Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Hernia 5/2019

14.11.2018 | Original Article

Importance of the physical exam: double-blind randomized controlled trial of radiologic interpretation of ventral hernias after selective clinical information

verfasst von: D. V. Cherla, K. Bernardi, K. J. Blair, S. S. Chua, J. P. Hasapes, L. S. Kao, T. C. Ko, E. J. Matta, M. L. Moses, K. G. Shiralkar, V. R. Surabhi, V. S. Tammisetti, C. P. Viso, M. K. Liang

Erschienen in: Hernia | Ausgabe 5/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Increasingly, radiologic imaging is obtained as part of the pathway in diagnosing ventral hernias. Often, radiologists receive incomplete or incorrect clinical information from clinicians. Objective: The aim of the study is to determine if clinical exam findings alter radiological interpretation of ventral hernias on CT.

Methods

This is a single-institution double-blind, randomized trial. All patients with a recent abdominal/pelvic CT scan seen in various surgical clinics were enrolled. A surgeon blinded to the CT scan findings performed a standardized physical examination and assessed for the presence of a ventral hernia. Seven independent radiologists blinded to the study design reviewed the scans. Each radiologist received one of three types of clinical exam data per CT: accurate (correct), inaccurate (purposely incorrect), or none. Allocation was random and stratified by the presence of clinical hernia. The primary outcome was the proportion of radiologic hernias detected, analyzed by chi square.

Results

115 patients were enrolled for a total of 805 CT scan reads. The proportion of hernias detected differed by up to 25% depending on if accurate, no, or inaccurate clinical information was provided. Inaccurate clinical data in patients with no hernia on physical exam led to a significant difference in the radiologic hernia detection rate (54.3% versus 35.7%, p = 0.007). No clinical data in patients with a hernia on physical exam led to a lower radiologic hernia detection rate (75.0% versus 93.8%, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

The presence and accuracy of clinical information provided to radiologists impacts the diagnosis of abdominal wall hernias in up to 25% of cases. Standardization of both clinical and radiologic examinations for hernias and their reporting are needed.

Trial registration

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Berdahl CT, Vermeulen MJ, Larson DB, Schull MJ (2013) Emergency department computed tomography utilization in the United States and Canada. Ann Emerg Med 62(5):486–496CrossRefPubMed Berdahl CT, Vermeulen MJ, Larson DB, Schull MJ (2013) Emergency department computed tomography utilization in the United States and Canada. Ann Emerg Med 62(5):486–496CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Chin JY, Goldstraw E, Lunniss P, Patel K (2012) Evaluation of the utility of abdominal CT scans in the diagnosis, management, outcome and information given at discharge of patients with non-traumatic acute abdominal pain. Br J Radiol 85(1017):e596–e602CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chin JY, Goldstraw E, Lunniss P, Patel K (2012) Evaluation of the utility of abdominal CT scans in the diagnosis, management, outcome and information given at discharge of patients with non-traumatic acute abdominal pain. Br J Radiol 85(1017):e596–e602CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Khalilzadeh O, Rahimian M, Batchu V, Vadvala HV, Novelline RA, Choy G (2015) Effectiveness of second-opinion radiology consultations to reassess the cervical spine CT scans: a study on trauma patients referred to a tertiary-care hospital. Diagn Interv Radiol 21(5):423–427CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khalilzadeh O, Rahimian M, Batchu V, Vadvala HV, Novelline RA, Choy G (2015) Effectiveness of second-opinion radiology consultations to reassess the cervical spine CT scans: a study on trauma patients referred to a tertiary-care hospital. Diagn Interv Radiol 21(5):423–427CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zen E, Yousem DM, Carone M, Lewin JS (2010) Second-opinion consultations in neuroradiology. Radiology 255(1):135–141CrossRef Zen E, Yousem DM, Carone M, Lewin JS (2010) Second-opinion consultations in neuroradiology. Radiology 255(1):135–141CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng T, Dumire R, Golden S, Gregory J (2013) Impact on patient care of discordance in radiology readings between external overnight radiology services and staff radiology readings at a level 1 trauma center. Am J Surg 205(3):280–282CrossRefPubMed Cheng T, Dumire R, Golden S, Gregory J (2013) Impact on patient care of discordance in radiology readings between external overnight radiology services and staff radiology readings at a level 1 trauma center. Am J Surg 205(3):280–282CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Eakins C, Ellis WD, Pruthi S et al (2012) Second opinion interpretations by specialty radiologists at a pediatric hospital: rate of disagreement and clinical implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(4):916–920CrossRefPubMed Eakins C, Ellis WD, Pruthi S et al (2012) Second opinion interpretations by specialty radiologists at a pediatric hospital: rate of disagreement and clinical implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(4):916–920CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Grady AT, Sosa JA, Tanpitukpongse TP, Choudhury KR, Gupta RT, Hoang JK (2015) Radiology reports for incidental thyroid nodules on CT and MRI: high variability across subspecialties. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36(2):397–402CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grady AT, Sosa JA, Tanpitukpongse TP, Choudhury KR, Gupta RT, Hoang JK (2015) Radiology reports for incidental thyroid nodules on CT and MRI: high variability across subspecialties. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36(2):397–402CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Doubilet P, Herman PG (1981) Interpretation of radiographs: effect of clinical history. AJR Am J Roentgenol 137(5):1055–1058CrossRefPubMed Doubilet P, Herman PG (1981) Interpretation of radiographs: effect of clinical history. AJR Am J Roentgenol 137(5):1055–1058CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Holihan JL, Flores-Gonzalez JR, Mo J, Ko TC, Kao LS, Liang MK (2017) A prospective assessment of clinical and patient-reported outcomes of initial non-operative management of ventral hernias. World J Surg 41(5):1267–1273CrossRef Holihan JL, Flores-Gonzalez JR, Mo J, Ko TC, Kao LS, Liang MK (2017) A prospective assessment of clinical and patient-reported outcomes of initial non-operative management of ventral hernias. World J Surg 41(5):1267–1273CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Holihan JL, Karanjawala B, Ko A et al (2016) Use of computed tomography in diagnosing ventral hernia recurrence: a blinded, prospective, multispecialty evaluation. JAMA Surg 151(1):7–13CrossRefPubMed Holihan JL, Karanjawala B, Ko A et al (2016) Use of computed tomography in diagnosing ventral hernia recurrence: a blinded, prospective, multispecialty evaluation. JAMA Surg 151(1):7–13CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kohavi R, Provost F (1998) Glossary of terms. Mach Learn 30(2/3):271–274CrossRef Kohavi R, Provost F (1998) Glossary of terms. Mach Learn 30(2/3):271–274CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Brady A, Laoide RO, McCarthy P, McDermott R (2012) Discrepancy and error in radiology: concepts, causes and consequences. Ulster Med J 81(1):3–9PubMedPubMedCentral Brady A, Laoide RO, McCarthy P, McDermott R (2012) Discrepancy and error in radiology: concepts, causes and consequences. Ulster Med J 81(1):3–9PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tillack AA, Borgstede JP (2013) An evaluation of the impact of clinically embedded reading rooms on radiologist-referring clinician communication. J Am Colloid Radiol 10(5):368–372CrossRef Tillack AA, Borgstede JP (2013) An evaluation of the impact of clinically embedded reading rooms on radiologist-referring clinician communication. J Am Colloid Radiol 10(5):368–372CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Welch HG, Prorok PC, O’Malley AJ, Kramer BS (2016) Breast-cancer tumor size, overdiagnosis, and mammography screening effectiveness. N Engl J Med 375(15):1438–1447CrossRefPubMed Welch HG, Prorok PC, O’Malley AJ, Kramer BS (2016) Breast-cancer tumor size, overdiagnosis, and mammography screening effectiveness. N Engl J Med 375(15):1438–1447CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Renfrew DL, Franken EA, Berbaum KS et al (1992) Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference. Radiology 183(1):145–150CrossRef Renfrew DL, Franken EA, Berbaum KS et al (1992) Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference. Radiology 183(1):145–150CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodenough CJ, Ko TC, Kao LS et al (2015) Development and validation of a risk stratification score for ventral incisional hernia after abdominal surgery: hernia expectation rates in intra-abdominal surgery (the HERNIA Project). J AM Colloid Surg 220(4):405–413 (Epub 2015 Jan 2) CrossRef Goodenough CJ, Ko TC, Kao LS et al (2015) Development and validation of a risk stratification score for ventral incisional hernia after abdominal surgery: hernia expectation rates in intra-abdominal surgery (the HERNIA Project). J AM Colloid Surg 220(4):405–413 (Epub 2015 Jan 2) CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Nardi M Jr., Millo P, Brachet Contul R et al (2017) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with composite mesh: analysis of risk factors for recurrence in 185 patients with 5 years follow-up. Int J Surg 40:38–44 (Epub ahead of print)CrossRefPubMed Nardi M Jr., Millo P, Brachet Contul R et al (2017) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with composite mesh: analysis of risk factors for recurrence in 185 patients with 5 years follow-up. Int J Surg 40:38–44 (Epub ahead of print)CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Importance of the physical exam: double-blind randomized controlled trial of radiologic interpretation of ventral hernias after selective clinical information
verfasst von
D. V. Cherla
K. Bernardi
K. J. Blair
S. S. Chua
J. P. Hasapes
L. S. Kao
T. C. Ko
E. J. Matta
M. L. Moses
K. G. Shiralkar
V. R. Surabhi
V. S. Tammisetti
C. P. Viso
M. K. Liang
Publikationsdatum
14.11.2018
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
Hernia / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Elektronische ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1856-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

Hernia 5/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.