Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2018

12.12.2017

Impact of incisional hernia development following abdominal operations on total healthcare cost

verfasst von: Vamsi V. Alli, Jianying Zhang, Dana A. Telem

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Introduction of the category III CPT code (0437T) for prophylactic mesh augmentation (PMA) highlights efforts to reduce incisional hernia (IH). PMA’s value in the context of value-based care requires understanding both the cost of IH development and the savings from prevention. We hypothesized large healthcare costs with IH development. Appreciating which subsets of patients are at highest risk for IH, and the subsets who have the costliest care is essential in targeting interventions for hernia prevention.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study utilizing data from Truven Health Analytic MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database from calendar years 2011–2014. Adults undergoing open abdominal operations with continued enrollment 3-year post-surgery were included. Inpatient and outpatient claims were tracked over 3 years to identify IH. Quantile regression estimated the association between conditional distribution of total cost and IH. A generalized linear model with gamma distribution estimated the association of conditional mean of total cost and IH. Models were adjusted for confounding cost covariates (e.g., age, gender, obesity, smoking, cancer).

Results

14,290 patients were identified, 1294 (9.1%) developed IH, 48% within 1-year, 33% at 1–2 years, and 19% at 2–3 years post-surgery. 515 underwent stoma creation, 4579 colon resection, 2263 liver/kidney, 3890 peritoneal, 3043 other (foregut, appendectomy, cholecystectomy). Rate of IH formation was 25, 13, 5.9, 6.3, and 6.3%, respectively. The difference in median expenditures for IH development versus no IH was ostomies: $26,098, colorectal: $21,211, liver/kidney: $23,811, peritoneal: $25,554, others: $28,870 (p < 0.0.01). IH within 1 year was more expensive than within 3 years in the following categories: colorectal ($16,034, p = 0.0385), liver/kidney ($27,145, p = 0.0004), and ostomy ($18,992, p = 0.0035).

Conclusion

IH is a common occurrence imposing significant healthcare burden. Higher costs occur when IH occurs within 1 year versus 3 years from the index-procedure. This highlights the importance of hernia prevention techniques and the question of whether temporizing closure adjuncts  are appropriate in high-risk patients.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dasari M, Wessel CB, Hamad GG (2016) Prophylactic mesh placement for prevention of incisional hernia after open bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 212(4):615–622CrossRefPubMed Dasari M, Wessel CB, Hamad GG (2016) Prophylactic mesh placement for prevention of incisional hernia after open bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 212(4):615–622CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer JP et al (2016) A risk model and cost analysis of incisional hernia after elective, abdominal surgery based upon 12,373 cases: the case for targeted prophylactic intervention. Ann Surg 263(5):1010–1017CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fischer JP et al (2016) A risk model and cost analysis of incisional hernia after elective, abdominal surgery based upon 12,373 cases: the case for targeted prophylactic intervention. Ann Surg 263(5):1010–1017CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fink C et al (2014) Incisional hernia rate 3 years after midline laparotomy. Br J Surg 101(2):51–54CrossRefPubMed Fink C et al (2014) Incisional hernia rate 3 years after midline laparotomy. Br J Surg 101(2):51–54CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Poulose BK et al (2012) Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 16(2):179–183CrossRefPubMed Poulose BK et al (2012) Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 16(2):179–183CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Burger JW et al (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240(4):578–583; discussion 583–585PubMedPubMedCentral Burger JW et al (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240(4):578–583; discussion 583–585PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Awaiz A et al (2015) Meta-analysis and systematic review of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for elective incisional hernia. Hernia 19(3):449–463CrossRefPubMed Awaiz A et al (2015) Meta-analysis and systematic review of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for elective incisional hernia. Hernia 19(3):449–463CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Al Chalabi H et al (2015) A systematic review of laparoscopic versus open abdominal incisional hernia repair, with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 20:65–74CrossRefPubMed Al Chalabi H et al (2015) A systematic review of laparoscopic versus open abdominal incisional hernia repair, with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg 20:65–74CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Diener MK et al (2010) Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 251(5):843–856CrossRefPubMed Diener MK et al (2010) Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 251(5):843–856CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhangu A et al (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh placement for prevention of incisional hernia following midline laparotomy. Hernia 17(4):445–455CrossRefPubMed Bhangu A et al (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh placement for prevention of incisional hernia following midline laparotomy. Hernia 17(4):445–455CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Millbourn D, Wimo A, Israelsson LA (2014) Cost analysis of the use of small stitches when closing midline abdominal incisions. Hernia 18(6):775–780CrossRefPubMed Millbourn D, Wimo A, Israelsson LA (2014) Cost analysis of the use of small stitches when closing midline abdominal incisions. Hernia 18(6):775–780CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang XC et al (2017) Mesh reinforcement for the prevention of incisional hernia formation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Surg Res 209:17–29CrossRefPubMed Wang XC et al (2017) Mesh reinforcement for the prevention of incisional hernia formation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Surg Res 209:17–29CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Borab ZM et al. (2017) Does prophylactic mesh placement in elective, midline laparotomy reduce the incidence of incisional hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 161:1149–1163CrossRefPubMed Borab ZM et al. (2017) Does prophylactic mesh placement in elective, midline laparotomy reduce the incidence of incisional hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 161:1149–1163CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer JP et al (2016) A cost-utility assessment of mesh selection in clean-contaminated ventral hernia repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(2):647–659CrossRefPubMed Fischer JP et al (2016) A cost-utility assessment of mesh selection in clean-contaminated ventral hernia repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(2):647–659CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Carbonell AM et al (2013) Outcomes of synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 217(6):991–998CrossRefPubMed Carbonell AM et al (2013) Outcomes of synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 217(6):991–998CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Majumder A et al (2016) Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs. Surgery 160(4):828–838CrossRefPubMed Majumder A et al (2016) Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs. Surgery 160(4):828–838CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosen MJ et al (2017) Multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study of the recurrence, surgical site infection, and quality of life after contaminated ventral hernia repair using biosynthetic absorbable mesh: The COBRA Study. Ann Surg 265(1):205–211CrossRefPubMed Rosen MJ et al (2017) Multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study of the recurrence, surgical site infection, and quality of life after contaminated ventral hernia repair using biosynthetic absorbable mesh: The COBRA Study. Ann Surg 265(1):205–211CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat López-Cano M et al (2014) PREBIOUS trial: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of PREventive midline laparotomy closure with a BIOabsorbable mesh for the prevention of incisional hernia: rationale and design. Contemp Clin Trials 39(2):335–341CrossRefPubMed López-Cano M et al (2014) PREBIOUS trial: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of PREventive midline laparotomy closure with a BIOabsorbable mesh for the prevention of incisional hernia: rationale and design. Contemp Clin Trials 39(2):335–341CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Impact of incisional hernia development following abdominal operations on total healthcare cost
verfasst von
Vamsi V. Alli
Jianying Zhang
Dana A. Telem
Publikationsdatum
12.12.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5936-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.