatment option for the patient.
A major issue in translating organoid-based data into the clinic is the absence of a threshold response [
59]. The analysis based on the JSD approach could provide such a quantitative readout to aid in identifying the best treatment options for a particular patient. For this approach to be successful it would be necessary to validate that the JSD approach can be used as a predictor of patient outcome by comparing the results obtained from treated organoids to the patient’s response. The data acquisition and analysis can readily be automated making the JSD approach suitable for translation.
4 Methods
4.1 Organoid and fibroblast isolation
Human breast tissue from reduction mammoplasty or breast cancer surgery was collected as waste tissue with institutional review board approval. A list of age, race, and diagnosis for each patient used in this study is provided (Table
S1). Organoids were prepared as previously described [
13]. Briefly, tissue was minced and digested in Collagenase A medium (DMEM/F12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1 mg/mL Collagenase A (Roche Diagnostics), 1 μg/mL insulin (Sigma-Aldrich), 600 U/μL Nystatin (Sigma-Aldrich), 100 U/mL penicillin–100 μg/mL streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific)) for 18-21 h in a 37 °C 5% CO
2 incubator. Digested material was pelleted at 180 g for 5 min and the supernatant collected for fibroblast isolation. The remaining pellet was resuspended in DMEM/F12 with DNAse I (1000 U/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich) for 3–5 min in a 37°C 5% CO
2 incubator. Fetal bovine serum (FBS) (0.5 mL) was added, and the digested tissue was pelleted at 180 g for 10 min. The pellet was resuspended in 9 ml of DMEM/F12 and centrifuged at 350 g for 15 s. This wash was repeated 4–6 times. The pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of base medium (DMEM/F12, 1 μg/mL hydrocortisone (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 μg/mL insulin-5.5 μg/mL transferrin–6.7 ng/mL selenium-2 μg/mL ethanolamine (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 2.5 μg/mL Amphotericin B (Sigma-Aldrich), 50 μg/mL gentamicin (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 100 U/mL penicillin-100 μg/mL streptomycin). A volume of 60 μl of a 60% Matrigel in base media was added into the wells of an 8-well LabTek plate and solidified for 15 min in a 37°C 5% CO
2 incubator. Organoids were counted and resuspended in a 50% Matrigel in base media. A volume of 40 μl of Matrigel/organoid solution containing 30–40 medium sized organoids was plated onto the solidified Matrigel layer and allowed to solidify for 15 min at 37°C.
4.2 Organoid culture and drug treatment
4.3 Immunostaining
Organoids were fixed and immunostained as previously described [
13]. Detailed methods for immunostaining, imaging, and analysis are provided in the supplementary experimental procedures.
4.4 Data processing
Organoids on average have smaller area than ST. Therefore, to correct for potential artifacts in K8/K14 ratio, we subdivided the images obtained from ST into smaller tiles to match an average organoid size. K8/K14 quantitation was carried out on the resulting tiles if the total tissue area per image was greater than 5% of image area. K8 and K14 area were measured and log2 of K8/K4 ratio calculated. Median and quartile values of log2(K8/K14) from ST of normal breast tissue were determined and set as bin boundaries: -inf:Q25, Q25-median, median-Q75, Q75-inf. Subsequently all images were classified in these bins, and bin distribution was calculated per condition (N of sections in the bin(1–4)/Total N of sections per condition) to generate distribution table. These distributions were then used to calculate JSD values for comparison of any two given conditions.
Quantitation and data analysis was carried out in Python3.8.10 using the following packages: Pillow (image tilling and RGB quantitation); Pandas, NumPy, Matplotlib and SciPy (data management, data manipulation, and statistical analysis); Seaborn (data visualization).
Fibroblasts obtained during the isolation of epithelial clusters were plated in base medium with 10% FBS. After two passages, the fibroblasts were washed extensively and cultured in base medium without serum. Conditioned medium was collected after 48 h. For conditioned medium from organoids, epithelial clusters were cultured in base media and medium was collected every 48 h for 6 days. The conditioned medium from fibroblasts and organoids was analyzed using Human Cytokine Antibody Array C5 (RayBiotech, Inc.). Multianalyte profiling of fibroblast-conditioned media was performed by the Vanderbilt Hormone Assay and Analytical Services Core using the Luminex-100 system.
4.6 RNA-sequencing
RNA samples were prepared using the TruSeq mRNA library method (poly-A selected). Sequencing was done using the Illumina HiSeq 3000 at 2X75 paired-end reads by Vanderbilt Technologies for Advanced Genomics with a mean of 30e6 reads per library. TopHat (v2.0.9) spliced aligner software was used to align reads to hg19, using refseq transcripts as a guide [
61]. Transcripts were assembled and quantified using refseq transcripts as a guide with cufflinks, and normalized FPKMs generated using cuffnorm [
62]. Normalized FPKM expression levels were analyzed in R/Bioconductor. Principle Component Analysis was performed using pcaMethods [
63].
4.7 Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 6. Statistical significance was determined using the Mann–Whitney test (two-sided) and all p-values < 0.05 are reported.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Susan G. Komen #IIR12223770 (D.A.L.), NIH grants DK113423 (D.A.L.) and CA213201 (D.A.L.) and the University of Virginia Cancer Center Charlottesville Women’s Four Miler Fund (D.A.L.). We thank the University of Virginia Biorepository and Tissue Procurement Facility. The cytokeratin Endo-A (K8) monoclonal developed by Philippe Brulet and Rolf Kemler was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, developed under the auspices of the NICHD, and maintained by the Department of Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. No conflicts of interest to report.
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.