Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2016

16.03.2016 | Original Article

Implementation of a mobile inpatient quality of life (QoL) assessment for oncology nursing

verfasst von: Markus K. Schuler, Freya Trautmann, Mirko Radloff, Roman Schmädig, Leopold Hentschel, Maria Eberlein-Gonska, Thomas Petzold, Heike Vetter, Sebastian Oberlack, Gerhard Ehninger, Jochen Schmitt

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Cancer patients suffer from a variety of symptoms, but little is known about changes during hospitalization and symptom burden at discharge. We implemented an electronic quality of life (QoL) assessment used by the nursing team in routine inpatient care. Feasibility, acceptance, and the course of QoL were investigated.

Methods

A self-administered electronic questionnaire based on the EQ-5D and the EORTC QLQ-C30 was applied in clinical routine. Cancer patients were approached by the nursing staff to complete the QoL assessment twice, at admission and at the day of discharge. Both the feedback of the nursing staff as well as characteristics of participants were used to evaluate the electronic assessment.

Results

Out of 210 patients from an oncologic ward, 85 patients (40 %) were invited to participate, 95 % of whom (n = 81) agreed to participate. Participation rate depended on the day of admission, the presence of the coordinating nurse, the overall morbidity assessed by patient clinical complexity level, and the patient age. Forty-six patients (56 %) asked for assistance in completing the questionnaire. Patients older than 53 years and male patients were more likely to need assistance. Twenty-two percent of the nursing staff (n = 5) use the information assessed for individual patient care. Fifty-two percent (n = 12) rated the additional workload as very little or little and 68 % (n = 15) agreed that handling for the patient was easy. Global QoL improved during the stay. Most severe symptoms at admission included fatigue, pain, appetite loss, and insomnia.

Conclusions

The results of this study indicate that it is feasible to implement and use an electronic QoL assessment by the nursing staff in routine inpatient cancer care. Obstacles and worries of staff members have to be considered when further developing this program.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Zagadailov E, Fine M, Shields A (2013) Patient-reported outcomes are changing the landscape in oncology care: challenges and opportunities for payers. Am Health Drug Benefits 6:264–274PubMedPubMedCentral Zagadailov E, Fine M, Shields A (2013) Patient-reported outcomes are changing the landscape in oncology care: challenges and opportunities for payers. Am Health Drug Benefits 6:264–274PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cella D, Hahn EA, Dineen K (2002) Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: differences between improvement and worsening. Qual Life Res 11:207CrossRefPubMed Cella D, Hahn EA, Dineen K (2002) Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: differences between improvement and worsening. Qual Life Res 11:207CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Quinten C, Martinelli F, Coens C, et al. (2014) A global analysis of multitrial data investigating quality of life and symptoms as prognostic factors for survival in different tumor sites. Cancer 120:302–311. doi:10.1002/cncr.28382 CrossRefPubMed Quinten C, Martinelli F, Coens C, et al. (2014) A global analysis of multitrial data investigating quality of life and symptoms as prognostic factors for survival in different tumor sites. Cancer 120:302–311. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​28382 CrossRefPubMed
7.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kotronoulas G, Kearney N, Maguire R, et al. (2014) What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. J Clin Oncol 32:1480–1501. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5948 CrossRefPubMed Kotronoulas G, Kearney N, Maguire R, et al. (2014) What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. J Clin Oncol 32:1480–1501. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2013.​53.​5948 CrossRefPubMed
11.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fromme EK, Eilers KM, Mori M, et al. (2004) How accurate is clinician reporting of chemotherapy adverse effects? A comparison with patient-reported symptoms from the quality-of-life questionnaire C30. J Clin Oncol off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:3485–3490. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.03.025 CrossRef Fromme EK, Eilers KM, Mori M, et al. (2004) How accurate is clinician reporting of chemotherapy adverse effects? A comparison with patient-reported symptoms from the quality-of-life questionnaire C30. J Clin Oncol off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:3485–3490. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2004.​03.​025 CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrison JD, Young JM, Auld S, et al. (2011) Quantifying postdischarge unmet supportive care needs of people with colorectal cancer: a clinical audit. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctology G B Irel 13:1400–1406. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02478.x Harrison JD, Young JM, Auld S, et al. (2011) Quantifying postdischarge unmet supportive care needs of people with colorectal cancer: a clinical audit. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctology G B Irel 13:1400–1406. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1463-1318.​2010.​02478.​x
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang C-H (2007) Patient-reported outcomes measurement and management with innovative methodologies and technologies. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil 16(Suppl 1):157–166. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9196-2 CrossRef Chang C-H (2007) Patient-reported outcomes measurement and management with innovative methodologies and technologies. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil 16(Suppl 1):157–166. doi:10.​1007/​s11136-007-9196-2 CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen RE, Snyder CF, Abernethy AP, et al. (2014) Review of electronic patient-reported outcomes systems used in cancer clinical care. J Oncol Pract Am Soc Clin Oncol 10:e215–e222. doi:10.1200/JOP.2013.001067 CrossRef Jensen RE, Snyder CF, Abernethy AP, et al. (2014) Review of electronic patient-reported outcomes systems used in cancer clinical care. J Oncol Pract Am Soc Clin Oncol 10:e215–e222. doi:10.​1200/​JOP.​2013.​001067 CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Antunes B, Harding R, Higginson IJ, EUROIMPACT (2014) Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers. Palliat Med 28:158–175. doi:10.1177/0269216313491619 CrossRefPubMed Antunes B, Harding R, Higginson IJ, EUROIMPACT (2014) Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers. Palliat Med 28:158–175. doi:10.​1177/​0269216313491619​ CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Howell D, Molloy S, Wilkinson K, et al. (2015) Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Ann Oncol off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv181 Howell D, Molloy S, Wilkinson K, et al. (2015) Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Ann Oncol off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdv181
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Gwaltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S (2008) Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res 11:322–333. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00231.x CrossRef Gwaltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S (2008) Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res 11:322–333. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1524-4733.​2007.​00231.​x CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Salaffi F, Gasparini S, Ciapetti A, et al. (2013) Usability of an innovative and interactive electronic system for collection of patient-reported data in axial spondyloarthritis: comparison with the traditional paper-administered format. Rheumatol Oxf Engl 52:2062–2070. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/ket276 CrossRef Salaffi F, Gasparini S, Ciapetti A, et al. (2013) Usability of an innovative and interactive electronic system for collection of patient-reported data in axial spondyloarthritis: comparison with the traditional paper-administered format. Rheumatol Oxf Engl 52:2062–2070. doi:10.​1093/​rheumatology/​ket276 CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376CrossRefPubMed Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy Amst Neth 16:199–208CrossRef EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy Amst Neth 16:199–208CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Rabin R, de Charro F (2001) EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 33:337–343CrossRefPubMed Rabin R, de Charro F (2001) EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 33:337–343CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Greiner W, Claes C, Busschbach JJV, von der Schulenburg J-MG (2005) Validating the EQ-5D with time trade off for the German population. Eur J Health Econ HEPAC Health Econ Prev Care 6:124–130CrossRef Greiner W, Claes C, Busschbach JJV, von der Schulenburg J-MG (2005) Validating the EQ-5D with time trade off for the German population. Eur J Health Econ HEPAC Health Econ Prev Care 6:124–130CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hess KR, Abbruzzese MC, Lenzi R, et al. (1999) Classification and regression tree analysis of 1000 consecutive patients with unknown primary carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res off J Am Assoc Cancer Res 5:3403–3410 Hess KR, Abbruzzese MC, Lenzi R, et al. (1999) Classification and regression tree analysis of 1000 consecutive patients with unknown primary carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res off J Am Assoc Cancer Res 5:3403–3410
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Kass GV (1980) An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 29:119–127. doi:10.2307/2986296 Kass GV (1980) An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 29:119–127. doi:10.​2307/​2986296
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Cocks K, King MT, Velikova G, et al. (2012) Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30. Eur J Cancer 48:1713–1721. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.059 CrossRefPubMed Cocks K, King MT, Velikova G, et al. (2012) Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30. Eur J Cancer 48:1713–1721. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejca.​2012.​02.​059 CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, et al. (2002) Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 288:3027–3034CrossRef Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, et al. (2002) Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 288:3027–3034CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Koller M, Steinger B, et al. (2012) Direct improvement of quality of life using a tailored quality of life diagnosis and therapy pathway: randomised trial in 200 women with breast cancer. Br J Cancer 106:826–838. doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Koller M, Steinger B, et al. (2012) Direct improvement of quality of life using a tailored quality of life diagnosis and therapy pathway: randomised trial in 200 women with breast cancer. Br J Cancer 106:826–838. doi:10.​1038/​bjc.​2012.​4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Rummans TA, Clark MM, Sloan JA, et al. (2006) Impacting quality of life for patients with advanced cancer with a structured multidisciplinary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 24:635–642. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.06.209 CrossRefPubMed Rummans TA, Clark MM, Sloan JA, et al. (2006) Impacting quality of life for patients with advanced cancer with a structured multidisciplinary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 24:635–642. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2006.​06.​209 CrossRefPubMed
41.
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Strasser F, Blum D, von Moos R, et al. (2016) The effect of real-time electronic monitoring of patient-reported symptoms and clinical syndromes in outpatient workflow of medical oncologists: E-MOSAIC, a multicenter cluster-randomized phase III study (SAKK 95/06). Ann Oncol off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO 27:324–332. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv576 CrossRef Strasser F, Blum D, von Moos R, et al. (2016) The effect of real-time electronic monitoring of patient-reported symptoms and clinical syndromes in outpatient workflow of medical oncologists: E-MOSAIC, a multicenter cluster-randomized phase III study (SAKK 95/06). Ann Oncol off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO 27:324–332. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdv576 CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Implementation of a mobile inpatient quality of life (QoL) assessment for oncology nursing
verfasst von
Markus K. Schuler
Freya Trautmann
Mirko Radloff
Roman Schmädig
Leopold Hentschel
Maria Eberlein-Gonska
Thomas Petzold
Heike Vetter
Sebastian Oberlack
Gerhard Ehninger
Jochen Schmitt
Publikationsdatum
16.03.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3163-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.