Background
With an estimate of 71 million infected individuals worldwide, Hepatitis C virus (HCV) represents a major health problem and is currently the leading cause of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and an indication for liver transplantation worldwide [
1]. Despite the recent development of highly effective compounds, direct-acting agents (DAAs), designed to specifically block HCV replication, the combination of pegylated interferon alpha (peg-IFN-α) plus ribavirin (RBV) is still the main option for HCV treatment in several countries, including Uruguay. This therapy, however, only yields a sustained virological response (SVR) in about half of the treated patients when infected with HCV genotype 1; the most prevalent genotype in Uruguay [
2‐
4]. The poor response to treatment, its high cost, as well as the frequent occurrence of severe side effects associated to the use of peg-IFN-α/RBV [
5], highlight the relevance of enabling the means for predicting the patient’s response to antiviral therapy. This would allow an early selection of the most adequate cost-effective HCV treatment for each particular patient. Different predictors of SVR are known, some of which are linked to the virus (genotype, viral load) whereas others are linked to the host (age, sex, race, liver fibrosis, genetic factors) [
6].
Among the host factors known to be associated with the outcome of HCV-treatment, specific single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located near the interleukin 28B (IL28B) gene (which codes for IFN-λ-3) have shown a significant relationship with both spontaneous virus clearance and response to peg-IFN-α/RBV treatment [
7‐
10]. Patients carrying the “good” response genotypes (major allele in homozygosity) are more likely to resolve the infection than those carrying the “poor” response genotypes (risk allele in homozygosity or heterozygosity) [
7‐
9]. Since its characterization, IL28B genotyping has proven useful in guiding clinicians towards the selection of the most adequate patient-personalized therapy [
11]. Nevertheless the strong predictive value of these SNPs is only applicable for patients infected with HCV genotypes 1 and 4 [
12,
13]. In cases of infection with genotypes 2 or 3 IL28B SNP information is valuable only for patients with detectable levels of HCV RNA at week 4 (absence of rapid virological response) [
14]. Interestingly, IL28B genotyping has also proven relevant to anticipate HCV SVR in regimens using DAAs either in combination with IFN [
15‐
19] or in its absence [
20].
Ethnicity is also a host factor that correlates with the patient’s ability to respond to antiviral treatment [
21,
22]. This phenomenon has been partly explained by the prevalence of IL28B polymorphisms within different ethnic groups [
23]. For example, the major C allele (“good” response allele) of rs12979860 SNP in the general population has a frequency of 0.23–0.55 among Africans, 0.53–0.80 among Europeans and 0.66–1.00 among Asians [
24]. In this context, Asians and Europeans are better responders to peg-IFN-α/RBV treatment than African-descendants [
22]. The case for Latin America is less clear as the prevalence of these IL28B SNPs is known only in a few countries [
25‐
31]. Furthermore, given the admixed genetic background of the Latin American populations, it is unreasonable to assume an equivalent distribution of IL28B SNPs in all South America. In fact, when comparing different populations from Latin America a sharp difference in allele frequencies for IL28B is observed [
24]. For example, the C allele is less prevalent in Mexico (0.38–0.56) than in Brazil (0.64–0.824) [
24]. To date no genetic information regarding IL28B SNP prevalence is available for the Uruguayan population. Noteworthy, the Uruguayan population exhibits a European, Amerindian, and African contribution to ancestry, being the Europeans the main contributors [
32]. The contribution of Amerindians and Africans to the Uruguayan ancestry largely varies throughout the country stressing the heterogeneity of this South American population [
32].
Hence, the aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of IL28B polymorphisms (rs12979860 C > T and rs8099917 T > G) in treatment-naïve HCV-infected patients using uninfected individuals as controls and thus assess their possible association with the establishment of HCV infection. The results suggest that in Uruguay the prevalence of the favourable rs12979860 genotype (CC) is higher in the control group (p < 0.05). Additionally, considering rs8099917 genotype constant, individuals carrying rs12979860-TT or CT genotypes have a higher likelihood of developing chronic hepatitis upon infection with HCV, when compared to CC carriers.
Discussion
Infections with HCV have become a major cause of liver cancer and one of the most common indications for liver transplantation [
1]. In Uruguay the combination of peg-IFN-α plus RBV is still the main option for HCV treatment, despite the fact that HCV genotype 1 is the predominant genotype among the infected patients in Uruguay [
40]. This, in addition to the high cost of the new direct-acting therapies, highlight the relevance of searching for new indicators of response to antiviral therapy in the Uruguayan population in order to provide information that could be a useful guide for clinicians, enabling them to select a more patient-personalised anti-HCV therapy.
Many host factors have been associated with HCV-treatment outcome, among which, specific single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located near the interleukin 28B (IL28B) gene have been shown to exhibit a significant relationship with both spontaneous virus clearance and response to peg-IFN-α/RBV treatment [
7‐
10]. In this context, and considering that no information on IL28B SNPs genotype distribution was known for Uruguay, we were interested in evaluating the frequency of IL28B rs12979860 and rs8099917 in a cohort of Uruguayan individuals (HCV-infected as well as uninfected). With this aim, 92 healthy individuals and 78 HCV-infected patients were studied.
In full agreement with what others have reported [
26,
27,
30,
41‐
43], the frequency of the IL28B rs12979860 favourable genotype (CC), which strongly predicts spontaneous clearance of HCV infection, was less prevalent among the studied HCV-infected population than within the non-infected individuals. This differential genotypic distribution was statistically significant (
p˂0.05) (Fig.
1). This bias toward the less favourable genotype for rs12979860 is most probably associated to the way HCV-infected patients were selected for the study as all were recruited in a hospital setting. No significant differences between the frequencies of the protective rs8099917-TT genotype in general population and the studied HCV-infected patients were observed. The unfavourable homozygous genotypes were found at a low frequency in both populations under study (rs12979860-TT 23.1% vs 11.9% and rs8099917-GG 14.1% vs 5.4%, in the infected and control group, respectively). Given that a higher prevalence of favourable rs12979860 genotype has been found among healthy individuals when compared to HCV-infected patients [
41], it is plausible that our results support the notion of a protective effect of IL28B “good” response genotype within the Uruguayan population, as has been previously suggested by others [
10,
44].
Additionally, by means of logistic regression analyses we show that individuals carrying rs12979860-TT or CT genotypes have a higher likelihood of developing chronic hepatitis upon infection with HCV, when compared to CC carriers, when the rs8099917 genotype is constant (Table
3). Therefore, our results suggest that within the Uruguayan population rs12979860 might be a better predictor than rs8099917, at least in terms of occurrence of chronic HCV infection. This is also in agreement with the fact that these SNPs seem to be in weak linkage disequilibrium, which indicates that only one of them might be associated with development of chronicity in the studied Uruguayan cohort.
An interesting finding of this work is that it shows that the genotype frequencies in Uruguay seem to fall in the same ranges as those found in other countries (Table
4), this with the exception of Asian countries where the prevalence of protective genotypes were found to be higher [
37,
45]. Although the allelic frequencies of both SNPs in the control group fall in the range of the frequencies reported for different European populations [
24], the distribution of genotypes in the Uruguayan population seems to be more similar to the frequencies reported in Brazil [
30,
31] and the rs12979860-CC prevalence among infected patients (29.5%) resembles the one reported for Hispanics, rather than Caucasians (Table
5). This observation raises important questions regarding the Uruguayan genetic background and ethnicity. Uruguay has no Native American or African-descendant communities and until the 1980s its national identity was regarded as almost strictly Caucasian [
32]. More recently, however, several reports based both on classical markers as well as nuclear DNA analysis have revealed that the Uruguayan population has a small but important African and Native American ancestry contribution (see [
32] for a detailed review). Thus, it is tempting to speculate that it is this previously non-considered ethnic contribution that would explains why the SNPs frequencies within the Uruguayan population closely resemble those of admixed rather than a Caucasian population.
Table 4
Il28B favourable genotype prevalence reported in different countries
Rs12979860; CC
|
| 44.7 (378) | 45.6 (283) | Spain | |
| 45.1 (122) | 26.9 (108) | Egypt | |
| 44.6 (92) | 32.1 (136) | Turkey | |
| 43.7 (142) | 38.0 (921) – 42.0 (100) | Iran | |
| 86.9 (320) | 88.6 (297) | China | |
| ND | 24.1 (83) | Mexico | |
| 35.7 (185) | ND | Bolivia | |
| 38.1 (76) | ND | Peru | |
| 38.8 (98) | ND | Paraguay | |
| 37.0 (405) | 20.2 (99) | Chile | |
| 51.6 (991) | 18.4 (102) | Argentina | |
| 47.4 (190) | 24.0 (221) – 30.9 (175) | Brazil | |
| 45.6 (92) | 29.5 (78) | Uruguay | This study |
rs8099917; TT
|
| 64.1 (142) | 58.3 (921) | Iran | |
| 88.7 (320) | 89.6 (297) | China | |
| 89.3 (197) | 81.0 (400) | Taiwan | |
| ND | 27.5 (80) | Mexico | |
| 46.9 (405) | 29.3 (99) | Chile | |
| ND | 40.2 (102) | Argentina | |
| 67.8 (199) | 54.2 (177) – 63.1 (222) | Brazil | |
| 60.9 (92) | 57.7 (78) | Uruguay | This study |
Table 5
Rs12979860 favourable genotype (CC) prevalence reported according to ethnicity in HCV-infected patients
33.3 (2582) – 37.2 (1171) | Caucasians | |
22.9 (105) – 29.3 (116) | Hispanics | |
10.4 (48) – 14.0 (300) | African Americans/Black | |
49.2 (181) | Asian | |
Several reports from different countries and regions have found associations between favourable genotypes of IL28B SNPs and SVR [
8,
25,
28,
29,
31,
37,
38,
46], regretfully we did not find evidence which supports this link in our Uruguayan population. Differences in SNPs genotype distributions between SVR and NR/R patients were not statistically significant (chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests considering the three modes of inheritance: codominant, dominant and recessive). This might be attributable to the small number of patients included in this study that had finished their therapy by the time of writing this report (
n = 42) which accounts for 53.8% of all HCV-infected patients enrolled. In addition, of those 42 HCV-infected individuals that had completed their dual treatment, 17 achieved SVR while 25 were either non-responders or relapsers (NR/R). Of those who achieved SVR, 23.5% (n = 4/17) harboured the favourable IL28B genotype (rs12979860-CC), whereas only 20.0% of the NR/R patients had the favourable genotype (
n = 5/25). These results suggest a slight trend towards a higher frequency of “good” response genotypes in responder patients. This tendency has also been observed in other populations in Latin America where the frequency of CC-carriers among the NR patients (2% in Chile [
28] and 20% in Mexico [
25]) seems to be lower than among SVR patients. The small number of patients corresponding to each group (SVR or NR/R) might explain why we were not able to confirm the association between IL28B genotypes and response to therapy. Despite Heo et al. (2014) [
47] also reported no association even when including a larger number of patients (
n = 156), the ethnic disparities between Uruguayan and Korean populations does not allow us to confirm our findings. A limitation of our analyses, however, is that due to the limited number of patients, association studies were performed without taking into account the viral genotype. In this respect, some authors report no association between IL28B SNPs and SVR in patients infected with HCV genotype 3 [
48]. This fact might have biased our results since we included both HCV genotype 1 and 3 infected patients.
As mentioned before, despite the fact that some of the new treatment regimens including DAAs have been approved for use by Uruguayan national authorities, their costs are not always covered by our health system, making them unaffordable for most of the population. Therefore, we believe it would still be relevant for our country to use hosts genotype data as a predictor of response to HCV-treatment. Furthermore, IL28B genotype seems to be also informative when new DAAs are used, both in the context of protease inhibitors combination therapy [
15‐
19] as well as in IFN-free regimens with sofosbuvir (polymerase inhibitor) and ledipasvir (NS5A inhibitor) [
20]. Therefore, it is feasible to propose that IL28B genotyping could be a powerful tool use in Uruguay to predict the best personalised anti HCV-treatment in the upcoming years.