Erschienen in:
19.02.2021 | Original Article
Imaging sedation and anesthesia practice patterns in pediatric radiology departments — a survey of the Society of Chiefs of Radiology at Children’s Hospitals (SCORCH)
verfasst von:
Jonathan R. Dillman, Michael S. Gee, Christopher G. Ward, Elizabeth T. Drum, Lisa J. States
Erschienen in:
Pediatric Radiology
|
Ausgabe 8/2021
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Background
There are few data describing practice patterns related to the use of sedation/anesthesia for diagnostic imaging in pediatric radiology departments.
Objective
To understand current practice patterns related to imaging with sedation/anesthesia in pediatric radiology departments based on a survey of the Society of Chiefs of Radiology at Children’s Hospitals (SCORCH) in conjunction with the American College of Radiology’s Pediatric Imaging Sedation and Anesthesia Committee.
Materials and methods
A multi-question survey related to imaging with sedation/anesthesia in pediatric radiology departments was distributed to SCORCH member institutions in January 2019. A single reminder email was sent. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed.
Results
Of the 84 pediatric radiology departments, 23 (27%) completed the survey. Fifty-seven percent of the respondents self-identified as academic/university-affiliated and 13% as a division/section in an adult radiology department. Imaging sedation (excluding general anesthesia) is commonly performed by pediatric anesthesiologists (76%) and intensive care unit physicians (intensivists, 48%); only 14% of departments expect their pediatric radiologists to supervise imaging sedation. Ninety-six percent of departments use child life specialists for patient preparation. Seventy percent of departments have preparatory resources available on a website, including simulation videos (26%) and audio clips (17%). Nearly half (48%) of the departments have a mock scanner to aid in patient preparation. Imaging sedation/anesthesia is most often scheduled at the request of ordering clinicians (65%), while 57% of departments allow schedulers to place patients into imaging sedation/anesthesia slots based on specified criteria.
Conclusion
Imaging sedation/anesthesia practice patterns vary among pediatric radiology departments, and understanding current approaches can help with standardization and practice improvement.