Skip to main content
main-content
Erschienen in: wissen kompakt 2/2022

28.04.2022 | Implantologie | CME Zahnärztliche Fortbildung

Implantatoberflächen und klinische Performance: wo ist die Evidenz?

verfasst von: M.Sc. Dr. P. Donkiewicz, P. W. Kämmerer

Erschienen in: wissen kompakt | Ausgabe 2/2022

zum CME-Kurs Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Die Verlustrate von Zahnimplantaten liegt bei 1 bis 2 % in der initialen Einheilungsphase, während etwa 5 % nach erfolgreicher Osseointegration, zumeist aufgrund einer Periimplantitis über einen Zeitraum von 10 Jahren, verloren gehen. Implantathersteller haben verschiedene Oberflächen entwickelt, deren Eigenschaften die Erfolgs- und Überlebensraten begünstigen sollen. Mittels makrotopographischer Parameter (Breite, Länge, Gewinde) lässt sich die Primärstabilität regulieren, was gerade bei unvorteilhaften Knochenverhältnissen sinnvoll sein kann, während Mikro- und Nanotopographie sich auf die Sekundärstabilität und Osseointegration auswirken. Hierbei zeigt die gegenwärtige Evidenz einen Vorteil für physikalisch und/oder chemisch prozessierte gegenüber rein mechanisch behandelten Implantaten auf. Jedoch lässt sich aufgrund fehlender Langzeitdaten und Vergleichsstudien sowie vergleichbarer Überlebensraten kein Rückschluss auf die klinische Effektivität einzelner Modifikationen ziehen.
Zugang erhalten Sie mit:
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat ZM Online, DGI. In Deutschland werden jährlich 1,3 Millionen Implantate gesetzt – ZWP online – das Nachrichtenportal für die Dentalbranche ( zwp-online.​info) ZM Online, DGI. In Deutschland werden jährlich 1,3 Millionen Implantate gesetzt – ZWP online – das Nachrichtenportal für die Dentalbranche ( zwp-online.​info)
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A (2014) Reasons for failures of oral implants. J Oral Rehabil 41(6):443–476 PubMedCrossRef Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A (2014) Reasons for failures of oral implants. J Oral Rehabil 41(6):443–476 PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Smeets R, Henningsen A, Jung O, Heiland M, Hammächer C, Stein JM (2014) Definition, etiology, prevention and treatment of peri-implantitis—a review. Head Face Med 10(1):1–13 CrossRef Smeets R, Henningsen A, Jung O, Heiland M, Hammächer C, Stein JM (2014) Definition, etiology, prevention and treatment of peri-implantitis—a review. Head Face Med 10(1):1–13 CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Branemark PI (1983) Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 50:399–410 PubMedCrossRef Branemark PI (1983) Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 50:399–410 PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M, Corsi E, Anello T (2012) Titanium–zirconium alloy narrow-diameter implants (S traumann R oxolid®) for the rehabilitation of horizontally deficient edentulous ridges: prospective study on 18 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Impl Res 23(10):1136–1141 CrossRef Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M, Corsi E, Anello T (2012) Titanium–zirconium alloy narrow-diameter implants (S traumann R oxolid®) for the rehabilitation of horizontally deficient edentulous ridges: prospective study on 18 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Impl Res 23(10):1136–1141 CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A (2019) On osseointegration in relation to implant surfaces. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 21:4–7 PubMedCrossRef Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A (2019) On osseointegration in relation to implant surfaces. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 21:4–7 PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Trisi P, Rebaudi A (2002) Progressive bone adaptation of titanium implants during and after orthodontic load in humans. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 22(1):31–43 Trisi P, Rebaudi A (2002) Progressive bone adaptation of titanium implants during and after orthodontic load in humans. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 22(1):31–43
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenstein G, Cavallaro J (2017) Implant insertion torque: its role in achieving primary stability of restorable dental implants. Compend Continuing Educ Dent 38(2):88–95 Greenstein G, Cavallaro J (2017) Implant insertion torque: its role in achieving primary stability of restorable dental implants. Compend Continuing Educ Dent 38(2):88–95
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Johansson C, Albrektsson T (1987) Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: a 1‑yr follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 2(2):74–88 Johansson C, Albrektsson T (1987) Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: a 1‑yr follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 2(2):74–88
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rozé J, Babu S, Saffarzadeh A, Gayet-Delacroix M, Hoornaert A, Layrolle P (2009) Correlating implant stability to bone structure. Clin Oral Impl Res 20(10):1140–1145 CrossRef Rozé J, Babu S, Saffarzadeh A, Gayet-Delacroix M, Hoornaert A, Layrolle P (2009) Correlating implant stability to bone structure. Clin Oral Impl Res 20(10):1140–1145 CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Raghavendra S, Wood MC, Taylor TD (2005) Early wound healing around endosseous implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 20(3):425–431 Raghavendra S, Wood MC, Taylor TD (2005) Early wound healing around endosseous implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 20(3):425–431
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang PC, Lang NP, Giannobile WV (2010) Evaluation of functional dynamics during osseointegration and regeneration associated with oral implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 21(1):1–12 CrossRef Chang PC, Lang NP, Giannobile WV (2010) Evaluation of functional dynamics during osseointegration and regeneration associated with oral implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 21(1):1–12 CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jordana F, Susbielles L, Colat-Parros J (2018) Periimplantitis and implant body roughness: a systematic review of literature. Implant Dent 27(6):672–681 PubMedCrossRef Jordana F, Susbielles L, Colat-Parros J (2018) Periimplantitis and implant body roughness: a systematic review of literature. Implant Dent 27(6):672–681 PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pandey A, Awasthi A, Saxena KK (2020) Metallic implants with properties and latest production techniques: a review. Adv Mater Process Technol 6(2):405–440 Pandey A, Awasthi A, Saxena KK (2020) Metallic implants with properties and latest production techniques: a review. Adv Mater Process Technol 6(2):405–440
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Osman RB, Swain MV (2015) A critical review of dental implant materials with an emphasis on titanium versus zirconia. materials 8(3):932–958 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Osman RB, Swain MV (2015) A critical review of dental implant materials with an emphasis on titanium versus zirconia. materials 8(3):932–958 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL (2005) Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 20(4):569–577 Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL (2005) Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 20(4):569–577
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Grossmann Y, Levin L (2007) Success and survival of single dental implants placed in sites of previously failed implants. J Periodontol 78(9):1670–1674 PubMedCrossRef Grossmann Y, Levin L (2007) Success and survival of single dental implants placed in sites of previously failed implants. J Periodontol 78(9):1670–1674 PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Agari K, Le B (2020) Successive reimplantation of dental implants into sites of previous failure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 78(3):375–385 PubMedCrossRef Agari K, Le B (2020) Successive reimplantation of dental implants into sites of previous failure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 78(3):375–385 PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Vollmer A, Saravi B, Lang G, Adolphs N, Hazard D, Giers V, Stoll P (2020) Factors influencing primary and secondary implant stability—a retrospective cohort study with 582 implants in 272 patients. Appl Sci 10(22):8084 CrossRef Vollmer A, Saravi B, Lang G, Adolphs N, Hazard D, Giers V, Stoll P (2020) Factors influencing primary and secondary implant stability—a retrospective cohort study with 582 implants in 272 patients. Appl Sci 10(22):8084 CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Romanos GE, Ciornei G, Jucan A, Malmstrom H, Gupta B (2014) In vitro assessment of primary stability of Straumann® implant designs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 16(1):89–95 PubMedCrossRef Romanos GE, Ciornei G, Jucan A, Malmstrom H, Gupta B (2014) In vitro assessment of primary stability of Straumann® implant designs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 16(1):89–95 PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sennerby L, Pagliani L, Petersson A, Verrocchi D, Volpe S, Andersson P (2015) Two different implant designs and impact of related drilling protocols on primary stability in different bone densities: an in vitro comparison study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 30(3):564–568 CrossRef Sennerby L, Pagliani L, Petersson A, Verrocchi D, Volpe S, Andersson P (2015) Two different implant designs and impact of related drilling protocols on primary stability in different bone densities: an in vitro comparison study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 30(3):564–568 CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Atieh MA, Alsabeeha N, Duncan WJ (2018) Stability of tapered and parallel-walled dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 20(4):634–645 PubMedCrossRef Atieh MA, Alsabeeha N, Duncan WJ (2018) Stability of tapered and parallel-walled dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 20(4):634–645 PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Jokstad A, Ganeles J (2018) Systematic review of clinical and patient-reported outcomes following oral rehabilitation on dental implants with a tapered compared to a non-tapered implant design. Clin Oral Impl Res 29:41–54 CrossRef Jokstad A, Ganeles J (2018) Systematic review of clinical and patient-reported outcomes following oral rehabilitation on dental implants with a tapered compared to a non-tapered implant design. Clin Oral Impl Res 29:41–54 CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Alshehri M, Alshehri F (2016) Influence of implant shape (tapered vs cylindrical) on the survival of dental implants placed in the posterior maxilla: a systematic review. Implant Dent 25(6):855–860 PubMedCrossRef Alshehri M, Alshehri F (2016) Influence of implant shape (tapered vs cylindrical) on the survival of dental implants placed in the posterior maxilla: a systematic review. Implant Dent 25(6):855–860 PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Waechter J, Madruga MDM, Carmo Filho LCD, Leite FRM, Schinestsck AR, Faot F (2017) Comparison between tapered and cylindrical implants in the posterior regions of the mandible: A prospective, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial focusing on implant stability changes during early healing. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 19(4):733–741 PubMedCrossRef Waechter J, Madruga MDM, Carmo Filho LCD, Leite FRM, Schinestsck AR, Faot F (2017) Comparison between tapered and cylindrical implants in the posterior regions of the mandible: A prospective, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial focusing on implant stability changes during early healing. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 19(4):733–741 PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Barikani H, Rashtak S, Akbari S, Badri S, Daneshparvar N, Rokn A (2013) The effect of implant length and diameter on the primary stability in different bone types. J Dent 10(5):449 Barikani H, Rashtak S, Akbari S, Badri S, Daneshparvar N, Rokn A (2013) The effect of implant length and diameter on the primary stability in different bone types. J Dent 10(5):449
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Winkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S (2000) Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann Periodontol 5(1):22–31 PubMedCrossRef Winkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S (2000) Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann Periodontol 5(1):22–31 PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Himmlova L, Kácovský A, Konvic̆ková S (2004) Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 91(1):20–25 PubMedCrossRef Himmlova L, Kácovský A, Konvic̆ková S (2004) Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 91(1):20–25 PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Palacios JA, Garcia JJ, Caramês JM, Quirynen M, da Silva MDN (2018) Short implants versus bone grafting and standard-length implants placement: a systematic review. Clin Oral Invest 22(1):69–80 CrossRef Palacios JA, Garcia JJ, Caramês JM, Quirynen M, da Silva MDN (2018) Short implants versus bone grafting and standard-length implants placement: a systematic review. Clin Oral Invest 22(1):69–80 CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Dias FDN, Pecorari VGA, Martins CB, Del Fabbro M, Casati MZ (2019) Short implants versus bone augmentation in combination with standard-length implants in posterior atrophic partially edentulous mandibles: systematic review and meta-analysis with the Bayesian approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48(1):90–96 CrossRef Dias FDN, Pecorari VGA, Martins CB, Del Fabbro M, Casati MZ (2019) Short implants versus bone augmentation in combination with standard-length implants in posterior atrophic partially edentulous mandibles: systematic review and meta-analysis with the Bayesian approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48(1):90–96 CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Cruz RS, Lemos CAA, de Batista VES, Yogui FC, Oliveira HFF, Verri FR (2021) Narrow-diameter implants versus regular-diameter implants for rehabilitation of the anterior region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50(5):674–682 PubMedCrossRef Cruz RS, Lemos CAA, de Batista VES, Yogui FC, Oliveira HFF, Verri FR (2021) Narrow-diameter implants versus regular-diameter implants for rehabilitation of the anterior region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50(5):674–682 PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiegnitz E, Al-Nawas B (2018) Narrow-diameter implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res 29:21–40 CrossRef Schiegnitz E, Al-Nawas B (2018) Narrow-diameter implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res 29:21–40 CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Oswal MM, Amasi UN, Oswal MS, Bhagat AS (2016) Influence of three different implant thread designs on stress distribution: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 16(4):359 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Oswal MM, Amasi UN, Oswal MS, Bhagat AS (2016) Influence of three different implant thread designs on stress distribution: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 16(4):359 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Orsini E, Giavaresi G, Trirè A, Ottani V, Salgarello S (2012) Dental implant thread pitch and its influence on the osseointegration process: an in vivo comparison study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 27(2):383–392 Orsini E, Giavaresi G, Trirè A, Ottani V, Salgarello S (2012) Dental implant thread pitch and its influence on the osseointegration process: an in vivo comparison study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 27(2):383–392
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Abuhussein H, Pagni G, Rebaudi A, Wang HL (2010) The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Impl Res 21(2):129–136 CrossRef Abuhussein H, Pagni G, Rebaudi A, Wang HL (2010) The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Impl Res 21(2):129–136 CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat McCullough JJ, Klokkevold PR (2017) The effect of implant macro-thread design on implant stability in the early post-operative period: a randomized, controlled pilot study. Clin Oral Impl Res 28(10):1218–1226 CrossRef McCullough JJ, Klokkevold PR (2017) The effect of implant macro-thread design on implant stability in the early post-operative period: a randomized, controlled pilot study. Clin Oral Impl Res 28(10):1218–1226 CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Emmert M, Gülses A, Behrens E, Karayürek F, Acil Y, Wiltfang J, Spille JH (2021) An experimental study on the effects of the cortical thickness and bone density on initial mechanical anchorage of different Straumann® implant designs. Int J Implant Dent 7(1):1–8 CrossRef Emmert M, Gülses A, Behrens E, Karayürek F, Acil Y, Wiltfang J, Spille JH (2021) An experimental study on the effects of the cortical thickness and bone density on initial mechanical anchorage of different Straumann® implant designs. Int J Implant Dent 7(1):1–8 CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Ibrahim A, Heitzer M, Bock A, Peters F, Möhlhenrich SC, Hölzle F, Moddaber A, Kniha K (2020) Relationship between implant geometry and primary stability in different bony defects and variant bone densities: an in vitro study. materials 13(19):4349 PubMedCentralCrossRef Ibrahim A, Heitzer M, Bock A, Peters F, Möhlhenrich SC, Hölzle F, Moddaber A, Kniha K (2020) Relationship between implant geometry and primary stability in different bony defects and variant bone densities: an in vitro study. materials 13(19):4349 PubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Kong L, Hu K, Li D, Song Y, Yang J, Wu Z, Liu B (2008) Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 23(1):65–74 Kong L, Hu K, Li D, Song Y, Yang J, Wu Z, Liu B (2008) Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 23(1):65–74
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Amid R, Raoofi S, Kadkhodazadeh M, Movahhedi MR, Khademi M (2013) Effect of microthread design of dental implants on stress and strain patterns: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Biomed Tech Eng 58(5):457–467 Amid R, Raoofi S, Kadkhodazadeh M, Movahhedi MR, Khademi M (2013) Effect of microthread design of dental implants on stress and strain patterns: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Biomed Tech Eng 58(5):457–467
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Niu W, Wang P, Zhu S, Liu Z, Ji P (2017) Marginal bone loss around dental implants with and without microthreads in the neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 117(1):34–40 PubMedCrossRef Niu W, Wang P, Zhu S, Liu Z, Ji P (2017) Marginal bone loss around dental implants with and without microthreads in the neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 117(1):34–40 PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Thobity AM, Kutkut A, Almas K (2017) Microthreaded implants and crestal bone loss: a systematic review. J Oral Implantol 43(2):157–166 PubMedCrossRef Al-Thobity AM, Kutkut A, Almas K (2017) Microthreaded implants and crestal bone loss: a systematic review. J Oral Implantol 43(2):157–166 PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Eraslan O, İnan Ö (2010) The effect of thread design on stress distribution in a solid screw implant: a 3D finite element analysis. Clin Oral Invest 14(4):411–416 CrossRef Eraslan O, İnan Ö (2010) The effect of thread design on stress distribution in a solid screw implant: a 3D finite element analysis. Clin Oral Invest 14(4):411–416 CrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, Schraub DM, Simpson J, Lankford J Jr, Dean DD, Cochran DL, Boyan B (1995) Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 29(3):389–401 PubMedCrossRef Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, Schraub DM, Simpson J, Lankford J Jr, Dean DD, Cochran DL, Boyan B (1995) Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 29(3):389–401 PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Marinucci L, Balloni S, Becchetti E, Belcastro S, Guerra M, Calvitti M, Calvitti M, Lull C, Edoardo M, Locci P (2006) Effect of titanium surface roughness on human osteoblast proliferation and gene expression in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 21(5):719–725 Marinucci L, Balloni S, Becchetti E, Belcastro S, Guerra M, Calvitti M, Calvitti M, Lull C, Edoardo M, Locci P (2006) Effect of titanium surface roughness on human osteoblast proliferation and gene expression in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 21(5):719–725
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Kunrath MF, Piassarollo dos Santos R, Dias de Oliveira S de, Hubler R, Sesterheim P, Teixeira ER (2020) Osteoblastic cell behavior and early bacterial adhesion on macro-, micro-, and nanostructured titanium surfaces for biomedical implant applications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 35(4):773–781 CrossRef Kunrath MF, Piassarollo dos Santos R, Dias de Oliveira S de, Hubler R, Sesterheim P, Teixeira ER (2020) Osteoblastic cell behavior and early bacterial adhesion on macro-, micro-, and nanostructured titanium surfaces for biomedical implant applications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 35(4):773–781 CrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T (2010) On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 25(1):63–74 Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T (2010) On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 25(1):63–74
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Alla RK, Ginjupalli K, Upadhya N, Shammas M, Ravi RK, Sekhar R (2011) Surface roughness of implants: a review. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 25(3):112–118 Alla RK, Ginjupalli K, Upadhya N, Shammas M, Ravi RK, Sekhar R (2011) Surface roughness of implants: a review. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 25(3):112–118
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Abraham CM (2014) Suppl 1: a brief historical perspective on dental implants, their surface coatings and treatments. Dent J 8:50–55 Abraham CM (2014) Suppl 1: a brief historical perspective on dental implants, their surface coatings and treatments. Dent J 8:50–55
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Oates TW, Valderrama P, Bischof M, Nedir R, Jones A, Simpson J, Toutenburg H, Cochran DL (2007) Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 22(5):755 Oates TW, Valderrama P, Bischof M, Nedir R, Jones A, Simpson J, Toutenburg H, Cochran DL (2007) Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 22(5):755
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, Lang NP, Lindhe J (2004) Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 15(4):381–392 PubMedCrossRef Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, Lang NP, Lindhe J (2004) Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 15(4):381–392 PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, Hoffmann B, Lussi A, Steinemann SG (2004) Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 83(7):529–533 PubMedCrossRef Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, Hoffmann B, Lussi A, Steinemann SG (2004) Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 83(7):529–533 PubMedCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H (1991) Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 25(7):889–902 PubMedCrossRef Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H (1991) Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 25(7):889–902 PubMedCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Han A, Li X, Huang B, Tsoi JKH, Matinlinna JP, Chen Z, Deng DM (2016) The effect of titanium implant surface modification on the dynamic process of initial microbial adhesion and biofilm formation. Int J Adhesion Adhesiv 69:125–132 CrossRef Han A, Li X, Huang B, Tsoi JKH, Matinlinna JP, Chen Z, Deng DM (2016) The effect of titanium implant surface modification on the dynamic process of initial microbial adhesion and biofilm formation. Int J Adhesion Adhesiv 69:125–132 CrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Velzen FJ, Ofec R, Schulten EA, Ten Bruggenkate CM (2015) 10-year survival rate and the incidence of peri-implant disease of 374 titanium dental implants with a SLA surface: a prospective cohort study in 177 fully and partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Impl Res 26(10):1121–1128 CrossRef Van Velzen FJ, Ofec R, Schulten EA, Ten Bruggenkate CM (2015) 10-year survival rate and the incidence of peri-implant disease of 374 titanium dental implants with a SLA surface: a prospective cohort study in 177 fully and partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Impl Res 26(10):1121–1128 CrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim S, Jung UW, Cho KS, Lee JS (2018) Retrospective radiographic observational study of 1692 Straumann tissue-level dental implants over 10 years: I. Implant survival and loss pattern. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 20(5):860–866 PubMedCrossRef Kim S, Jung UW, Cho KS, Lee JS (2018) Retrospective radiographic observational study of 1692 Straumann tissue-level dental implants over 10 years: I. Implant survival and loss pattern. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 20(5):860–866 PubMedCrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Beschnidt SM, Cacaci C, Dedeoglu K, Hildebrand D, Hulla H, Iglhaut G, Ackermann KL (2018) Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5‑year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments. Int J Implant Dent 4(1):1–13 CrossRef Beschnidt SM, Cacaci C, Dedeoglu K, Hildebrand D, Hulla H, Iglhaut G, Ackermann KL (2018) Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5‑year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments. Int J Implant Dent 4(1):1–13 CrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Krennmair G, Seemann R, Schmidinger S, Ewers R, Piehslinger E (2010) Clinical outcome of root-shaped dental implants of various diameters: 5‑year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 25(2):367–366 Krennmair G, Seemann R, Schmidinger S, Ewers R, Piehslinger E (2010) Clinical outcome of root-shaped dental implants of various diameters: 5‑year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 25(2):367–366
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Wennerberg A, Galli S, Albrektsson T (2011) Current knowledge about the hydrophilic and nanostructured SLActive surface. Clin Cosmetic Investig Dent 3:59 CrossRef Wennerberg A, Galli S, Albrektsson T (2011) Current knowledge about the hydrophilic and nanostructured SLActive surface. Clin Cosmetic Investig Dent 3:59 CrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Wennerberg A, Svanborg LM, Berner S, Andersson M (2013) Spontaneously formed nanostructures on titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Impl Res 24(2):203–209 CrossRef Wennerberg A, Svanborg LM, Berner S, Andersson M (2013) Spontaneously formed nanostructures on titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Impl Res 24(2):203–209 CrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuan Y, Hays MP, Hardwidge PR, Kim J (2017) Surface characteristics influencing bacterial adhesion to polymeric substrates. RSC Adv 7(23):14254–14261 CrossRef Yuan Y, Hays MP, Hardwidge PR, Kim J (2017) Surface characteristics influencing bacterial adhesion to polymeric substrates. RSC Adv 7(23):14254–14261 CrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Hao CP, Cao NJ, Zhu YH, Wang W (2021) The osseointegration and stability of dental implants with different surface treatments in animal models: a network meta-analysis. Sci Rep 11(1):1–12 CrossRef Hao CP, Cao NJ, Zhu YH, Wang W (2021) The osseointegration and stability of dental implants with different surface treatments in animal models: a network meta-analysis. Sci Rep 11(1):1–12 CrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Alayan J, Vaquette C, Saifzadeh S, Hutmacher D, Ivanovski S (2017) Comparison of early osseointegration of SLA® and SLActive® implants in maxillary sinus augmentation: a pilot study. Clin Oral Impl Res 28(11):1325–1333 CrossRef Alayan J, Vaquette C, Saifzadeh S, Hutmacher D, Ivanovski S (2017) Comparison of early osseointegration of SLA® and SLActive® implants in maxillary sinus augmentation: a pilot study. Clin Oral Impl Res 28(11):1325–1333 CrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Lang NP, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, Ivanovski S, Donos N, Bosshardt DD (2011) Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans. Clin Oral Impl Res 22(4):349–356 CrossRef Lang NP, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, Ivanovski S, Donos N, Bosshardt DD (2011) Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans. Clin Oral Impl Res 22(4):349–356 CrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Heberer S, Kilic S, Hossamo J, Raguse JD, Nelson K (2011) Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study. Clin Oral Impl Res 22(5):546–551 CrossRef Heberer S, Kilic S, Hossamo J, Raguse JD, Nelson K (2011) Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study. Clin Oral Impl Res 22(5):546–551 CrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Degidi M, Nardi D, Piatelli A (2013) Prospektive Fünf-Jahres-Verlaufsstudie definitiver Sofortversorgungen zahnloser Patienten mittels eines intraoral verschweißten Titan-Gerüsts Degidi M, Nardi D, Piatelli A (2013) Prospektive Fünf-Jahres-Verlaufsstudie definitiver Sofortversorgungen zahnloser Patienten mittels eines intraoral verschweißten Titan-Gerüsts
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Cruz HV, Henriques M, Teughels W, Celis JP, Rocha LA (2015) Combined influence of fluoride and biofilms on the biotribocorrosion behavior of titanium used for dental applications. J Bio Tribo Corrosion 1(3):1–12 CrossRef Cruz HV, Henriques M, Teughels W, Celis JP, Rocha LA (2015) Combined influence of fluoride and biofilms on the biotribocorrosion behavior of titanium used for dental applications. J Bio Tribo Corrosion 1(3):1–12 CrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Masaki C, Schneider GB, Zaharias R, Seabold D, Stanford C (2005) Effects of implant surface microtopography on osteoblast gene expression. Clin Oral Impl Res 16(6):650–656 CrossRef Masaki C, Schneider GB, Zaharias R, Seabold D, Stanford C (2005) Effects of implant surface microtopography on osteoblast gene expression. Clin Oral Impl Res 16(6):650–656 CrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Mertens C, Steveling HG (2011) Early and immediate loading of titanium implants with fluoride-modified surfaces: results of 5‑year prospective study. Clin Oral Impl Res 22(12):1354–1360 CrossRef Mertens C, Steveling HG (2011) Early and immediate loading of titanium implants with fluoride-modified surfaces: results of 5‑year prospective study. Clin Oral Impl Res 22(12):1354–1360 CrossRef
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper LF, Reside GJ, Raes F, Garriga JS, Tarrida LG, Wiltfang J, De Bruyn H (2014) Immediate provisionalization of dental implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets: a 5-year prospective evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 29(3):709–717 Cooper LF, Reside GJ, Raes F, Garriga JS, Tarrida LG, Wiltfang J, De Bruyn H (2014) Immediate provisionalization of dental implants placed in healed alveolar ridges and extraction sockets: a 5-year prospective evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 29(3):709–717
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Östman PO, Wennerberg A, Ekestubbe A, Albrektsson T (2013) Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite™ tapered implants: a prospective 1‑year clinical and radiographic study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 15(6):809–818 PubMedCrossRef Östman PO, Wennerberg A, Ekestubbe A, Albrektsson T (2013) Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite™ tapered implants: a prospective 1‑year clinical and radiographic study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 15(6):809–818 PubMedCrossRef
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Sul YT, Johansson CB, Röser K, Albrektsson T (2002) Qualitative and quantitative observations of bone tissue reactions to anodised implants. Biomaterials 23(8):1809–1817 PubMedCrossRef Sul YT, Johansson CB, Röser K, Albrektsson T (2002) Qualitative and quantitative observations of bone tissue reactions to anodised implants. Biomaterials 23(8):1809–1817 PubMedCrossRef
75.
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang YH, Xiropaidis AV, Sorensen RG, Albandar JM, Hall J, Wikesjö UM (2005) Bone formation at titanium porous oxide (TiUnite™) oral implants in type IV bone. Clin Oral Impl Res 16(1):105–111 CrossRef Huang YH, Xiropaidis AV, Sorensen RG, Albandar JM, Hall J, Wikesjö UM (2005) Bone formation at titanium porous oxide (TiUnite™) oral implants in type IV bone. Clin Oral Impl Res 16(1):105–111 CrossRef
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Rocci A, Rocci M, Rocci C, Scoccia A, Gargari M, Martignoni M, Gottlow M, Sennerby L (2013) Immediate loading of Brånemark system TiUnite and machined-surface implants in the posterior mandible, part II: a randomized open-ended 9‑year follow-up clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 28(3):891–895 CrossRef Rocci A, Rocci M, Rocci C, Scoccia A, Gargari M, Martignoni M, Gottlow M, Sennerby L (2013) Immediate loading of Brånemark system TiUnite and machined-surface implants in the posterior mandible, part II: a randomized open-ended 9‑year follow-up clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 28(3):891–895 CrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Friberg B, Jemt T (2010) Clinical experience of tiunite™ implants: a 5‑year cross-sectional, retrospective follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 12:e95–e103 PubMedCrossRef Friberg B, Jemt T (2010) Clinical experience of tiunite™ implants: a 5‑year cross-sectional, retrospective follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 12:e95–e103 PubMedCrossRef
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A (2012) 10-year follow-up of immediately loaded implants with TiUnite porous anodized surface. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14(6):828–838 PubMedCrossRef Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A (2012) 10-year follow-up of immediately loaded implants with TiUnite porous anodized surface. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14(6):828–838 PubMedCrossRef
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Karl M, Albrektsson T (2017) Clinical performance of dental implants with a moderately rough (tiunite) surface: a meta-analysis of prospective clinical studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 32(4):717–734 CrossRef Karl M, Albrektsson T (2017) Clinical performance of dental implants with a moderately rough (tiunite) surface: a meta-analysis of prospective clinical studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 32(4):717–734 CrossRef
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonfante EA, Granato R, Marin C, Jimbo R, Giro G, Suzuki M, Coelho PG (2013) Biomechanical testing of microblasted, acid-etched/microblasted, anodized, and discrete crystalline deposition surfaces: an experimental study in beagle dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 28(1):136–142 CrossRef Bonfante EA, Granato R, Marin C, Jimbo R, Giro G, Suzuki M, Coelho PG (2013) Biomechanical testing of microblasted, acid-etched/microblasted, anodized, and discrete crystalline deposition surfaces: an experimental study in beagle dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 28(1):136–142 CrossRef
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE (2009) Discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystalline deposition enhances osteoconduction on titanium-based implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 90(2):577–585 PubMedCrossRef Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE (2009) Discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystalline deposition enhances osteoconduction on titanium-based implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 90(2):577–585 PubMedCrossRef
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Kulkarni Aranya A, Pushalkar S, Zhao M, LeGeros RZ, Zhang Y, Saxena D (2017) Antibacterial and bioactive coatings on titanium implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 105(8):2218–2227 PubMedCrossRef Kulkarni Aranya A, Pushalkar S, Zhao M, LeGeros RZ, Zhang Y, Saxena D (2017) Antibacterial and bioactive coatings on titanium implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 105(8):2218–2227 PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Implantatoberflächen und klinische Performance: wo ist die Evidenz?
verfasst von
M.Sc. Dr. P. Donkiewicz
P. W. Kämmerer
Publikationsdatum
28.04.2022
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
wissen kompakt / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1863-2637
Elektronische ISSN: 2190-3816
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11838-022-00150-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

wissen kompakt 2/2022 Zur Ausgabe
  • 05.05.2022 | MKG-Chirurgie | CME-Kurs

    Chirurgie der Oberlider

    Lidkorrekturen zählen zu den häufigsten Eingriffen in der ästhetischen Chirurgie. Für MKG-Fachärzte stellt die Operation an den Lidern rein technisch kein Problem dar. Wichtig ist aber, die Indikation für einen Eingriff nach systematischen Überlegungen zu stellen bzw. Kombinationsbehandlungen in Betracht zu ziehen. Dieser Fortbildungsbeitrag unterstützt bei der Auswahl der passenden Operationstechnik und klärt über Fehler durch Eingriffe an den Oberlidern auf, die entstehen, wenn ein Anheben der Augenbrauen indiziert wäre.

Implantologie in der DGI e.Academy

Die wichtigsten Grundlagenfortbildungen in der Implantologie. Jetzt 8 Module (16 Tutorials) online verfügbar, begleitend zum Curriculum Implantologie.

  • 01.05.2022 | Periimplantäre Erkrankungen | CME-Kurs

    Hat das Implantatdesign einen Einfluss auf die Entstehung einer Periimplantitis?

    Eine der wichtigsten Langzeitkomplikationen von Implantaten ist die Periimplantitis, bei der die beiden klinischen Phänotypen der periimplantären Mukositis und der Periimplantitis unterschieden werden. Moderne leitliniengerechte Therapiekonzepte können das Fortschreiten der Periimplantitis stoppen bzw. verlangsamen und die lokalen Gewebeverhältnisse stabilisieren. Mikrofilm und bakterielle Kontamination der Implantatoberfläche spielen dabei eine wichtige Rolle, schlechte Mundhygiene gilt als prädisponierender Faktor.