Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 3/2019

06.10.2018 | Original Article

Implementation of day of surgery admission for rectal cancer surgery in Ireland following a national centralisation programme

verfasst von: Ian Stephens, Claudine Murphy, Ian S. Reynolds, Shaheel Sahebally, Joseph Deasy, John P. Burke, Deborah A. McNamara

Erschienen in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Centralisation of rectal cancer surgery has altered the delivery of colorectal cancer care in Ireland. This has resulted in an increased demand for elective surgical beds in designated centres.

Aim

This study aimed to assess if day of surgery admission (DOSA), in conjunction with implementation of a coordinated enhanced recovery pathway can reduce length of stay following elective rectal cancer resection.

Methods

This is a retrospective review from a single institution. Our prospectively maintained Dendrite® Database was interrogated. Three time points were analysed across a 7-year period (2011, 2012, 2016). The first predates the introduction of a dedicated DOSA programme, the next was directly thereafter, and the final was 5-years post-implementation. These dates coincide with the centralisation of rectal cancer surgery to this centre. Outcomes included unadjusted length of stay and rates of DOSA pre-and post-implementation of the programme.

Results

The introduction of a DOSA pathway resulted in a fivefold increase in day of surgery admissions and a related 3-day reduction in average length of stay within a single year of implementation. This further improved in 2016, showing an almost 83% increase (15.90–98.50%) in day of surgery admission and a reduction in average length of stay from 16.4 to 12.4 days when compared to 2011.

Conclusions

Despite an increase in caseload of 54%, an estimated 272 bed days were saved. This demonstrated that DOSA is sustainable and highly effective in tackling the increased inpatient bed demands associated with the growing requirement for elective surgery.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Department of Health and Children (2006) A strategy for cancer control in Ireland. National Cancer Forum Department of Health and Children (2006) A strategy for cancer control in Ireland. National Cancer Forum
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Burke JP, Coffey JC, Boyle E, Keane F, McNamara DA (2013) Early outcomes for rectal cancer surgery in the republic of Ireland following a national centralization program. Ann Surg Oncol 20(11):3414–3421CrossRefPubMed Burke JP, Coffey JC, Boyle E, Keane F, McNamara DA (2013) Early outcomes for rectal cancer surgery in the republic of Ireland following a national centralization program. Ann Surg Oncol 20(11):3414–3421CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyle E, Timmons A, Al-Akash M, Kennedy AM, O'Grady H, Hill AD et al (2011) The management of rectal cancer in Ireland in 2007--room for improvement? Surgeon 9(4):179–186CrossRefPubMed Boyle E, Timmons A, Al-Akash M, Kennedy AM, O'Grady H, Hill AD et al (2011) The management of rectal cancer in Ireland in 2007--room for improvement? Surgeon 9(4):179–186CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Comber H, Sharp L, Timmons A, Keane FB (2012) Quality of rectal cancer surgery and its relationship to surgeon and hospital caseload: a population-based study. Color Dis 14(10):e692–e700CrossRef Comber H, Sharp L, Timmons A, Keane FB (2012) Quality of rectal cancer surgery and its relationship to surgeon and hospital caseload: a population-based study. Color Dis 14(10):e692–e700CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat National Cancer Control Programme (2014) Report on the implementation of “a strategy for cancer control in Ireland 2006”. Health Service Executive National Cancer Control Programme (2014) Report on the implementation of “a strategy for cancer control in Ireland 2006”. Health Service Executive
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bao H, Yang F, Su S, Wang X, Zhang M, Xiao Y, Jiang H, Wang J, Liu M (2016) Evaluating the effect of clinical care pathways on quality of cancer care: analysis of breast, colon and rectal cancer pathways. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 142(5):1079–1089CrossRefPubMed Bao H, Yang F, Su S, Wang X, Zhang M, Xiao Y, Jiang H, Wang J, Liu M (2016) Evaluating the effect of clinical care pathways on quality of cancer care: analysis of breast, colon and rectal cancer pathways. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 142(5):1079–1089CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun SX, Leung AN, Dillon PW, Hollenbeak CS (2015) Length of stay and readmissions in mastectomy patients. Breast J 21(5):526–532CrossRefPubMed Sun SX, Leung AN, Dillon PW, Hollenbeak CS (2015) Length of stay and readmissions in mastectomy patients. Breast J 21(5):526–532CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Spanjersberg W, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven C (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Art. No.: CD007635 Spanjersberg W, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven C (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Art. No.: CD007635
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Teeuwen PH, Bleichrodt RP, de Jong PJ, van Goor H, Bremers AJ (2011) Enhanced recovery after surgery versus conventional perioperative care in rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 54(7):833–839CrossRefPubMed Teeuwen PH, Bleichrodt RP, de Jong PJ, van Goor H, Bremers AJ (2011) Enhanced recovery after surgery versus conventional perioperative care in rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 54(7):833–839CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Stephens I, Stuart C, Stephens R, McCormick P, Larkin J, Mehigan B (2017) Trends in surgical mortality following colorectal resection between 2002 and 2012: a single-centre, retrospective analysis. Ir Med J 110(6):578PubMed Stephens I, Stuart C, Stephens R, McCormick P, Larkin J, Mehigan B (2017) Trends in surgical mortality following colorectal resection between 2002 and 2012: a single-centre, retrospective analysis. Ir Med J 110(6):578PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Department of Health (2017) National cancer strategy 2017-2026. National cancer control programme Department of Health (2017) National cancer strategy 2017-2026. National cancer control programme
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rothwell LA, Bokey EL, Keshava A, Chapuis PH, Dent OF (2006) Outcomes after admission on the day of elective resection for colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 76(1–2):14–19CrossRefPubMed Rothwell LA, Bokey EL, Keshava A, Chapuis PH, Dent OF (2006) Outcomes after admission on the day of elective resection for colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 76(1–2):14–19CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Andersen J et al (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94(2):224–231CrossRefPubMed Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Andersen J et al (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94(2):224–231CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hendry PO, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Dejong CH, Ljungqvist O et al (2009) Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 96(2):197–205CrossRefPubMed Hendry PO, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Dejong CH, Ljungqvist O et al (2009) Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 96(2):197–205CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gash KJ, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR (2012) Enhanced recovery after laparoscopic colorectal resection with primary anastomosis: accelerated discharge is safe and does not give rise to increased readmission rates. Color Dis 14(10):1287–1290CrossRef Gash KJ, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR (2012) Enhanced recovery after laparoscopic colorectal resection with primary anastomosis: accelerated discharge is safe and does not give rise to increased readmission rates. Color Dis 14(10):1287–1290CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Byrne BE, Branagan G, Chave HS (2013) Unselected rectal cancer patients undergoing low anterior resection with defunctioning ileostomy can be safely managed within an Enhanced Recovery Programme. Tech Coloproctol 17(1):73–78CrossRefPubMed Byrne BE, Branagan G, Chave HS (2013) Unselected rectal cancer patients undergoing low anterior resection with defunctioning ileostomy can be safely managed within an Enhanced Recovery Programme. Tech Coloproctol 17(1):73–78CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hardt J, Schwarzbach M, Hasenberg T, Post S, Kienle P, Ronellenfitsch U (2013) The effect of a clinical pathway for enhanced recovery of rectal resections on perioperative quality of care. Int J Color Dis 28(7):1019–1026CrossRef Hardt J, Schwarzbach M, Hasenberg T, Post S, Kienle P, Ronellenfitsch U (2013) The effect of a clinical pathway for enhanced recovery of rectal resections on perioperative quality of care. Int J Color Dis 28(7):1019–1026CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sehgal R, Hill A, Deasy J, McNamara DA, Cahill RA (2012) Fast-track for the modern colorectal department. World J Surg 36(10):2473–2480CrossRefPubMed Sehgal R, Hill A, Deasy J, McNamara DA, Cahill RA (2012) Fast-track for the modern colorectal department. World J Surg 36(10):2473–2480CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Implementation of day of surgery admission for rectal cancer surgery in Ireland following a national centralisation programme
verfasst von
Ian Stephens
Claudine Murphy
Ian S. Reynolds
Shaheel Sahebally
Joseph Deasy
John P. Burke
Deborah A. McNamara
Publikationsdatum
06.10.2018
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0021-1265
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-4362
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1904-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.