Key points
-
CNO/CRMO is a chronic auto-inflammatory disease of the skeletal system.
-
Imaging plays an essential role in diagnosis, differential diagnosis and therapy monitoring.
-
MRI/whole-body MRI can be used as a standard for rapid assessment of disease activity.
Background
Disease entity, incidence and clinical significance
Keep in mind/key point: CNO/CRMO—might be unreported—delay in therapy
Keep in mind/Key point: Diagnostic triad clinic + laboratory + imaging (especially MRI)
Main text
Part I: systematic review of the literature
Search strategy, eligibility criteria and data extraction
Diagnosis of CNO
Article | Patients with MRI | Patients with WB-MRI | Patients with local MRI | Patients with lesions in MRI | Total lesions in MRI | Lesions per patient in MRI Median | MRI sequences |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Roderick et al. [7] | 37 | 30 | 7 | Not specified | 162 (incl. x-ray), 47 symptomatic | Not specified | Not specified |
Girschick et al. [20] | 426 including adults (number not specified) | 145 | 281 | Not specified | Not specified | 4,1 | Not specified |
Wipff et al. [21] | 40 | 2 | 38 | Not specified | Not specified | 3,1 | Not specified |
Jansson et al. [13] | 72 | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | not specified |
Falip et al. [22] | 31 | 15 | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | local MRI: T1-SE, T2-SE fatsat or STIR. WB-MRI: T1-SE, STIR |
Padwa et al. [23] | 7 | None | 7 | 7 | FSEIR, T1w, T1w fatsat + C | ||
Ziobrowska-Bech et al. [24] | 29 | 8 | 21 | Not specified | 145 | Local MRI: T1w, T2w fatsat or STIR. WB-MRI: T1w, STIR | |
Fritz et al. [25] | 13 | 13 | 13 | 101 | 8 | STIR, T1-FSE, T1-FSE fatsat + C | |
von Kalle et al. [26] | 53 | 53 | 53 | 513 | 8 | STIR | |
Andronikou et al. [27] | 37 | 37 | 37 | 317 | 8,6 | STIR, some patients DWI | |
Leclair et at [28] | 16 | 16 | 16 | 33 | 2 | STIR, DWI with ADC | |
Morbach et al. [17] | 32 | 14 | 18 | 32 | 98 (54 sympt., 44 asympt.) | Not specified | T1-TSE, T1-TSE fatsat + C, TIRM |
Skrabl-Baumgartner et al. [9] | 24 pediatric, 10 adults | 5 pediatric | 24 pediatric, 10 adults | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified (all imaging modalities) | Not specified |
Arnoldi et al. [29] | 40 including adults (number not specified) | 17 | 23 | 35 | 112 | Not specified | STIR, T1-TSE |
Schnabel et al. [6] | 48 | 36 | 12 | 48 | 344 | 6 | Not specified |
Keep in mind/Key point: hallmarks of CNO—multifocality—specific pattern with three “hot regions”
Keep in mind/Key point: MRI (ideally WB-MRI) as first-line imaging method
Differential diagnosis of CNO
Article | Single-center or multicenter | Numbers of WB-MRI | Non-oncologic indication | MRI sequences |
---|---|---|---|---|
Greer [31] | Single-center | 360 patients (within 1 year) | 250 (69%) | CRMO: coronal STIR, suppl. sag STIR, opt. ax T1-W FSE and T2-W FSE FS or STIR |
Schooler et al. [32] | Multicenter | Not specified | Not specified | Coronal STIR (54 of 62 responses, 90%) |
Merlini et al. [33] | Single center | 54 patients (within 2 years) | 24 (44%) | 3D STIR |
Korchi et al. [34] | Single center | 42 patients (within 5 years) | Only non-oncologic | Coronal T1w, coronal 3D SPACE IR, axial STIR-EPI DWI |
Keep in mind/Key point: sparse data on differential diagnosis and timing of biopsies
Follow-up of CNO
Article | Patients with WB-MRI | Patients with follow-up MRI | Time frame between MRIs | Total lesions in initial MRI | Total lesions in follow-up MRI | MRI sequences |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Guerin-Pfyffer et al. [36] | 9 | 5 | 6 months—4 years | 28 | 14 | STIR, T1w, T2w |
Hofmann et al. [37] | 8 | 8 (1 lost for last follow-up) | After 3 and 6 cycles of Pam, 6 months after last Pam | 37 | Not specified | T1-TSE, T1-TSE fatsat + C, TIRM |
Beck et al. [8] | 21 | 37 (21 WB-MRI) | After 3, 6 and 12 months | 184 | 81 after 12 months | TIRM |
Sağ et al. [38] | 13 | Not specified | Not specified | 60 | Not specified | Not specified |
Miettunen et al. [39] | Only local MRI | 9 (local MRI) | Within 4 weeks of symptom recurrence after end of Pam | Not specified, median 3,5 | Not specified | T1-SE, T2 fatsat or STIR, T1w fatsat + C, |
Moussa et al. [40] | 7 | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | local MRI: pre- and post-contrast; WB-MRI: STIR | |
Gaal et al. [41] | 1, rest only local MRI (mandible) | 8 | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | T1w, STIR |
Roderick et al. [42] | 11 | 11 | Before and after Pam therapy, median 16 months | 75 | 32 | T1w, STIR, T1w + C |
Hospach et al. [43] | Not specified | 12 (only with vertebral deformities) | Pam (7 patients): before therapy and after median 13 months | Only specified in patients with Pam | Only specified after Pam | STIR |
Keep in mind/Key point: There may be discrepancies between changes in lesion load on imaging versus changes in clinical examination.
Keep in mind/Key point: imaging gate-keeper/decision-support for therapy
Keep in mind/Key point: MRI is an integral part in therapy monitoring
Keep in mind/Key point: high relapse rate—rationale for early follow-up
Part II: presentation of own imaging experiences
Case load and imaging examples
Keep in mind/key point: the extent of lesions (size, signal intensity) varies between individuals
Keep in mind/key point: DD might be difficult and might include biopsy plus imaging follow-up
Keep in mind/key point: bone marrow changes might persist even in complete clinical remission