Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2018

06.11.2017 | Urologic Oncology

Impact of County Rurality and Urologist Density on the Practice of Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection and Mortality in Patients Diagnosed with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis

verfasst von: Michael Romanelli, MA, Tariq Issa, MA, Whitney Zahnd, MS, Danuta Dynda, MD, Shaheen Alanee, MD, MPH, MBA, AFACS

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Inguinal lymphadenectomy (LND) is influential in reducing the mortality of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCCP). We investigated the impact of urologic workforce density (UD) and rural residence (RR) on the practice of LND and mortality of SCCP (SCCP-RM).

Materials and Methods

UD was determined from the 2014 to 2015 Area Health Resource File data, while RR was determined using the 2003 rural–urban continuum codes. All cases of SCCP within the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results 18 registry with known county codes were used for analysis (n = 2863).

Results

Overall, 48.69% of cases lived in a county with less than the mean UD, 8.38% lived in counties with no urologists, 14.60% lived in a rural county, and 19.2% (n = 550) had LND performed. UD and RR had no impact on the prevalence of LND, number of lymph nodes examined, or the mean number of lymph nodes positive for SCCP (all p > 0.05). Adjusted analysis indicated that older patients and patients with regional stage of cancer were at a greater risk for post-LND SCCP-RM (hazard ratio [HR] 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28–2.21, and HR 4.32, 95% CI 3.09–6.06, respectively). There was no difference in the HR of SCCP-RM dependent on race, marital status, education, RR, UD, or LND.

Conclusion

While demand on the urologist workforce has increased in rural demographics, no impact of limited access to urologists on the practice of LND in SCCP could be identified in this study. In addition, there was no significant difference in the risk of SCCP-specific mortality related to lower UD or RR.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernandez BY, Barnholtz-Sloan J, German RR, Guiliano A, Goodman MT, King JB, et al. Burden of Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis in the United States, 1998–2003. Cancer. 2008;113:2883–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hernandez BY, Barnholtz-Sloan J, German RR, Guiliano A, Goodman MT, King JB, et al. Burden of Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis in the United States, 1998–2003. Cancer. 2008;113:2883–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Curado MP, Edwards B, Shin HR, Storm H, Ferlay J, Heanue M, et al. Cancer incidence in five continents. IARC Sci Publ. 2007;9:160. Curado MP, Edwards B, Shin HR, Storm H, Ferlay J, Heanue M, et al. Cancer incidence in five continents. IARC Sci Publ. 2007;9:160.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Pow-Sang MR, Ferreira U, Pow-Sang JM, Nardi AC, Destefano V. Epidemiology and natural history of penile cancer. Urology 2010;76:2–6.CrossRef Pow-Sang MR, Ferreira U, Pow-Sang JM, Nardi AC, Destefano V. Epidemiology and natural history of penile cancer. Urology 2010;76:2–6.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lont AP, Kroon BK, Gallee MP, van Tinteren H, Moonen LM, Horenblas S. Pelvic lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: extent of inguinal lymph node involvement as an indicator for pelvic lymph node involvement and survival. J Urol. 2007;177:947–52.CrossRefPubMed Lont AP, Kroon BK, Gallee MP, van Tinteren H, Moonen LM, Horenblas S. Pelvic lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: extent of inguinal lymph node involvement as an indicator for pelvic lymph node involvement and survival. J Urol. 2007;177:947–52.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat McDougal WS. Carcinoma of the penis: improved survival by early regional lymphadenectomy based on the histological grade and depth of invasion of the primary lesion. J Urol. 1995;154:1364–6.CrossRefPubMed McDougal WS. Carcinoma of the penis: improved survival by early regional lymphadenectomy based on the histological grade and depth of invasion of the primary lesion. J Urol. 1995;154:1364–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu B, Djaladat H. Lymphadenectomy for testicular, penile, upper tract urothelial and urethral cancers. Curr Opin Urol. 2015;25:129–35.CrossRefPubMed Hu B, Djaladat H. Lymphadenectomy for testicular, penile, upper tract urothelial and urethral cancers. Curr Opin Urol. 2015;25:129–35.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Horenblas S. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in penile carcinoma. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2012;29:90–5.CrossRefPubMed Horenblas S. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in penile carcinoma. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2012;29:90–5.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Odisho AY, Fradet V, Cooperberg MR, Ahmad AE, Carroll PR. Geographic distribution of urologists throughout the United States using a county level approach. J Urol. 2009;181:760–6.CrossRefPubMed Odisho AY, Fradet V, Cooperberg MR, Ahmad AE, Carroll PR. Geographic distribution of urologists throughout the United States using a county level approach. J Urol. 2009;181:760–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pruthi RS, Neuwahl S, Nielsen ME, Fraher E. Recent trends in the urology workforce in the United States. Urology. 2013;82:987–93.CrossRefPubMed Pruthi RS, Neuwahl S, Nielsen ME, Fraher E. Recent trends in the urology workforce in the United States. Urology. 2013;82:987–93.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Odisho AY, Cooperberg MR, Fradet V, Ahmad AE, Carroll PR. Urologist density and county-level urologic cancer mortality. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2499–504.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Odisho AY, Cooperberg MR, Fradet V, Ahmad AE, Carroll PR. Urologist density and county-level urologic cancer mortality. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2499–504.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Frye TP, Sadowski DJ, Zahnd WE, Jenkins WD, Danuta DI, Mueller GS, et al. Impact of county rurality and urologist density on urological cancer mortality in Illinois. J Urol. 2015;193:1608–13.CrossRefPubMed Frye TP, Sadowski DJ, Zahnd WE, Jenkins WD, Danuta DI, Mueller GS, et al. Impact of county rurality and urologist density on urological cancer mortality in Illinois. J Urol. 2015;193:1608–13.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Area Health Resources File (AHRF). 2014-2015. US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Bureau of Health Workforce, Rockville, MD. http://ahrf.hrsa.gov/ Area Health Resources File (AHRF). 2014-2015. US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Bureau of Health Workforce, Rockville, MD. http://​ahrf.​hrsa.​gov/​
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Yao N, Foltz SM, Odisho AY, Wheeler DC. Geographic analysis of urologist density and prostate cancer mortality in the United States. PLoS One. 2015;10:6. Yao N, Foltz SM, Odisho AY, Wheeler DC. Geographic analysis of urologist density and prostate cancer mortality in the United States. PLoS One. 2015;10:6.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Ward E, Wu X, Martin HJ, McLaughlin CC, Thun MJ. Geographic patterns of prostate cancer mortality and variations in access to medical care in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2005;14:590–5.CrossRef Jemal A, Ward E, Wu X, Martin HJ, McLaughlin CC, Thun MJ. Geographic patterns of prostate cancer mortality and variations in access to medical care in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2005;14:590–5.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandhu GS, Strope SA, Kibel AS, Owens PL, Tanagho YS, Kollogjeri D, et al. Predictors of the contemporary use of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2012;187:729.CrossRef Sandhu GS, Strope SA, Kibel AS, Owens PL, Tanagho YS, Kollogjeri D, et al. Predictors of the contemporary use of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2012;187:729.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bianchi M, Becker A, Abdollah F, Trinh QD, Hansen J, Tian Z, et al. Rates of open versus laparoscopic and partial versus radical nephrectomy for T1a renal cell carcinoma: a population-based evaluation. Int J Urol. 2013;20:1064–71.CrossRefPubMed Bianchi M, Becker A, Abdollah F, Trinh QD, Hansen J, Tian Z, et al. Rates of open versus laparoscopic and partial versus radical nephrectomy for T1a renal cell carcinoma: a population-based evaluation. Int J Urol. 2013;20:1064–71.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mobility in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2117–27.CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mobility in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2117–27.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Joudi FN, Konety BR. The impact of provider volume on outcomes from urological cancer therapy. J Urol. 2005;174:432–8.CrossRefPubMed Joudi FN, Konety BR. The impact of provider volume on outcomes from urological cancer therapy. J Urol. 2005;174:432–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson RH, Carver BS, Bosl GJ, Bajorin D, Motzer R, Feldman D, et al. Evaluation of lymph node counts in primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Cancer. 2010;116:5243–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thompson RH, Carver BS, Bosl GJ, Bajorin D, Motzer R, Feldman D, et al. Evaluation of lymph node counts in primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Cancer. 2010;116:5243–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Thuret R, Sun M, Lughezzani G, Budaus L, Liberman D, Abdollah F, et al. A contemporary population-based assessment of the rate of lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:439–46.CrossRefPubMed Thuret R, Sun M, Lughezzani G, Budaus L, Liberman D, Abdollah F, et al. A contemporary population-based assessment of the rate of lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:439–46.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Impact of County Rurality and Urologist Density on the Practice of Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection and Mortality in Patients Diagnosed with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis
verfasst von
Michael Romanelli, MA
Tariq Issa, MA
Whitney Zahnd, MS
Danuta Dynda, MD
Shaheen Alanee, MD, MPH, MBA, AFACS
Publikationsdatum
06.11.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6211-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.