Immunosuppressive therapy for active IgA nephropathy is effective and safe, even in “elderly” patients

Proportions of elderly aged ≥65 and ≥75 within Japan will increase to 30 and 20 %, respectively, in 2025, when “Baby-Boom Generations” will reach the age of 75 years. Okabayashi and colleagues report that even in elderly patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN), immunosuppressive treatment can reduce proteinuria, with no adverse events. Their findings remind us of recent finding from STOP-IgAN study; additional immunosuppressive therapy to intensive supportive care [specifically renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors (RASi)] did not improve the outcome. If STOP-IgAN makes doctors believe that immunosuppression is not necessary, many patients could lose opportunity to eliminate their kidney disease. Indeed, we have experienced patients with IgAN, who despite hematuria, could not undergo renal biopsy or immunosuppressive treatment at another facility because of low proteinuria, and exhibited advanced lesions in their renal biopsy at our institution. The discrepancy between Okabayashi’s and STOP-IgAN study was derived not only from differences in population age (≥60 years vs. 18–70 years). STOP-IgAN excluded the crescentic IgAN, whereas Okabayashi et al. found active manifestations (hematuria, mesangial proliferation, and cellular/fibrocellular crescent). Therefore, immunosuppressive therapy is required even in elderly patients. In STOP-IgAN, RASi were used first, and then immunosuppressive agent was additionally used. RASi has important implications to reduce glomerular capillary pressure and to suppress the intrarenal RAS activity. However, immunosuppressant should be administered initially to cure hematuria. In fact, microscopic-hematuria was resolved in only 16 and 42 % of two-assigned groups in STOP-IgAN, respectively. Okabayashi et al. provided a timely message regarding the significance of immunosuppressive treatment of IgAN.