Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Erschienen in: Translational Behavioral Medicine 4/2016

14.09.2016 | Original Research

Implications of social media use on health information technology engagement: Data from HINTS 4 cycle 3

verfasst von: Devlon N. Jackson, PhD, MPH, Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou, PhD, MPH, Kisha I. Coa, PhD, MPH, April Oh, PhD, MPH, Bradford Hesse, PhD

Erschienen in: Translational Behavioral Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

ABSTRACT

Little is known about the association between Internet/social media use and health information technology (HIT) engagement. This study examines patterns of social media use and HIT engagement in the U.S.A. using data from the 2013 Health Information National Trends Survey (N = 3,164). Specifically, predictors of two HIT activities (i.e., communicating with a healthcare provider using the Internet or email and tracking personal health information electronically) are examined. Persons who were females, higher education, non-Hispanic others, having a regular healthcare provider, and ages 35–44 were more likely to participate in HIT activities. After controlling for sociodemographics and health correlates, social media use was significantly associated with HIT engagement. To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to systematically examine the use and relationships across multiple types of health-related online media.
Literatur
1.
Brenner, J., & Smith, A. (2013). 72 % of online adults are social networking site users. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project.
2.
3.
Smith, A. (2011). Why Americans use social media. Pew Research Center: Washington, DC.
4.
Fox, S., & Duggan, M. (2013). Health online 2013. Washington, DC: Pew Reserach Center’s Internet & American Life Project.
5.
Thackeray, R., Crookston, B. T., & West, J. H. (2013). Correlates of health-related social media use among adults. Journal of medical Internet research., 15(1), e21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Patel, V., Barker, W., & Siminerio, E. (2014). Individual’s access and use of their online medical record nationwide. Washington, DC: The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.
7.
Klinger EV, Carlini SV, Gonzalez I, et al. Accuracy of race, ethnicity, and language preference in an electronic health record. Journal of general internal medicine. 2014.
8.
Roblin, D. W., Houston 2nd, T. K., Allison, J. J., Joski, P. J., & Becker, E. R. (2009). Disparities in use of a personal health record in a managed care organization. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 16(5), 683–689.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Beckjord, E. B., Finney Rutten, L. J., Squiers, L., et al. (2007). Use of the internet to communicate with health care providers in the United States: estimates from the 2003 and 2005 Health Information National Trends Surveys (HINTS). Journal of medical Internet research., 9(3), e20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Wen, K. Y., Kreps, G., Zhu, F., & Miller, S. (2010). Consumers’ perceptions about and use of the Internet for personal health records and health information exchange: analysis of the 2007 health information national trends survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research., 12(4), e73.
11.
Lustria, M. L., Smith, S. A., & Hinnant, C. C. (2011). Exploring digital divides: an examination of eHealth technology use in health information seeking, communication and personal health information management in the USA. Health informatics journal., 17(3), 224–243.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Attai, D. J., Cowher, M. S., Al-Hamadani, M., Schoger, J. M., Staley, A. C., & Landercasper, J. (2015). Twitter social media is an effective tool for breast cancer patient education and support: patient-reported outcomes by survey. Journal of medical Internet research., 17(7), e188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Gerber, D. E., Laccetti, A. L., Chen, B., et al. (2014). Predictors and intensity of online access to electronic medical records among patients with cancer. Journal of oncology practice / American Society of Clinical Oncology, 10(5), e307–e312.CrossRef
14.
Klasnja, P., Hartzler, A., Powell, C., & Pratt, W. (2011). Supporting cancer patients’ unanchored health information management with mobile technology. AMIA Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium AMIA Symposium, 2011, 732–741.PubMed
15.
Undem, T. (2010). Consumers and health information technology: a national survey. California HealthCare Foundation: Oakland, CA.
16.
Choi, N. (2011). Relationship between health service use and health information technology use among older adults: analysis of the US National Health Interview Survey. Journal of medical Internet research., 13(2), 3–3.CrossRef
17.
Government USF. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009: Health Information Technology for Economic and Clincial Act: U.S. Federal Governement. 2009.
18.
Levy, H., Janke, A. T., & Langa, K. M. (2015). Health literacy and the digital divide among older americans. J Gen Intern Med, 30(3), 284–289.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Smith SG, O’Conor R, Aitken W, Curtis LM, Wolf MS, Goel MS. Disparities in registration and use of an online patient portal among adults: findings from the LitCog cohort. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2015;First published online: 25 April 2015.
20.
21.
Hsaiao, C.-J., & Hing, E. (2014). Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physicians practices: United States, 2001–2013. National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, MD.
22.
Coordinator TOotN. Report to Congress: Update on the adoption of health information technology and related efforts to facilitate the electronic use and exchange of health information Washington, DC: The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. 2014.
23.
Swain M, Charles D, Furukawa M. ONC data brief-Health information exchange among U.S. non-federal acute hospitals: 2008–2013: The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. 2014.
24.
Kruse, C. S., Argueta, D. A., Lopez, L., & Nair, A. (2015). Patient and provider attitudes toward the use of patient portals for the management of chronic disease: a systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research., 17(2), e40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zarcadoolas, C., Vaughon, W. L., Czaja, S. J., Levy, J., & Rockoff, M. L. (2013). Consumers’ perceptions of patient-accessible electronic medical records. Journal of medical Internet research., 15(8), e168.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Young, R., Willis, E., Cameron, G., & Geana, M. (2014). “Willing but unwilling”: attitudinal barriers to adoption of home-based health information technology among older adults. Health informatics journal, 20(2), 127–135.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Rutten LF, Agunwamba A, Wilson P, et al. Cancer-related information seeking among cancer survivors: Trends over a decade (2003–2013). Journal of Cancer Education. 2015.
28.
Strekalova Y. Emergent health risks and audience information engagement on social media. American Journal of Infection Control. 2015.
29.
Dutta-Bergman, M. (2004). Complementarity in consumption of news types across traditional and new media. J Broadcast Electron Media, 48, 41–60.CrossRef
30.
Dutta-Bergman, M. (2004). Interpersonal communication after 9/11 via telephone and internet: a theory of channel complementarity. New Media Soc, 6, 659–673.CrossRef
31.
Rains, S., & Ruppel, E. (2013). Channel complementarity theory and teh health information-seeking process: further investigating the implications of source characteristics complementarity. Commun Res, 1-21.
32.
Chou, W. S., Liu, B., Post, S., & Hesse, B. (2011). Health-related Internet use among cancer survivors: data from the health information national trends survey, 2003-2007. Journal of Cancer Survivorship., 5(3), 263–270
33.
Westat N. Health information national trends survey 4, cycle 3, methodology report. 2014.
34.
Chou, W. Y., Hunt, Y. M., Beckjord, E. B., Moser, R. P., & Hesse, B. W. (2009). Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. Journal of medical Internet research., 11(4), e48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Prestin, A., Vieux, S. N., & Chou, W. Y. (2015). Is online health activity alive and well or flatlining? Findings from 10 years of the Health Information National Trends Survey. J Health Commun, 20(7), 790–798.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Purcell, K. (2013). Online video 2013. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
37.
Company TN. The U.S. digital consumer report. 2014.
38.
Group AM. US Hispanic trends and behaviors. 2013.
39.
Gevelber L. Your next big opportunity: The U.S. Hispanic market. 2014. Accessed April 5, 2015.
40.
Duggan, M., & Brenner, J. (2013). The demographics of social media users - 2012. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
41.
DuBenske, L., Gustafson, D., Shaw, B., & Cleary, J. (2010). Web-based cancer communication and decision making systems: connecting patients, caregivers, and clinicians for improved health outcomes. Medical decision making: an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 30(6), 732–744.CrossRef
42.
Kontos, E., Blake, K. D., Chou, W. Y., & Prestin, A. (2014). Predictors of eHealth usage: insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012. Journal of medical Internet research, 16(7), e172.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Commission FC. 2015 Broadband progress report and notice of inquiry on immediate action to accelerate deployment. Washington, DC. 2015.
Metadaten
Titel
Implications of social media use on health information technology engagement: Data from HINTS 4 cycle 3
verfasst von
Devlon N. Jackson, PhD, MPH
Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou, PhD, MPH
Kisha I. Coa, PhD, MPH
April Oh, PhD, MPH
Bradford Hesse, PhD
Publikationsdatum
14.09.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Translational Behavioral Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1869-6716
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-9860
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-016-0437-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Translational Behavioral Medicine 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Original Research

Society of Behavioral Medicine supports implementation of high quality lung cancer screening in high-risk populations

Case Study

Examining the role of a community coalition in facilitating policy and environmental changes to promote physical activity: the case of Get Fit Kaua‘i

Original Research

Engaging research participants to inform the ethical conduct of mobile imaging, pervasive sensing, and location tracking research

Original Research

Development of a dynamic computational model of social cognitive theory

Erratum

Erratum to: Recall of indoor tanning salon warnings and safety guidelines among a national sample of tanners

Case Study

Simplified Novel Application (SNApp) framework: a guide to developing and implementing second-generation mobile applications for behavioral health research