Skip to main content

01.12.2017 | Research | Ausgabe 1/2017 Open Access

Journal of Hematology & Oncology 1/2017

Impact of in vivo T cell depletion in HLA-identical allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission conditioned with a fludarabine iv-busulfan myeloablative regimen: a report from the EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party

Journal of Hematology & Oncology > Ausgabe 1/2017
Marie Thérèse Rubio, Maud D’Aveni-Piney, Myriam Labopin, Rose-Marie Hamladji, Miguel A. Sanz, Didier Blaise, Hakan Ozdogu, Etienne Daguindeau, Carlos Richard, Stella Santarone, Giuseppe Irrera, Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha, Moshe Yeshurun, Jose L. Diez-Martin, Mohamad Mohty, Bipin N Savani, Arnon Nagler
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​s13045-016-0389-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Acute graft-versus-host disease
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Acute myeloid leukemia
Absolute nuclear cells
Anti-thymocyte globulin
Bone marrow
Chronic graft-versus-host disease
Cumulative incidence
Complete remission
Epstein-Barr virus
Fludarabine and 4 days intravenous busulfan
GVHD and relapse-free survival
Hazard ratio
Leukemia-free survival
Myeloablative conditioning
Matched related donor
Matched unrelated donor
Non-relapse mortality
Overall survival
Peripheral blood
Peripheral blood stem cells
Relapse incidence
Reduced toxicity conditioning
Veno-occlusive disease


Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) with myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen remains the treatment of choice for intermediate or poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) [ 1]. The standard conditioning regimen including myeloablative dose of intravenous (iv) busulfan and cyclophosphamide is however associated with substantial toxicities in adults above 40 years of age [ 2]. The association of fludarabine to myeloablative dose of iv busulfan (Flu-ivBu4), developed in the past two decades, has been shown to preserve significant anti-leukemic activity with reduced toxicity mortality in both retrospective [ 38] and prospective randomized studies [ 9, 10], in particular, in adults above 40 years. This so-called reduced toxicity conditioning (RTC) regimen is therefore being widely used in allo-SCT for patients with AML in CR1.
The Flu-ivBu 4 regimen is usually performed with peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) to favor engraftment and enhance the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect [ 11, 12]. However, use of PBSC from HLA-matched related (MRD) or unrelated (MUD) donors with MAC increases the risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) [ 1113]. Prospective randomized studies have shown that in vivo T cell depletion with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) reduces the incidence of cGVHD without increasing the risk of relapse in allo-SCT performed with PBSC from MRD or MUD after conventional cyclophosphamide-based MAC regimens for AML [ 1416]. These results raise the question of the impact of use of ATG in the Flu-ivBu4 RTC, in which the balance between the GVH and GVL effects of allo-SCT might be more sensitive to T cell depletion. Very scarce data exist on the potential effect of ATG in this transplant context. Russel et al. reported reduced non-relapse mortality (NRM) due to lower incidence of cGVHD in a retrospective study of patients transplanted with MRD after Flu-Bu-based MAC and ATG compared to conventional cyclophosphamide-based MAC without ATG but a trend towards higher relapse incidence [ 17]. A Korean study comparing the outcomes of 16 patients receiving Flu-ivBu for 3 or 4 days and ATG to 45 patients receiving the same type of conditioning without ATG for various hematological malignancies transplanted with MRD did not observe any benefit of adding ATG, with also concerns about its possible negative impact on relapse [ 18]. Heterogeneity in terms of conditioning between groups or of types of disease limits the interpretation of these data. With the objective to explore the impact of the use of ATG in the Flu-ivBu4 RTC, we chose to retrospectively analyze a cohort of 566 adult patients given hematopoietic stem cells from HLA-identical sibling donors for AML in CR1 following Flu-ivBu4 conditioning regimen. In this homogeneous cohort of patients, we compared post-transplant outcomes of 145 of those who received ATG for GVHD prophylaxis to the 421 patients who did not.


Study design and data collection

This is a retrospective multicenter analysis using the data set of the Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) group registry. The EBMT is a voluntary working group of more than 500 transplant centers that are required to report all consecutive stem cell transplantations and follow-ups once a year. Audits are routinely performed to determine the accuracy of the data. The study was planned and approved by the ALWP of the EBMT. In addition, the study protocol was approved by the institutional review board at each site and complied with country-specific regulatory requirements. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Since 1990, patients provide informed consent authorizing the use of their personal information for research purposes. Eligibility criteria for this analysis included adult patients above 18 years of age with AML who underwent a first allo-SCT from an HLA-matched related donor following fludarabine and 4 days of intravenous busulfan (Flu-ivBu4) regimen between 2006 and 2013. Exclusion criteria were previous allogeneic or cord blood transplantation and ex vivo T cell-depleted stem cell graft. Variables collected included recipient and donor characteristics (age, gender, CMV serostatus), disease characteristics and status at transplant, year of transplantation and interval from diagnosis to transplantation, transplant-related factors including conditioning regimen, use and dose of thymoglobulin as pre-transplant in vivo T cell depletion, stem cell source (bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB)), post-transplant GVHD prophylaxis. GVHD prophylaxis regimens were dependent on centers’ protocols. Grading of acute GVHD was performed using established criteria [ 19]. Chronic GVHD was classified as limited or extensive according to published criteria [ 20]. For the purpose of this study, all necessary data were collected according to the EBMT guidelines, using the EBMT minimum essential data forms. The list of institutions reporting data included in this study is provided in the supplemental data (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Statistical analysis

Study end points were engraftment, incidences and severity of acute and chronic GVHD, incidence of primary disease relapse (RI), NRM, leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), and GVHD and relapse-free survival (GRFS). Start time was date of transplant for all end points. LFS was defined as survival without relapse or progression, NRM as death without relapse/progression, and GRFS as survival with no evidence of relapse/progression, grade III to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), or severe cGVHD as defined by Ruggeri et al. for registry-based studies [ 21]. Cumulative incidence functions (CIF) were used to estimate RI and NRM in a competing risk setting, because death and relapse compete with each other. For estimating the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD, we considered relapse and death to be competing events. Groups were compared by the chi-square method for qualitative variables, whereas the Mann-Whitney test was applied for continuous parameters. Univariate comparisons were done using the log-rank test for OS, LFS, and GRFS and the Gray’s test for RI, NRM, and GVHD cumulative incidences. Multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards model for all end points. Factors differing in terms of distribution between the groups and all factors known as potentially risk factors were included in the final model. In order to test for a center effect, we introduced a random effect or frailty for each center into the model [ 22]. All tests were two-sided. The type I error rate was fixed at 0.05 for the determination of factors associated with time to event outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and R 3.2.3 software packages (R Development Core Team, Vienna, Austria).


Patient, transplant, and disease characteristics

Between 2006 and 2013, 566 patients with AML transplanted with a sibling donor following a Flu-ivBu4 myeloablative conditioning regimen with or without ATG were included in the study. Patient and disease characteristics are summarized in Table  1. Among the total population of patients, 421 (74.4%) did not receive ATG within the conditioning regimen (no-ATG group), while 145 (25.6%) received ATG (ATG group). Thymoglobulin was the main ATG brand used (95.2%). Median dose of thymoglobulin was 5 mg/kg (range, 2.5–15.8), and a majority of patients (73.7%) received a total dose below 6 mg/kg. Apart from ATG, GVHD prophylaxis was mainly based on the association of cyclosporine (CsA) and methotrexate (MTX) in the no-ATG group (88.4%), while most of the patients in the ATG group received CsA alone (29%) or CsA and MTX (40%). The choice of GVHD prophylaxis was dependent on the centers’ protocols.
Table 1
Patient and disease characteristics
Patient characteristics
p value
Number of patients
Recipient age at SCT (years, range)
43.7 (18–68)
48.8 (20–69)
Recipient gender, n (%)
215 (51.3%)
82 (56.9%)
204 (48.7%)
62 (43.1%)
Year of SCT (median), year (%)
2011 (2006–2013)
2012 (2006–2013)
<10 −5
Interval from diagnosis to SCT (median days)
Median follow-up a (months, range)
16 (1.5–93)
21 (1–106)
Donor age (years, range)
41 (8–70)
47 (10–65)
Donor gender, n (%)
236 (56.3%)
70 (48.6%)
183 (43.7%)
74 (51.4%)
Female donor to male recipient, n (%)
96 (23%)
44 (30.8%)
Diagnosis, n (%)
 De novo AML
391 (92.9%)
127 (87.6%)
 Secondary AML
30 (7.1%)
18 (12.4%)
Cytogenetics in de novo AML, n (% of available data)
18 (16.2%)
6 (9%)
76 (68.5%)
50 (74.6%)
17 (15.3%)
11 (16.4%)
 Not available/failed
Source of SC, n (%)
<10 −4
84 (20%)
10 (6.9%)
337 (80%)
135 (93.1%)
In vivo T cell depletion, n (%)
138 (95.2%)
 ATG Fresenius
4 (2.8%)
 Missing brand of ATG
3 (2%)
 Mean dose of thymoglobuline (mg/kg) (range)
5 (2.5–15.8)
 Thymo ≤ 6 mg/kg
98 (73.7%)
 Thymo > 6 mg/kg
35 (26.3%)
 Unknown dose of thymoglobuline
Post-transplant GVHD prophylaxis
<10 −4
4 (1%)
42 (29%)
 CsA + MTX
372 (88.4%)
57 (39.3%)
 CsA/FK 506 + MMF
35 (8.3%)
17 (11.7%)
10 (2.4%)
29 (20%)
Patient positive CMV serology, n (%)
362 (87%)
107 (74.3%)
<10 −4
Donor positive CMV serology, n (%)
330 (80.1%)
104 (72.7%)
CMV risk, n (%)
33 (8%)
22 (15.5%)
328 (77.9%)
103 (71%)
49 (12%)
17 (12%)
CMV risk low = negative recipient and donor serology, high positive recipient and negative donor serology, intermediate: all other combinations
AML acute myeloid leukemia, ATG anti-thymocyte globulin, BM bone marrow, CMV cytomegalovirus, CsA cyclosporine A, MMF mycophenolate mofetil, MTX methotrexate, PB peripheral blood, SC stem cells, SCT stem cell transplantation
aFor alive patients
In comparison to the no-ATG group, patients in the ATG group were older (median age of 48.8 vs. 43.7 years, p = 0.002), had been transplanted more recently (median year of transplantation 2012 vs. 2011, p < 10 −5), with older donors (median age of 47 vs. 41 years, p = 0.003), and were more frequently transplanted with PBSC graft (93 vs. 80%, p < 10 −4) for secondary AML (12 vs. 7%, p = 0.05). There was no difference in terms of cytogenetic risk between the two groups in patients with available cytogenetics. Significantly higher proportions of CMV seropositive patients were transplanted in the no-ATG group (87 vs. 74%, p < 10 −4) resulting in different distributions of transplant CMV risk with increased low risk in the ATG group (15.5 vs. 8%, p = 0.008) (Table  1).

Impact of ATG on engraftment and GVHD

Engraftment and incidences of acute and chronic GVHD are shown in Table  2. There was no difference in terms of engraftment between the no-ATG and ATG groups (98.6 and 100%, respectively, p = 0.15). Median time for absolute nuclear cells (ANC) > 0.5 × 10 9/L was longer in the no-ATG group (15 and 14 days, respectively, p = 0.001) (Table  2).
Table 2
Engraftment and GVHD
p value
Total number of patients
Engraftment, n (%)
411 (98.6%)
145 (100%)
 No engraftment, n (%)
6 (1.4%)
0 (0%)
 Missing, n
Median time ANC > 0.5 G/L (days, range)
15 (5–45)
14 (5–28)
Acute GVHD,
 Grade 0–I, n (%)
315 (78.2%)
116 (84.7%)
 Grade II–IV, n (%)
88 (21.8%)
21 (15.3%)
 Grade III–IV, n (%)
31 (7.7%)
6 (4.4%)
 Missing, n
Chronic GVHD a
 All grades
52% (46–57.7)
30.8% (22.3–39.8)
26.3% (21.2–31.6)
7.6% (3.5–13.7)
4.7 × 10 −5
 Limited, n
 Extensive; n
 Missing, n
ATG anti-thymocyte globulin, GVHD graft-versus-host disease
aTwo-year cumulative incidence
In univariate analysis, we did not observe any impact of the use of ATG on the incidences of grade II–IV and grade III–IV aGVHD. Day 100 cumulative incidences of grade II–IV and III–IV aGVHD were similar between the no-ATG and ATG groups (21.8 vs. 15.3%, p = 0.10 and 7.7 vs. 4.4%, p = 0.19, respectively) (Table  2). By contrast, 2-year incidences of overall and extensive chronic GVHD were significantly reduced in the ATG group in comparison to the no-ATG group (30.8 vs. 52% for overall cGVHD, p = 0.0002 and 7.6 vs. 26.3% for extensive cGVHD, p < 10 −4) (Tables  2 and 3 and Fig.  1). As shown in Table  4, GVHD-related deaths represented 22.2% ( n = 32) and 17.1% ( n = 6) of all causes of death in the no-ATG and ATG groups, respectively.
Table 3
Post-transplant 2-year outcomes
Extensive GVHD
17.3% [13.3–21.7]
27.2% [22.4–32.1]
26.3% [21.2–31.6]
39.6% [34–45.1]
55.4% [49.8–61]
58.9% [53.2–64.6]
10.7% [7.7–14.2]
22.5% [15.1–30.8]
7.6% [3.5–13.7]
60.1% [51–69.3]
66.8% [58.1–75.6]
71.8% [63.4–80.2]
p value
4.7 × 10 −5
ATG anti-thymocyte globulin, GRFS GVHD and relapse-free survival, LFS leukemia-free survival, NRM non-relapse mortality, OS overall survival, RI relapse incidence
Table 4
Causes of death
N = 144
N = 35
77 (53.5%)
19 (54.3%)
32 (22.2%)
6 (17.1%)
23 (16%)
5 (14.3%)
5 (3.5%)
3 (8.6%)
Idiopathic pneumonia
2 (1.4%)
0 (0%)
2 (1.4%)
0 (0%)
Other SCT-related
3 (2.1%)
2 (5.7%)
ATG anti-thymocyte globulin, GVHD graft-versus-host disease, SCT stem cell transplantation, VOD veno-occlusive disease
In multivariate analyses, the use of ATG was associated with a reduced risk of chronic GVHD development (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.46, 95% CI, 0.31–0.68; p = 0.0001) (Table  5). Factors associated with an increased risk of developing chronic GVHD were secondary AML (HR = 1.68, 95% CI, 1.04–2.72; p = 0.033) and the use of a female donor for a male recipient (HR = 1.75, 95% CI, 1.27–2.43; p = 0.001). We observed a center effect on the incidence cGVHD ( p = 0.0007) (Table  5).
Table 5
Multivariate analyses
Chronic GVHD
p value
OR (95% CI)
p value
HR (95% CI)
p value
HR (95% CI)
p value
HR (95% CI)
p value
HR (95% CI)
p value
HR (95% CI)
In vivo T cell depletion
0.46 (0.31–0.68)
0.59 (0.32–1.09)
0.72 (0.46–1.12)
0.67 (0.46–0.95)
0.65 (0.44–0.95)
4 × 10 −5
0.51 (0.37–0.70)
Age at SCT >50 years
1.13 (0.82–1.57)
1.83 (1.14–2.94)
1.39 (0.96–2.00)
1.53 (1.15–2.05)
1.42 (1.04–1.93)
1.32 (1.02–1.71)
Interval diag. to SCT a
1.05 (0.91–1.22)
1.00 (1.00–1.00)
1.00 (1.00–1.00)
1.00 (1.00–1.00)
1.00 (1.00–1.00)
1.00 (1.00–1.00)
Year of SCT
1.00 (1.00–1.00)
0.99 (0.87–1.30)
1.01 (0.91–1.12)
1.00 (0.92–1.09)
0.98 (0.90–1.06)
0.98 (0.91–1.05)
Secondary AML
1.68 (1.04–2.72)
1.55 (0.76–3.19)
1.26 (0.71–2.26)
1.35 (0.86–2.12)
1.40 (0.87–2.25)
1.47 (0.99–2.18)
Female D to male R
1.75 (1.27–2.43)
1.12 (0.66–1.90)
1.22 (0.82–1.82)
1.18 (0.86–1.62)
1.21 (0.87–1.69)
1.62 (1.24–2.11)
R CMV seropositivity
1.32 (0.84–2.09)
0.93 (0.46–1.90)
0.91 (0.55–1.53)
0.91 (0.60–1.38)
0.85 (0.55–1.31)
0.92 (0.64–1.32)
D CMV seropositivity
1.17 (0.81–1.68)
1.49 (0.77–2.89)
1.06 (0.67–1.68)
1. 20 (0.82–1.75)
1.21 (0.81–1.80)
1.04 (0.75–1.42)
Center (frailty variable)
AML acute myeloid leukemia, CMV cytomegalovirus, D donor, diag diagnosis, GRFS GVHD/relapse-free survival, GVHD graft-versus-host disease, LFS leukemia-free survival, NRM non-relapse mortality, OS overall survival, R recipient, SCT allogeneic stem cell transplantation
aAnalyzed per 6-month interval

Toxicity and NRM

The median follow-up of the entire cohort of 19 months (range, 1–106) was similar in both no-ATG (16 months) and ATG groups (21 months) (Table  1). Two-year NRM for the entire cohort was 15.5% (95% CI, 12.3–19.1). In univariate analysis, 2-year cumulative incidence of NRM was no different between the no-ATG (17.3%; 95% CI, 13.3–21.7) and the ATG (10.7%; 95% CI, 7.7–14.2) groups ( p = 0.149). (Table  3 and Fig.  2a).
Apart from GVHD, the main other causes of death from NRM in the no-ATG and ATG groups were infections (23 patients and 5 patients (16 and 14.3% of all deaths), respectively) and veno-occlusive disease (3 patients in each group (3.5 and 8.6% of all deaths), respectively) (Table  4).
In multivariate analyses, recipient age above 50 years was associated with an increased risk of NRM (HR = 1.83, 95% CI, 1.14–2.94; p = 0.012) and we observed a center effect on the incidence of NRM ( p = 0.047). Although not significant, there was a trend for reduced NRM in patients receiving ATG (HR = 0.59, 95% CI, 0.32–1.09; p = 0.094) (Table  5).

Use of ATG had no impact on relapse incidence

Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse in the entire cohort of patients was 25.9% (95% CI, 21.8–30.1) and represented the main cause of death in the two groups of patients: 53.4% of all causes of death in the no-ATG and 54.5% of those of the ATG groups (Table  4). In univariate analysis, the use of ATG had no impact on the 2-year incidence of relapse, which occurred in 27.2% (95% CI, 22.4–32.1) of the patients in the no-ATG group and in 22.5% (95% CI, 15.1–30.8) of those in the ATG group ( p = 0.226) (Table  3 and Fig.  2b). The absence of the impact of ATG on relapse risk was confirmed in multivariate analyses (HR = 0.72, 95% CI, 0.46–1.12; p = 0.149) (Table  5). No significant factor was associated with the risk of relapse in this study, although older age (>50 years) showed a trend to an increased risk (HR = 1.39, 95% CI, 0.96–2.00; p = 0.083).

Use of ATG improved transplant survivals including GRFS

At 2 years, LFS and OS for in the entire cohort of patients were 58.4% (95% CI, 53.7–63.2) and 62.2% (95% CI, 57.4–67), respectively. In univariate analysis, 2-year LFS and OS were improved in the ATG group (66.8%; 95% CI, 58.1–75.6 and 71.8%; 95% CI, 63.4–80.2, respectively) in comparison to the no-ATG group (55.4%; 95% CI, 49.8–61 and 58.9%; 95% CI, 53.2–64.6, respectively) ( p = 0.044 and 0.049, respectively) (Table  3 and Fig.  2c, d). The beneficial impact of ATG on LFS and OS was confirmed in multivariate analyses (HR = 0.67, 95% CI, 0.46–0.95, p = 0.027 for LFS and HR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44–0.95, p = 0.027 for OS) (Table  5). The only other factor that also impacted transplant survivals was recipient older age (>50 years) resulting in impaired LFS (HR = 1.53, 95% CI, 1.15–2.05, p = 0.004) and worse OS (HR = 1.42, 95% CI, 1.04–1.93, p = 0.026) (Table  5).
Two-year overall GRFS was 45.0% (95% CI, 40.1–49.8). In univariate analysis, patients of the ATG group had improved 2-year GRFS (60.1%, 95% CI, 51–69.3) compared those of the no-ATG group (39.6%, 95% CI, 34–45.1) ( p = 0.00016) (Table  3 and Fig.  3). Use of ATG was significantly associated with improved GRFS in multivariate analyses (HR = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.37–0.70, p = 4 × 10 −5) (Table  5), while use of a female donor for a male recipient and recipient older age (>50 years) were associated with worse GRFS (HR = 1.62, 95% CI, 1.24–2.11, p = 0.0004 and HR = 1.32, 95% CI, 1.02–1.71, p = 0.037) (Table  5).


The main challenge of allo-SCT in AML and other hematological malignancies remains to limit organ life-threatening toxicity while preserving the GVL effect and patients’ quality of life by avoiding severe chronic GVHD. The GVHD and relapse-free survival composite end point is becoming an important end point to improve in allo-SCT [ 21, 23]. In this objective, while improvements in terms of tolerability of the transplant process have been shown in the last two decades by the development of reduced intensity and toxicity conditioning regimens and by improvement of supportive care including management of infections [ 24], the increased use of PBSC grafts, reaching 70% of stem cell grafts used in Europe nowadays [ 25], is also associated with higher incidence of severe cGVHD even with HLA-identical sibling donors [ 11, 12, 26], thus potentially impairing GRFS. The Flu-ivBu4 RTC associated with PBSC graft has been reported as effective than conventional Bu-cyclophosphamide MAC regimen but with reduced short- and long-term non-relapse mortality in AML patients transplanted in CR1 with an HLA 10/10-matched related or unrelated donor [ 810]. However, the incidence of chronic GVHD with PBSC (80%) grafts from HLA-identical sibling donors, following such RTC in the absence of ATG, remains high with 68% overall cGVHD and 42% extensive cGVHD incidences at 4 years post-transplant reported recently by the Spanish Cooperative Transplant Group [ 7]. The current study was limited to AML in CR1 transplanted with HLA-identical donors to reduce bias due to donor type and disease status on transplant outcomes. As reported in other contexts of allo-SCT [ 14, 16, 17, 2730], we confirm in the present study that the addition of intermediate dose of thymoglobulin (median, 5 mg/kg) significantly reduces, after adjustment to other factors, the risk of developing cGVHD (Cox HR = 0.46, p = 0.0001). Compared to patients not receiving ATG, those transplanted with ATG, despite having received more frequently PBSC, had a reduction of 2 years of cumulative incidence of the overall cGVHD from 52 to 31% ( p = 0.00026) and that of extensive cGVHD from 26 to 8% ( p < 10 −4). Such reduction of cGVHD incidence was not associated with reduced anti-leukemic control since use of ATG did not impact relapse incidence in this series of AML transplanted in CR1 in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Most patients had received a thymoglobulin dose of <6 mg/kg, so we could not analyze the impact of the ATG dose on outcomes. However, these results are in line with preserved GVL effect despite the addition of low or intermediate doses of ATG in the context of allo-SCT for AML performed with MRD and MUD following conventional MAC [ 31, 32] and RIC [ 29, 30, 33, 34], in contrast with increased risk of relapse with doses of thymoglobulin >10 mg/kg [ 28].
By contrast, as reported by others [ 15, 17, 30], we did not observe protective effect of such doses of ATG against acute GVHD. Actually, in the context of allo-SCT performed with PBSC from matched related or unrelated donors, use of low doses of ATG (2.5 mg/kg of thymoglobulin) was associated with an increased risk of aGVHD [ 34, 35]; a reduction of the incidence of aGVHD has been observed with thymoglobulin doses starting at 5 mg/kg, although higher doses (≥7.5 mg/kg of thymoglobulin) were associated with increased risk of mortality from infections and relapse in both MAC and RIC settings [ 28, 36]. The optimal dose of thymoglobulin in both RIC and MAC seems therefore to be about 5 mg/kg. At such intermediate dose of ATG, as described by others [ 14, 15, 30, 37], we did not observe difference of infection-related mortality between the ATG and no-ATG groups, despite potential increased frequency of viral EBV reactivation manageable by viral load monitoring and preemptive use of rituximab [ 30, 37].
Altogether, our results show that the addition of intermediate dose of ATG to the Flu-ivBu4 RTC represents an independent factor associated with improved GRFS, as defined by Ruggeri et al. for registry-based studies [ 21], allowing a probability of being alive without disease and without significant cGVHD at 2 years after allo-SCT in 60% of the patients transplanted for AML in CR1 with a sibling donor, compared to 40% of those not receiving ATG. Although GRFS is not routinely analyzed up to now, a 2-year 60% GRFS compares favorably to 40% GRFS at 3 years reported after allo-SCT performed for AML transplanted in CR1 (79%) or CR2 (21%) with MAC (61%) or RIC and PBSC (82%) from HLA-matched related (55%) or unrelated (45%) donors within the EBMT registry [ 21], and to 25% at 1 year reported with PBSC HLA-sibling donor allo-SCT by the Minnesota Group [ 23].
Use of ATG in our series appears also as an independent factor associated with improved LFS and OS, mainly due to reduced incidence of overall and extensive cGVHD leading to a trend towards increased late NRM in the absence of ATG. Although a center effect was observed in the incidence of cGVHD and NRM, possibly due to preferential used of ATG and of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion in some centers, we did not detect a center effect on LFS, OS, and GRFS. The only other factor associated with worse survivals was recipient age above 50 years, due to higher NRM, as reported by others with such conditioning regimen [ 7].


We recognize that this study has several limitations, mainly because of its retrospective aspect and that the reason for the choice of GVHD prophylaxis was not known but mainly dependent on the center’s protocols. However, the study was performed on a homogeneous cohort of AML patients transplanted in CR1 with HLA-identical sibling donors following a Flu-ivBu4 RTC. Despite these limitations, the results of this study suggest that, in this particular setting, an intermediate dose of ATG improves the composite end point severe GVHD and relapse-free survival by reducing the incidence of overall and chronic GVHD without affecting the long-term anti-leukemic effect. These results should be confirmed in a well-designed phase III randomized trial.


Not applicable.


Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

ML, MM, and AN had full access to all the data in the study (available upon data specific request).

Authors’ contributions

MTR, BNS, ML, and AN designed the research and/or analyzed data. RMH, MAS, DB, HO, ED, CRE, SS, GI, IYA, MY, and JLDM provided the clinical data. MTR, MD, BNS, ML, and AN wrote the manuscript, and all authors approved the final version of the manuscript. A complete list of contributors, as well as members of the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group, appears on the online data supplement. MTR, MDP, BNS, MM ,and AN had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board at each site and complied with country-specific regulatory requirements. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Patients provide informed consent authorizing the use of their personal information for research purposes.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär


Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag als Mediziner

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf

Alle e.Med Abos bis 30. April 2021 zum halben Preis!

Jetzt e.Med zum Sonderpreis bestellen!

e.Med Innere Medizin


Mit e.Med Innere Medizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Innere Medizin, den Premium-Inhalten der internistischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten internistischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Journal of Hematology & Oncology 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

07.05.2021 | DDG-Tagung 2021 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Prävention von aktinischen Keratosen intensivieren

07.05.2021 | DDG-Tagung 2021 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Von Wirkung und Nebenwirkung

07.05.2021 | DDG-Tagung 2021 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Progredienzangst frühzeitig erkennen

07.05.2021 | DDG-Tagung 2021 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Schleimhautmelanom: Neue Therapieoption in Sicht?

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Onkologie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.