Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2019

19.09.2018

Imaging in the pre-operative staging of ovarian cancer

verfasst von: Francesca Castellani, Edward C. Nganga, Lucy Dumas, Susana Banerjee, Andrea G. Rockall

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The main prognostic factor in ovarian cancer is the stage of disease at diagnosis. The staging system in use (FIGO classification, updated in 2014) is based on the surgical-pathological findings. Although surgical staging is the gold standard in ovarian cancer, the initial patient management depends on the imaging-based pre-surgical staging assessment, in order to identify unresectable or difficult to resect disease. Radiologists need to be aware of the strengths of the available imaging modalities, as well as the imaging pitfalls. Clear understanding of pattern of disease spread and review areas are critical for accurate staging and treatment planning. The current standard of care for pre-surgical staging is CT of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis. This allows a rapid evaluation of disease extent and is fairly accurate in identifying bulky disease but has definite limitations in assessing the extent of small volume disease and in the confirmation of certain sites of disease beyond the abdomen. Functional MRI has been reported to be superior in detecting small peritoneal deposits. PET/CT may be used as a problem-solving tool in some patients where determination remains unclear, particularly in confirmation of advanced stage beyond the abdomen.
Literatur
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Hallett R, et al. (2009) Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). Lancet Oncol 10:327–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70026-9 CrossRefPubMed Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Hallett R, et al. (2009) Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). Lancet Oncol 10:327–340. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1470-2045(09)70026-9 CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Force USPST (2018) Screening for ovarian cancer: Us preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 319:588–594CrossRef Force USPST (2018) Screening for ovarian cancer: Us preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 319:588–594CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tavassoli FA, Devilee P (2003) WHO histological classification of tumours of the ovary. In: Pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs. IARC Press, Lyon, pp 113–202 Tavassoli FA, Devilee P (2003) WHO histological classification of tumours of the ovary. In: Pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs. IARC Press, Lyon, pp 113–202
37.
Zurück zum Zitat National Collaborating Centre for Cancer (UK) (2011) Ovarian cancer: the recognition and initial management of ovarian cancer. NICE Clinical Guideline National Collaborating Centre for Cancer (UK) (2011) Ovarian cancer: the recognition and initial management of ovarian cancer. NICE Clinical Guideline
Metadaten
Titel
Imaging in the pre-operative staging of ovarian cancer
verfasst von
Francesca Castellani
Edward C. Nganga
Lucy Dumas
Susana Banerjee
Andrea G. Rockall
Publikationsdatum
19.09.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1779-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Abdominal Radiology 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Radiology

The “teardrop sign”

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.