Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 11/2016

04.03.2016 | Physics

Impact of the scout view orientation on the radiation exposure and image quality in thoracic and abdominal CT

verfasst von: S. Suntharalingam, A. Wetter, N. Guberina, J. Theysohn, A. Ringelstein, T. Schlosser, M. Forsting, K. Nassenstein

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 11/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the impact of the scout view orientation on radiation exposure and image quality in thoracoabdominal CT, when automated tube voltage selection (ATVS) and automated tube current modulation (ATCM) are used in combination with scan planning on a single scout view.

Methods

Fifty patients underwent two thoracoabdominal CT examinations, one planned on an anteroposterior scout view, one planned on a lateral scout view. Both examinations included contrast-enhanced imaging of chest (CH) and abdomen (AB) and non-contrast-enhanced imaging of the liver (LI). For all examinations the same imaging protocol was used on the same dual-source CT scanner. The radiation exposure was recorded and objective as well as visual image quality was assessed for all examinations.

Results

The median dose-length product was significantly lower in scans planned on a lateral scout view (CH: 179 vs. 218 mGy*cm, LI: 148 vs. 178 mGy*cm, AB: 324 vs. 370 mGy*cm, p < 0.0001). Objective image quality was marginal lower in scans planned on a lateral scout view, whereas the visual image quality was rated as equal.

Conclusion

At the tested radiation doses, the orientation of the scout view has a significant impact on the radiation exposure but no clinically relevant impact on the image quality.

Key Points

The scout view orientation has a significant impact on the radiation exposure.
The scout view orientation has no clinically relevant impact on image quality.
A lateral scout view should be preferred with regard to radiation exposure.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284CrossRefPubMed Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, Gilley DB, Gray JE, Ibbott GS, Lipoti JA, Mahesh M, McCrohan JL, Stabin MG, Thomadsen BR, Yoshizumi TT (2009) Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources--1950-2007. Radiology 253:520–531CrossRefPubMed Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, Gilley DB, Gray JE, Ibbott GS, Lipoti JA, Mahesh M, McCrohan JL, Stabin MG, Thomadsen BR, Yoshizumi TT (2009) Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources--1950-2007. Radiology 253:520–531CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat (2009) NRCP National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Report 160 - Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. NRCP (2009) NRCP National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Report 160 - Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. NRCP
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Raman SP, Johnson PT, Deshmukh S, Mahesh M, Grant KL, Fishman EK (2013) CT dose reduction applications: available tools on the latest generation of CT scanners. J Am Coll Radiol JACR 10:37–41CrossRefPubMed Raman SP, Johnson PT, Deshmukh S, Mahesh M, Grant KL, Fishman EK (2013) CT dose reduction applications: available tools on the latest generation of CT scanners. J Am Coll Radiol JACR 10:37–41CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tzedakis A, Damilakis J, Perisinakis K, Stratakis J, Gourtsoyiannis N (2005) The effect of z overscanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations. Med Phys 32:1621–1629CrossRefPubMed Tzedakis A, Damilakis J, Perisinakis K, Stratakis J, Gourtsoyiannis N (2005) The effect of z overscanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations. Med Phys 32:1621–1629CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Christner JA, Zavaletta VA, Eusemann CD, Walz-Flannigan AI, McCollough CH (2010) Dose reduction in helical CT: dynamically adjustable z-axis X-ray beam collimation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:W49–W55CrossRefPubMed Christner JA, Zavaletta VA, Eusemann CD, Walz-Flannigan AI, McCollough CH (2010) Dose reduction in helical CT: dynamically adjustable z-axis X-ray beam collimation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:W49–W55CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kordolaimi SD, Argentos S, Pantos I, Kelekis NL, Efstathopoulos EP (2013) A new era in computed tomographic dose optimization: the impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose. J Comput Assist Tomogr 37:924–931CrossRefPubMed Kordolaimi SD, Argentos S, Pantos I, Kelekis NL, Efstathopoulos EP (2013) A new era in computed tomographic dose optimization: the impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose. J Comput Assist Tomogr 37:924–931CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Winklehner A, Karlo C, Puippe G et al (2011) Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential. Eur Radiol 21:2521–2526CrossRefPubMed Winklehner A, Karlo C, Puippe G et al (2011) Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential. Eur Radiol 21:2521–2526CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee EJ, Lee SK, Agid R, Howard P, Bae JM, terBrugge K (2009) Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between fixed tube current and combined automatic tube current modulation in craniocervical CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:1754–1759CrossRefPubMed Lee EJ, Lee SK, Agid R, Howard P, Bae JM, terBrugge K (2009) Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between fixed tube current and combined automatic tube current modulation in craniocervical CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:1754–1759CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee S, Yoon SW, Yoo SM et al (2011) Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between combined automatic tube current modulation and fixed tube current technique in CT of abdomen and pelvis. Acta Radiol 52:1101–1106CrossRefPubMed Lee S, Yoon SW, Yoo SM et al (2011) Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between combined automatic tube current modulation and fixed tube current technique in CT of abdomen and pelvis. Acta Radiol 52:1101–1106CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Krazinski AW, Meinel FG, Schoepf UJ et al (2014) Reduced radiation dose and improved image quality at cardiovascular CT angiography by automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection: intra-individual comparison. Eur Radiol 24:2677–2684CrossRefPubMed Krazinski AW, Meinel FG, Schoepf UJ et al (2014) Reduced radiation dose and improved image quality at cardiovascular CT angiography by automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection: intra-individual comparison. Eur Radiol 24:2677–2684CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Frellesen C, Stock W, Kerl JM et al (2014) Topogram-based automated selection of the tube potential and current in thoraco-abdominal trauma CT - a comparison to fixed kV with mAs modulation alone. Eur Radiol 24:1725–1734CrossRefPubMed Frellesen C, Stock W, Kerl JM et al (2014) Topogram-based automated selection of the tube potential and current in thoraco-abdominal trauma CT - a comparison to fixed kV with mAs modulation alone. Eur Radiol 24:1725–1734CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Habibzadeh MA, Ay MR, Asl AR, Ghadiri H, Zaidi H (2012) Impact of miscentering on patient dose and image noise in x-ray CT imaging: phantom and clinical studies. Phys Med 28:191–199CrossRefPubMed Habibzadeh MA, Ay MR, Asl AR, Ghadiri H, Zaidi H (2012) Impact of miscentering on patient dose and image noise in x-ray CT imaging: phantom and clinical studies. Phys Med 28:191–199CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayo-Smith WW, Hara AK, Mahesh M, Sahani DV, Pavlicek W (2014) How I do it: managing radiation dose in CT. Radiology 273:657–672CrossRefPubMed Mayo-Smith WW, Hara AK, Mahesh M, Sahani DV, Pavlicek W (2014) How I do it: managing radiation dose in CT. Radiology 273:657–672CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Papadakis AE, Perisinakis K, Damilakis J (2008) Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult multidetector CT examinations: a phantom study on dose reduction and image quality. Med Phys 35:4567–4576CrossRefPubMed Papadakis AE, Perisinakis K, Damilakis J (2008) Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult multidetector CT examinations: a phantom study on dose reduction and image quality. Med Phys 35:4567–4576CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lambert JW, Kumar S, Chen JS, Wang ZJ, Gould RG, Yeh BM (2015) Investigating the CT localizer radiograph: acquisition parameters, patient centring and their combined influence on radiation dose. Br J Radiol 88:20140730CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lambert JW, Kumar S, Chen JS, Wang ZJ, Gould RG, Yeh BM (2015) Investigating the CT localizer radiograph: acquisition parameters, patient centring and their combined influence on radiation dose. Br J Radiol 88:20140730CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Tirkes T, Hollar MA, Tann M, Kohli MD, Akisik F, Sandrasegaran K (2013) Response criteria in oncologic imaging: review of traditional and new criteria. Radiographics Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc 33:1323–1341 Tirkes T, Hollar MA, Tann M, Kohli MD, Akisik F, Sandrasegaran K (2013) Response criteria in oncologic imaging: review of traditional and new criteria. Radiographics Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc 33:1323–1341
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Winklehner A, Gordic S, Lauk E et al (2015) Automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection for body CTA: Performance evaluation of 192-slice dual-source CT. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3632-4 PubMed Winklehner A, Gordic S, Lauk E et al (2015) Automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection for body CTA: Performance evaluation of 192-slice dual-source CT. Eur Radiol. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-015-3632-4 PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lurz M, Lell MM, Wuest W et al (2015) Automated tube voltage selection in thoracoabdominal computed tomography at high pitch using a third-generation dual-source scanner: image quality and radiation dose performance. Investig Radiol 50:352–360CrossRef Lurz M, Lell MM, Wuest W et al (2015) Automated tube voltage selection in thoracoabdominal computed tomography at high pitch using a third-generation dual-source scanner: image quality and radiation dose performance. Investig Radiol 50:352–360CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh S, Petrovic D, Jamnik E et al (2014) Effect of localizer radiograph on radiation dose associated with automatic exposure control: human cadaver and patient study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 38:293–298CrossRefPubMed Singh S, Petrovic D, Jamnik E et al (2014) Effect of localizer radiograph on radiation dose associated with automatic exposure control: human cadaver and patient study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 38:293–298CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaasalainen T, Palmu K, Reijonen V, Kortesniemi M (2014) Effect of patient centering on patient dose and image noise in chest CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:123–130CrossRefPubMed Kaasalainen T, Palmu K, Reijonen V, Kortesniemi M (2014) Effect of patient centering on patient dose and image noise in chest CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:123–130CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Moro L, Panizza D, D'Ambrosio D, Carne I (2013) Considerations on an automatic computed tomography tube current modulation system. Radiat Prot Dosim 156:525–530CrossRef Moro L, Panizza D, D'Ambrosio D, Carne I (2013) Considerations on an automatic computed tomography tube current modulation system. Radiat Prot Dosim 156:525–530CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Impact of the scout view orientation on the radiation exposure and image quality in thoracic and abdominal CT
verfasst von
S. Suntharalingam
A. Wetter
N. Guberina
J. Theysohn
A. Ringelstein
T. Schlosser
M. Forsting
K. Nassenstein
Publikationsdatum
04.03.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4285-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2016

European Radiology 11/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.