Background
The evidence-based practice being implemented
Case management intervention effectiveness
The guiding implementation science framework
The generic implementation framework (GIF)
The RE-AIM framework
Aims of the study
Methods and design
Design
Setting
Participants
The CM intervention
Study procedure, implementation strategies and ethics
Implementation program components | Description | Implementation phase | ED staff involvement |
---|---|---|---|
Needs and interest assessment | I-CaM team sends a survey to all eligible hospitals to assess health-providers needs and interests regarding the CM intervention. | Exploration | 10 min |
Hospital orientation | I-CaM team meets with key ED staff to provide more information about the CM intervention and the study procedures. | Exploration | 2 h |
Workshop | Interested key ED staff participate in a one-day workshop aiming to provide basic training on the CM intervention and assist in their decision of whether to adopt the CM intervention | Exploration | 1 day |
CM toolkit | The CM toolkit includes a detailed description of the CM intervention components, a validated framework of vulnerability among FUEDs to use as a screening tool and a booklet with practical information to use as models for the implementing sites. | Preparation, operation and sustainability | Continued use |
Team member selection support | Provides a description of key team member characteristics to support team member selection at implementing sites | Preparation | Continued use |
Site visits & training | I-CaM team meets with key staff in implementing sites to provide support to establish available resources on-site, to tailor the CM intervention to local realities and to provide training and coaching regarding the CM intervention to the full CM team | Preparation | 2 visits of 2 h |
Coaching, technical assistance & feedback | The I-CaM coach (I-CaM research nurse) conducts site visits every three months with as needed support to provide tailored assistance and feedback to each site | Operation | Between 4 and 8 h depending on sites’ needs |
Coaching | The I-CaM coach provides support and technical assistance upon request from implementing sites | Sustainability | Depending on sites’ needs |
The development and exploration phases
The preparation phase
The operation phase
The sustainability phase
Measures
Implementation-related measures
Components | Tool | Participants | Phase |
---|---|---|---|
Implementation process evaluation | |||
Implementation process | Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC) | Champions, case managers, I-CaM team | All |
Implementation time-efforts and costs | Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC) | Champions, case managers, I-CaM team | All |
Influencing factors | |||
ED staff awareness and interest in FUED and CM | Online survey | ED staff (public hospitals in the French-speaking Switzerland) | Exploration |
Semi-structured interview | Champions | Exploration | |
Acceptability, perceived appropriateness and feasibility of the CM | Acceptability Intervention Measure (AIM) and Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) Feasibility of the Intervention measure (FIM) | Champions and case managers | Preparation and operation |
Semi-structured interview | Champions | Exploration | |
Semi-structured interview | Champions and case managers | Operation | |
Intentions to use the CM | Measure of Innovation Specific Implementation Intentions | Champions and case managers | Preparation, operation |
Implementation climate | Implementation Climate scale (ICS)s | Champions and case managers | Preparation, operation |
Semi-structured interview | Champions and case managers | Preparation, operation | |
Readiness for change | Organizational Readiness for Implementation Change (ORIC) | Champions and case managers | Preparation, operation |
Implemention effectiveness | |||
Adoption rate (hospitals included/invited) | Monitoring of the activity on site | Hospitals | Exploration |
Reach (patients receiving the CM/eligible) | Monitoring of the activity on site | Hospitals | Operation, sustainability |
Implementation effectiveness | |||
Clinical effectiveness | Clinical outcomes (see Table 3) | Patients receiving the intervention | Operation |
Fidelity of the CM | Fidelity checklist | Case managers | Operation and sustainability |
Integration of the CM | NoMad survey | Champions and case managers | Operation, sustainability |
Semi-structured interview | Champions and case managers | Operation and sustainability | |
Normalization of the CM | Measure of Inner Context Sustainment (MICS) | Champions and case managers | Operation and sustainability |
Semi-structured interview | Champions and case managers | Operation and sustainability |
Components | Tool | Timing |
---|---|---|
Descriptive variables and covariates | ||
Demographics | Self-reported questionnaire | Baseline |
Vulnerability determinants | Extracted from medical records | Baseline |
Clinical outcomes | ||
ED visits | Extracted from medical records | Baseline, 6, and 12 months |
Health-care reorientation | Extracted from medical records | Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months |
Quality of life | WHOQOL-BREF | Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months |
Empowerment | Health Care Empowerment Inventory | Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months |
Self-efficacy | Self-Efficacy Scale | Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months |
Health literacy | European Health Literacy Project Questionnaire | Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months |
Problematic alcohol use | AUDIT-C | Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months |
Precursors of alcohol use | Visual analog rulers assessing importance, intentions, readiness and confidence regarding alcohol use changes | Baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months |