Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 4/2008

01.07.2008 | Original Article

Impact of stapled haemorrhoidopexy on stool continence and anorectal function—long-term follow-up of 242 patients

verfasst von: Stefan Riss, Philipp Riss, Michael Schuster, Thomas Riss

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and aims

Several studies have proved the feasibility and safety of stapled anopexy for treating haemorrhoidal prolapse. However, stool urgency and faecal incontinence as possible side effects are still debated. Therefore, the present study was designed to assess the impact of Longo’s procedure on stool continence and anorectal function.

Materials and methods

From 1999 to 2005, 300 patients underwent stapled haemorrhoidopexy for symptomatic haemorrhoidal prolapse. Two hundred forty-two patients (100 women, 142 men) were available for follow-up and were retrospectively reviewed. All operations were performed by one single surgeon. To evaluate anorectal function, the results of a validated incontinence score (total incontinence score [IS]: 0 = best, 20 = worst) and evacuation score (total evacuation score [ES]: 0 = worst, 28 = best) were compared pre- and postoperatively.

Results

The total IS showed no difference in means before and after operation (p = 0.875, CI 95%) retrospectively. Concerning the ES, paired sample t-test showed a weak positive correlation, indicating a significant difference in score means (p = 0.041, CI 95%). The group means changed from 26.24 before operation to 26.60 after the follow-up period.

Conclusion

The present data revealed no significant negative impact of Longo’s technique on anorectal function. In contrast, according to the evacuation score, the results showed a significant improvement of evacuation.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Longo A (1998) Treatment of haemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolaps with circular suturing device: a new procedure. World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Rome, Italy Longo A (1998) Treatment of haemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolaps with circular suturing device: a new procedure. World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Rome, Italy
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hetzer FH, Demartines N, Handschin AE, Clavien PA (2002) Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 137(3):337–340PubMedCrossRef Hetzer FH, Demartines N, Handschin AE, Clavien PA (2002) Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 137(3):337–340PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I (2003) Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 46(1):93–99PubMedCrossRef Kairaluoma M, Nuorva K, Kellokumpu I (2003) Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 46(1):93–99PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE (2000) Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355(9206):782–785PubMedCrossRef Mehigan BJ, Monson JR, Hartley JE (2000) Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355(9206):782–785PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM (2000) Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355(9206):779–781PubMedCrossRef Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM (2000) Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355(9206):779–781PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H, Fleshman J, Corman M, Wexner S et al (2004) A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 47(11):1824–1836PubMedCrossRef Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H, Fleshman J, Corman M, Wexner S et al (2004) A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 47(11):1824–1836PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom PO, Kamm MA, Phillips RK (2000) Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 356(9231):730–733PubMedCrossRef Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJ, Nystrom PO, Kamm MA, Phillips RK (2000) Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 356(9231):730–733PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tsang C, Eu KW (2001) Randomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88(11):1449–1455PubMedCrossRef Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tsang C, Eu KW (2001) Randomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88(11):1449–1455PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, Hartley JE, White TJ, Monson JR (2003) Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 361(9367):1437–1438PubMedCrossRef Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, Hartley JE, White TJ, Monson JR (2003) Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 361(9367):1437–1438PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat da Silva GM, Kaiser R, Borjesson L, Colqhoun P, Lobo C, Khandwala F et al (2004) The effect of diverticular disease on the colonic J pouch. Colorectal Dis 6(3):171–175PubMedCrossRef da Silva GM, Kaiser R, Borjesson L, Colqhoun P, Lobo C, Khandwala F et al (2004) The effect of diverticular disease on the colonic J pouch. Colorectal Dis 6(3):171–175PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44(1):77–80PubMedCrossRef Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44(1):77–80PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fueglistaler P, Guenin MO, Montali I, Kern B, Peterli R, von Flue M et al (2007) Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: high patient satisfaction despite frequent postoperative symptoms. Dis Colon Rectum 50(2):204–212PubMedCrossRef Fueglistaler P, Guenin MO, Montali I, Kern B, Peterli R, von Flue M et al (2007) Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: high patient satisfaction despite frequent postoperative symptoms. Dis Colon Rectum 50(2):204–212PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH (2004) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 47(11):1837–1845PubMedCrossRef Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH (2004) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 47(11):1837–1845PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P, De Miguel M (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 48(4):809–815PubMedCrossRef Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P, De Miguel M (2005) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 48(4):809–815PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, Lanteri R, Di Cataldo A, Licata A (2004) Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 19(3):239–244PubMedCrossRef Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, Lanteri R, Di Cataldo A, Licata A (2004) Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 19(3):239–244PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Sallustio PL, Martino P, De Fazio M, Memeo V (2001) Long-term effects of stapled haemorrhoidectomy on internal anal function and sensitivity. Br J Surg 88(11):1487–1491PubMedCrossRef Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Sallustio PL, Martino P, De Fazio M, Memeo V (2001) Long-term effects of stapled haemorrhoidectomy on internal anal function and sensitivity. Br J Surg 88(11):1487–1491PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S (2001) Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88(5):669–674PubMedCrossRef Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, Milito G, Canuti S (2001) Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88(5):669–674PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M, Cioffi U, De Simone M, Salamina G et al (2001) Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse. Am J Surg 182(1):64–68PubMedCrossRef Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M, Cioffi U, De Simone M, Salamina G et al (2001) Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse. Am J Surg 182(1):64–68PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C, Ho J, Eu KW, Tang CL et al (2000) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy—cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 43(12):1666–1675PubMedCrossRef Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C, Ho J, Eu KW, Tang CL et al (2000) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy—cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 43(12):1666–1675PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson MS, Pope V, Doran HE, Fearn SJ, Brough WA (2002) Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 45(11):1437–1444PubMedCrossRef Wilson MS, Pope V, Doran HE, Fearn SJ, Brough WA (2002) Objective comparison of stapled anopexy and open hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 45(11):1437–1444PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Johannsson HO, Graf W, Pahlman L (2002) Long-term results of haemorrhoidectomy. Eur J Surg 168(8–9):485–489PubMed Johannsson HO, Graf W, Pahlman L (2002) Long-term results of haemorrhoidectomy. Eur J Surg 168(8–9):485–489PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen HH (1977) [New aspects of the pathogenesis and treatment of haemorrhoids (author’s transl)]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 102(35):1244–1248PubMedCrossRef Hansen HH (1977) [New aspects of the pathogenesis and treatment of haemorrhoids (author’s transl)]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 102(35):1244–1248PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hyams L, Philpot J (1970) An epidemiological investigation of hemorrhoids. Am J Proctol 21(3):177–193PubMed Hyams L, Philpot J (1970) An epidemiological investigation of hemorrhoids. Am J Proctol 21(3):177–193PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A (1994) Constipation is not a risk factor for hemorrhoids: a case–control study of potential etiological agents. Am J Gastroenterol 89(11):1981–1986PubMed Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A (1994) Constipation is not a risk factor for hemorrhoids: a case–control study of potential etiological agents. Am J Gastroenterol 89(11):1981–1986PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Impact of stapled haemorrhoidopexy on stool continence and anorectal function—long-term follow-up of 242 patients
verfasst von
Stefan Riss
Philipp Riss
Michael Schuster
Thomas Riss
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2008
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-007-0257-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2008

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 4/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.