Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 2/2019

01.11.2018 | Original Contributions

Impact of Patient Attrition from Bariatric Surgery Practice on Clinical Outcomes

verfasst von: Julia A. Jurgensen, Wendy Reidt, Todd Kellogg, Manpreet Mundi, Meera Shah, Maria L. Collazo Clavell

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Obesity has become a global epidemic. Bariatric surgery remains the most successful modality for producing sustained weight loss. Attrition rates after bariatric surgery are currently reported between 3 and 63% depending on the type of bariatric operation and the length of follow-up provided by the bariatric surgery team. It is currently unknown if patient attrition from bariatric surgery programs impact clinical outcomes. The availability of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) and the Mayo Clinic Midwest unified electronic medical record (EMR) provide a unique opportunity to explore this topic.

Methods

Raw data was downloaded from MBSAQIP database for all laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) cases between May 1, 2008 and January 8, 2015 (N = 1242). Baseline weight and preexisting comorbidities (type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia) were recorded using the MBSAQIP database and the EMR. Current weight and comorbidity data (type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia) were subsequently collected at the time closest to the patient’s surgical anniversary dates during the following assessment periods: years 1, 2, and 3 after surgery. Mean percentage total weight loss (TWL) was calculated at each time frame for each patient. Data was summarized using descriptive statistics, including counts and percentages for categorical variables by either year or year and location.

Results

The number of patients seen by the bariatric surgery practice (BSP) compared to those seen by other providers within our practice (attrition to bariatric surgery practice (ABSP)) was highest in year 1 and reduced each subsequent year (year 1: BSP N = 740, ABSP N = 166, year 2: BSP N = 425, ABSP N = 309, and year 3: BSP N = 235, ABSP N = 325). The mean TWL in the BSP and ABSP groups at year 1 was 31.84% versus 30.19%, at year 2 was 31.34% versus 29.67%, and at year 3 was 29.01% versus 27.71% respectively. Differences were statistically significant between groups at years 1 and 2 (p < 0.05). A statistically significant difference was not found in year 3 despite a trend towards higher TWL in the BSP group. Among all patients, statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001) were observed between baseline and years 1, 2, and 3 for type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia.

Conclusions

Our study confirms the problem of patient attrition to follow up at our BSP. It is also the first to suggest a difference in weight loss outcomes among patients seen in BSP compared to those seen by other providers (ABSP) at 1 and 2 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). The potential implications of this observation on long-term weight maintenance after LRYGB and the impact on metabolic comorbidities remain unknown but warrant further investigation. It also warrants the development of strategies to improve patient retention in BSP and/or engagement of medical providers to achieve that end.
Literatur
1.
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Compher C, Hanlon A, Kang Y, et al. Attendance at clinical visits predicts weight loss after gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2012;22:927–34.CrossRefPubMed Compher C, Hanlon A, Kang Y, et al. Attendance at clinical visits predicts weight loss after gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2012;22:927–34.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat DeNino W, Osler T, Evans E, et al. Travel distance as factor in follow-up visit compliance in post-laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding population. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:597–600.CrossRefPubMed DeNino W, Osler T, Evans E, et al. Travel distance as factor in follow-up visit compliance in post-laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding population. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6:597–600.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gould J, Beverstein G, Reinhardt S, et al. Impact of routine and long-term follow-up on weight loss after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:627–30.CrossRefPubMed Gould J, Beverstein G, Reinhardt S, et al. Impact of routine and long-term follow-up on weight loss after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:627–30.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lara M, Baker M, Larson C, et al. Travel distance, age, and sex as factors in follow-up visit compliance in the post-gastric bypass population. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1:17–21.CrossRefPubMed Lara M, Baker M, Larson C, et al. Travel distance, age, and sex as factors in follow-up visit compliance in the post-gastric bypass population. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1:17–21.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat McVay M, Friedman K, Applegate K, et al. Patient predictors of follow-up care attendance in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:956–62.CrossRefPubMed McVay M, Friedman K, Applegate K, et al. Patient predictors of follow-up care attendance in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:956–62.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller B, Murphy K, O'Brien P, et al. Development of a measure of barriers to laproscopic adjustment gastric banding (LAGB) aftercare attendance. Obes Surg. 2016;26:776–84.CrossRefPubMed Miller B, Murphy K, O'Brien P, et al. Development of a measure of barriers to laproscopic adjustment gastric banding (LAGB) aftercare attendance. Obes Surg. 2016;26:776–84.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Moroshko I, Brennan L, O-Brien P. Predictors of attrition in bariatric aftercare: a systemic review of the literature. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1640–7.CrossRefPubMed Moroshko I, Brennan L, O-Brien P. Predictors of attrition in bariatric aftercare: a systemic review of the literature. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1640–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pontiroli A, Fossati A, Vedani P, et al. Post-surgery adherence to scheduled visits and compliance, more than personality disorders, predict outcomes of bariatric restrictive surgery in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1492–7.CrossRefPubMed Pontiroli A, Fossati A, Vedani P, et al. Post-surgery adherence to scheduled visits and compliance, more than personality disorders, predict outcomes of bariatric restrictive surgery in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1492–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Schauer P, Bhatt D, Kirwan J, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes – 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):641–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schauer P, Bhatt D, Kirwan J, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes – 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):641–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sivagnanam P, Rhodes M. The importance of follow-up and distance from Centre in weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surgery Endoscopic. 2010;24:2432–8.CrossRef Sivagnanam P, Rhodes M. The importance of follow-up and distance from Centre in weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surgery Endoscopic. 2010;24:2432–8.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vidal P, Ramon J, Goday A, et al. Lack of adherence to follow-up visits after bariatric surgery: reasons and outcome. Obes Surg. 2014;24:179–83.CrossRefPubMed Vidal P, Ramon J, Goday A, et al. Lack of adherence to follow-up visits after bariatric surgery: reasons and outcome. Obes Surg. 2014;24:179–83.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wheeler E, Prettyman A, Lenhard M, et al. Adherence to outpatient program postoperative appointments after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:515–20.CrossRefPubMed Wheeler E, Prettyman A, Lenhard M, et al. Adherence to outpatient program postoperative appointments after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:515–20.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Impact of Patient Attrition from Bariatric Surgery Practice on Clinical Outcomes
verfasst von
Julia A. Jurgensen
Wendy Reidt
Todd Kellogg
Manpreet Mundi
Meera Shah
Maria L. Collazo Clavell
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3565-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Obesity Surgery 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.