The consequences of poorly managed hearing loss can be ameliorated with hearing aid use but rates of use are sub-optimal. The impact of audiologist behaviour on subsequent use, particularly over the long term, is unknown.
This study aimed to describe the role of the behaviour change wheel in developing an intervention to introduce and embed particular clinical behaviours into adult hearing aid fitting consultations, within the framework of the Medical Research Council guidance on complex interventions.
Following the steps of the behaviour change wheel, audiologist behaviours that might influence hearing aid use were identified based on a systematic review and qualitative work with audiologists. An analysis, using the COM-B model, identified potential drivers of the target behaviours. This was used to select intervention functions and behaviour change techniques likely to influence behaviour in this context.
The target behaviours were as follows: giving information about the benefits of hearing aid use and the negative consequences of non-use, providing prompts for use and engaging in collaborative behavioural planning for use. The behavioural analysis suggested that psychological capability, opportunity and motivation were potential drivers of these behaviours. The intervention functions of education, coercion, training, environmental restructuring, modelling and enablement were selected and combined to develop a single complex intervention that seeks to address the target behaviours.
This is the first study to use the behaviour change wheel to develop a complex intervention in the context of audiology. The theory-based development of the intervention will facilitate evaluation of its feasibility and effectiveness.
World Health Organisation. Chronic conditions: The global burden. Available at http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/2004_report_update/en/ Accessibility verified July 21, 2016.
World Health Organisation. Deafness and hearing loss. Available at http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs300/en/. Accessibility verified March 7, 2016.
World Health Organisation. Global health and aging. Available at http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/global_health.pdf. Accessibility verified July 21, 2016.
Gimsing S. Use of hearing aids five years after issue. Ugeskr Laeger. 2008; 170: 3407–3411. PubMed
Hougaard S, Ruf S. EuroTrak I: A consumer survey about hearing aids in Germany, France, and the UK. Hearing Review. 2011; 18:12–28.
Kochkin S. MarkeTrak V “Why my hearing aids are in the drawer: The consumers’ perspective . Hearing Journal. 2000; 53: 34–42. CrossRef
Arlinger S. Negative consequences of uncorrected hearing loss-a review. Int J Audiol. 2003; 42 Suppl 2: 17–20. CrossRef
Brooks D, Hallam R, Mellor P. The effects on significant others of providing a hearing aid to the hearing-impaired partner. Brit J Audiol. 2001; 35:165–171. CrossRef
Hallberg, LRM, Barrenäs, ML. Living with a male with noise-induced hearing loss: Experiences from the perspective of spouses. Brit J Audiol. 1993; 27:255–261. CrossRef
Hickson L, Worrall L. Beyond hearing aid fitting: Improving communication for older adults. Int J Audiol. 2003; 42 Suppl 2: 84–91. CrossRef
Heine C, Browning CJ. The communication and psychosocial perceptions of older adults with sensory loss: A qualitative study. Ageing Soc. 2004; 24: 113–130. CrossRef
Dunear-Jacob J, Erlen JA, Schlenk EA, Ryan CM, Sereika SM. Adherence in chronic disease. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2000; 18: 48–90.
Haskard KB, DiMatteo MR, Williams SL. Adherence and health outcomes: How much does adherence matter? In: Shumaker SA, Ockene JK, Riekert KA, eds. The handbook of health behaviour change. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2009: 771–784.
Adams K, Greiner, AC, Corrigan, JM. 1st Annual Crossing the Quality Chasm Summit: A focus on communities. Washington: National Academies Press; 2004.
Pearson, ML, Mattke S, Shaw R, Ridgely, MS, Wiseman, SH. Patient Self-Management Support Programs. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007.
Barker F, Mackenzie E, Elliott L, Jones S, de Lusignan S. Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014; doi: 10.1002/14651858.
Hanratty B, Lawlor DA. Effective management of the elderly hearing impaired—a review. J Pub Health. 2000; 22: 512–517. CrossRef
Marcus BH, Williams DM, Dubbert PM, et al. Physical Activity Intervention Studies What We Know and What We Need to Know: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity); Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; and the Interdisciplinary Working Group on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Circulation. 2006; 114: 2739–2752. CrossRefPubMed
Michie S, Atkins L, West R. The behaviour change wheel: A guide to designing interventions. London: Silverback; 2014.
Sinnott C, Mercer SW, Payne RA, Duerden M, Bradley CP, Byrne M. Improving medication management in multimorbidity: Development of the MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MY COMRADE) intervention using the Behaviour Change Wheel. Implement Sci 2015; 10: 132. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0322-1. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Jackson C, Eliasson L, Barber N, Weinman J. Applying COM-B to medication adherence. European Health Psychologist 2014; 16: 7–17.
Moodie, ST Spotlight on Science: Implementation Science. Canadian Hearing Report. 2011; 6: 23–26.
Humes LE, Krull V. Hearing aids for adults. In Wong L, Hickson L, eds. Evidence-based practice in audiology. San Diego, CA: Plural; 2012: 61–91
Barker F, Mackenzie E, de Lusignan S. Current process in hearing aid fitting appointments: an analysis of audiologists’ use of behaviour change techniques using the behaviour change technique taxonomy (v1). Int J Audiol 2016; doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1197425.
Barker F, Atkins L, de Lusignan S. Applying the COM-B behaviour model and behaviour change wheel to develop an intervention to improve hearing-aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation. Int J Audiol 2016; doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1120894.
Chisolm TH, Johnson CE, Danhauer JL, et al. A systematic review of health-related quality of life and hearing aids: Final report of the American Academy of Audiology Task Force On the Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification in Adults. J Am Acad Audiol 2007; 18: 151–183. CrossRefPubMed
Chisolm TH, Arnold M. Evidence about the effectiveness of aural rehabilitation programs for adults. In: Wong L, Hickson L, eds. Evidence-based practice in audiology. San Diego, CA: Plural; 2012: 237–266.
- Improving Collaborative Behaviour Planning in Adult Auditory Rehabilitation: Development of the I-PLAN Intervention Using the Behaviour Change Wheel
PhD Fiona Barker
MB BS, MSc, MD Simon de Lusignan
PhD Deborah Cooke
- Springer US
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Print ISSN: 0883-6612
Elektronische ISSN: 1532-4796