Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Obesity Surgery
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 7/2021

03.05.2021 | Review

IFSO Update Position Statement on One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB)

verfasst von: Maurizio De Luca, Giacomo Piatto, Giovanni Merola, Jacques Himpens, Jean-Marc Chevallier, Miguel-A Carbajo, Kamal Mahawar, Alberto Sartori, Nicola Clemente, Miguel Herrera, Kelvin Higa, Wendy A. Brown, Scott Shikora

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 7/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) issued a position statement on the role of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) in the field of bariatric/metabolic surgery in 2018 De Luca et al. (Obes Surg. 28(5):1188-206, 2018). This position statement was issued by the IFSO OAGB task force and approved by the IFSO Scientific Committee and IFSO Executive Board. In 2018, the OAGB task force recognized the necessity to update the position statement in the following 2 years since additional high-quality data could emerge. The updated IFSO position statement on OAGB was issued also in response to inquiries to the IFSO by society members, universities, hospitals, physicians, insurances, patients, policy makers, and media. The IFSO position statement on OAGB has been reviewed within 2 years according to the availability of additional scientific evidence. The recommendation of the statement is derived from peer-reviewed scientific literature and available knowledge. The IFSO update position statement on OAGB will again be reviewed in 2 years provided additional high-quality studies emerge.
Literatur
1.
Carbajo M, Garcia-Caballero M, Toledano M, et al. One-anastomosis gastric bypass by laparoscopy: results of the first 209 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15(3):398–404.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg. 2001;11(3):276–80.PubMedCrossRef
3.
De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G, et al. Mini gastric bypass-one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28(5):1188–206.PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
Chevallier JM, Arman GA, Guenzi M, et al. One thousand single anastomosis (omega loop) gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity in a 7-year period: outcomes show few complications and good efficacy. Obes Surg. 2015;25(6):951–8.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Musella M, Milone M. Still "controversies" about the mini gastric bypass? Obes Surg. 2014;24(4):643–4.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Scozzari G, Trapani R, Toppino M, et al. Esophagogastric cancer after bariatric surgery: systematic review of the literature. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(1):133–42.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Lee WJ, Chong K, Lin YH, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus single anastomosis (mini-) gastric bypass for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: 5-year results of a randomized trial and study of incretin effect. Obes Surg. 2014;24(9):1552–62.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Victorzon M. Single-anastomosis gastric bypass: better, faster, and safer? Scand J Surg. 2015;104(1):48–53.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Angrisani L, Antonella S, Giampaolo F. Bariatric and metabolic surgery. Angrisani L, editor: Springer-Verlag Mailand; 2017. XV, 206 p.
11.
Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery and endoluminal procedures: IFSO worldwide survey 2014. Obes Surg. 2017;27(9):2279–89.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Knobloch K, Yoon U, Vogt PM. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011;39(2):91–2.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1–12.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, et al. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(9):712–6.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Chiu CC, Lee WJ, Wang W, et al. Prevention of trocar-wound hernia in laparoscopic bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006;16(7):913–8.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Rutledge R. Hospitalization before and after mini-gastric bypass surgery. Int J Surg. 2007;5(1):35–40.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Lee WJ, Lee YC, Ser KH, et al. Revisional surgery for laparoscopic minigastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(4):486–91.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Chen MC, Lee YC, Lee WJ, et al. Diet behavior and low hemoglobin level after laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass surgery. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012;59(120):2530–2.PubMed
19.
Chen CY, Lee WJ, Lee HM, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of gastric bypass complication to sleeve gastrectomy: technique and early results. Obes Surg. 2016;26(9):2014–21.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Mishra T, Lakshmi KK, Peddi KK. Prevalence of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis in morbidly obese South Indian patients and the further development of biliary calculus disease after sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass and mini gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2016;26(10):2411–7.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Saarinen T, Rasanen J, Salo J, et al. Bile reflux scintigraphy after mini-gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2017;27(8):2083–9.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Salama TMS, Hassan MI. Incidence of biliary reflux esophagitis after laparoscopic omega loop gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(6):618–22.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Musella M, Susa A, Manno E, et al. Complications following the mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB): a multi-institutional survey on 2678 patients with a mid-term (5 years) follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27(11):2956–67.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Baig SJ, Priya P, Mahawar KK, et al. Indian Bariatric Surgery Outcome Reporting G. Weight regain after bariatric surgery—a multicentre study of 9617 patients from Indian Bariatric Surgery Outcome Reporting Group. Obes Surg. 2019;29(5):1583–92.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Hussain A, Van den Bossche M, Kerrigan DD, et al. Retrospective cohort study of 925 OAGB procedures. The UK MGB/OAGB collaborative group. Int J Surg. 2019;69:13–8.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Mahawar KK, Himpens J, Shikora SA, et al. The first consensus statement on one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) using a modified Delphi approach. Obes Surg. 2018;28(2):303–12.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Karimi M, Kabir A, Nejatifar M, et al. Trend of changes in serum albumin and its relation with sex, age, and BMI following laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass surgery in morbid obese cases. Obes Surg. 2018;28(3):671–80.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Keleidari B, Mahmoudieh M, Davarpanah Jazi AH, et al. Comparison of the bile reflux frequency in one anastomosis gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a cohort study. Obes Surg. 2019;29(6):1721–5.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Khalaj A, Kalantar Motamedi MA, Mousapour P, et al. Protein-calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after one-anastomosis-mini-gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB): case series from the Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS). Obes Surg. 2019;29(6):1714–20.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Komaei I, Sarra F, Lazzara C, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass-mini gastric bypass with tailored biliopancreatic limb length formula relative to small bowel length: preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2019;29(9):3062–70.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Madhok BM, Mahawar KK, Hadfield JN, et al. Haematological indices and haematinic levels after mini gastric bypass: a matched comparison with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Clin Obes. 2018;8(1):43–9.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Musella M, Bruni V, Greco F, et al. Conversion from laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): preliminary data from a multicenter retrospective study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(8):1332–9.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Nabil TM, Khalil AH, Mikhail S, et al. Conventional versus distal laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2019;29(10):3103–10.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Robert M, Espalieu P, Pelascini E, et al. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10178):1299–309.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Wang W, Huang MT, Wei PL, et al. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass for failed vertical banded gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 2004;14(6):777–82.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Wang W, Wei PL, Lee YC, et al. Short-term results of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005;15(5):648–54.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242(1):20–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
Rutledge R, Walsh TR. Continued excellent results with the mini-gastric bypass: six-year study in 2,410 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15(9):1304–8.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Elgeidie A, Abdelgawad M, El Sorogy M, et al. The effect of stoma size on the mid-term weight loss outcome of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): a single-blinded prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2020;10
40.
Shivakumar S, Tantia O, Goyal G, et al. LSG vs MGB-OAGB-3 year follow-up data: a randomised control trial. Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2820–8.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1827–34.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Rheinwalt KP, Plamper A, Ruckbeil MV, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass-mini-gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)—a mid-term cohort study with 612 patients. Obes Surg. 2019;
43.
Carbajo MA, Jimenez JM, Luque-de-Leon E, et al. Evaluation of weight loss indicators and laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass outcomes. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1961.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Noun R, Riachi E, Zeidan S, et al. Mini-gastric bypass by mini-laparotomy: a cost-effective alternative in the laparoscopic era. Obes Surg. 2007;17(11):1482–6.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Kansou G, Lechaux D, Delarue J, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic mini gastric bypass: one year outcomes. Int J Surg. 2016;33(Pt A):18–22.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Navarrete S, Leyba JL, Ll SN, et al. Results of the comparative study of 200 cases: one anastomosis gastric bypass vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2597–602.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Toh BC, Chan WH, Eng AKH, et al. Five-year long-term clinical outcome after bariatric metabolic surgery: a multi-ethnic Asian population in Singapore. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(7):1762–5.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Boyle M, Mahawar K. One anastomosis gastric bypass performed with a 150-cm biliopancreatic limb delivers weight loss outcomes similar to those with a 200-cm biliopancreatic limb at 18–24 months. Obes Surg. 2020;30(4):1258–64.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Noun R, Zeidan S. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: an effective option for the treatment of morbid obesity. J Chir (Paris). 2007;144(4):301–4. Le mini-gastric bypass coelioscopique: une option nouvelle pour le traitement de l'obesite morbide.CrossRef
50.
Peraglie C. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB) in the super-super obese: outcomes in 16 patients. Obes Surg. 2008;18(9):1126–9.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Piazza L, Ferrara F, Leanza S, et al. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: short-term single-institute experience. Updates Surg. 2011;63(4):239–42.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Carbajo MA, Jimenez JM, Castro MJ, et al. Outcomes in weight loss, fasting blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin in a sample of 415 obese patients, included in the database of the European accreditation council for excellence centers for bariatric surgery with laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass. Nutr Hosp. 2014;30(5):1032–8.PubMed
53.
Kim MJ, Hur KY. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic single anastomosis gastric bypass (LSAGB) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in lower BMI (<30 kg/m(2)) patients. Obes Surg. 2014;24(7):1044–51.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Kular KS, Manchanda N, Rutledge R. A 6-year experience with 1,054 mini-gastric bypasses-first study from Indian subcontinent. Obes Surg. 2014;24(9):1430–5.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Kular KS, Manchanda N, Cheema GK. Seven years of mini-gastric bypass in type II diabetes patients with a body mass index <35 kg/m(2). Obes Surg. 2016;26(7):1457–62.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Peraglie C. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in patients age 60 and older. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(1):38–43.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Abu-Abeid A, Lessing Y, Pencovich N, et al. Diabetes resolution after one anastomosis gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(2):181–5.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Ahuja A, Tantia O, Chaudhuri T, et al. Predicting remission of diabetes post metabolic surgery: a comparison of ABCD, diarem, and DRS scores. Obes Surg. 2018;28(7):2025–31.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Ansar H, Zamaninour N, Pazouki A, et al. Weight loss after one anastomosis gastric bypass-mini gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB): patient-related perioperative predictive factors. Obes Surg. 2020;30(4):1316–23.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Apers J, Wijkmans R, Totte E, et al. Implementation of mini gastric bypass in the Netherlands: early and midterm results from a high-volume unit. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(9):3949–55.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Jamal W, Zagzoog MM, Sait SH, et al. Initial outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass at a single institution. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019;12:35–41.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Abdallah El-Husseiny M, Abdel-Moneim AA, Abdel-Maksoud MA, et al. The role of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in management of metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2018;12(4):491–5.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Hussain A, El-Hasani S. Short- and Mid-term Outcomes of 527 One anastomosis gastric bypass/mini-gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) operations: retrospective study. Obes Surg. 2019;29(1):262–7.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Alkhalifah N, Lee WJ, Hai TC, et al. 15-year experience of laparoscopic single anastomosis (mini-)gastric bypass: comparison with other bariatric procedures. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(7):3024–31.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Ospanov OB. Surgical technique of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass with obstructive stapleless pouch creation: a case series. Int J Surg. 2019;67:70–5.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Salama TM, Sabry K. Redo surgery after failed open VBG: laparoscopic minigastric bypass versus laparoscopic Roux en Y gastric bypass—which is better? Minim Invasive Surg. 2016;2016:8737519.PubMedPubMedCentral
67.
Noun R, Slim R, Chakhtoura G, et al. Resectional one anastomosis gastric bypass/mini gastric bypass as a novel option for revision of restrictive procedures: preliminary results. J Obes. 2018;2018:4049136.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
68.
Chansaenroj P, Aung L, Lee WJ, et al. Revision procedures after failed adjustable gastric banding: comparison of efficacy and safety. Obes Surg. 2017;27(11):2861–7.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Poublon N, Chidi I, Bethlehem M, Kuipers E, Gadiot R, Emous M, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, remedy for insufficient weight loss and weight regain after failed restrictive bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2020.
70.
Moszkowicz D, Rau C, Guenzi M, et al. Laparoscopic omega-loop gastric bypass for the conversion of failed sleeve gastrectomy: early experience. J Visc Surg. 2013;150(6):373–8.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Bruzzi M, Voron T, Zinzindohoue F, et al. Revisional single-anastomosis gastric bypass for a failed restrictive procedure: 5-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(2):240–5.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Ghosh S, Bui TL, Skinner CE, et al. A 12-month review of revisional single anastomosis gastric bypass for complicated laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for body mass index over 35. Obes Surg. 2017;27(11):3048–54.PubMedCrossRef
73.
AlSabah S, Al Haddad E, Al-Subaie S, et al. Short-term results of revisional single-anastomosis gastric bypass after sleeve gastrectomy for weight regain. Obes Surg. 2018;28(8):2197–202.PubMedCrossRef
74.
Almalki OM, Lee WJ, Chen JC, et al. Revisional gastric bypass for failed restrictive procedures: comparison of single-anastomosis (mini-) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2018;28(4):970–5.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Chiappetta S, Stier C, Scheffel O, et al. Mini/one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a second step procedure after sleeve gastrectomy—a retrospective cohort study. Obes Surg. 2019;29(3):819–27.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Lee YC, Liew PL, Lee WJ, et al. Gastrointestinal quality of life following bariatric surgery in Asian patients. Hepatogastroenterology. 2013;60(124):759–61.PubMed
77.
Yang PJ, Lee WJ, Tseng PH, et al. Bariatric surgery decreased the serum level of an endotoxin-associated marker: lipopolysaccharide-binding protein. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(6):1182–7.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Disse E, Pasquer A, Espalieu P, et al. Greater weight loss with the omega loop bypass compared to the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparative study. Obes Surg. 2014;24(6):841–6.PubMedCrossRef
79.
Milone M, Lupoli R, Maietta P, et al. Lipid profile changes in patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a comparative study between sleeve gastrectomy and mini-gastric bypass. Int J Surg. 2015;14:28–32.PubMedCrossRef
80.
Musella M, Susa A, Greco F, et al. The laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: the Italian experience: outcomes from 974 consecutive cases in a multicenter review. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(1):156–63.PubMedCrossRef
81.
Garcia-Caballero M, Reyes-Ortiz A, Garcia M, et al. Super obese behave different from simple and morbid obese patients in the changes of body composition after tailored one anastomosis gastric bypass (BAGUA). Nutr Hosp. 2014;29(5):1013–9.PubMed
82.
Bruzzi M, Rau C, Voron T, et al. Single anastomosis or mini-gastric bypass: long-term results and quality of life after a 5-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(2):321–6.PubMedCrossRef
83.
Carbajo MA, Fong-Hirales A, Luque-de-Leon E, et al. Weight loss and improvement of lipid profiles in morbidly obese patients after laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: 2-year follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):416–21.PubMedCrossRef
84.
Lee YC, Lee WJ, Liew PL. Predictors of remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus in obese patients after gastrointestinal surgery. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2013;7(6):e494–500.PubMedCrossRef
85.
Musella M, Milone M, Gaudioso D, et al. A decade of bariatric surgery. What have we learned? Outcome in 520 patients from a single institution. Int J Surg. 2014;12(Suppl 1):S183–8.PubMedCrossRef
86.
Al-Shurafa H, Elzaafarany AH, Albenmousa A, et al. Primary experience of bariatric surgery in a newly established private obesity center. Saudi Med J. 2016;37(10):1089–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
87.
Jammu GS, Sharma R. A 7-year clinical audit of 1107 cases comparing sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-En-Y gastric bypass, and mini-gastric bypass, to determine an effective and safe bariatric and metabolic procedure. Obes Surg. 2016;26(5):926–32.PubMedCrossRef
88.
Kruschitz R, Luger M, Kienbacher C, et al. The effect of Roux-en-Y vs. omega-loop gastric bypass on liver, metabolic parameters, and weight loss. Obes Surg. 2016;26(9):2204–12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
89.
Madhok B, Mahawar KK, Boyle M, et al. Management of super-super obese patients: comparison between mini (one anastomosis) gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2016;26(7):1646–9.PubMedCrossRef
90.
Musella M, Apers J, Rheinwalt K, et al. Efficacy of bariatric surgery in type 2 diabetes mellitus remission: the role of mini gastric bypass/one anastomosis gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy at 1 year of follow-up. A European survey. Obes Surg. 2016;26(5):933–40.PubMedCrossRef
91.
Chakhtoura G, Zinzindohoue F, Ghanem Y, et al. Primary results of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in a French obesity-surgery specialized university hospital. Obes Surg. 2008;18(9):1130–3.PubMedCrossRef
92.
Lee WJ, Wang W, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: experience with tailored bypass limb according to body weight. Obes Surg. 2008;18(3):294–9.PubMedCrossRef
93.
Lee WJ, Wang W, Lee YC, et al. Effect of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass for type 2 diabetes mellitus: comparison of BMI>35 and <35 kg/m2. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(5):945–52.PubMedCrossRef
94.
Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, et al. One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: short- and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2012;22(5):697–703.PubMedCrossRef
95.
Luger M, Kruschitz R, Langer F, et al. Effects of omega-loop gastric bypass on vitamin D and bone metabolism in morbidly obese bariatric patients. Obes Surg. 2015;25(6):1056–62.PubMedCrossRef
96.
Guenzi M, Arman G, Rau C, et al. Remission of type 2 diabetes after omega loop gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(9):2669–74.PubMedCrossRef
97.
Garcia-Caballero M, Valle M, Martinez-Moreno JM, et al. Resolution of diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome in normal weight 24-29 BMI patients with One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass. Nutr Hosp. 2012;27(2):623–31.PubMed
98.
Darabi S, Talebpour M, Zeinoddini A, et al. Laparoscopic gastric plication versus mini-gastric bypass surgery in the treatment of morbid obesity: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(6):914–9.PubMedCrossRef
99.
Greco F, Tacchino R. Ileal food diversion: a simple, powerful and easily revisable and reversible single-anastomosis gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2015;25(4):680–6.PubMedCrossRef
100.
Blanc P, Lointier P, Breton C, et al. The hand-sewn anastomosis with an absorbable bidirectional monofilament barbed suture Stratafix(R) during laparoscopic one anastomosis loop gastric bypass. Retrospective Study in 50 Patients. Obes Surg. 2015;25(12):2457–60.PubMedCrossRef
101.
Genser L, Robert M, Barrat C, et al. Management of failures and complications in weight loss surgery. Soins. 2016;61(811):47–50. Echecs et complications de la chirurgie de l'obesite.PubMedCrossRef
102.
Parmar CD, Mahawar KK, Boyle M, et al. Mini gastric bypass: first report of 125 consecutive cases from United Kingdom. Clin Obes. 2016;6(1):61–7.PubMedCrossRef
103.
Lessing Y, Pencovich N, Khatib M, et al. One-anastomosis gastric bypass: first 407 patients in 1 year. Obes Surg. 2017;27(10):2583–9.PubMedCrossRef
104.
Seetharamaiah S, Tantia O, Goyal G, et al. LSG vs OAGB-1 year follow-up data—a randomized control trial. Obes Surg. 2017;27(4):948–54.PubMedCrossRef
105.
Greco F. Conversion of vertical sleeve gastrectomy to a functional single-anastomosis gastric bypass: technique and preliminary results using a non-adjustable ring instead of stapled division. Obes Surg. 2017;27(4):896–901.PubMedCrossRef
106.
Yeh C, Huang HH, Chen SC, et al. Comparison of consumption behavior and appetite sensations among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after bariatric surgery. PeerJ. 2017;5:e3090.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
107.
Taha O, Abdelaal M, Abozeid M, et al. Outcomes of omega loop gastric bypass, 6-years experience of 1520 cases. Obes Surg. 2017;27(8):1952–60.PubMedCrossRef
108.
Carbajo MA, Luque-de-Leon E, Jimenez JM, et al. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: technique, results, and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1153–67.PubMedCrossRef
109.
Ospanov O, Buchwald JN, Yeleuov G, et al. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass with band-separated gastric pouch (OAGB-BSGP): a randomized controlled trial. Obes Surg. 2019;29(12):4131–7.PubMedCrossRef
110.
Ahuja A, Tantia O, Goyal G, et al. MGB-OAGB: effect of biliopancreatic limb length on nutritional deficiency, weight loss, and comorbidity resolution. Obes Surg. 2018;28(11):3439–45.PubMedCrossRef
111.
Mahawar KK, Parmar C, Carr WRJ, et al. Impact of biliopancreatic limb length on severe protein-calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass. J Minim Access Surg. 2018;14(1):37–43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
112.
Parmar CD, Mahawar KK. One anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass is now an established bariatric procedure: a systematic review of 12,807 patients. Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2956–67.PubMedCrossRef
113.
Wang FG, Yan WM, Yan M, et al. Outcomes of mini vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Int J Surg. 2018;56:7–14.PubMedCrossRef
114.
Jia D, Tan H, Faramand A, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Obes Surg. 2020;30(4):1211–8.PubMedCrossRef
115.
Wang FG, Yu ZP, Yan WM, et al. Comparison of safety and effectiveness between laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(50):e8924.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
116.
Parmar CD, Bryant C, Luque-de-Leon E, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients with BMI >/= 50 kg/m(2): a systematic review comparing it with Roux-En-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2019;29(9):3039–46.PubMedCrossRef
117.
Parikh M, Eisenberg D, Johnson J, et al. American Society for M, Bariatric Surgery Clinical Issues C. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery review of the literature on one-anastomosis gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(8):1088–92.PubMedCrossRef
118.
Kodama S, Fujihara K, Horikawa C, et al. Network meta-analysis of the relative efficacy of bariatric surgeries for diabetes remission. Obes Rev. 2018;19(12):1621–9.PubMedCrossRef
119.
Brown WA, Halim Shah YJ, Balalis G, et al. IFSO Position statement on the role of esophago-gastro-duodenal endoscopy prior to and after bariatric and metabolic surgery procedures. Obes Surg. 2020;30:3135–53.PubMedCrossRef
120.
Osman Abouzeid TA, Ain Shoka AA. Abd Elsamee Atia KS. From diabetes remedy to diabetes remission; could single-anastomosis gastric bypass be a safe bridge to reach target in non-obese patients? Asian J Surg. 2019;42(1):307–13.PubMedCrossRef
121.
Himpens JM, Vilallonga R, Cadiere GB, et al. Metabolic consequences of the incorporation of a Roux limb in an omega loop (mini) gastric bypass: evaluation by a glucose tolerance test at mid-term follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(7):2935–45.PubMedCrossRef
122.
Deitel M, D H, C P. Mini-Gastric bypass for bariatric surgery increasing worldwide. Austin J Surg. 2016.
123.
Mahawar KK, Kular KS, Parmar C, et al. Perioperative practices concerning one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass: a survey of 210 surgeons. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):204–11.PubMedCrossRef
124.
Abou Ghazaleh R, Bruzzi M, Bertrand K, et al. Is mini-gastric bypass a rational approach for type-2 diabetes? Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017;19(12):51.PubMedCrossRef
125.
Braghetto I, Csendes A. single anastomosis gastric bypass (one anastomosis gastric bypass or mini gastric bypass): the experience with Billroth Ii must be considered and is a challenge for the next years. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2017;30(4):267–71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
126.
Parmar CD, Zakeri R, Mahawar K. A systematic review of one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass as a metabolic operation for patients with body mass index </= 35 kg/m(2). Obes Surg. 2020;30(2):725–35.PubMedCrossRef
127.
Magouliotis DE, Tasiopoulou VS, Tzovaras G. One anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a meta-analysis. Clin Obes. 2018;8(3):159–69.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
IFSO Update Position Statement on One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB)
verfasst von
Maurizio De Luca
Giacomo Piatto
Giovanni Merola
Jacques Himpens
Jean-Marc Chevallier
Miguel-A Carbajo
Kamal Mahawar
Alberto Sartori
Nicola Clemente
Miguel Herrera
Kelvin Higa
Wendy A. Brown
Scott Shikora
Publikationsdatum
03.05.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 7/2021
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05413-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2021

Obesity Surgery 7/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Original Contributions

The Effect of Tissue Adhesive on Surgical Site Infection Following Elective Bariatric Surgery: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Original Contributions

Post-bariatric Abdominoplasty: Identification of Risk Factors for Complications

Letter to the Editor

Effects of Bariatric Surgery on Influenza-Like Illness: a Two-Center Cross-sectional Study

Original Contributions

Long-Term Improvement of Chronic Low-Grade Inflammation After Bariatric Surgery

Original Contributions

Evaluation of Changes in Ventricular Repolarization Parameters in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery

Original Contributions

RYGB Is More Effective than VSG at Protecting Mice from Prolonged High-Fat Diet Exposure: An Occasion to Roll Up Our Sleeves?

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

17.04.2024 | Postoperative nausea and vomiting | Nachrichten

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

16.04.2024 | HNO-Chirurgie | Nachrichten

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

16.04.2024 | Infektiologie | Nachrichten

Kein Abstrich bei chronischen Wunden ohne Entzündungszeichen!

10.04.2024 | Postoperative Schmerztherapie | Nachrichten

Chronische Schmerzen nach Op. oft mit neuropathischer Komponente
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.