nach oben

Internal and Emergency Medicine

Erschienen in:

24.05.2017 | CE- SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Impact of gender on short-term and long-term all-cause mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis

verfasst von: Yushu Wang, Sui Zhu, Rongsheng Du, Juteng Zhou, Yucheng Chen, Qing Zhang

Erschienen in: Internal and Emergency Medicine | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

A meta-analysis to determine the impact of gender on mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS): PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, was systematically searched. Two investigators independently reviewed retrieved articles and assessed eligibility. Unadjusted mortality rates or adjusted effect estimates regarding gender-specific short-term and long-term all-cause mortality were identified. A total of 30 studies involving 358,827 patients with NSTE-ACS (129, 632 women and 229,195 men) were identified. In the unadjusted analysis, women had significantly higher risk of short-term all-cause mortality (RR 1.37; 95% CI 1.26–1.49; P < 0.00001) and long-term all-cause mortality (RR 1.18; 95% CI 1.07–1.31; P = 0.001) compared with men. However, when a meta-analysis was performed using adjusted effect estimates, the association between women and higher risk of short-term mortality (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.91–1.07; P = 0.74) and long-term all-cause mortality (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.68–1.03; P = 0.09) was markedly attenuated. Adjusted short-term and long-term all-cause mortality appeared similar in women and men. In conclusion, women with NSTE-ACS have higher short-term and long-term mortality compared with men. However, gender differences do not differ following adjustment for baseline cardiovascular risk factors and clinical differences.

Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR et al (2017) Heart disease and stroke statistics-2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 127:e6–e245

Lerner DJ, Kannel WB (1986) Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population. Am Heart J 111:383–390CrossRefPubMed

Lichtman JH, Leifheit-Limson EC, Watanabe E, Allen NB, Garavalia B et al (2015) Symptom recognition and healthcare experiences of young women with acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 8:S31–S38CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Khan NA, Daskalopoulou SS, Karp I, Eisenberg MJ, Pelletier R et al (2013) Sex differences in acute coronary syndrome symptom presentation in young patients. JAMA Intern Med 173:1863–1871PubMed

Worrall-Carter L, McEvedy S, Wilson A, Rahman MA (2016) Gender differences in presentation, coronary intervention, and outcomes of 28,985 acute coronary syndrome patients in Victoria, Australia. Womens Health Issues 26:14–20CrossRefPubMed

Dreyer RP, Smolderen KG, Strait KM, Beltrame JF, Lichtman JH et al (2016) Gender differences in pre-event health status of young patients with acute myocardial infarction: a VIRGO study analysis. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 5:43–54CrossRefPubMed

Leung Yinko SS, Maheswaran J, Pelletier R, Bacon SL, Daskalopoulou SS et al (2015) Sex differences in health behavior change after premature acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J 170:242–248CrossRefPubMed

Bavishi C, Bangalore S, Patel D, Chatterjee S, Trivedi V et al (2015) Short and long-term mortality in women and men undergoing primary angioplasty: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 198:123–130CrossRefPubMed

Khera S, Kolte D, Gupta T, Subramanian KS, Khanna N et al (2015) Temporal trends and sex differences in revascularization and outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in younger adults in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:1961–1972CrossRefPubMed

10.

Pancholy SB, Shantha GP, Patel T, Cheskin LJ (2014) Sex differences in short-term and long-term all-cause mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous intervention: a meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 174:1822–1830CrossRefPubMed

11.

Otten AM, Maas AH, Ottervanger JP, Kloosterman A, van’t Hof AW et al (2013) Is the difference in outcome between men and women treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention age dependent? Gender difference in STEMI stratified on age. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2:334–341CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Clemmensen P, Roe MT, Hochman JS, Cyr DD, Neely ML et al (2015) Long-term outcomes for women versus men with unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction managed medically without revascularization: insights from the targeted platelet inhibition to clarify the optimal strategy to medically manage acute coronary syndromes trial. Am Heart J 170:695–705CrossRefPubMed

13.

Vogel B, Farhan S, Hahne S, Kozanli I, Kalla K et al (2016) Sex-related differences in baseline characteristics, management and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 5:347–353CrossRefPubMed

14.

Johnston N, Jönelid B, Christersson C, Kero T, Renlund H et al (2015) Effect of gender on patients with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 115:1661–1666CrossRefPubMed

15.

Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD et al (2000) Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) Group. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA 283:2008–2012CrossRefPubMed

16.

Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welchet V et al (2011) The Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm. Accessed 21 Dec 2016

17.

Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558CrossRefPubMed

18.

DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188CrossRefPubMed

19.

Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50:1088–1101CrossRefPubMed

20.

Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Numasawa Y, Inohara T, Ishii H, Kuno T, Kodaira M et al (2017) Comparison of outcomes of women versus men with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (from the Japanese Nationwide Registry). Am J Cardiol 119:826–831CrossRefPubMed

22.

Edmund Anstey D, Li S, Thomas L, Wang TY, Wiviott SD (2016) Race and sex differences in management and outcomes of patients after ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarct: results from the NCDR. Clin Cardiol 39:585–595CrossRefPubMed

23.

Pelletier R, Choi J, Winters N, Eisenberg MJ, Bacon SL et al (2016) Sex differences in clinical outcomes after premature acute coronary syndrome. Can J Cardiol 32:1447–1453CrossRefPubMed

24.

De Carlo M, Morici N, Savonitto S, Grassia V, Sbarzaglia P et al (2015) Sex-related outcomes in elderly patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: insights from the Italian elderly ACS study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 8:791–796CrossRefPubMed

25.

Isorni MA, Blanchard D, Teixeira N, le Breton H, Renault N et al (2015) Impact of gender on use of revascularization in acute coronary syndromes: the national observational study of diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization (ONACI). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 86:E58–E65CrossRefPubMed

26.

Lu HT, Nordin R, Wan Ahmad WA, Lee CY, Zambahari R et al (2014) Sex differences in acute coronary syndrome in a multiethnic Asian population: results of the malaysian national cardiovascular disease database-acute coronary syndrome (NCVD-ACS) registry. Glob Heart 9:381–390CrossRefPubMed

27.

Gnavi R, Rusciani R, Dalmasso M, Giammaria M, Anselmino M et al (2014) Gender, socioeconomic position, revascularization procedures and mortality in patients presenting with STEMI and NSTEMI in the era of primary PCI. Differences or inequities? Int J Cardiol 176:724–730CrossRefPubMed

28.

Hersi A, Al-Habib K, Al-Faleh H, Al-Nemer K, Alsaif S et al (2013) Gender inequality in the clinical outcomes of equally treated acute coronary syndrome patients in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med 33:339–346CrossRefPubMed

29.

Lee CY, Hairi NN, Wan Ahmad WA, Ismail O, Liew HB et al (2013) Are there gender differences in coronary artery disease? The Malaysian National Cardiovascular Disease Database-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (NCVD-PCI) Registry. PLoS One 8:e72382CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Pain TE, Jones DA, Rathod KS, Gallagher SM, Knight CJ et al (2013) Influence of female sex on long-term mortality after acute coronary syndromes treated by percutaneous coronary intervention: a cohort study of 7304 patients. Coron Artery Dis 24:183–190CrossRefPubMed

31.

Kumbhani DJ, Shishehbor MH, Willis JM, Karim S, Singh D et al (2012) Influence of gender on long-term mortality in patients presenting with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 109:1087–1091CrossRefPubMed

32.

Janion-Sadowska A, Sielski J, Gierlotka M, Nowalany-Kozielska E, Janion M et al (2011) Gender-related differences in clinical course, therapeutic approach and prognosis in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Kardiol Pol 69:784–792PubMed

33.

Huang SS, Chen YH, Lu TM, Wu TC, Charng MJ et al (2012) Effect of invasive strategy on different genders of Chinese patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 79:946–955CrossRefPubMed

34.

Berthillot C, Stephan D, Chauvin M, Roul G (2010) In-hospital complications after invasive strategy for the management of Non STEMI: women fare as well as men. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 10:31CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Shao CL, Qiao SB, Zhu J, Chen J, Yang WX et al (2010) The clinical characteristics and prognosis of non ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in different genders. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi 49:754–757PubMed

36.

Halvorsen S, Eritsland J, Abdelnoor M, Holst Hansen C, Risøe C et al (2009) Gender differences in management and outcome of acute myocardial infarctions treated in 2006–2007. Cardiology 114:83–88CrossRefPubMed

37.

Gehrie ER, Reynolds HR, Chen AY, Neelon BH, Roe MT et al (2009) Characterization and outcomes of women and men with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and nonobstructive coronary artery disease: results from the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) quality improvement initiative. Am Heart J 158:688–694CrossRefPubMed

38.

Lee KH, Jeong MH, Ahn YK, Kim JH, Chae SC et al (2008) Gender differences of success rate of percutaneous coronary intervention and short term cardiac events in Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry. Int J Cardiol 130:227–234CrossRefPubMed

39.

Alfredsson J, Stenestrand U, Wallentin L, Swahn E (2007) Gender differences in management and outcome in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Heart 93:1357–1362CrossRefPubMed

40.

Elkoustaf RA, Mamkin I, Mather JF, Murphy D, Hirst JA et al (2006) Comparison of results of percutaneous coronary intervention for non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris in men versus women. Am J Cardiol 98:182–186CrossRefPubMed

41.

Sinkovic A, Marinsek M, Svensek F (2006) Women and men with unstable angina and/or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Wien Klin Wochenschr 118(Suppl 2):52–57CrossRefPubMed

42.

Heer T, Gitt AK, Juenger C, Schiele R, Wienbergen H et al (2006) Gender differences in acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 98:160–166CrossRefPubMed

43.

Clayton TC, Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Poole-Wilson PA, Shaw TR et al (2004) Do men benefit more than women from an interventional strategy in patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction? The impact of gender in the RITA 3 trial. Eur Heart J 25:1641–1650CrossRefPubMed

44.

Blomkalns AL, Chen AY, Hochman JS, Peterson ED, Trynosky K et al (2005) Gender disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: large-scale observations from the CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) National Quality Improvement Initiative. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:832–837CrossRefPubMed

45.

Mueller C, Neumann FJ, Roskamm H, Buser P, Hodgson JM et al (2002) Women do have an improved long-term outcome after non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes treated very early and predominantly with percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective study in 1,450 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 40:245–250CrossRefPubMed

46.

Passos LC, Lopes AA, Costa U, Lobo N, Rabelo Júnior A (1999) Difference in the in-hospital mortality of unstable angina pectoris between men and women. Arq Bras Cardiol 72:669–676CrossRefPubMed

47.

Worrall-Carter L, McEvedy S, Wilson A, Rahman MA (2016) Impact of comorbidities and gender on the use of coronary interventions in patients with high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 87:E128–E136CrossRefPubMed

48.

Woo JS, Kim W, Ha SJ, Kim SJ, Kang WY et al (2010) Impact of gender differences on long-term outcomes after successful percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 145:516–518CrossRefPubMed

49.

Vikman S, Airaksinen KE, Tierala I, Peuhkurinen K, Majamaa-Voltti K et al (2007) Gender-related differences in the management of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients. Scand Cardiovasc J 41:287–293CrossRefPubMed

50.

Tavris D, Shoaibi A, Chen AY, Uchida T, Roe MT et al (2010) Gender differences in the treatment of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Clin Cardiol 33:99–103CrossRefPubMed

51.

Kunadian V, Qiu W, Lagerqvist B, Johnston N, Sinclair H et al (2017) Gender differences in outcomes and predictors of all-cause mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (data from United Kingdom and Sweden). Am J Cardiol 119:210–216CrossRefPubMed

52.

Kragholm K, Halim SA, Yang Q, Schulte PJ, Hochman JS et al (2015) Sex-stratified trends in enrollment, patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes among non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: insights from clinical trials over 17 years. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 8:357–367CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Kudenchuk PJ, Maynard C, Martin JS, Wirkus M, Weaver WD (1996) Comparison of presentation, treatment, and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in men versus women (the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry). Am J Cardiol 78:9–14CrossRefPubMed

54.

Chandra NC, Ziegelstein RC, Rogers WJ, Tiefenbrunn AJ, Gore JM et al (1998) Observations of the treatment of women in the United States with myocardial infarction: a report from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-I. Arch Intern Med 158:981–988CrossRefPubMed

55.

Kostis JB, Wilson AC, O’Dowd K, Gregory P, Chelton S et al (1994) Sex differences in the management and long-term outcome of acute myocardial infarction: a statewide study. Circulation 90:1715–1730CrossRefPubMed

56.

Chandrasekhar J, Mehran R (2016) Sex-based differences in acute coronary syndromes: insights from invasive and noninvasive coronary technologies. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9:451–464CrossRefPubMed

57.

Champney KP, Frederick PD, Bueno H, Parashar S, Foody J et al (2009) The joint contribution of sex, age and type of myocardial infarction on hospital mortality following acute myocardial infarction. Heart 95:895–899CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Ma Q, Wang J, Jin J, Gao M, Liu F et al (2017) Clinical characteristics and prognosis of acute coronary syndrome in young women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Cardiol 228:837–843CrossRefPubMed

59.

Colan MG, Folson AR, Finch A, Davis CE, Sorlie P et al (1993) Association of factor VIII and Von Willebrand factor with age, race, sex and risk factors for atherosclerosis; the atherosclerosis risk in the communities (ARIC Study). Thromb Haemost 70:380–385

60.

Kalaria VG, Zareba W, Moss AJ, Pancio G, Marder VJ et al (2000) Gender-related differences in thrombogenic factors predicting recurrent cardiac events in patients after acute myocardial infarction. The THROMBO Investigators. Am J Cardiol 85:1401–1418CrossRefPubMed

61.

Hara H, Yajima J, Kirigaya H, Nagashima K, Oikawa Y et al (2004) Sex differences in coronary atherosclerosis: coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasonography. J Cardiol 43:215–221PubMed

62.

Anand SS, Xie CC, Mehta S, Franzosi MG, Joyner C et al (2005) Differences in the management and prognosis of women and men who suffer from acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:1845–1851CrossRefPubMed

63.

Alfredsson J, Clayton T, Damman P, Fox KA, Fredriksson M et al (2014) Impact of an invasive strategy on 5 years outcome in men and women with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 168:522–529CrossRefPubMed

64.

Donataccio MP, Puymirat E, Parapid B, Steg PG, Eltchaninoff H et al (2015) In-hospital outcomes and long-term mortality according to sex and management strategy in acute myocardial infarction. Insights from the French ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) 2005 Registry. Int J Cardiol 201:265–270CrossRefPubMed

65.

Mackay MH, Ratner PA, Johnson JL, Humphries KH, Buller CE (2011) Gender differences in symptoms of myocardial ischaemia. Eur Heart J 32:3107–3114CrossRefPubMed

66.

Kosuge M, Kimura K, Ishikawa T, Ebina T, Hibi K et al (2006) Differences between men and women in terms of clinical features of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Circ J 70:222–226CrossRefPubMed

67.

Toyota T, Furukawa Y, Ehara N, Funakoshi S, Morimoto T et al (2013) Sex-based differences in clinical practice and outcomes for Japanese patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ J 77:1508–1517CrossRefPubMed

68.

Iannaccone M, Quadri G, Taha S, D’Ascenzo F, Montefusco A et al (2016) Prevalence and predictors of culprit plaque rupture at OCT in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 17:1128–1137CrossRefPubMed

69.

Arbustini E, Dal Bello B, Morbini P, Burke AP, Bocciarelli M et al (1999) Plaque erosion is a major substrate for coronary thrombosis in acute myocardial infarction. Heart 82:269–272CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

70.

Berger JS, Elliott L, Gallup D, Roe M, Granger CB et al (2009) Sex differences in mortality following acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 302:874–882CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Impact of gender on short-term and long-term all-cause mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis
verfasst von: Yushu Wang
Sui Zhu
Rongsheng Du
Juteng Zhou
Yucheng Chen
Qing Zhang
Publikationsdatum: 24.05.2017
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Internal and Emergency Medicine / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1828-0447
Elektronische ISSN: 1970-9366
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-017-1684-y

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

25.04.2024 | Nierenkarzinom | Nachrichten

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Impact of gender on short-term and long-term all-cause mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

Metformin rückt in den Hintergrund

Myokarditis nach Infekt – richtig schwierig wird es bei Profisportlern

Update Innere Medizin

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Finding the needle in the haystack

Severe dysphagia rapidly reverted after iron supplementation

Understanding and improving decisions in clinical medicine (II): making sense of reasoning in practice

Ethnic inequalities in acute myocardial infarction hospitalization rates among young and middle-aged adults in Northern Italy: high risk for South Asians

Medical doctors and the foundation of the International Red Cross

Independent risk factors for mortality in critically ill patients with candidemia on Italian Internal Medicine Wards

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

Metformin rückt in den Hintergrund

Myokarditis nach Infekt – richtig schwierig wird es bei Profisportlern

Update Innere Medizin