Erschienen in:
07.09.2022 | Original Article
Improvement of Nasal Dorsal Onlay Graft Appearance after Augmentation Rhinoplasty with Costal Cartilage for Thin-Skinned Patients
verfasst von:
Ruobing Zheng, Xin Wang, Huan Wang, Jianjun You, Yihao Xu, Xulong Zhang, Junsheng Guo, Fei Fan
Erschienen in:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
|
Ausgabe 1/2023
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Background
The camouflage of the nasal dorsum is very important for thin-skinned patients. In this study, the authors presented an improved method for these patients and evaluated the safety and efficacy of this method in augmentation rhinoplasty.
Methods
Fifty-two thin-skinned nose Chinese patients, ranging in age from 18 to 42 years, who underwent open augmentation rhinoplasty with modified perichondrium on dorsal onlay graft were included in the study. Among these patients, 24 of them were primary cases, and the other cases were secondary. The Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) scale and Visual aid scoring (VAS) questionnaire were used to evaluate aesthetic outcomes.
Results
During the long-term follow-up (ranging from 6 to 20 months), the ROE scores of each item before and after surgery were statistically significant in our study. The total scores of the preoperative and postoperative ROE scale of the study were 9.77 ± 3.18 and 20.65 ± 1.88, respectively, which indicated reasonably high satisfaction. According to the VAS questionnaire, patients’ own evaluations of the nasal dorsal improvement rendered a high satisfaction rate. One case of fat liquefaction at the donor site and two cases of warping occurred and no other major complications were encountered.
Conclusion
Covering the two edges of the graft with perichondrium on the onlay dorsal graft seems a convenient and effective method for thin-skinned augmentation rhinoplasty, which was the best choice for camouflage of the nasal dorsum in our department.
Level of Evidence: IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266."