Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2018

27.12.2017 | Original Scientific Report

Impact of a Multidisciplinary Team Approach for Managing Advanced and Recurrent Colorectal Cancer

verfasst von: Sung Min Jung, Yong Sang Hong, Tae Won Kim, Jin-hong Park, Jong Hoon Kim, Seong Ho Park, Ah Young Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Young-Joo Lee, Chang Sik Yu

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 7/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The wide variety of treatment strategies makes clinical decision-making difficult in advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer cases. Many hospitals have started multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings comprising a team of dedicated specialists for discussing cases. MDTs for selected cases that are difficult to diagnose and treat are alternatives to regular MDTs. This study’s aim was to determine the impact of a MDT for colorectal cancer on clinical decision-making.

Methods

Cases were discussed when clinical specialists had difficulty making decisions alone. All processes done by the MDT were then recorded in prospectively designed medical case forms.

Results

From Jan 2011 to Dec 2014, 1383 cases were discussed. A total of 549 (39.8%) case forms were completed for patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer, whereas 833 (60.2%) were completed for those with recurrent diseases. The MDT altered the proposed treatment of the referring physician in 179 (13%) cases. In 85 of the 179 (47.5%) altered cases, the radiologist’s review of clinical information affected the diagnosis and decision. Furthermore, 152 of the 1383 MDT decisions were not implemented. Treatment intent, therapeutic plan, and alteration of decision were important reasons for not following the MDT’s recommendation.

Conclusion

Case discussions in MDT meetings resulted in altered clinical decisions in >10% cases. Implementation rates after MDT discussions might be affected by the treatment decision-making process. Imperfect decisions made by individual physicians can be decreased by the multidisciplinary decision-making process.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris E, Haward RA, Gilthorpe MS, Craigs C, Forman D (2006) The impact of the Calman–Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire’s colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer 95(8):979–985CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morris E, Haward RA, Gilthorpe MS, Craigs C, Forman D (2006) The impact of the Calman–Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire’s colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer 95(8):979–985CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright FC, De Vito C, Langer B, Hunter A (2007) Expert panel on multidisciplinary cancer conference standards. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a systematic review and development of practice standards. Eur J Cancer 43(6):1002–1010CrossRefPubMed Wright FC, De Vito C, Langer B, Hunter A (2007) Expert panel on multidisciplinary cancer conference standards. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a systematic review and development of practice standards. Eur J Cancer 43(6):1002–1010CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Australian Cancer Network Colorectal Cancer Guidelines Revision Committee (2005) Guidelines for the prevention, early detection and management of colorectal cancer. National Health and Medical Research Council, Sydney Australian Cancer Network Colorectal Cancer Guidelines Revision Committee (2005) Guidelines for the prevention, early detection and management of colorectal cancer. National Health and Medical Research Council, Sydney
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong NJ, Wright FC, Gagliardi AR, Paszat LF (2010) Examining the potential relationship between multidisciplinary cancer care and patient survival: an international literature review. J Surg Oncol 102(2):125–134CrossRefPubMed Hong NJ, Wright FC, Gagliardi AR, Paszat LF (2010) Examining the potential relationship between multidisciplinary cancer care and patient survival: an international literature review. J Surg Oncol 102(2):125–134CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Munro A, Brown M, Niblock P, Steele R, Carey F (2015) Do Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) processes influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer? A population-based experience. BMC Cancer 15:686CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Munro A, Brown M, Niblock P, Steele R, Carey F (2015) Do Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) processes influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer? A population-based experience. BMC Cancer 15:686CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma A, Sharp DM, Walker LG, Monson JR (2008) Colorectal MDTs: the team’s perspective. Colorectal Dis 10(1):63–68PubMed Sharma A, Sharp DM, Walker LG, Monson JR (2008) Colorectal MDTs: the team’s perspective. Colorectal Dis 10(1):63–68PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryan J, Faragher I (2014) Not all patients need to be discussed in a colorectal cancer MDT meeting. Colorectal Dis 16(7):520–526CrossRefPubMed Ryan J, Faragher I (2014) Not all patients need to be discussed in a colorectal cancer MDT meeting. Colorectal Dis 16(7):520–526CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chinai N, Bintcliffe F, Armstrong EM, Teape J, Jones BM, Hosie KB (2013) Does every patient need to be discussed at a multidisciplinary team meeting? Clin Radiol 68(8):780–784CrossRefPubMed Chinai N, Bintcliffe F, Armstrong EM, Teape J, Jones BM, Hosie KB (2013) Does every patient need to be discussed at a multidisciplinary team meeting? Clin Radiol 68(8):780–784CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Daniels IR, Fisher SE, Heald RJ, Moran BJ (2007) Accurate staging, selective preoperative therapy and optimal surgery improves outcome in rectal cancer: a review of the recent evidence. Colorectal Dis 9(4):290–301CrossRefPubMed Daniels IR, Fisher SE, Heald RJ, Moran BJ (2007) Accurate staging, selective preoperative therapy and optimal surgery improves outcome in rectal cancer: a review of the recent evidence. Colorectal Dis 9(4):290–301CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang KH, Smith MJ, McAnena OJ, Aprjanto AS, Dowdall JF (2012) Increased use of multidisciplinary treatment modalities adds little to the outcome of rectal cancer treated by optimal total mesorectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 27(10):1275–1283CrossRefPubMed Chang KH, Smith MJ, McAnena OJ, Aprjanto AS, Dowdall JF (2012) Increased use of multidisciplinary treatment modalities adds little to the outcome of rectal cancer treated by optimal total mesorectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 27(10):1275–1283CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat MacDermid E, Hooton G, MacDonald M et al (2009) Improving patient survival with the colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team. Colorectal Dis 11(3):291–295CrossRefPubMed MacDermid E, Hooton G, MacDonald M et al (2009) Improving patient survival with the colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team. Colorectal Dis 11(3):291–295CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleissig A, Jenkins V, Catt S, Fallowfield L (2006) Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncol 7(11):935–943CrossRefPubMed Fleissig A, Jenkins V, Catt S, Fallowfield L (2006) Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncol 7(11):935–943CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaughan-Shaw PG, Wheeler JM, Borley NR (2015) The impact of a dedicated multidisciplinary team on the management of early rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 17(8):704–709CrossRefPubMed Vaughan-Shaw PG, Wheeler JM, Borley NR (2015) The impact of a dedicated multidisciplinary team on the management of early rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 17(8):704–709CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergamini C, Locati L, Bossi P et al (2016) Does a multidisciplinary team approach in a tertiary referral centre impact on the initial management of head and neck cancer? Oral Oncol 54:54–57CrossRefPubMed Bergamini C, Locati L, Bossi P et al (2016) Does a multidisciplinary team approach in a tertiary referral centre impact on the initial management of head and neck cancer? Oral Oncol 54:54–57CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wood JJ, Metcalfe C, Paes A et al (2008) An evaluation of treatment decisions at a colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team. Colorectal Dis 10(8):769–772CrossRefPubMed Wood JJ, Metcalfe C, Paes A et al (2008) An evaluation of treatment decisions at a colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team. Colorectal Dis 10(8):769–772CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Impact of a Multidisciplinary Team Approach for Managing Advanced and Recurrent Colorectal Cancer
verfasst von
Sung Min Jung
Yong Sang Hong
Tae Won Kim
Jin-hong Park
Jong Hoon Kim
Seong Ho Park
Ah Young Kim
Seok-Byung Lim
Young-Joo Lee
Chang Sik Yu
Publikationsdatum
27.12.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4409-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2018

World Journal of Surgery 7/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.