Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2021

03.01.2021 | Original Scientific Report

If in Doubt Don’t Act Out! Exploring Behaviours in Clinical Decision Making by General Surgeons Towards Surgical Procedures

verfasst von: Dale F. Whelehan, Kevin C. Conlon, Paul F. Ridgway

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Clinical decision-making (CDM) plays an integral role to surgeons work and has ramifications for patient outcomes and experience. The factors influencing a surgeons decision-making and the utility of cognitive decisional short cuts used in CDM known as ‘heuristics’ remains unknown. The aim of this paper is to explore how general surgeons make decisions in high-stake biliary tract clinical scenarios.

Methods

This was a cross sectional survey comprising of two sections—a ‘demographics section’ and a ‘clinical vignettes section’. Participants were recruited by an email distributed by the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Non-parametric testing examined relationships and content analysis was applied for clinical reasoning.

Results

73 participants or 37.6% of the overall population completed the survey. 71.4% of these were male. Most (50%) were higher trainees with moderate levels of overall reflective practice in decision-making. A majority of participants chose conservatively in high-stake biliary tract clinical cases with disease factors (43.5%) weighted highest, followed by personal factors (41.1%) and patient factors (15.4%) in clinical reasoning. The presence of a ‘hook’ associated with commonly used heuristics did not significantly change decision-making behaviour.

Conclusion

In high-stake scenarios, surgeons make conservative clinical decisions, predominantly dominated by disease and personal justifications. The utility of heuristics in lower-stake scenarios should be explored regarding clinical decision-making rationale and outcomes. Practitioners should consider use of patient factors in high-stake decisions to enable shared decision-making when appropriate which can reduce post-decisional regret and support the vision of patient-centred care.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Donaldson MS, Corrigan JM, Kohn LT (eds.) (2000) To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academies Press; Apr 1 Donaldson MS, Corrigan JM, Kohn LT (eds.) (2000) To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academies Press; Apr 1
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Andel C, Davidow SL, Hollander M, Moreno DA (2012) The economics of health care quality and medical errors. J Health Care Finance 39(1):39PubMed Andel C, Davidow SL, Hollander M, Moreno DA (2012) The economics of health care quality and medical errors. J Health Care Finance 39(1):39PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Sci 185(4157):1124–1131CrossRef Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Sci 185(4157):1124–1131CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Whelehan DF, Conlon KC, Ridgway PF (2020) Medicine and heuristics: cognitive biases and medical decision-making. Irish j med sci Whelehan DF, Conlon KC, Ridgway PF (2020) Medicine and heuristics: cognitive biases and medical decision-making. Irish j med sci
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Macbeth G, Razumiejczyk E, Gigerenzer G (2009) (2007) Gut feelings the intelligence of the unconscious. Revis Latinoam de Psicol 41(2):363–366 Macbeth G, Razumiejczyk E, Gigerenzer G (2009) (2007) Gut feelings the intelligence of the unconscious. Revis Latinoam de Psicol 41(2):363–366
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ogdie AR, Reilly JB, Pang MW, Keddem MS, Barg FK, Von Feldt JM, Myers JS (2012) Seen through their eyes: residents’ reflections on the cognitive and contextual components of diagnostic errors in medicine. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll 87(10):1361CrossRef Ogdie AR, Reilly JB, Pang MW, Keddem MS, Barg FK, Von Feldt JM, Myers JS (2012) Seen through their eyes: residents’ reflections on the cognitive and contextual components of diagnostic errors in medicine. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll 87(10):1361CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Crowley RS, Legowski E, Medvedeva O, Reitmeyer K, Tseytlin E, Castine M, Jukic D, Mello-Thoms C (2013) Automated detection of heuristics and biases among pathologists in a computer-based system. Adv Health Sci Educ 18(3):343–363CrossRef Crowley RS, Legowski E, Medvedeva O, Reitmeyer K, Tseytlin E, Castine M, Jukic D, Mello-Thoms C (2013) Automated detection of heuristics and biases among pathologists in a computer-based system. Adv Health Sci Educ 18(3):343–363CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, Christensen N (eds.) (2008) Clinical reasoning in the health professions E-book. Elsevier Health Sciences Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, Christensen N (eds.) (2008) Clinical reasoning in the health professions E-book. Elsevier Health Sciences
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Blumenthal-Barby JS, Krieger H (2015) Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy. Med Decis Mak 35(4):539–557CrossRef Blumenthal-Barby JS, Krieger H (2015) Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy. Med Decis Mak 35(4):539–557CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Flin R, Youngson G, Yule S (2007) How do surgeons make intraoperative decisions? BMJ Qual Saf 16(3):235–239CrossRef Flin R, Youngson G, Yule S (2007) How do surgeons make intraoperative decisions? BMJ Qual Saf 16(3):235–239CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Eysenbach G (2012) Correction: improving the quality of web surveys: the checklist for reporting results of internet E-surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 14(1):e8CrossRef Eysenbach G (2012) Correction: improving the quality of web surveys: the checklist for reporting results of internet E-surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 14(1):e8CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Priddis L, Rogers SL (2018) Development of the reflective practice questionnaire: preliminary findings. Reflect Pract 19(1):89–104CrossRef Priddis L, Rogers SL (2018) Development of the reflective practice questionnaire: preliminary findings. Reflect Pract 19(1):89–104CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers SL, Priddis LE, Michels N, Tieman M, Van Winkle LJ (2019) Applications of the reflective practice questionnaire in medical education. BMC Med Educ 19(1):1–1CrossRef Rogers SL, Priddis LE, Michels N, Tieman M, Van Winkle LJ (2019) Applications of the reflective practice questionnaire in medical education. BMC Med Educ 19(1):1–1CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Feeley I, Kelly M, Healy EF, Murray F, O’Byrne JM (2018) Surgical tuition within Irish hospitals: a national survey. Irish J Med Sci (1971–) 187(1):177–182CrossRef Feeley I, Kelly M, Healy EF, Murray F, O’Byrne JM (2018) Surgical tuition within Irish hospitals: a national survey. Irish J Med Sci (1971–) 187(1):177–182CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsieh HF, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15(9):1277–1288CrossRef Hsieh HF, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15(9):1277–1288CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Marewski JN, Gigerenzer G (2012) Heuristic decision making in medicine. Dialogues in clin neurosci 14(1):77CrossRef Marewski JN, Gigerenzer G (2012) Heuristic decision making in medicine. Dialogues in clin neurosci 14(1):77CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Croskerry P (2003a) Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decisionmaking. Ann Emerg Med 41(1):110–120CrossRef Croskerry P (2003a) Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decisionmaking. Ann Emerg Med 41(1):110–120CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Gino F, Moore DA, Bazerman MH (2009) No harm, no foul: the outcome bias in ethical judgments. Harvard Business School NOM Working Paper. 8(8–080) Gino F, Moore DA, Bazerman MH (2009) No harm, no foul: the outcome bias in ethical judgments. Harvard Business School NOM Working Paper. 8(8–080)
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mamede S, van Gog T, van den Berge K, Rikers RM, van Saase JL, van Guldener C, Schmidt HG (2010) Effect of availability bias and reflective reasoning on diagnostic accuracy among internal medicine residents. JAMA 304(11):1198–1203CrossRef Mamede S, van Gog T, van den Berge K, Rikers RM, van Saase JL, van Guldener C, Schmidt HG (2010) Effect of availability bias and reflective reasoning on diagnostic accuracy among internal medicine residents. JAMA 304(11):1198–1203CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Shanafelt TD, Balch CM, Bechamps G, Russell T, Dyrbye L, Satele D, Collicott P, Novotny PJ, Sloan J, Freischlag J (2010) Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons. Ann Surg 251(6):995–1000CrossRef Shanafelt TD, Balch CM, Bechamps G, Russell T, Dyrbye L, Satele D, Collicott P, Novotny PJ, Sloan J, Freischlag J (2010) Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons. Ann Surg 251(6):995–1000CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Croskerry P (2003b) The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad Med 78(8):775–780CrossRef Croskerry P (2003b) The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad Med 78(8):775–780CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Dekker SW (2009) Just culture: who gets to draw the line? Cogn Technol Work 11(3):177–185CrossRef Dekker SW (2009) Just culture: who gets to draw the line? Cogn Technol Work 11(3):177–185CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gibbs G (1988) Learning by doing: a guide to teaching and learning methods. Further Education Unit Gibbs G (1988) Learning by doing: a guide to teaching and learning methods. Further Education Unit
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Légaré F, Stacey D, Turcotte S, Cossi MJ, Kryworuchko J, Graham ID, Lyddiatt A, Politi MC, Thomson R, Elwyn G, Donner‐Banzhoff N (2014) Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. (9) Légaré F, Stacey D, Turcotte S, Cossi MJ, Kryworuchko J, Graham ID, Lyddiatt A, Politi MC, Thomson R, Elwyn G, Donner‐Banzhoff N (2014) Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. (9)
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Gawande A (2010) Checklist manifesto, the (HB). Penguin Books India Gawande A (2010) Checklist manifesto, the (HB). Penguin Books India
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Whelehan D, Alexander M, Ridgway PF (2020) Would you allow a sleepy surgeon operate on you? A Narrative Rev Sleep Med Rev 13:101341CrossRef Whelehan D, Alexander M, Ridgway PF (2020) Would you allow a sleepy surgeon operate on you? A Narrative Rev Sleep Med Rev 13:101341CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Croskerry P, Abbass AA, Wu AW (2008) How doctors feel: affective issues in patients’ safety. The Lancet 372(9645):1205–1206CrossRef Croskerry P, Abbass AA, Wu AW (2008) How doctors feel: affective issues in patients’ safety. The Lancet 372(9645):1205–1206CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall WJ, Chapman MV, Lee KM, Merino YM, Thomas TW, Payne BK, Eng E, Day SH, Coyne-Beasley T (2015) Implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals and its influence on health care outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Public Health 105(12):e60-76CrossRef Hall WJ, Chapman MV, Lee KM, Merino YM, Thomas TW, Payne BK, Eng E, Day SH, Coyne-Beasley T (2015) Implicit racial/ethnic bias among health care professionals and its influence on health care outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Public Health 105(12):e60-76CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
If in Doubt Don’t Act Out! Exploring Behaviours in Clinical Decision Making by General Surgeons Towards Surgical Procedures
verfasst von
Dale F. Whelehan
Kevin C. Conlon
Paul F. Ridgway
Publikationsdatum
03.01.2021
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05888-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

World Journal of Surgery 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.