Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 1/2018

05.05.2017

Improving Assessment of Work Related Mental Health Function Using the Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB)

verfasst von: Elizabeth E. Marfeo, Pengsheng Ni, Christine McDonough, Kara Peterik, Molly Marino, Mark Meterko, Elizabeth K. Rasch, Leighton Chan, Diane Brandt, Alan M. Jette

Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose To improve the mental health component of the Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB), developed for the US Social Security Administration’s (SSA) disability determination process. Specifically our goal was to expand the WD-FAB scales of mood & emotions, resilience, social interactions, and behavioral control to improve the depth and breadth of the current scales and expand the content coverage to include aspects of cognition & communication function. Methods Data were collected from a random, stratified sample of 1695 claimants applying for the SSA work disability benefits, and a general population sample of 2025 working age adults. 169 new items were developed to replenish the WD-FAB scales and analyzed using factor analysis and item response theory (IRT) analysis to construct unidimensional scales. We conducted computer adaptive test (CAT) simulations to examine the psychometric properties of the WD-FAB. Results Analyses supported the inclusion of four mental health subdomains: Cognition & Communication (68 items), Self-Regulation (34 items), Resilience & Sociability (29 items) and Mood & Emotions (34 items). All scales yielded acceptable psychometric properties. Conclusions IRT methods were effective in expanding the WD-FAB to assess mental health function. The WD-FAB has the potential to enhance work disability assessment both within the context of the SSA disability programs as well as other clinical and vocational rehabilitation settings.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Krahn GL, Walker DK, Correa-De-Araujo R. Persons with disabilities as an unrecognized health disparity population. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(Suppl 2):S198–S206.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Krahn GL, Walker DK, Correa-De-Araujo R. Persons with disabilities as an unrecognized health disparity population. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(Suppl 2):S198–S206.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Marfeo EE, Eisen S, Ni P, Rasch EK, Rogers ES, Jette A. Do claimants over-report behavioral health dysfunction when filing for work disability benefits?. Work. 2015;51(2):187–194.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Marfeo EE, Eisen S, Ni P, Rasch EK, Rogers ES, Jette A. Do claimants over-report behavioral health dysfunction when filing for work disability benefits?. Work. 2015;51(2):187–194.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Marfeo EE, Haley SM, Jette AM, Eisen SV, Ni P, Bogusz K, Meterko M, McDonough CM, Chan L, Brandt DE, Rasch EK. Conceptual foundation for measures of physical function and behavioral health function for social security work disability evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2013;94(9):1645–1652.CrossRef Marfeo EE, Haley SM, Jette AM, Eisen SV, Ni P, Bogusz K, Meterko M, McDonough CM, Chan L, Brandt DE, Rasch EK. Conceptual foundation for measures of physical function and behavioral health function for social security work disability evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2013;94(9):1645–1652.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Brandt DE, Houtenville AJ, Huynh MT, Chan L, Rasch EK. Connecting contemporary paradigms to the social security administration’s disability evaluation process. J Disab Pol Stud. 2011;22(2):116–128.CrossRef Brandt DE, Houtenville AJ, Huynh MT, Chan L, Rasch EK. Connecting contemporary paradigms to the social security administration’s disability evaluation process. J Disab Pol Stud. 2011;22(2):116–128.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mathiowetz N, Wunderlich GS, eds. Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Review the Social Security Administration’s Disability Decision Process Research. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000. Mathiowetz N, Wunderlich GS, eds. Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Review the Social Security Administration’s Disability Decision Process Research. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Escorpizo R, Gmünder HP, Stucki G. Introduction to special section: advancing the field of vocational rehabilitation with the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). J Occup Rehab. 2011;21(2):121–125.CrossRef Escorpizo R, Gmünder HP, Stucki G. Introduction to special section: advancing the field of vocational rehabilitation with the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). J Occup Rehab. 2011;21(2):121–125.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Marfeo EE, Ni P, Chan L, Rasch EK, McDonough CM, Brandt DE, Bogusz K, Jette AM. Interpreting physical and behavioral health scores from new work disability instruments. J Rehab Med. 2015;47(5):394–402.CrossRef Marfeo EE, Ni P, Chan L, Rasch EK, McDonough CM, Brandt DE, Bogusz K, Jette AM. Interpreting physical and behavioral health scores from new work disability instruments. J Rehab Med. 2015;47(5):394–402.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Marfeo EE, Ni P, Haley SM, Bogusz K, Meterko M, McDonough CM, Chan L, Rasch EK, Brandt DE, Jette AM. Scale refinement and initial evaluation of a behavioral health function measurement tool for work disability evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2013;94(9):1679–1686.CrossRef Marfeo EE, Ni P, Haley SM, Bogusz K, Meterko M, McDonough CM, Chan L, Rasch EK, Brandt DE, Jette AM. Scale refinement and initial evaluation of a behavioral health function measurement tool for work disability evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2013;94(9):1679–1686.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Marfeo EE, Ni P, Haley SM, Jette AM, Bogusz K, Meterko M, McDonough CM, Chan L, Brandt DE, Rasch EK. Development of an instrument to measure behavioral health function for work disability: item pool construction and factor analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2013;94(9):1670–1680.CrossRef Marfeo EE, Ni P, Haley SM, Jette AM, Bogusz K, Meterko M, McDonough CM, Chan L, Brandt DE, Rasch EK. Development of an instrument to measure behavioral health function for work disability: item pool construction and factor analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2013;94(9):1670–1680.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Marino ME, Meterko M, Marfeo EE, McDonough CM, Jette AM, Ni P, Bogusz K, Rasch EK, Brandt DE, Chan L. Work-related measures of physical and behavioral health function: test-retest reliability. Disab Health J. 2015;8(4):652–657.CrossRef Marino ME, Meterko M, Marfeo EE, McDonough CM, Jette AM, Ni P, Bogusz K, Rasch EK, Brandt DE, Chan L. Work-related measures of physical and behavioral health function: test-retest reliability. Disab Health J. 2015;8(4):652–657.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Meterko M, Marfeo EE, McDonough CM, Jette AM, Ni P, Bogusz K, Rasch EK, Brandt DE, Chan L. Work disability functional assessment battery: feasibility and psychometric properties. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2015;96(6):1028–1035.CrossRef Meterko M, Marfeo EE, McDonough CM, Jette AM, Ni P, Bogusz K, Rasch EK, Brandt DE, Chan L. Work disability functional assessment battery: feasibility and psychometric properties. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2015;96(6):1028–1035.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Franche RL, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehab. 2002;12(4):233–256.CrossRef Franche RL, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehab. 2002;12(4):233–256.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Saunders SL, Nedelec B. What work means to people with work disability: a scoping review. J Occup Rehab. 2014;24(1):100–110.CrossRef Saunders SL, Nedelec B. What work means to people with work disability: a scoping review. J Occup Rehab. 2014;24(1):100–110.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Escorpizo R, Stucki G. Disability evaluation, social security, and the international classification of functioning, disability and health: the time is now. J Occup Environ Med. 2013;55(6):644–651.CrossRefPubMed Escorpizo R, Stucki G. Disability evaluation, social security, and the international classification of functioning, disability and health: the time is now. J Occup Environ Med. 2013;55(6):644–651.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rivers D. Sample matching: representative sampling from internet panels. A white paper on the advantages of the sample matching methodology. Palo Alto, CA:YouGovPolymetrix; 2002. Rivers D. Sample matching: representative sampling from internet panels. A white paper on the advantages of the sample matching methodology. Palo Alto, CA:YouGovPolymetrix; 2002.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat McDonough CM, Jette AM, Ni P, Bogusz K, Marfeo EE, Brandt DE, Chan L, Meterko M, Haley SM, Rasch EK. Development of a self-report physical function instrument for disability assessment: item pool construction and factor analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2013;94(9):1653–1660.CrossRef McDonough CM, Jette AM, Ni P, Bogusz K, Marfeo EE, Brandt DE, Chan L, Meterko M, Haley SM, Rasch EK. Development of a self-report physical function instrument for disability assessment: item pool construction and factor analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2013;94(9):1653–1660.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ni P, McDonough CM, Jette AM, Bogusz K, Marfeo EE, Rasch EK, Brandt DE, Meterko M, Haley SM, Chan L. Development of a computer-adaptive physical function instrument for social security administration disability determination. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2013;94(9):1661–1669.CrossRef Ni P, McDonough CM, Jette AM, Bogusz K, Marfeo EE, Rasch EK, Brandt DE, Meterko M, Haley SM, Chan L. Development of a computer-adaptive physical function instrument for social security administration disability determination. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2013;94(9):1661–1669.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Floyd FJ, Widaman KF. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(3):286–299.CrossRef Floyd FJ, Widaman KF. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(3):286–299.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Publications; 2015. Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Publications; 2015.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equat Model. 1999;6(1):1–55.CrossRef Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equat Model. 1999;6(1):1–55.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Steiger JH. Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach. Multivar Behav Res. 1990;25(2):173–180.CrossRef Steiger JH. Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach. Multivar Behav Res. 1990;25(2):173–180.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gibbons RD, Bock RD, Hedeker D, Weiss DJ, Segawa E, Bhaumik DK, Kupfer DJ, Frank E, Grochocinski VJ, Stover A. Full-information item bifactor analysis of graded response data. Appl Psychol Measur. 2007;31(1):4–19.CrossRef Gibbons RD, Bock RD, Hedeker D, Weiss DJ, Segawa E, Bhaumik DK, Kupfer DJ, Frank E, Grochocinski VJ, Stover A. Full-information item bifactor analysis of graded response data. Appl Psychol Measur. 2007;31(1):4–19.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Edelen MO, Reeve BB. Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(1):5–18.CrossRefPubMed Edelen MO, Reeve BB. Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(1):5–18.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Orlando M, Thissen D. Further investigation of the performance of S-X2: an item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Appl Psychol Measur. 2003;27(4):289–298.CrossRef Orlando M, Thissen D. Further investigation of the performance of S-X2: an item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Appl Psychol Measur. 2003;27(4):289–298.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Roju NS, Van der Linden WJ, Fleer PF. IRT-based internal measures of differential functioning of items and tests. Appl Psychol Measur. 1995;19(4):353–368.CrossRef Roju NS, Van der Linden WJ, Fleer PF. IRT-based internal measures of differential functioning of items and tests. Appl Psychol Measur. 1995;19(4):353–368.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Woods CM, Cai L, Wang M. The Langer-improved Wald test for DIF testing with multiple groups: evaluation and comparison to two-group IRT. Educ Psychol Measur. 2013;73(3):532–547.CrossRef Woods CM, Cai L, Wang M. The Langer-improved Wald test for DIF testing with multiple groups: evaluation and comparison to two-group IRT. Educ Psychol Measur. 2013;73(3):532–547.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai L, Du Toit S, Thissen D. IRTPRO: flexible, multidimensional, multiple categorical IRT modeling [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International; 2011. Cai L, Du Toit S, Thissen D. IRTPRO: flexible, multidimensional, multiple categorical IRT modeling [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International; 2011.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Edelen MO, Stucky BD, Chandra A. Quantifying ‘problematic’DIF within an IRT framework: Application to a cancer stigma index. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(1):95–103.CrossRefPubMed Edelen MO, Stucky BD, Chandra A. Quantifying ‘problematic’DIF within an IRT framework: Application to a cancer stigma index. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(1):95–103.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai L, du Toit S, Thissen D. IRTPRO: flexible, multidimensional, multiple categorical IRT modeling. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International; 2011. Cai L, du Toit S, Thissen D. IRTPRO: flexible, multidimensional, multiple categorical IRT modeling. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International; 2011.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Bjorner J, Smith K, Stone C, Sun X. IRTFIT: a macro for item fit and local dependence tests under IRT models. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated; 2007. Bjorner J, Smith K, Stone C, Sun X. IRTFIT: a macro for item fit and local dependence tests under IRT models. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated; 2007.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat SAS Institute. SAS 9.1.3 Cary, NC: 2004. SAS Institute. SAS 9.1.3 Cary, NC: 2004.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Quinn H, Thissen D, Liu Y, Magnus B, Lai JS, Amtmann D, Varni JW, Gross HE, DeWalt DA. Using item response theory to enrich and expand the PROMIS® pediatric self report banks. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12(1):160–170.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Quinn H, Thissen D, Liu Y, Magnus B, Lai JS, Amtmann D, Varni JW, Gross HE, DeWalt DA. Using item response theory to enrich and expand the PROMIS® pediatric self report banks. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12(1):160–170.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Hays RD, Morales LS, Reise SP. Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med Care. 2000;38(9 Suppl):II28–II42.PubMedPubMedCentral Hays RD, Morales LS, Reise SP. Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med Care. 2000;38(9 Suppl):II28–II42.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Improving Assessment of Work Related Mental Health Function Using the Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB)
verfasst von
Elizabeth E. Marfeo
Pengsheng Ni
Christine McDonough
Kara Peterik
Molly Marino
Mark Meterko
Elizabeth K. Rasch
Leighton Chan
Diane Brandt
Alan M. Jette
Publikationsdatum
05.05.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-017-9710-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe