Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2020

24.03.2020 | Original Research

Impact of Hospitalist Team Structure on Patient-Reported Satisfaction with Physician Performance

verfasst von: Katie L. Lappé, MD, Sonja E. Raaum, MD, Claire E. Ciarkowski, MD, Santosh P. Reddy, MD, Stacy A. Johnson, MD

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 9/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Patient experience is valuable because it reflects how patients perceive the care they receive within the healthcare system and is associated with clinical outcomes. Also, as part of the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) program, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) rewards hospitals with financial incentives for patient experience as measured by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. It is unclear how the addition of residents and advanced practice clinicians (APCs) to hospitalist-led inpatient teams affects patient satisfaction as measured by the HCAHPS and Press Ganey survey.

Objective

To compare patient satisfaction with hospitalists on resident, APC, and solo hospitalist teams measured by HCAHPS and Press Ganey physician performance domain survey results.

Design

Retrospective observational cohort study.

Participants

All patients discharged from the Internal Medicine inpatient service between July 1, 2015, and July 1, 2018, who met HCAHPS survey eligibility criteria and completed a patient experience survey.

Main Measures

HCAHPS and Press Ganey physician performance domain survey results.

Key Results

No differences were observed in the selection of “top box” scores on the HCAHPS physician performance domain between resident, APC, and solo hospitalist teams. Adjusted Press Ganey physician performance domain survey results demonstrated significant differences between solo hospitalist and resident teams, with solo hospitalists having higher scores in three areas: time physician spent with you (4.58 vs. 4.38, p = 0.050); physician kept you informed (4.63 vs. 4.43, p = 0.047); and physician skill (4.80 vs. 4.63, p = 0.027). Solo hospitalists were perceived to have higher physician skill in comparison with hospitalist-APC teams (4.80 vs. 4.69, p = 0.042).

Conclusion

While Press Ganey survey results suggest that patients have greater satisfaction with physicians on solo hospitalist teams, these differences were not observed on the HCAHPS physician performance survey domain, suggesting physician team structure does not impact HVBP incentive payments by CMS.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Boulding, W,Glickman, SW, Manary , MP, Schulman, KA, and Staelin R.. Relationship between patient satisfaction with inpatient care and hospital readmission within 30 days. Am J Manag Care. Boulding, W,Glickman, SW, Manary , MP, Schulman, KA, and Staelin R.. Relationship between patient satisfaction with inpatient care and hospital readmission within 30 days. Am J Manag Care.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Jha AK, Orav EJ, Zheng J, Epstein AM. Patients’ perception of hospital care in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2008;18:1921–1952.CrossRef Jha AK, Orav EJ, Zheng J, Epstein AM. Patients’ perception of hospital care in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2008;18:1921–1952.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wray, Cm, Flores, A, Padula, WV, Prochaska, MT, Meltzer, DO, and Arora, VM. Measuring Patient Experiences on Hospitalist and Teaching Services: Patient Responses to a 30-Day Post-Discharge Questionnaire. J Hosp Med. 2017;11(2):99–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2485 Wray, Cm, Flores, A, Padula, WV, Prochaska, MT, Meltzer, DO, and Arora, VM. Measuring Patient Experiences on Hospitalist and Teaching Services: Patient Responses to a 30-Day Post-Discharge Questionnaire. J Hosp Med. 2017;11(2):99–104. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jhm.​2485
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams R. Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Stata J. 2012;12(2):308–331.CrossRef Williams R. Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Stata J. 2012;12(2):308–331.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauer B, Brookhart MA RJ et al. Developing a Protocol for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research: A User’s Guide. No. 12(13). (Velentgas P, Dreyer NA, Nourjah P et al., ed.). AHRQ Publication; 2013. Sauer B, Brookhart MA RJ et al. Developing a Protocol for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research: A User’s Guide. No. 12(13). (Velentgas P, Dreyer NA, Nourjah P et al., ed.). AHRQ Publication; 2013.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ludbrook J. Multiple comparison procedures updated. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1998;25(12):1032–1037.CrossRef Ludbrook J. Multiple comparison procedures updated. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1998;25(12):1032–1037.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sally A. Santen, MD, Robin R. Hemphill, MD, Emily E. Prough, MD, and Alice A. Perlowski M. Do patients understand their physician’s level of training? A survey of emergency department patients. Acad Med. 2004;79(2):139–143. Sally A. Santen, MD, Robin R. Hemphill, MD, Emily E. Prough, MD, and Alice A. Perlowski M. Do patients understand their physician’s level of training? A survey of emergency department patients. Acad Med. 2004;79(2):139–143.
Metadaten
Titel
Impact of Hospitalist Team Structure on Patient-Reported Satisfaction with Physician Performance
verfasst von
Katie L. Lappé, MD
Sonja E. Raaum, MD
Claire E. Ciarkowski, MD
Santosh P. Reddy, MD
Stacy A. Johnson, MD
Publikationsdatum
24.03.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-05775-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2020

Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.